The politics of accountability: The rise and fall of goals 2000

American Journal of Education

Volumn 112, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 10-43

  Superfine, Benjamin Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 29144462729     PISSN: 01956744     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/444513     Document Type: Review

References (107)

1. Adams, Rebecca, et al. 2002. "Agency-by-Agency: The President's Opening Bid." Congressional Quarterly Weekly, February 9, http://library.cqpress.com.
2. America 2000: Excellence in Education Act. 1991. HR 2460 (S 1141), 102nd Cong.
3. American Federation of Teachers. 1999. Making Standards Matter: A Fifty-State Progress Report on Efforts to Raise Academic Standards. Washington, DC: American Federation of Teachers.
4. Ardizzone, Kris. 1996. "1996 Goals 2000 Amendment Adds Words, Confusion but Maintains Strict Control by Federal Government." Eagle Forum, http://www.eagleforum.org/educate/1996/june96/focus.html.
5. Arons, Stephen. 1994. "The Threat to Freedom in Goals 2000." Education Week, April 6, http://www.edweek.org.
6. Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, et al. v. New York City Department of Education, et al. 2003. 269 F. Supp. 2d 338 (S.D.N.Y.).
7. Atkinson, Richard C. 1999. "The Golden Fleece, Science Education, and U.S. Science Policy." Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 143 (3): 407-17.
8. Berman, Paul, and Milbrey W. McLaughlin. 1977. Federal Programs Supporting Educational Change, vol. 7, Factors Affecting Implementation and Continuation. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corp.
9. A Bill to Clarify the Rules Governing Venue, and for Other Purposes. 1995. Public Law 104-34.
10. Californians for Justice Education Fund, et al. v. California State Board of Education. 2003. Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 11713.
11. Carnegie Forum on Education and the Economy. 1986. A Nation Prepared: Teachers for the Twenty-first Century. Washington, DC: Carnegie Forum on Education and the Economy.
12. Center for Law and Education, et al. v. United States Department of Education. 2002. 209 F. Supp. 2d 102 (D.D.C.).
13. Center for Law and Education, et al. v. United States Department of Education. 2004. 315 F. Supp. 2d 15 (D.D.C.).
14. Center on Education Policy. 2004. From the Capital to the Classroom: Tear 2 of the No Child Left Behind Act. Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy.
15. Clinton, William. 1996. State of the Union Address, January 23.
16. Clune, William. 1993. "Systemic Educational Policy: A Conceptual Framework." In Designing Coherent Education Policy: Improving the System, ed. Susan Fuhrman. 1st ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
17. Cohen, David. K. 1982. "Policy and Organization: The Impact of State and Federal Education Policy on School Governance." Harvard Educational Review 52 (4): 474-99.
18. Connecticut Attorney General's Office. 2005. "Press Release: Attorney General Prepares Legal Action against Federal Government for No Child Left Behind Act," April 5, http://www.cslib.org/attygenl/mainlinks/ tabindex4.htm.
19. Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO). 1995. Status Report: State Systemic Education Improvements. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
20. Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO). 2003. Statewide Educational Accountability under NCLB. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
21. Department of Education Organization Act. 1979. Public Law 96-088.
22. Education Commission of the States. 1983. Action for Excellence. Denver: Education Commission of the States.
23. Education Week. 1995. "Federal File: House to Debate Plan for School Telecomm Access," August 2, http://www.edweek.org.
24. Education Week. 1997. "News in Brief," July 9, http://www.edweek.org.
25. Edwards, John. 2004. "Transcript of Democratic Presidential Candidate Debate," January 4, http://desmoinesregister.com/extras/politics/ caucus2004/transcript_final.html.
26. Elmore, Richard F. 2002. "Unwarranted Intrusion: Isn't It Ironic That Republicans Sponsored the Single Largest - and Potentially the Single Most Damaging - Expansion of Federal Power of the Nation's Education System in History?" Education Next, http://www.educationnext.org.
27. Federal Register. 2002. Title I - Improving the Academic Achievement of the Disadvantaged: Final Rule, December 2, http://www.gpoaccess.gov.
28. Federal Register. 2003. Title I - Improving the Academic Achievement of the Disadvantaged: Final Rule, December 9, http://www.gpoaccess.gov.
29. Finn, Chester E. 1993. "Commentary." Washington Times, May 23, http://www.lexisnexis.com.
30. Finn, Chester E., and Michael J. Petrilli. 2000. "The State of State Standards 2000." Fordham Report. Washington, DC: Fordham Foundation.
31. Fresh Start Academy v. Toledo Board of Education. 2005. U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5336.
32. Fuhrman, Susan H. 2004. Introduction to Redesigning Accountability Systems for Education, ed. Susan H. Fuhrman and Richard F. Elmore. New York: Teachers College Press.
33. Fuhrman, Susan H., Margaret E. Goertz, and Mark C. Duffy. 2004. "'Slow Down, You Move Too Fast': The Politics of Making Changes in High-Stakes Accountability Policies for Students." In Redesigning Accountability Systems for Education, ed. Susan H. Fuhrman and Richard F. Elmore. New York: Teachers College Press.
34. General Accounting Office. 1998. Goals 2000: Flexible Funding Supports State and Local Education Reform. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
35. General Accounting Office. 2003a. Characteristics of Tests Will Influence Expenses: Information Sharing May Help States Realize Efficiencies. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
36. General Accounting Office. 2003b. Unfunded Mandates: Analysis of Reform Act Coverage. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
37. General Accounting Office. 2004. No Child Left Behind Act: Improvements Needed in Education's Process for Tracking States' Implementation of Key Provisions. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
38. Gingrich, Newt, et al. 1994. "Contract with America," http://newt.accrisoft.com/clientuploads/contractwithamerica.pdf.
39. Goals 2000: Educate America Act. 1994. Public Law 103-227.
40. Goertz, Margaret E., Mark C. Duffy, and Kerstin Carlson Le Floch. 2001. Assessment and Accountability Systems in the 50 States: 1999-2000. Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
41. Heise, Michael. 1994. "Goals 2000: Educate America Act: The Federalization and Legalization of Educational Policy." Fordham Law Review 63:345-81.
42. Improving America's Schools Act. 1994. Public Law 103-382.
43. Innerst, Carol. 1995. "Alabama Quits Goals 2000, Gives Back Federal Funds." Washington Times, October 5, http://www.lexis.com.
44. Jennings, John. 1998. Why National Standards and Tests? Politics and the Quest for Better Schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
45. Joftus, Scott, and Ilene Berman. 1998. Great Expectations: Defining and Assessing Rigor in State Standards for Mathematics and English Language Arts. Washington, DC: Council for Basic Education.
46. Johnston, Robert C. 1995. "Clinton Urges 3.8% Increase for E.D. programs." Education Week, February 15, http://www.edweek.org.
47. Johnston, Robert C. 1996. "President Vows Veto Unless School Aid Grows." Education Week, February 14, http://www.edweek.org.
48. Kegerreis v. United States. 2003. U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18012.
49. Kennedy, Edward, and George Miller. 2002. Letter to President George W. Bush, March 18, http://edworkforce.house.gov/democrats/re131802.html.
50. Kim, Jimmy, and Gail L. Sunderman. 2004. Large Mandates and Limited Resources: State Response to the No Child Left Behind Act and Implications for Accountability. Cambridge, MA: Civil Rights Project at Harvard University.
51. Martz, Judy, and Bill Richardson. 2003. Excerpt of Letter to Secretary Roderick Paige, October 6, http://www.edweek.org.
52. Massaro, Toni. 1994. "Community and Dissent." Education Week, May 18, http://www.edweek.org.
53. Mathis, William J. 2003. "Costs and Benefits." Phi Delta Kappan 84 (9): 679-86.
54. McDonnell, Lorraine M. 2004. Politics, Persuasion, and Educational Testing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
55. McGreevey, James. 2003. Letter to Secretary Roderick Paige, October 10, http://www.state.nj.us/cgi-bin/governor/njnewsline/view_article.pl?id= 1445.
56. McLaughlin, Milbrey W. 1987. "Learning from Experience: Lessons from Policy Implementation." Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 9 (2): 171-78.
57. Millicent, Lawton. 1996. "In Reversal, Alabama to Accept Goals 2000 Funding." Education Week, September 4, http://www.edweek.org.
58. Montgomery, David. 1995. "The Ripple Effect: Empty Halls, Lost Money, Discontent." Washington Post, November 15, http://www.lexis.com.
59. Nather, David. 2001. "As Education Bills Head for Floor Votes, Big Ideological Tests Loom in House." Congressional Quarterly Weekly, May 19, http://library.cqpress.com.
60. National Commission on Excellence in Education. 1983. A Nation at Risk: The Imperative for Educational Reform. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
61. National Council of State Legislatures. 2005. Task Force on No Child Left Behind Final Report. Washington, DC: National Council of State Legislatures.
62. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. 1989. Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
63. National Defense Education Act. 1958. Public Law 85-864.
64. National Education Association, 2004, Education Funding: By the Numbers. Washington, DC: National Education Association, http://www.nea.org/esea/ eseafunding.html.
65. National Education Association, et al. 2004. "Joint Organizational Statement on the 'No Child Left Behind' Act," October 21, http://www.nea.org/presscenter/nclbjointstatement.html.
66. National Education Association. 2005. No Child Left Behind: State Legislative Watch List, April. Washington, DC: National Education Association, http://www.nea.org/lawsuit/stateres.html.
67. National Education Goals Panel. 1999. The National Education Goals Report: Building a Nation of Learners, 1999. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
68. National Governors' Association. 1990. Educating America: State Strategies for Achieving the National Education Goals. Washington, DC: National Governors' Association.
69. No Child Left Behind Act. 2002. Public Law 107-110.
70. Northwest Evaluation Association. 2004. The State of State Standards: Research Investigating Proficiency Levels in Fourteen States. Lake Oswego, OR: Northwest Evaluation Association.
71. O'Day, Jennifer A., and Marshall S. Smith. 1993. "Systemic Reform and Education Opportunity." In Designing Coherent Education Policy, ed. Susan H. Fuhrman. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
72. Olsen, Lynn. 1994. "Boards Seen Setting Tone for Standards Efforts." Education Week, May 18, http://www.edweek.org.
73. Olsen, Lynn. 2003. "'Approved' Is a Relative Term for Ed. Department." Education Week, August 6, http://www.edweek.org.
74. Paige, Roderick. 2004a. "Remarks for the Highly Qualified Teacher Policy Announcement," March 15, http://www.ed.gov/news/speeches/2004/03/ 03172004.html.
75. Paige, Roderick. 2004b. Remarks before the National School Boards Association, March 29, http://www.ed.gov/news/speeches/2004/03/03292004.html.
76. Pitsch, Mark. 1994a. "E.D. Form for Goals Funding Sent to States." Education Week, March 4, http://www.edweek.org.
77. Pitsch, Mark. 1994b. "Federal File: Presidential Positioning." Education Week, May 17, http://www.edweek.org.
78. Pitsch, Mark. 1995a. "Conservatives Vie to Use Momentum to Push Reform Agenda." Education Week, February 1, http://www.edweek.org.
79. Pitsch, Mark. 1995b. "Mont. Lawmakers Reject Goals 2000 as Other States Sign On." Education Week, April 19, http://www.edweek.org.
80. Pitsch, Mark. 1996a. "To Placate Conservatives, Measure Alters Goals 2000." Education Week, May 1, http://www.edweek.org.
81. Pitsch, Mark. 1996b. "Proposed Criteria for Picking Goals 2000 Districts Outlined." Education Week, May 29, http://www.edweek.org.
82. Pressman, Jeffrey, and Aaron B. Wildavsky. 1973. Implementation: How Great Expectations in Washington Are Dashed in Oakland; or, Why It's Amazing That Federal Programs Work at All, This Being a Saga of the Economic Development Administration as Told by Two Sympathetic Observers Who Seek to Build Morals on a Foundation of Ruined Hopes. Berkeley: University of California Press.
83. Ravitch, Diane. 1995. "The Search for Order and the Rejection of Conformity: Standards in American Education." In Learning from the Past: What History Teaches Us about School Reform, ed. Diane Ravitch and Maris A. Vinovskis. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
84. Reading School District v. Department of Education. 2004. 855 A.2d 166 (Pa. Commw. Ct.).
85. Riley, Richard. 1997. "The Role of the Federal Government in Education - Supporting a Desire for State and Local Education." Saint Louis Law Review 17:29-54.
86. Riskind, Jonathan. 1994, "State Board Turns Away Protesters; Superintendent Says Meeting Room Too Tiny for Crowd." Columbus Dispatch, October 12, http://www.lexis.com.
87. Sabatier, Paul, and Daniel A. Manzmanian. 1979. "The Implementation of Public Policy: A Framework of Analysis." Policy Studies Journal 8 (4): 538-60.
88. Sack, Joetta L. 2005. "State Lawmakers Say Measure Is All About Local Control of Schools." Education Week, April 27, http://www.edweek.org.
89. Spellings, Margaret. 2005. "Raising Achievement: A New Path for No Child Left Behind; Prepared Remarks for Secretary Spellings at Mount Vernon, Virginia," April 7, http://www.ed.gov/news/speeches/2005/04/04072005.html.
90. U.S. Congress. 1992. Congressional Record: Proceedings and Debates of the 102d Congress, October 2, http://thomas.loc.gov.
91. U.S. Congress. 1993. Congressional Record: Proceedings and Debates of the 103d Congress, October 13, http://thomas.loc.gov.
92. U.S. Congress. 1994a. Congressional Record: Proceedings and Debates of the 103d Congress, February 2, http://thomas.loc.gov.
93. U.S. Congress. 1994b. Congressional Record: Proceedings and Debates of the 103d Congress, February 24, http://thomas.loc.gov.
94. U.S. Congress, Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. 2002. Hearing Examining State and Community Perspectives of the Implementation of Title I of H.R. 1, to Close the Achievement Gap with Accountability, Flexibility, and Choice, So That No Child Is Left Behind, September 10. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
95. U.S. Department of Education. 1995. Guidance for Reviewers for Reviewing Comprehensive Plans Developed under the Goals 2000: Educate America Act. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
96. U.S. Department of Education. 1996a. Goals 2000: Increasing Student Achievement through State and Local Initiatives. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
97. U.S. Department of Education. 1996b. Reinventing Chapter 1: The Current Chapter 1 Program and New Directions. Final Report of the National Assessment of the Chapter 1 Program. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
98. U.S. Department of Education. 1997. Reports on Reform from the Field: District and State Survey Results. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
99. U.S. Department of Education. 1998. Goals 2000: Reforming Education. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
100. U.S. Department of Education. 1999a. Promising Results, Continuing Challenges: The Final Report of the National Assessment of Title I. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
101. U.S. Department of Education. 1999b. One System or Two? Title I Accountability in the Context of High Stakes for Schools in Local Districts and States. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
102. U.S. Department of Education. 2000. Making Progress: An Update on State Implementation of Federal Education Laws Enacted in 1994. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
103. U.S. Department of Education. 2001. High Standards for All Students: A Report from the National Assessment of Title I on Progress and Challenges since the 1994 Reauthorkation. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
104. U.S. Department of Education. 2004. "Press Release: Secretary Paige Issues New Policy for Calculating Participation Rates under No Child Left Behind," March 29, http://www.ed.gov/news/pressreleases/2004/03/03292004. html.
105. Virginia House of Delegates. 2004. House Joint Resolution No. 192, January 14.
106. Wattenberg, Ben. 1995. "Clinton Says He Let Down the Democrats." Times Albany, November 3, http://www.lexisnexis.com.
107. Yudof, Mark, David Kirp, Betsy Levin, and Rachel Moran. 2001. Educational Policy and the Law. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.