Randomized comparison of direct stenting with predilatation followed by stenting on vessel trauma and restenosis

American Heart Journal

Volumn 147, Issue 4, 2004, Pages

  Hoffmann, Rainer ^a,b   Takimoglu Boerekci, Mefaret ^a   Langenberg, Roswitha ^a   Knackstedt, Christian ^a   Franke, Andreas ^a   Radke, Peter W ^a   Hanrath, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL RWTH AACHEN   (Germany)

^b RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACETYLSALICYLIC ACID; CLOPIDOGREL; TICLOPIDINE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY STENT; DRUG EFFICACY; DRUG TOLERABILITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; OCCLUSION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; THROMBOSIS;

EID: 17944388873     PISSN: 00028703     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2003.11.017     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Briguori C., Sheiban I., De Gregorio J., et al. Direct coronary stenting without predilatation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 34:1999;1910-1915
2. Pentousis D., Guerin Y., Funck F., et al. Direct stent implantation without predilatation using the Multilink stent. Am J Cardiol. 82:1998;1437-1440
3. Martinez-Elbal L., Ruiz-Nodar J.M., Zueco J., et al. Direct coronary stenting versus stenting with balloon pre-dilation Immediate and follow-up results of a multicentre, prospective, randomized study: the DISCO trial. DIrect Stenting of COronary Arteries. Eur Heart J. 23:2002;633-640
4. Brueck M., Scheinert D., Wortmann A., et al. Direct coronary stenting versus predilatation followed by stent placement. Am J Cardiol. 90:2002;1187-1192
5. Rogers C., Parikh S., Seifert P., et al. Endogenous cell seeding Remnant endothelium after stenting enhances vascular repair. Circulation. 94:1996;2909-2914
6. Baim D.S., Flatley M., Caputo R., et al. Comparison of PRE-dilatation vs direct stenting in coronary treatment using the Medtronic AVE S670 Coronary Stent System (the PREDICT trial). Am J Cardiol. 88:2001;1364-1369
7. Miketic S., Carlsson J., Tebbe U. Clinical and angiographic outcome after conventional angioplasty with optional stent implantation compared with direct stenting without predilatation. Heart. 88:2002;622-626
8. Hasdai D., Holmes D.R., Garratt K.N., et al. Mechanical pressure and stretch release endothelin-1 from human atherosclerotic coronary arteries in vivo. Circulation. 95:1997;357-362
9. Hoffmann R., Mintz G.S., Dussaillant G.R., et al. Patterns and mechanisms of in-stent restenosis A serial intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation. 94:1996;1247-1254
10. Nissen S., Gurley J., Grines C.L., et al. Intravascular ultrasound assessment of lumen size and wall morphology in normal subjects and patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation. 84:1991;1087-1099
11. Elbaz M., El Mokhtar E., Khalife K., et al. Is direct coronary stenting the best strategy for long-term outcome? Results of the multicentric randomized benefit evaluation of direct coronary stenting (BET) study. Am Heart J. 144:2002;E7
12. Brito F.S. Jr, Caixeta A.M., Perin M.A., et al. The DIRECT Study Investigators Comparison of direct stenting versus stenting with predilation for the treatment of selected coronary narrowings. Am J Cardiol. 89:2002;115-120
13. Loubeyre C., Morice M.C., Lefevre T., et al. A randomized comparison of direct stenting with conventional stent implantation in selected patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 39:2002;15-21
14. Le Breton H., Boschat J., Commeau P., et al. Stent Without Balloon Predilation (SWIBAP) Study Group Randomised comparison of coronary stenting with and without balloon predilatation in selected patients. Heart. 86:2001;302-308
15. Wilson S.H., Berger P.B., Mathew V., et al. Immediate and late outcomes after direct stent implantation without balloon predilatation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 35:2000;937-943
16. Kuchan M.J., Frangos J.A. Shear stress regulates endothelin-1 release via protein kinase C and cGMP in cultured endothelial cells. Am J Physiol. 33:1993;H150-156
17. Kruger D., Giannitsis E., Sheikhzadeh A., et al. Cardiac release and kinetics of endothelin after uncomplicated percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol. 81:1998;1421-1426
18. Petronio A.S., Amoroso G., Limbruno U., et al. Endothelin-1 release from atherosclerotic plaque after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in stable angina pectoris and single-vessel coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 84:1999;1085-1088
19. A receptor antagonism reduces neointimal hyperplasia in a porcine coronary stent model. Circulation. 97:1998;2551-2556
20. Dudek D., Legutko J., Kaluza G.L., et al. Intravascular ultrasonic evaluation of the magnitude of stent expansion and the mechanisms of lumen enlargement after direct stenting and after conventional stenting with balloon predilatation. Am J Cardiol. 15:(90):2002;639-641
21. Finet G., Weissman N.J., Mintz G.S., et al. Mechanism of lumen enlargement with direct stenting versus predilatation stenting Influence of remodelling and plaque characteristics assessed by volumetric intracoronary ultrasound. Heart. 89:2003;84
22. Finet G., Weissman N.J., Mintz G.S., et al. Comparison of luminal enlargement by direct coronary stenting versus predilation coronary stenting by three-dimensional volumetric intravascular ultrasound analysis. Am J Cardiol. 88:2001;1179-1182