Current progress in patient-specific modeling

Briefings in Bioinformatics

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 111-126

  Neal, Maxwell Lewis ^a   Kerckhoffs, Roy ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Clinical decision support techniques; Computer simulation; Computer assisted three dimensional imaging

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; REVIEW; TEACHING;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, CLINICAL; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; PATIENT SIMULATION;

EID: 77950362881     PISSN: 14675463     EISSN: 14774054     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbp049     Document Type: Article

References (130)

1. Ricotta JJ, Pagan J, Xenos M, et al. Cardiovascular disease management: the need for better diagnostics. Med Biol Eng Comput 2008;46:1059-68.
2. Kent DM, Hayward RA. Limitations of applying summary results of clinical trials to individual patients: the need for risk stratification. JAMA 2007;298:1209-12.
3. Doyle BJ, Callanan A, Burke PE, et al. Vessel asymmetry as an additional diagnostic tool in the assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 2009;49:443-54.
4. Virtual Physiological Human-Latest News. http://www.vphnoe.eu/home 2009 (10 October 2009, date last accessed).
5. Hunter P, Robbins P, Noble D. The IUPS human physiome project. Pflügers Archiv EurJ Physiol 2002;445:1-9.
6. VPH Projects. http://www.vph-noe.eu/vph-projects 2009 (10 October 2009, date last accessed)
7. NIH. Predictive Multiscale Models of the Physiome in Health and Disease (PAR-08-023). http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PAR-08-023.html 2009 (10 October 2009, date last accessed)
8. Antiga L, Piccinelli M, Botti L, et al. An image-based modeling framework for patient-specific computational hemodynamics. Med Biol Engin Comput 2008;46: 1097-112.
9. Bekkers EJ, Taylor CA. Multiscale vascular surface model generation from medical imaging data using hierarchical features. IEEE Trans Med Imag 2008;27:331-41.
10. Gassman EE, Powell SM, Kallemeyn NA, et al. Automated bony region identification using artificial neural networks: reliability and validation measurements. Skelet al Radiol 2008; 37:313-19.
11. Goel VR, Greenberg RK, Greenberg DP. Mathematical analysis of DICOM CT datasets: Can endograft sizing be automated for complex anatomy? J Vascular Surg 2008; 47:1306-12.
12. Grosland NM, Bafna R, Magnotta VA. Automated hexahedral meshing of anatomic structures using deformable registration. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 2009;12: 35-43.
13. O'Reilly MA, Whyne CM. Comparison of computed tomography based parametric and patient-specific finite element models of the healthy and metastatic spine using a mesh-morphing algorithm. Spine 2008;33:1876-81.
14. Shim VB, Pitto RP, Streicher RM, et al. Development and validation of patient-specific finite element models of the hemipelvis generated from a sparse CT data set. J Biomech Eng 2008;130:051010.
15. Taylor CA, Figueroa CA. Patient-specific modeling of cardiovascular mechanics. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2009;11: 109-34.
16. Bathe KJ. Finite Element Procedures. New Jersey: Englewood Cliffs, 1996.
17. Zankl AR, Schumacher H, Krumsdorf U, et al. Pathology, natural history and treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Clin Res Cardiol 2007;96:140-51.
18. Martufi G, Di Martino ES, Amon CH, et al. Three-dimensional geometrical characterization of abdominal aortic aneurysms: image-based wall thickness distribution. J Biomech Eng 2009;131:061015.
19. Rissland P, Alemu Y, Einav S, et al. Abdominal aortic aneurysm risk of rupture: patient-specific FSI simulations using anisotropic model. J Biomech Eng 2009;131:031001.
20. Vande Geest J, Schmidt D, Sacks M, et al. The effects of anisotropy on the stress analyses of patient-specific abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Biomed Engin 2008;36:921-32.
21. Figueroa AC, Baek S, Taylor CA, et al. A computational framework for fluid-solid-growth modeling in cardiovascular simulations. Comput Meth Appl Mech Eng 2009;198: 3583-602.
22. Helderman F, Manoch I, Breeuwer M, et al. A numerical model to predict abdominal aortic aneurysm expansion based on local wall stress and stiffness. Med Biol Eng Comput 2008;46:1121-7.
23. Figueroa CA, Vignon-Clementel IE, Jansen KE, et al. A coupled momentum method for modeling blood flow in three-dimensional deformable arteries. Comp Meth Appl Mech Eng 2006;195:5685-706.
24. Rinkel GJ, Djibuti M, Algra A, et al. Prevalence and risk of rupture of intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review. Stroke 1998;29:251-6.
25. Burns J, Brown R. Treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: surgery, coiling, or nothing? Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2009;9:6-12.
26. Isaksen JG, Bazilevs Y, Kvamsdal T, et al. Determination of wall tension in cerebral artery aneurysms by numerical simulation. Stroke 2008;39:3172-8.
27. Cebral JR, Hendrickson S, Putman CM. Hemodynamics in a lethal basilar artery aneurysm just before its rupture. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:95-8.
28. Rayz VL, Lawton MT, Martin AJ, et al. Numerical simulation of pre-and postsurgical flow in a giant basilar aneurysm. J Biomech Eng 2008;130:021004.
29. Kim M, Taulbee DB, Tremmel M, et al. Comparison of two stents in modifying cerebral aneurysm hemodynamics. Ann Biomed Eng 2008;36:726-41.
30. Rayz VL, Boussel L, Lawton MT, et al. Numerical modeling of the flow in intracranial aneurysms: prediction of regions prone to thrombus formation. Ann Biomed Eng 2008;36:1793-804.
31. Olgac U, Poulikakos D, Saur SC, et al. Patient-specific three-dimensional simulation of LDL accumulation in a human left coronary artery in its healthy and atherosclerotic states. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2009;296: 1969-82.
32. Tan FP, Soloperto G, Bashford S, et al. Analysis of flow disturbance in a stenosed carotid artery bifurcation using two-equation transitional and turbulence models. J Biomech Eng 2008;130:061008.
33. Marsden AL, Bernstein AJ, Reddy VM, et al. Evaluation of a novel Y-shaped extracardiac Fontan baffle using computational fluid dynamics. J Thoracic Cardiovasc Surg 2009;137: 394-403, e392.
34. Sun Q, Wan D, Liu J, et al. Patient-specific computational fluid dynamic simulation of a bilateral bidirectional Glenn connection. Med Biol Engin Comput 2008;46:1153-9.
35. Pekkan K, Dur O, Sundareswaran K, et al. Neonatal aortic arch hemodynamics and perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass. J Biomech Eng 2008;130:061012.
36. Marchandise E, Willemet M, Lacroix V. A numerical hemodynamic tool for predictive vascular surgery. Med Engin Phys 2009;31:131-44.
37. Pekkan K, Whited B, Kanter K, et al. Patient-specific surgical planning and hemodynamic computational fluid dynamics optimization through free-form haptic anatomy editing tool (SURGEM). Med Biol Engin Comput 2008;46: 1139-52.
38. Boussel L, Rayz V, Martin A, et al. Phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging measurements in intracranial aneurysms in vivo of flow patterns, velocity fields, and wall shear stress: comparison with computational fluid dynamics. Magn ResonMed 2009;61:409-17.
39. Hollnagel DI, Summers PE, Poulikakos D, et al. Comparative velocity investigations in cerebral arteries and aneurysms: 3D phase-contrast MR angiography, laser Doppler velocimetry and computational fluid dynamics. NMR Biomed 2009;22:795-808.
40. Canstein C, Cachot P, Faust A, et al. 3D MR flow analysis in realistic rapid-prototyping model systems of the thoracic aorta: Comparison with in vivo data and computational fluid dynamics in identical vessel geometries. Magn Resonance Med 2008;59:535-46.
41. Rayz VL, Boussel L, Acevedo-Bolton G, et al. Numerical simulations of flow in cerebral aneurysms: comparison of CFD results and in vivo MRI measurements. J Biomech Eng 2008;130:051011.
42. Breeuwer M, de Putter S, Kose U, et al. Towards patientspecific risk assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Med Biol Eng Comput 2008;46:1085-95.
43. de Putter S, Wolters BJBM, Rutten MCM, et al. Patientspecific initial wall stress in abdominal aortic aneurysms with a backward incremental method. J Biomech 2007;40: 1081-90.
44. Huang X, Yang C, Yuan C, et al. Patient-specific artery shrinkage and 3D zero-stress state in multicomponent 3D FSI models for carotid atherosclerotic plaques based on in vivo MRI data. Mol Cell Biomech 2009;6:121-34.
45. Drevelle X, Dubousset J, Lafon Y, et al. Analysis of the mechanisms of idiopathic scoliosis progression using finite element simulation. Stud Health Technol Inform 2008; 140:85-9.
46. Lafon Y, Lafage V, Dubousset J, et al. Intraoperative three-dimensional correction during rod rotation technique. Spine 2009;34:512-9.
47. Majdouline Y, Aubin CE, Labelle H. Influence of correction objectives on the optimal scoliosis instrumentation strategy: a preliminary study. Stud Health Technol Inform 2008;140:116-20.
48. Nie WZ, Ye M, Wang ZY. Infinite models in scoliosis: a review of the literature and analysis of personal experience. Biomed Tech 2008;53:174-80.
49. Wang X, Aubin CE, Labelle H, et al. Biomechanical modelling of a direct vertebral translation instrumentation system: preliminary results. Stud Health Technol Inform 2008; 140:128-32.
50. Anderson AE, Ellis BJ, Maas SA, et al. Validation of finite element predictions of cartilage contact pressure in the human hip joint. J Biomech Eng 2008;130:051008.
51. Barratt DC, Chan CSK, Edwards PJ, et al. Instantiation and registration of statistical shape models of the femur and pelvis using 3D ultrasound imaging. Med Image Anal 2008;12:358-74.
52. Bailey C, Gul R, Falworth M, et al. Component alignment in hip resurfacing using computer navigation, clinical orthopaedics and related research. 2009;467:917-22.
53. Pahr DH, Zysset PK. From high-resolution CT data to finite element models: development of an integrated modular framework. Comp Meth Biomech Biomed Engin 2009;12:45-57.
54. Zheng G, Schumann S. 3D reconstruction of a patientspecific surface model of the proximal femur from calibrated x-ray radiographs: a validation study. Med Phys 2009;36: 1155-66.
55. de Zee M, Cattaneo PM, Svensson P, et al. Prediction of the articular eminence shape in a patient with unilateral hypoplasia of the right mandibular ramus before and after distraction osteogenesis-a simulation study. J Biomech 2009; 42:1049-53.
56. Diederichs G, Seim H, Meyer H, et al. CT-based patientspecific modeling of glenoid rim defects: a feasibility study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;191:1406-11.
57. Subburaj K, Ravi B, Agarwal M. Automated identification of anatomical landmarks on 3D bone models reconstructed from CT scan images. Comp Med Imag Graph 2009;33: 359-68.
58. D'Ambrosio AL, Mocco J, Hankinson TC, et al. Quantification of the frontotemporal orbitozygomatic approach using a three-dimensional visualization and modeling application. Neurosurgery 2008;62:251-60; discussion 260-51.
59. Cattaneo PM, Dalstra M, Frich LH. A three-dimensional finite element model from computed tomography data: a semi-automated method. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. J Engin Med 2001;215:203-213.
60. Diamant I, Shahar R, Masharawi Y, et al. A method for patient-specific evaluation of vertebral cancellous bone strength: in vitro validation. Clin Biomech 2007;22:282-91.
61. Ackerman MJ. The visible human project. Proc IEEE 1998; 86:504-11.
62. Aubin CE, Labelle H, Chevrefils C, et al. Preoperative planning simulator for spinal deformity surgeries. Spine 2008;33:2143-52.
63. Doenst T, Spiegel K, Reik M, et al. Fluid-dynamic modeling of the human left ventricle: methodology and application to surgical ventricular reconstruction. Ann Thorac Surg 2009;87:1187-95.
64. Tang D, Yang C, Geva T, et al. Patient-specific MRI-based 3D FSI RV/LV/patch models for pulmonary valve replacement surgery and patch optimization. J Biomech Eng 2008; 130:041010.
65. Jolley M, Stinstra J, Pieper S, et al. A computer modeling tool for comparing novel ICD electrode orientations in children and adults. Heart Rhythm 2008;5:565-72.
66. Pfeifer B, Hanser F, Seger M, et al. Patient-specific volume conductor modeling for non-invasive imaging of cardiac electrophysiology. Open Med Inform J 2008;2: 32-41.
67. Kroon W, Delhaas T, Arts T, et al. Computational modeling of volumetric soft tissue growth: application to the cardiac left ventricle. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 2009;8: 301-9.
68. Ionasec RI, Georgescu B, Gassner E, et al. Dynamic model-driven quantitative and visual evaluation of the aortic valve from 4D CT. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv Int Conf Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 2008; 11:686-94.
69. Votta E, Caiani E, Veronesi F, et al. Mitral valve finiteelement modelling from ultrasound data: a pilot study for a new approach to understand mitral function and clinical scenarios. Phil Trans Royal Soc A: Math, Phys and Engin Sci 2008;366:3411-34.
70. Starfinger C, Chase JG, Hann CE, et al. Model-based identification and diagnosis of a porcine model of induced endotoxic shock with hemofiltration. Math Biosci 2008;216: 132-9.
71. Le Rolle V, Hern ndez AI, Richard P-Y, et al. Model-based analysis of myocardial strain data acquired by tissue Doppler imaging. Artificial Intell Med 2008;44: 201-19.
72. Sermesant M, Peyrat JM, Chinchapatnam P, et al. Toward patient-specific myocardial models of the heart. Heart Fail Clin 2008;4:289-301.
73. Kerckhoffs RC, Bovendeerd PH, Kotte JC, et al. Homogeneity of cardiac contraction despite physiological asynchrony of depolarization: a model study. Ann Biomed Eng 2003;31:536-47.
74. Usyk TP, LeGrice IJ, McCulloch AD. Computational model of three dimensional cardiac electromechanics. Comput Visual Sci 2002;4:249-57.
75. Campbell SG, Howard E, Aguado-Sierra J, et al. Effect of transmurally heterogeneous myocyte excitation-contraction coupling on canine left ventricular electromechanics. Exp Physiol 2009;94:541-52.
76. Nash MP, Panfilov AV. Electromechanical model of excitable tissue to study reentrant cardiac arrhythmias. Progr BiophysMol Biol 2004;85:501-22.
77. Nickerson D, Smith N, Hunter P. New developments in a strongly coupled cardiac electromechanical model. Europace 2005;7(Suppl 2):118-27.
78. Niederer SA, Smith NP. An improved numerical method for strong coupling of excitation and contraction models in the heart. Prog BiophysMol Biol 2008;96:90-111.
79. Sermesant M, Moireau P, Camara O, et al. Cardiac function estimation from MRI using a heart model and data assimilation: advances and difficulties. Med Image Anal 2006;10:642-56.
80. Smith NP, Buist ML, Pullan AJ. Altered T wave dynamics in a contracting cardiac model. J Cardiovascular Electrophysiol 2003;14:203-9.
81. Southern J, Pitt-Francis J, Whiteley J, et al. Multi-scale computational modelling in biology and physiology. Prog BiophysMol Biol 2008;96:60-89.
82. Kerckhoffs RC, Narayan SM, Omens JH, et al. Computational modeling for bedside application. Heart Fail Clin 2008;4:371-8.
83. Hsieh AL, Wang Y, Ross RS, et al. Mechanotransduction in single cardiac myocyte studied using laser tweezers and FRET. Biophys J 2009;96:316a.
84. Amaro R, Baron R, McCammon J. An improved relaxed complex scheme for receptor flexibility in computer-aided drug design. J Comp-Aid Mol Design 2008;22:693-705.
85. Song CM, Lim SJ, Tong JC. Recent advances in computeraided drug design. Brief Bioinform 2009. Advance Access published online on May 11, 2009; doi:10.1093/bib/bbp023.
86. VPH-preDiCT. http://www.vph-predict.eu/ 2009 (10 October 2009, date last accessed).
87. Astrom M, Zrinzo LU, Tisch S, et al. Method for patientspecific finite element modeling and simulation of deep brain stimulation. Med Biol Eng Comput 2009;47:21-8.
88. Maks CB, Butson CR, Walter BL, et al. Deep brain stimulation activation volumes and their association with neurophysiological mapping and therapeutic outcomes. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2009;80:659-66.
89. Vasques X, Cif L, Hess O, et al. Stereotactic model of the electrical distribution within the internal globus pallidus during deep brain stimulation. J Comput Neurosci 2009;26: 109-18.
90. Schiavone P, Chassat F, Boudou T, et al. In vivo measurement of human brain elasticity using a light aspiration device. Med Image Anal 2009;13:673-8.
91. Wittek A, Hawkins T, Miller K. On the unimportance of constitutive models in computing brain deformation for image-guided surgery. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 2009;8: 77-84.
92. Wittek A, Dutta-Roy T, Taylor Z, et al. Subject-specific non-linear biomechanical model of needle insertion into brain. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 2008;11:135-46.
93. Wakeland W, Agbeko R, Vinecore K, et al. Assessing the prediction potential of an in silico computer model of intracranial pressure dynamics. Crit Care Med 2009;37: 1079-89.
94. Dubowsky SR, Rasmussen J, Sisto SA, et al. Validation of a musculoskelet al model of wheelchair propulsion and its application to minimizing shoulder joint forces. J Biomech 2008;41:2981-8.
95. Reinbolt JA, Haftka RT, Chmielewski TL, et al. A computational framework to predict post-treatment outcome for gait-related disorders. Med Engin Phys 2008;30:434-43.
96. Linder-Ganz E, Shabshin N, Gefen A. Patient-specific modeling of deep tissue injury biomechanics in an unconscious patient who developed myonecrosis after prolonged lying. J Tissue Viability 2009;18:62-71.
97. Portnoy S, Yizhar Z, Shabshin N, et al. Internal mechanical conditions in the soft tissues of a residual limb of a transtibial amputee. J Biomech 2008;41:1897-909.
98. Bouten CV, Oomens CW, Baaijens FP, et al. The etiology of pressure ulcers: skin deep or muscle bound? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84:616-9.
99. Gefen A. Bioengineering models of deep tissue injury. Adv Skin Wound Care 2008;21:30-6.
100. Linder-Ganz E, Engelberg S, Scheinowitz M, et al. Pressuretime cell death threshold for albino rat skelet al muscles as related to pressure sore biomechanics. J Biomech 2006; 39:2725-32.
101. Stekelenburg A, Strijkers GJ, Parusel H, et al. Role of ischemia and deformation in the onset of compressioninduced deep tissue injury: MRI-based studies in a rat model. J Appl Physiol 2007;102:2002-11.
102. Cattaneo PM, Dalstra M, Melsen B. Moment-to-force ratio, center of rotation, and force level: A finite element study predicting their interdependency for simulated orthodontic loading regimens. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthoped 2008;133:681-9.
103. Cattaneo PM, Dalstra M, Melsen B. Strains in periodontal ligament and alveolar bone associated with orthodontic tooth movement analyzed by finite element. Orthod Craniofac Res 2009;12:120-8.
104. Kondo T, Wakabayashi N. Influence of molar support loss on stress and strain in premolar periodontium: a patient-specific FEM study. J Dent 2009;37:541-8.
105. Campbell JM, Wong CO, Muzik O, et al. Early dose response to yttrium-90 microsphere treatment of metastatic liver cancer by a patient-specific method using single photon emission computed tomography and positron emission tomography. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009;74: 313-20.
106. South CP, Partridge M, Evans PM. A theoretical framework for prescribing radiotherapy dose distributions using patient-specific biological information. Med Phys 2008;35: 4599-611.
107. Titz B, Jeraj R. An imaging-based tumour growth and treatment response model: investigating the effect of tumour oxygenation on radiation therapy response. Phys Med Biol 2008;53:4471-88.
108. Gorelik B, Ziv I, Shohat R, et al. Efficacy of weekly docetaxel and bevacizumab in mesenchymal chondrosarcoma: a new theranostic method combining xenografted biopsies with a mathematical model. Cancer Res 2008;68: 9033-40.
109. Fuentes D, Oden JT, Diller KR, et al. Computational modeling and real-time control of patient-specific laser treatment of cancer. Ann Biomed Eng 2009;37:763-82.
110. Hogea C, Davatzikos C, Biros G. An image-driven parameter estimation problem for a reaction-diffusion glioma growth model with mass effects. J Math Biol 2008;56: 793-825.
111. Szeto MD, Chakraborty G, Hadley J, et al. Quantitative metrics of net proliferation and invasion link biological aggressiveness assessed by MRI with hypoxia assessed by FMISO-PET in newly diagnosed glioblastomas. Cancer Res 2009;69:4502-9.
112. Pathmanathan P, Gavaghan DJ, Whiteley JP, et al. Predicting tumor location by modeling the deformation of the breast. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2008;55:2471-80.
113. Juffer AH, Marin U, Niemitalo O, et al. Computer modeling of brain tumor growth. Mini Rev Med Chem 2008;8:1494-506.
114. Deisboeck TS, Zhang L, Yoon J. In silico cancer modeling: is it ready for prime time? Nat Clin Pract Oncol 2009;6:34-42.
115. Ashwath S, Toshinori Y, Christopher EH, et al. A minimal model of lung mechanics and model-based markers for optimizing ventilator treatment in ARDS patients. Comp Meth Programs Biomed 2009;95:166-80.
116. Shi Y, Qi F, Xue Z, et al. Segmenting lung fields in serial chest radiographs using both population-based and patientspecific shape statistics. IEEE Trans Med Imag 2008;27: 481-94.
117. Li NY, Verdolini K, Clermont G, et al. A patient-specific in silico model of inflammation and healing tested in acute vocal fold injury. PLoS ONE 2008;3:e2789.
118. Zhou X, Zhang N, Sha D, et al. A discrete mechanics framework for real time virtual surgical simulations with application to virtual laparoscopic nephrectomy. Stud Health Technol Inform 2009;142:459-64.
119. Oomens CWJ, Ratingen MRV, Janssen JD, et al. A numerical-experimental method for a mechanical characterization of biological materials. J Biomech 1993;26:617.
120. Hendriks FM, Brokken D, Van Eemeren J, et al. A numerical-experimental method to characterize the non-linear mechanical behaviour of human skin. Skin Res Technol 2003;9:274-83.
121. Rudy Y, Ackerman MJ, Bers DM, et al. Systems approach to understanding electromechanical activity in the human heart: a national heart, lung, and blood institute workshop summary. Circulation 2008;118:1202.
122. NIH. Working Group 10: Model Sharing and the Defining of Modeling Standards. http://www.imagwiki.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Working_Group_10 2008.
123. EMBL-EBI. MIASE-Minimum Information About a Simulation Experiment. http://www.ebi.ac.uk/compneursrv/miase/ 2009.
124. Hucka M, Finney A, Sauro HM, et al. The Systems Biology Markup Language (SBML): A Medium for Representation and Exchange of Biochemical Network Models. Bioinformatics 2003;19:524-31.
125. Le Novere N, Finney A, Hucka M, et al. Minimum information requested in the annotation of biochemical models (MIRIAM). Nat Biotechnol 2005;23:1509-15.
126. Neal ML, Gennari JH, Arts T, et al. Advances in semantic representation for multiscale biosimulation: a case study in merging models. Pac Symp Biocomput 2009;14:304-15.
127. Nickerson D, Hunter P. Using CellML in computational models of multiscale physiology. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2005;6:6096-9.
128. Smith NP, Crampin EJ, Niederer SA, et al. Computational biology of cardiac myocytes: proposed standards for the physiome. J Experiment Biol 2007;210:1576.
129. Kass DA. Cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Cardiovascular Electrophysiol 2005;16:S35-41.
130. Owens JD, Houston M, Luebke D, et al. GPU computing. Proc IEEE 2008;96:879-99.