Intracoronary Stenting and Angiographic Results: Restenosis after Direct Stenting Versus Stenting with Predilation in Patients with Symptomatic Coronary Artery Disease (ISAR-DIRECT Trial)

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

Volumn 61, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 190-195

  Mehilli, Julinda ^a   Kastrati, Adnan ^a   Dirschinger, Josef ^b   Etzel, Lena ^a   Bollwein, Hildegard ^b   Pache, Jürgen ^b   Schühlen, Helmut ^b   Von Beckerath, Nicolas ^a   Seyfarth, Melchior ^b   Schmitt, Claus ^b   Schömig, Albert ^a,b  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Coronary artery disease; Randomized; Restenosis; Stents

Indexed keywords

BETA ADRENERGIC RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; CALCIUM ANTAGONIST; DIPEPTIDYL CARBOXYPEPTIDASE INHIBITOR; HYDROXYMETHYLGLUTARYL COENZYME A REDUCTASE INHIBITOR; NITRATE;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY STENT; FEMALE; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; HYPERLIPIDEMIA; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOVASCULAR PROCEDURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; RESTENOSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; STENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VASODILATATION;

AGED; BALLOON DILATATION; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY DISEASE; CORONARY RESTENOSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MALE; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; STENTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 10744226633     PISSN: 15221946     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.10706     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Dirschinger J, et al. Influence of balloon pressure during stent placement in native coronary arteries on early and late angiographic and clinical outcome: a randomized evaluation of high-pressure inflation. Circulation 1999;100:918-923.
2. Mudra H, et al. Randomized comparison of coronary stent implantation under ultrasound or angiographic guidance to reduce stent restenosis (OPTICUS study). Circulation 2001;104:1343-1349.
3. Rogers C, et al. Endogenous cell seeding: remnant endothelium after stenting enhances vascular repair. Circulation 1996;94:2909-2914.
4. Baim DS, et al. Comparison of PRE-dilatation vs direct stenting in coronary treatment using the Medtronic AVE S670 Coronary Stent System (the PREDICT trial). Am J Cardiol 2001;88:1364-1369.
5. Brito FS Jr, et al. Comparison of direct stenting versus stenting with predilation for the treatment of selected coronary narrowings. Am J Cardiol 2002;89:115-120.
6. Wilson SH, et al. Immediate and late outcomes after direct stent implantation without balloon predilation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;35:937-943.
7. Carrie D, et al. Comparison of direct coronary stenting with and without balloon predilatation in patients with stable angina pectoris: BET (Benefit Evaluation of Direct Coronary Stenting) study group. Am J Cardiol 2001;87:693-698.
8. Timurkaynak T, et al. Direct stenting in angiographically apparent thrombus-containing lesions. J Invas Cardiol 2001;13:742-747.
9. Martinez-Elbal L, et al. Direct coronary stenting versus stenting with balloon pre-dilation: immediate and follow-up results of a multicentre, prospective, randomized study-the DISCO trial. Eur Heart J 2002;23:633-640.
10. Schömig A, et al. A randomized comparison of antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy after the placement of coronary artery stents. N Engl J Med 1996;334:1084-1089.
11. Ellis SG, et al. Coronary morphologic and clinical determinants of procedural outcome with angioplasty for multivessel coronary disease: implications for patient selection-Multivessel Angioplasty Prognosis Study Group. Circulation 1990;82:1193-1202.
12. Mintz GS, et al. Patterns of calcification in coronary artery disease: a statistical analysis of intravascular ultrasound and coronary angiography in 1155 lesions. Circulation 1995;91:1959-1965.
13. EPISTENT investigators. Randomized placebo-controlled and balloon-angioplasty-controlled trial to assess safety of coronary stenting with use of platelet glycoprotein-IIb/IIIa blockade. Lancet 1998;352:87-92.
14. Briguori C, et al. Direct coronary stenting without predilation. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;34:1910-1915.
15. Laarman G, et al. Direct coronary stent implantation: safety, feasibility, and predictors of success of the strategy of direct coronary stent implantation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001;52:443-448.
16. Finet G, et al. Comparison of luminal enlargement by direct coronary stenting versus predilation coronary stenting by three-dimensional volumetric intravascular ultrasound analysis. Am J Cardiol 2001;88:1179-1182.
17. Le Breton H, et al. Randomised comparison of coronary stenting with and without balloon predilatation in selected patients. Heart 2001;86:302-308.
18. Timurkaynak T, et al. Myocardial injury after apparently successful coronary stenting with or without balloon dilation: direct versus conventional stenting. J Invas Cardiol 2002;14:167-170.
19. Hausleiter J, Kastrati A, Mehilli J, Schuhlen H, Pache J, Dotzer F, Sattelberger U, Dirschinger J, Schomig A. Impact of lesion complexity on the capacity of a trial to detect differences in stent performance: results from the ISAR-STEREO trial. Am Heart J 2003;146:882-886.
20. Edelman ER, Rogers C. Stent-versus-stent equivalency trials: are some stents more equal than others? Circulation 1999;100:896-898.