Is direct coronary stenting the best strategy for long-term outcome? Results of the multicentric randomized benefit evaluation of direct coronary stenting (BET) study.

American heart journal

Volumn 144, Issue 4, 2002, Pages

  Elbaz, Meyer ^a   El Mokhtar, Elyes ^a   Khalifé, Khalifé ^a   Citron, Bernard ^a   Izaaz, Karl ^a   Hamon, Martial ^a   Juliard, Jean Michel ^a   Leclercq, Florence ^a   Fourcade, Joelle ^a   Lipiecki, Janus ^a   Sabatier, Rémi ^a   Boulet, Vincent ^a   Rinaldi, Jean Pierre ^a   Mourali, Sami ^a   Fatouch, Michel ^a   Asmar, Alain ^a   Steg, Pierre Gabriel ^a   Puel, Jacques ^a   Carrié, Didier ^a  

^a CHU PURPAN   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANGINA PECTORIS; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; MULTIMODALITY CANCER THERAPY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STATISTICS; STENT; SUDDEN DEATH; TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ANGINA PECTORIS; ANGIOPLASTY, TRANSLUMINAL, PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY; COMBINED MODALITY THERAPY; CORONARY DISEASE; DEATH, SUDDEN, CARDIAC; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; STATISTICS; STENTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0036782414     PISSN: None     EISSN: 10976744     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (0)