Design and first clinical results with the ZMR taper revision prosthesis;Design und erste klinische ergebnisse mit dem ZMR-taper-revisionsschaft

Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und Ihre Grenzgebiete

Volumn 143, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 355-359

  Hinrichs, F ^a   Boudriot, U ^a   Hunerkopf M ^a   Griss, P ^a  

^a PHILIPPS UNIVERSITY MARBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cementless revision; Hip prosthesis revision; Modular revision stem

Indexed keywords

TITANIUM;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY WEIGHT; BONE REMODELING; CEMENTATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FEMUR; FEMUR FRACTURE; FEMUR TROCHANTERIC FRACTURE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HIP DISLOCATION; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; LUNG EMBOLISM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PARALYSIS; PROSTHESIS FIXATION; SURFACE PROPERTY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WEIGHT BEARING; WOUND INFECTION;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; CAUSALITY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GERMANY; HIP FRACTURES; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; JOINT INSTABILITY; MALE; PREVALENCE; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PROSTHESIS-RELATED INFECTIONS; REOPERATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 22144450703     PISSN: 00443220     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-836456     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Charnley J. Anchorage of the femoral head prosthesis to the shaft of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1960; 42: 28-30
2. Malchau H, Herberts P, Eisler T, Garellick G, Söderman P. The Swedish total hip replacement register. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2002; 84 (Suppl 2): S2-S20
3. Wirtz DC, Niethard FU. Ursachen, Diagnostik und Therapie der aseptischen Hüftendoprothesenlockerung - eine Standortbestimmung. Z Orthop 1997; 135: 270-280
4. Hinrichs F, Boudriot U, Held T, Griss P. 10-Jahres Ergebnisse einer Monobloc-Hüftendoprothesenpfanne mit mehrlagiger Reintitangitterschale zur zementfreien Implantation. Z Orthop 2001; 139: 212-216
5. Valle CJD, Paprosky WG. The femur in revision total hip arthroplasty evaluation and classification. Clin Orthop 2004; 420: 55-62
6. Paprosky WG, Greidanus NV, Antoniou J. Minimum 10-year-results of extensively porous-coated stems in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1999; 369: 230-242
7. Hussamy O, Lachiewicz PF. Revision total hip arthroplasty with the BIAS (Biologic Ingrowth Anatomic System) femoral component. Three to six-year results. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1994; 76: 1137-1148
8. Hartwig CH, Böhm P, Czech U, Reize P, Küsswetter W. The Wagner revision stem in alloarthroplasty of the hip. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1996; 115: 5-9
9. Kolstad K, Adalberth G, Mallmin H, Milbrink J, Sahlstedt B. The Wagner revision stem for severe osteolysis. Acta Orthop Scand 1996; 67: 541-544
10. Suominen S, Santavirta S. Revision total hip arthroplasty in deficient proximal femur using a distal load-bearing prosthesis. Ann Chir Gynaecol 1996; 85: 253-262
11. Grunig R, Morscher E, Ochsner PE. Three-to 7-year results with the uncemented SL femoral revision prosthesis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1997; 116: 87-197
12. Böhm P, Bischel O. Femoral revision with the Wagner SL revision stem: evaluation of one hundred and twenty-nine revisions followed for a mean of 4.8 years. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2001; 83: 1023-1031
13. Strömberg CNP, Herberts P, Ahnfelt L. Revision total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 55 years old. Clinical and radiological results after 4 years. J Arthroplasty 1988; 3: 47-59
14. Retpen JB, Varmarken JE, Stürup J, Olsen C, Sölund K, Jensen JS. Clinical results after revision and primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1989; 4: 297-302
15. Mulroy WF, Harris WH. Revision total hip arthroplasty with use of so-called second-generation cementing techniques for aseptic loosening of the femoral component. A fifteen-year-average follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1996; 78: 325-330
16. Taylor JW, Rorabeck CH. Hip revision arthroplasty. Approach to the femoral side. Clin Orthop 1999; 369: 208-222
17. Moreland JR, Bernstein ML. Femoral revision hip arthroplasty with uncemented, porous-coated stems. Clin Orthop 1995; 319: 141-150
18. Schuh A, Werber S, Holzwarth U, Zeiler G. Cementless modular hip revision arthroplasty using the MRP Titan Revision Stem: outcome of 79 hips after an average of 4 years follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2004; 124: 306-309. Epub 2004 Apr 3
19. Wirtz DC, Heller KD, Holzwarth U, Siebert C, Pitto RP, Zeiler G, Blencke BA, Forst R. A modular femoral implant for uncemented stem revision in THR. Int Orthop 2000; 24: 134-138
20. Chandler HP, Ayres DK, Tan RC, Anderson LC, Varma AK. Revision total hip replacement using the S-ROM femoral component. Clin Orthop 1995; 319: 130-140
21. Katz RP, Callaghan JJ, Sullivan PM, Johnston RC. Long-term results of revision total hip arthroplasty with improved cementing technique. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1997; 79: 322-326
22. Christie MJ, DeBoer DK, Tingstad EM, Capps M, Brinson MF, Trick LW. Clinical experience with a modular noncemented femoral component in revision total hip arthroplasty: 4- to 7-year results. J Arthroplasty 2000; 15: 840-848
23. Cameron HU. The long-term success of modular proximal fixation stems in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2002; 17: 138-141
24. Bono JV, McCarthy JC, Lee J. Fixation with a modular stem in revision total hip arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 2000; 49: 131-139
25. Chandler HP, Ayres DK, Tan RC, Anderson LC, Varma AK. Revision total hip replacement using the S-ROM femoral component. Clin Orthop 1995; 319: 130-140
26. Kwong LM, Miller AJ, Lubinus P. A modular distal fixation option for proximal bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty: a 2- to 6-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 2003; 18: 94-97
27. Böhm P, Bischel O. Femoral revision with the Wagner SL revision stem: evaluation of one hundred and twenty-nine revisions followed for a mean of 4.8 years. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2001; 83: 1023-1031
28. Wirtz DC, Heller KD, Holzwarth U, Siebert C, Pitto RP, Zeiler G, Blencke BA, Forst R. A modular femoral implant for uncemented stem revision in THR. Int Orthop 2000; 24: 134-138