The Courts and Standards-Based Education Reform

The Courts and Standards-Based Education Reform

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 1-274

  Superfine, Benjamin Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Accountability; Education; Education policy; Law; No Child Left Behind; Standards based reform; Testing

Indexed keywords

EID: 77950539308     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195337488.001.0001     Document Type: Book

References (176)

1. Robert F. Nagel, "Separation of Powers and the Scope of Federal Equitable Remedies," Stanford Law Review 661 (1978): 661-724.
2. Charles F. Sabel and William H. Simon, "Destabilization Rights: How Public Law Litigation Succeeds," Harvard Law Review 117 (2004): 1015-101.
3. Malcom M. Feeley and Edward L. Rubin, Judicial Policy Making and the Modern State: How the Courts Reformed America's Prisons (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).
4. Sabel and Simon, "Destabilization Rights: How Public Law Litigation Succeeds," 1020.
5. Helen Hershkoff, "Positive Rights and State Constitutions: The Limits of Federal Rationality Review," Harvard Law Review 112 (1999): 1131-96.
6. Edward L. Rubin and Malcom M. Feeley, "Judicial Policy Making and Litigation against the Government," University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law 5 (2003): 617-64.
7. Rubin and Feeley, "Judicial Policy Making and Litigation against the Government," 656.
8. James S. Liebman and Charles F. Sabel, "Changing Schools: A Public Laboratory Dewey Barely Imagined: The Emerging Model of School Governance and Legal Reform," New York University School of Law Review of Law and Social Change 28 (2003): 183-304;
9. Gary Orfield, The Reconstruction of Southern Education: The Schools and the 1964 Civil Rights Act (New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, 1969);
10. Michael A. Rebell, "Poverty, 'Meaningful' Educational Opportunity, and the Necessary Role of the Courts," North Carolina Law Review 85 (2007): 1467-543.
11. Molly Hunter, "All Eyes Forward: Public Engagement and Education reform in Kentucky," Journal of Law and Education 28 (1999): 485-516.
12. Michael Lipsky, Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services (New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation, 1980);
13. David Tyack and Larry Cuban, Tinkering toward Utopia: A Century of Public School Reform (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995).
14. Mark A Smylie and Robert L. Crowson, "Working within the Scripts: Building Institutional Infrastructure for Children's Service Coordination in Schools," Educational Policy 10, no. 1 (1996): 3-21.
15. Kristen Tosh Cowan and Leigh M. Manasevit, The New Title I: Balancing Accountability with Flexibility (Washington, D.C.: Thompson Publishing Group, 2002).
16. National Reading Panel, Teaching Children to Read: An Evidence-Based Assessment of the Scientific Research Literature on Reading and Its Implications for Reading Instruction (Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, 2000);
17. Kathleen Kennedy Manzo, "Senate Report Details "Reading First" Conflicts of Interest," Education Week, May 9, 2007. http://www.edweek.org (accessed January 28, 2006).
18. Margaret Eisenhart and Lisa Towne, "Contestation and Change in National Policy On 'Scientifically Based' Education Research," Educational Researcher 32, no. 7 (2003): 32-38.
19. Jennifer Mueller, "Facing the Unhappy Day: Three Aspects of the High-Stakes Testing Movement," Kansas Journal of Law and Public Policy 11, no. 2 (2001): 201-78.
20. Benjamin M. Superfine, "At the Intersection of Law and Psychometrics: Explaining the Validity Clause of No Child Left Behind," Journal of Law and Education 33 (2004): 475-513.
21. Decker F. Walker, "What Constitutes Curricular Validity in a High-School-Leaving Examination?" in The Courts, Validity, and Minimum Competency Testing, ed. George Mandaus (Boston, MA: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing, 1983).
22. William S. Koski, "Educational Opportunity and Accountability in an Era of Standards-Based School Reform," Stanford Law and Policy Review 12 (2001): 301-15;
23. Rachel Moran, "Sorting and Reforming: High-Stakes Testing in the Public Schools," Akron Law Review 34 (2000): 107-35;
24. Walt Haney, "Validity and Competency Tests: The Debra P. Case, Conceptions of Validity, and Strategies for the Future," in The Courts, Validity, and Minimum Competency Testing, ed. George F. Madaus (Boston, MA: Kluwer Nijhoff Publishing, 1983).
25. Keith L. Cruse and Jon S. Twing, "The History of Statewide Achievement Testing in Texas," Applied Measurement in Education 13, no. 4 (2000): 327-31.
26. Walt Haney, "The Myth of the Texas Miracle in Education," Education Policy Analysis Archives 8, no. 41 (2000). http://epaa.asu.edu (accessed July 9, 2006).
27. Susan E. Phillips, "GI Forum v. Texas Education Agency: Psychometric Evidence," Applied Measurement in Education 13, no. 4 (2000): 343-85.
28. William A. Mehrens, "Defending a State Graduation Test: GI Forum v. Texas Education Agency: Measurement Perspectives from an External Evaluator," Applied Measurement in Education 13, no. 4 (2000): 387-401;
29. Audrey L. Amerin and David C. Berliner, "High-Stakes Testing, Uncertainty, and Student Learning," Education Policy Analysis Archives 10, no. 18 (2002). http://epaa.asu.edu (accessed July 9, 2006);
30. Martin Carnoy and Susanna Loeb, "Does External Accountability Affect Student Outcomes? A Cross-State Analysis," Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 24, no. 4 (2002): 305-31;
31. Laurence A. Toenjes and A. G. Dworkin, "Are Increasing Test Scores in Texas Really a Myth, or Is Haney's Myth a Myth?," Education Policy Analysis Archives 10, no. 17 (2002). http://epaa.asu.edu (accessed July 9, 2006).
32. James Crawford, "A Diminished Vision of Civil Rights: No Child Left Behind and the Growing Divide in How Educational Equity Is Understood," Education Week, June 6, 2007. http://www/edweek.org (accessed January 9, 2006).
33. James Crawford, "A Diminished Vision of Civil Rights: No Child Left Behind and the Growing Divide in How Educational Equity Is Understood," Education Week, June 6, 2007. http://www/edweek.org (accessed January 9, 2006).
34. Michael Heise, "Equal Educational Opportunity by the Numbers: The Warren Court's Empirical Legacy," Washington and Lee Law Review 59 (2002): 1309-42.
35. Jay P. Heubert, "Introduction," in Law and School Reform, ed. Jay P. Heubert (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1999).
36. Peter Enrich, "Leaving Equality Behind: New Directions in School Finance Reform," Vanderbilt Law Review 48, no. 1 (1995): 101-94.
37. Molly S. McUsic, "The Use of Education Clauses in School Finance Litigation," Harvard Journal on Legislation 28 (1991): 307-40.
38. David Tyack and Aaron Benavot, "Courts and Public Schools: Educational Litigation in Historical Perspective," Law and Society Review 19, no. 3 (1985): 339-804.
39. David Tyack and Elisabeth Hansot, Managers of Virtue: Public School Leadership in America, 1820-1980 (New York, NY: Basic Books, 1982).
40. David Tyack, "Toward a Social History of Law and Public Education," in School Days, Rule Days: The Legislation and Regulation of Education, ed. David L. Kirp and Donald N. Jensen (Philadelphia, PA: Falmer Press, 1985).
41. Abram Chayes, "The Role of the Judge in Public Law Litigation," Harvard Law Review 89 (1976): 1281-316.
42. Mark A. Chesler, Joseph Sanders, and Debra S. Kalmuss, Social Science in Court: Mobilizing Experts in the School Desegregation Cases (Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1988).
43. Mark Yudof et al., Education Policy and the Law (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing, 2001).
44. James S. Liebman, "Implementing Brown in the Nineties: Political Reconstruction, Liberal Recollection, and Litigatively Enforced Legislative Reform," Virginia Law Review 76 (1990): 349-435;
45. Molly S. McUsic, "The Law's Role in the Distribution of Education: The Promises and Pitfalls of School Finance Litigation," in Law and School Reform, ed. Jay P. Heubert (1999);
46. James S. Liebman and Charles F. Sabel, "Changing Schools: A Public Laboratory Dewey Barely Imagined: The Emerging Model of School Governance and Legal Reform," New York University School of Law Review of Law and Social Change 28 (2003): 183-304;
47. Gary Orfield, The Reconstruction of Southern Education: The Schools and the 1964 Civil Rights Act (New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, 1969);
48. Michael A. Rebell, "Poverty, 'Meaningful' Educational Opportunity, and the Necessary Role of the Courts," North Carolina Law Review 85 (2007): 1467-543.
49. Michael A. Rebell and Robert L. Hughes, "Efficacy and Engagement: The Remedies Problem Posed by Sheff v. O'Neill," Connecticut Law Review 29 (1997): 1115-86.
50. Molly Hunter, "All Eyes Forward: Public Engagement and Education reform in Kentucky," Journal of Law and Education 28 (1999): 485-516.
51. Neil Komesar, Imperfect Alternatives: Choosing Institutions in Law, Economics, and Public Policy (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1994).
52. Michael A. Rebell and Arthur R. Block, Education Policy Making and the Courts: An Empirical Study of Judicial Activism (Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 1982).
53. Charles J. Ogletree, All Deliberate Speed: Reflections on the First Half-Century of Brown v. Board of Education (New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Co., 2004).
54. Michael Heise, "The Courts, Education Policy, and Unintended Consequences," Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy 11 (2002): 636-63.
55. Kevin G. Welner and Haggai Kupermintz, "Rethinking Expert Testimony in Education Rights Litigation," Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 26, no. 2 (2004): 127-42, 127.
56. Michael Kaufman, "Rhetorical Questions Concerning Justice and Equality in Educational Opportunities," Loyola University of Chicago Law Journal 36 (2005): 495-511.
57. Nathan Glazer, "Toward an Imperial Judiciary," The Public Interest 41 (1975): 104-23.
58. Gerald N. Rosenberg, The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1991), 338.
59. James S. Liebman, "Desegregating Politics: 'All-Out' School Desegregation Explained," Columbia Law Review 90 (1990): 1463-533.
60. Gary Orfield, "Turning Back to Segregation," in Dismantling Desegregation: The Quiet Reversal of Brown v. Board of Education, ed. Gary Orfield and Susan E. Eaton (New York, NY: The New Press, 1996).
61. Gary Orfield, "Conservatives and the Rush toward Resegregation," in Law and School Reform, ed. Jay P. Heubert (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1999).
62. Michael Heise, "Litigated Learning and the Limits of Law," Vanderbilt Law Review 57, no. 2417 (2004): 2417-61.
63. William N. Evans, Sheila E. Murray, and Robert M. Schwab, "The Impact of Court-Mandated Finance Reform," in Equity and Adequacy in Education Finance: Issues and Perspectives, ed. Helen F. Ladd, et al. (1999);
64. Bradley W. Joondeph, "The Good, the Bad and the Ugly: An Empirical Analysis of Litigation Prompted School Finance Reform," Santa Clara Law Review 35 (1995): 763-824.
65. Patricia F. First and Louis F. Miron, "The Social Construction of Adequacy," Journal of Law and Education 20 (1991): 421-44;
66. Thomas Hehir and Sue Gamm, "Special Education: From Legalism to Collaboration," in Law and School Reform, ed. Jay P. Heubert (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1999).
67. Mary Wagner et al., "The Transition Experiences of Young People with Disabilities," (Menlo Park: CA: SRI International, 1993).
68. David L. Kirp and David Neal, "The Allure of Legalism Reconsidered: The Case of Special Education," in School Days, Rule Days, ed. David L. Kirp and Donald L. Jensen (London: Falmer Press, 1986).
69. Herbert Weshcler, "Toward Neutral Principles of Constitutional Law," Harvard Law Review 73 (1959): 1-35.
70. Joe Williams, "School Transfer Delays Slammed," New York Daily News, September 20, 2002. http://www.lexis.com (accessed July 9, 2006).
71. Abby Goodnough, "Free Tutoring Fails to Draw Many Students," New York Times, September 4, 2002. http://www.lexis.com (accessed July 9, 2006).
72. Bradford C. Mank, "Suing under Section 1983: The Future after Gonzaga University v. Doe," Houston Law Review 39 (2003): 1417-82.
73. Caroline M. Hoxby, "Inadequate Yearly Progress: Unlocking the Secrets of NCLB," Education Next 5, no. 3 (2005): 46-51;
74. Robert L. Linn, Eva L. Baker, and Damian W. Betebenner, "Accountability Systems: Implications of Requirements of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001," Educational Researcher 31, no. 6 (2002): 3-16.
75. Bess Keller, "NEA Takes Stand against Bush Education Law," Education Week, July 7, 2003. http://www.edweek.org (accessed September 8, 2006).
76. National Education Association et al., "Joint Organizational Statement on 'No Child Left Behind' Act," (Washington, D.C.: National Education Association, 2004).
77. Center on Education Policy, "From the Capital to the Classroom: Year 2 of the No Child Left Behind Act," (Washington, D.C.: Center on Education Policy, 2004).
78. Soncia Coleman, "Background on Connecticut's No Child Left Behind Act Law Suit," (Hartford: CT, Office of Legislative Research, Connecticut General Assembly, 2006).
79. Sam Dillon, "Court Revives Lawsuit against No Child Left Behind," New York Times, January 8, 2008. http://www.lexis.com (accessed January 9, 2008).
80. Elizabeth DeBray-Pelot, "NCLB's Transfer Policy and Court-Ordered Desegregation: The Conflict between Two Federal Mandates in Richmond County, Georgia, and Pinellas County, Florida," Educational Policy 21, no. 5 (2007): 717-46.
81. Michael Griffith, "School Finance Litigation and Beyond," http://www.ecs.org/clearinghouse/60/26/6026.htm (accessed August 10, 2006).
82. William N. Evans, Sheila E. Murray, and Robert M. Schwab, "The Impact of Court-Mandated Finance Reform," in Equity and Adequacy in Education Finance: Issues and Perspectives, ed. Helen F. Ladd, et al. (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 1999)
83. Bradley W. Joondeph, "The Good, the Bad and the Ugly: An Empirical Analysis of Litigation Prompted School Finance Reform," Santa Clara Law Review 35 (1995): 763-824.
84. Patricia F. First and Louis F. Miron, "The Social Construction of Adequacy," Journal of Law and Education 20 (1991);
85. Joondeph, "The Good, the Bad and the Ugly: An Empirical Analysis of Litigation Prompted School Finance Reform."
86. Michael Heise, "Equal Educational Opportunity, Hollow Victories, and the Demise of School Finance Equity Theory: An Empirical Perspective and Alternative Explanations," Georgia Law Review 32: 543-631;
87. Robert F. Williams, "Equality Guarantees in State Constitutional Law," Texas Law Review 63 (1985): 1195-1223.
88. Richard F. Elmore and Milbrey McLaughlin, Reform and Retrenchment: the Politics of California School Finance Reform (Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, 1982);
89. National Access Network, "School Funding Decisions since 1989." (New York: NY: National Access Network, 2006).
90. Public School Forum of North Carolina, "Local School Finance Study," (Raleigh, NC: Public School Form of North Carolina, 1994).
91. Tico A. Almeida, "Refocusing School Finance Litigation on At-Risk Children: Leandro v. State of North Carolina," Yale Law and Policy Review 22 (2004): 525-69.
92. Campaign for Fiscal Equity Inc., "The State of Learning in NY: The State of Learning in New York State Public Schools," (New York, NY: Campaign for Fiscal Equity Inc., 2001).
93. Shaila K. Dewan, "Pataki Attacks June Ruling That 8th Grade Education Is Enough," New York Times, Sept. 13, 2002. http://www.lexis.com (accessed January 28, 2006).
94. Patricia F. First, "The Meaning of Educational Adequacy: The Confusion of DeRolph," Journal of Law and Education 32 (2003): 185-215.
95. Kelly Thompson Cochran, "Beyond School Financing: Defining the Constitutional Right to an Adequate Education," North Carolina Law Review 78 (2000);
96. James S. Liebman and Charles F. Sabel, "Changing Schools: A Public Laboratory Dewey Barely Imagined: The Emerging Model of School Governance and Legal Reform," New York University School of Law Review of Law and Social Change 28 (2003): 183-304.
97. James S. Liebman, "Implementing Brown in the Nineties: Political Reconstruction, Liberal Recollection, and Litigatively Enforced Legislative Reform," Virginia Law Review 76 (1990): 349-345.
98. Aaron J. Saiger, "Legislating Accountability: Standards, Sanctions, and School District Reform," William and Mary Law Review 46 (2005): 1655-1732.
99. Michael Heise, "The Courts, Education Policy, and Unintended Consequences," Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy 11 (2002): 636-663.
100. David Tyack, The One Best System (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1974).
101. Richard F. Elmore, "Introduction," in The New Accountability: High Schools and High-Stakes Testing, ed. Martin Carnoy, Richard F. Elmore, and Leslie Santee Siskin (New York, NY: Routledge Farmer, 2003).
102. Diane Ravitch, "The Search for Order and the Rejection of Conformity: Standards in American Education," in Learning from the Past: What History Teaches Us about School Reform, ed. Diane Ravitch and Maris Vinovskis (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995).
103. Herbert M. Kliebard, The Struggle for the American Curriculum (New York, NY: Routledge, 1995).
104. Peter B. Dow, Schoolhouse Politics: Lessons from the Sputnik Era (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991).
105. Martin R. West and Paul E. Peterson, "The Politics and Practice of Accountability," in No Child Left Behind? The Politics and Practice of School Accountability, ed. Paul E. Peterson and Martin R. West (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 2003).
106. Frederick M. Hess, "Refining or Retreating? High-Stakes Accountability in the States," in No Child Left Behind? The Politics and Practice of School Accountability, ed. Paul E. Peterson and Martin R. West (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 2003).
107. Susan. H. Fuhrman, "The Twenty-Year Effort to Reform Education," in A Nation Reformed?, ed. David T. Gordon (Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press, 2003).
108. Margaret E. Goertz, Mark C. Duffy, and Kerstin C. Le Floch, "Assessment and Accountability Systems in the 50 States: 1999-2000," (Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education, 2001).
109. Daniel. P. Resnick and Lauren. B. Resnick, "Standards, Curriculum, and Performance: A Historical and Comparative Perspective," Educational Researcher 14, no. 4 (1985): 5-20.
110. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, "Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics," (Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 1989).
111. David K. Cohen, "Policy and Organization: The Impact of State and Federal Education Policy on School Governance," Harvard Educational Review 52, no. 4 (1982): 474-99.
112. Marshall S. Smith and Jennifer A. O'Day, "Systemic School Reform," in The Politics of Curriculum and Testing: The 1990 Yearbook of the Politics of Education Association, ed. Susan H. Fuhrman and Betty Malem (London: Falmer Press, 1991).
113. Jennifer A. O'Day and Marshall S. Smith, "Systemic Reform and Educational Opportunity," in Designing Coherent Education Policy: Improving the System, ed. Susan Fuhrman (San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1993), 251.
114. William Clune, "Systemic Education Policy: A Conceptual Framework," in Designing Coherent Education Policy: Improving the System, ed. Susan Fuhrman (San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1993).
115. Gretchen Guiton and Jeannie Oakes, "Opportunity to Learn and Conceptions of Educational Equality," Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 17, no. 3 (1995): 323-36.
116. Linda Darling-Hammond, "Education Reform through National Standards and Assessment," American Journal of Education 102, no. 4 (1994): 478-510;
117. Jeannie Oakes, "What Educational Indicators? The Case for Assessing the School Context," Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 11, no. 2 (1989): 181-99;
118. Floraline I. Stevens and John Grymes, "Opportunity to Learn: Issues of Equity for Poor and Minority Students," (Washington, D.C.: National Center for Education Statistics, 1993).
119. Diane Massell, Michael Kirst, and Margaret Hoppe, "Persistence and Change: Standards-Based Systemic Reform in Nine States," (Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education, 1997).
120. Christopher B. Swanson and David Lee Stevenson, "Standards-Based Reform in Practice: Evidence on State Policy and Classroom Instruction from the NAEP State Assessments," Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 24, no. 1 (2002): 1-27.
121. U.S. Congress, Congressional Record (May 5, 1992). http://www.gpoaccess.gov/bills/index.html (accessed January 5, 2006).
122. Benjamin M. Superfine, "The Politics of Accountability: The Rise and Fall of Goals: 2000," American Journal of Education 112, no. 1 (2005): 10-43.
123. Government Accountability Office, "Goals 2000: Flexible Funding Supports State and Local Education Reform," (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1998).
124. Arthur Woodward, David L. Elliott, and Kathleen Carter Nagel, Textbooks in School and Society (New York, NY: Garland Publishing Company, 1988).
125. Diane Ravitch, The Language Police: How Pressure Groups Restrict What Students Learn (New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf, 2003).
126. William H. Clune, "Toward a Theory of Standards-Based Reform: The Case of Nine NSF Statewide Systemic Initiatives," in From the Capitol to the Classroom: Standards-Based Reform in the States, ed. Susan H. Fuhrman (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2001);
127. William A. Firestone, et al., "Pressure and Support," in The Ambiguity of Teaching to the Test, ed. William A. Firestone, Roberta Y. Schorr, and Lora F. Monfils (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2004).
128. U.S. Department of Education, "Reports on Reform from the Field: District and State Survey Results," (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1997).
129. Lorrie A. Shepard, "Curricular Coherence in Assessment Design," in Towards Coherence between Classroom Assessment and Accountability, ed. Mark Wilson (Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 2004).
130. Jamal Abedi, "The No Child Left Behind Act and English Language Learners: Assessment and Accountability Issues," Educational Researcher 33, no. 1 (2004): 4-14.
131. Margaret E. Goertz, Mark C. Duffy, and Kerstin C. Le Floch, "Assessment and Accountability Systems in the 50 States: 1999-2000," (Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education, 2001).
132. Richard F. Elmore, "Accountability and Capacity," in The New Accountability, ed. Martin Carnoy, Richard F. Elmore, and Leslie Santee Siskin (New York, NY: Routledge Farmer, 2003).
133. National Staff Development Council, Standards for Staff Development (Revised) (Ohio: National Staff Development Council, 2001);
134. Jonathan A. Supovitz, "Translating Teaching Practice into Improved Student Achievement," in From the Capitol to the Classroom: Standards-Based Reform in the States, ed. Susan H. Fuhrman (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2001).
135. Heather C. Hill, "Professional Development Standards and Practices in Elementary School Mathematics," Elementary School Journal 104, no. 3 (2004): 215-31.
136. Andrew C. Porter and John L. Smithson, "Are Content Standards Being Implemented in the Classroom? A Methodology and Some Tentative Answers," in From the Capitol to the Classroom: Standards-Based Reform in the States, ed. Susan H. Fuhrman (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2001).
137. S. G. Grant, "An Uncertain Lever: The Influence of State-Level Testing in New York on Teaching Social Studies," Teachers College Record 103, no. 3 (2001): 398-426.
138. Janine Remillard and Martha Bryans, "Teachers' Orientations toward Mathematics Curriculum Materials: Implications for Teacher Learning," Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 35, no. 5 (2004): 352-88.
139. James P. Spillane, and John Zeuli, "Reform and Teaching: Exploring Patterns of Practice in the Context of National and State Mathematics? Reforms," Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 21 (1999): 1-28.
140. James P. Spillane, "Challenging Instruction for 'All Students': Policy, Practitioners, and Practice," in From the Capitol to the Classroom: Standards-Based Reform in the States, ed. Susan H. Fuhrman (Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 2001).
141. Charles G. Abelmann and Richard F. Elmore, "When Accountability Knocks, Will Anyone Answer?" (Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education, 1999).
142. Richard F. Elmore, "Bridging the Gap between Standards and Achievement," (Washington, D.C.: Albert Shanker Institute, 2002);
143. Richard Lemons, Thomas F. Luschei, and Leslie Santee Siskin, "Leadership and the Demands of Standards-based Accountability," in The New Accountability, ed. Martin Carnoy, Richard F. Elmore, and Leslie Santee Siskin (New York, NY: Routledge Farmer, 2003)
144. William A. Firestone et al., "The Principal, Test Preparation, and Education reform," in The Ambiguity of Teaching to the Test, ed. William A. Firestone, Roberta Y. Schorr, and Lora F. Monfils (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2004).
145. James P. Spillane, "School Districts Matter: Local Educational Authorities and State Instructional Policy," Educational Policy 10, no. 1 (1996): 63-87.
146. Katrina Bulkley, Janet Fairman, and M. Cecilia Martinez, "The District and Test Preparation," in The Ambiguity of Teaching to the Test, ed. William A. Firestone, Roberta Y. Schorr, and Lora F. Monfils (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2004).
147. Jane Hannaway and Kristi Kimball, "Big Isn't Always Bad: School District Size, Poverty, and Standards-Based Reform," in From the Capitol to the Classroom: Standards-Based Reform in the States, ed. Susan H. Fuhrman (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2001)
148. Janet Fairman and William A. Firestone, "The District Role in State Assessment Policy: An Exploratory Study," in From the Capitol to the Classroom: Standards-Based Reform in the States, ed. Susan H. Fuhrman (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2001).
149. Diane Massell et al., "The Press from Above, the Pull from Below: High School Responses to External Accountability," in Holding High Hopes: How High Schools Respond to State Accountability Policies, ed. Bethany Gross and Margaret E. Goeretz (Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education, 2005).
150. Elliot H. Weinbaum, "Stuck in the Middle with You: District Responses to State Accountability," in Holding High Hopes: How High Schools Respond to State Accountability Policies, ed. Bethany Gross and Margaret E. Goertz (Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education, 2005).
151. Linda Skrla, James Joseph Scheurich, and Joseph F. Jr. Johnson, "Equity-Driven Achievement-Focused School Districts," (Austin, TX: The Charles A. Dana Center, The University of Texas at Austin, 2000).
152. Lora F. Monfils et al., "Teaching to the Test," in The Ambiguity of Teaching to the Test, ed. William A. Firestone, Roberta Y. Schorr, and Lora F. Monfils (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2004).
153. Paula White, Adam Gamoran, and John L. Smithson, "Math Innovations and Student Achievement in Seven High Schools in California and New York," (Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education, 1995).
154. Susan H. Fuhrman, "Introduction," in From the Capitol to the Classroom: Standards-Based Reform in the States, ed. Susan H. Fuhrman (Chicago, IL: National Society for the Study of Education, 2001).
155. David Grissmer and Ann Flanagan, "Exploring Rapid Achievement Gains in North Carolina and Texas: Lessons from the States," (National Education Goals Panel, 1998).
156. Martin Carnoy and Susanna Loeb, "Does External Accountability Affect Student Outcomes? A Cross-State Analysis," Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 24, no. 4 (2002): 305-31.
157. Walt Haney, "The Myth of the Texas Miracle in Education," Education Policy Analysis Archives 8, no. 41 (2000). http://epaa.asu.edu (accessed July 9, 2006);
158. Stephen P. Klein et al., "What Do Test Scores Tell Us?" Education Policy Analysis Archives 8, no. 49 (2000). http://epaa.asu.edu (accessed July 9, 2006).
159. Anthony S. Bryk, "No Child Left Behind, Chicago-Style," in No Child Left Behind? The Politics and Practice of School Accountability, ed. Paul E. Peterson and Martin R. West (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 2003);
160. John Q. Easton, Stuart Luppescu, and Todd Rosenkranz, "2006 ISAT Reading and Math Scores in Chicago and the Rest of the State," (Chicago, IL: Consortium on Chicago School Research, 2007);
161. Brian A. Jacob, "A Closer Look at Achievement Gains under High-Stakes Testing in Chicago," in No Child Left Behind? The Politics and Practice of School Accountability, ed. Paul E. Peterson and Martin R. West (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 2003);
162. Penny B. Sebring et al., "The Essential Supports for School Improvement," (Chicago, IL: Consortium on Chicago School Research, 2006).
163. Jacob, "A Closer Look at Achievement Gains under High-Stakes Testing in Chicago."
164. Audrey L. Amerin and David C. Berliner, "High-Stakes Testing, Uncertainty, and Student Learning," Education Policy Analysis Archives 10, no. 18 (2002). http://epaa.asu.edu (accessed July 9, 2006).
165. National Education Association, "Education Funding: By the Numbers," (Washington, D.C.: National Education Association, 2004). http://www.nea.org/esea/eseafunding.html (accessed June 6, 2006).
166. Bess Keller, "NEA Takes Stand against Bush Education Law," Education Week, July 7, 2003. http://www.edweek.org (accessed January 9, 2006);
167. George Miller and Edward Kennedy, "Kennedy and Miller Call on Bush to Back Historic Education Spending Increase to Ensure Success of Historic School Reform," (2002);
168. Christopher O. Tracy and Kate Walsh, "Necessary and Insufficient: Resisting a Full Measure of Teacher Quality," (Washington, D.C.: National Council on Teacher Quality, 2004).
169. Caroline M. Hoxby, "Inadequate Yearly Progress: Unlocking the Secrets of NCLB," Education Next 5, no. 3 (2005): 46-51;
170. Robert L. Linn, Eva L. Baker, and Damian W. Betebenner, "Accountability Systems: Implications of Requirements of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001," Educational Researcher 31, no. 6 (2002): 3-16.
171. Laura S. Hamilton et al., "Standards-Based Accountability under No Child Left Behind: Experiences of Teachers and Administrators in Three States," (Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 2007).
172. National Education Association, "No Child Left Behind: State Legislative Watch List," (Washington, D.C.: National Education Association, 2005);
173. National Education Association, "Urge Congress to Support Bills to Improve NCLB," (National Education Association, 2005).
174. Steven W. Raudenbush, "Learning from Attempts to Improve Schooling: The Contribution of Methodological Diversity," Educational Researcher 34, no. 5 (2005): 25-31.
175. Maris Vinovskis, "Missed Opportunities: Why the Federal Response to a Nation at Risk Was Inadequate," in A Nation Reformed? ed. David T. Gordon (Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press, 2003).
176. David Tyack and Larry Cuban, Tinkering toward Utopia: A Century of Public School Reform (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995).