(iii) Cementless femoral revision: The role of monoblock versus modular stems

Current Orthopaedics

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 171-178

  Sporer, Scott M ^a   Paprosky, Wayne G ^b  

^a RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b CENTRAL DUPAGE HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Extensively coated stem; Femoral revision; Hip revision; Modular

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BONE REMODELING; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; DIAPHYSIS; DISEASE SEVERITY; FOLLOW UP; HIP RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; OSTEOLYSIS; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; REOPERATION; SURGICAL PATIENT; TORSION; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TREATMENT PLANNING;

EID: 33747862993     PISSN: 02680890     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cuor.2006.02.006     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Krishnamurthy A.B., MacDonald S.J., and Paprosky W.G. 5- to 13-year follow-up study on cementless femoral components in revision surgery. J Arthroplasty 12 (1997) 839-847
2. Weeden S.H., and Paprosky W.G. Minimal 11-year follow-up of extensively porous-coated stems in femoral revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 17 (2002) 134-137
3. Aribindi R., Barba M., Solomon M.I., et al. Bypass fixation. Orthop Clin North Am 29 (1998) 319-329
4. Moreland J.R., and Bernstein M.L. Femoral revision hip arthroplasty with uncemented, porous-coated stems. Clin Orthop (1995) 141-150
5. Engh Jr. C.A., Ellis T.J., Koralewicz L.M., et al. Extensively porous-coated femoral revision for severe femoral bone loss: minimum 10-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 17 (2002) 955-960
6. Sporer S.M., and Paprosky W.G. Revision total hip arthroplasty: the limits of fully coated stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2003) 203-209
7. Cook S.D., Barrack R.L., Baffes G.C., et al. Wear and corrosion of modular interfaces in total hip replacements. Clin Orthop (1994) 80-88
8. Bohm P., and Bischel O. The use of tapered stems for femoral revision surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2004) 148-159
9. Isacson J., Stark A., and Wallensten R. The Wagner revision prosthesis consistently restores femoral bone structure. Int Orthop 24 (2000) 139-142
10. Kwong L.M., Miller A.J., and Lubinus P. A modular distal fixation option for proximal bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty: a 2-to 6-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 18 (2003) 94-97
11. Wirtz D.C., Heller K.D., Holzwarth U., et al. A modular femoral implant for uncemented stem revision in THR. Int Orthop 24 (2000) 134-138
12. Whiteside L.A. Major femoral bone loss in revision total hip arthroplasty treated with tapered, porous-coated stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2004) 222-226
13. Weinstein J. Dartmouth Atlas of musculoskeletal healthcare. American Hospital Association, 2001.
14. Callaghan J.J., Salvati E.A., Pellicci P.M., et al. Results of revision for mechanical failure after cemented total hip replacement, 1979 to 1982. A two to five-year follow-up. J Bone Jt Surg Am 67 (1985) 1074-1085
15. Dohmae Y., Bechtold J.E., Sherman R.E., et al. Reduction in cement-bone interface shear strength between primary and revision arthroplasty. Clin Orthop (1988) 214-220
16. Malkani A.L., Lewallen D.G., Cabanela M.E., et al. Femoral component revision using an uncemented, proximally coated, long-stem prosthesis. J Arthroplasty 11 (1996) 411-418
17. Moreland J.R., and Moreno M.A. Cementless femoral revision arthroplasty of the hip: minimum 5 years followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2001) 194-201
18. Lawrence J.M., Engh C.A., Macalino G.E., et al. Outcome of revision hip arthroplasty done without cement. J Bone Jt Surg Am 76 (1994) 965-973
19. McLaughlin J.R., and Harris W.H. Revision of the femoral component of a total hip arthroplasty with the calcar-replacement femoral component. Results after a mean of 10.8 years postoperatively. J Bone Jt Surg Am 78 (1996) 331-339
20. Mulroy W.F., and Harris W.H. Revision total hip arthroplasty with use of so-called second-generation cementing techniques for aseptic loosening of the femoral component. A fifteen-year-average follow-up study. J Bone Jt Surg Am 78 (1996) 325-330
21. Katz R.P., Callaghan J.J., Sullivan P.M., et al. Results of cemented femoral revision total hip arthroplasty using improved cementing techniques. Clin Orthop Relat Res (1995) 178-183
22. Kavanagh B.F., and Fitzgerald Jr. R.H. Multiple revisions for failed total hip arthroplasty not associated with infection. J Bone Jt Surg Am 69 (1987) 1144-1149
23. Pellicci P.M., Wilson Jr. P.D., Sledge C.B., et al. Long-term results of revision total hip replacement A follow-up report. J Bone Jt Surg Am 67 (1985) 513-516
24. Kavanagh B.F., Ilstrup D.M., and Fitzgerald Jr. R.H. Revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Am 67 (1985) 517-526
25. Mulliken B.D., Rorabeck C.H., and Bourne R.B. Uncemented revision total hip arthroplasty: a 4- to-6-year review. Clin Orthop Relat Res (1996) 156-162
26. Berry D.J., Harmsen W.S., Ilstrup D., et al. Survivorship of uncemented proximally porous-coated femoral components. Clin Orthop Relat Res (1995) 168-177
27. Woolson S.T., and Delaney T.J. Failure of a proximally porous-coated femoral prosthesis in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 10 Suppl (1995) S22-S28
28. Cameron HU. The long-term success of modular proximal fixation stems in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 17 (2002) 138-141
29. Christie M.J., DeBoer D.K., Tingstad E.M., et al. Clinical experience with a modular noncemented femoral component in revision total hip arthroplasty: 4- to 7-year results. J Arthroplasty 15 (2000) 840-848
30. Chandler H.P., Ayres D.K., Tan R.C., et al. Revision total hip replacement using the S-ROM femoral component. Clin Orthop (1995) 130-140
31. Cameron H.U. The two- to six-year results with a proximally modular noncemented total hip replacement used in hip revisions. Clin Orthop Relat Res (1994) 47-53
32. Grunig R., Morscher E., and Ochsner P.E. Three- to 7-year results with the uncemented SL femoral revision prosthesis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 116 (1997) 187-197