A computational framework to predict post-treatment outcome for gait-related disorders

Medical Engineering and Physics

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 434-443

  Reinbolt, Jeffrey A ^a   Haftka, Raphael T ^a   Chmielewski, Terese L ^a   Fregly, Benjamin J ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b University of Florida   (United States)

Author keywords

Gait; High tibial osteotomy; Knee adduction moment; Optimization; Patient specific

Indexed keywords

BIOMECHANICS; DATA ACQUISITION; GAIT ANALYSIS; MEDICAL PROBLEMS; OPTIMIZATION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

HIGH TIBIAL OSTEOTOMY; KNEE ADDUCTION MOMENT;

PATIENT TREATMENT;

ADDUCTION; ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; GAIT; GAIT DISORDER; GROUND REACTION FORCE; KINEMATICS; KNEE FUNCTION; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; LEG MOVEMENT; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION; THEORETICAL MODEL; TIBIA OSTEOTOMY; TORQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TREATMENT PLANNING;

ADULT; ALGORITHMS; BIOMECHANICS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; GAIT; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; MALE; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; OSTEOTOMY; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SOFTWARE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 42949135553     PISSN: 13504533     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2007.05.005     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Andriacchi T.P. Dynamics of knee malalignment. Orthop Clin North Am 25 3 (1994) 395-403
2. Bryan J.M., Hurwitz D.E., Bach B.R., Bittar T., and Andriacchi T.P. A predictive model of outcome in high tibial osteotomy. Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, vol. 22. San Francisco, California, February 9-13 (1997) 718
3. Hurwitz D.E., Sumner D.R., Andriacchi T.P., and Sugar D.A. Dynamic knee loads during gait predict proximal tibial bone distribution. J Biomech 31 5 (1998) 423-430
4. Prodromos C.C., Andriacchi T.P., and Galante J.O. A relationship between gait and clinical changes following high tibial osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg (American) 67 8 (1985) 1188-1194
5. Wang J.-W., Kuo K.N., Andriacchi T.P., and Galante J.O. The influence of walking mechanics and time on the results of proximal tibial osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg (American) 72 6 (1990) 905-913
6. Zhao D., Banks S.A., Mitchell K.H., D'Lima D.D., Colwell C.W., and Fregly B.J. Correlation between the knee adduction torque and medial contact force for a variety of gait patterns. J Orthop Res 25 6 (2007) 789-797
7. Mündermann A., Dyrby C.O., Hurwitz D.E., Sharma L., and Andriacchi T.P. Potential strategies to reduce medial compartment loading in patients with knee osteoarthritis of varying severity: reduced walking speed. Arthritis Rheum 50 4 (2004) 1172-1178
8. Andrews M., Noyes F., Hewett T.E., and Andriacchi T.P. Lower limb alignment and foot angle are related to stance phase knee adduction in normal subjects: a critical analysis of the reliability of gait analysis data. J Orthop Res 14 2 (1996) 289-295
9. Guo M, Axe MJ, Manal K. The influence of foot progression angle on the knee adduction moment during walking and stair climbing in pain free individuals with knee osteoarthritis. Gait Posture, in press.
10. Shaw J.A., and Moulton M.J. High tibial osteotomy: an opertation based on a spurious mechanical concept. A theoretic treatise. Am J Orthop 25 6 (1996) 429-436
11. Shaw J.A., Dungy D.S., and Arsht S.S. Recurrent varus angluation after high tibial osteotomy: an anatomic analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 420 1 (2004) 205-212
12. Chao E.Y.S. Graphic-based musculoskeletal model for biomechanical analyses and animation. Med Eng Phys 25 3 (2003) 201-212
13. Chao E.Y., and Sim F.H. Computer-aided pre-operative planning in knee osteotomy. Iowa Orthop J 15 (1995) 4-18
14. Reinbolt J.A., Schutte J.F., Fregly B.J., Haftka R.T., George A.D., and Mitchell K.H. Determination of patient-specific multi-joint kinematic models through two-level optimization. J Biomech 38 3 (2005) 621-626
15. Leardini A., Cappozzo A., Catani F., Toksvig-Larsen S., Petitto A., Sforza V., et al. Validation of a functional method for the estimation of hip joint centre location. J Biomech 32 1 (1999) 99-103
16. Bogert AJ van den, Smith GD, Nigg BM. In vivo determination of the anatomical axes of the ankle joint complex: an optimization approach. J Biomech 1994; 27(12):1477-88.
17. Anderson F.C., and Pandy M.G. A dynamic optimization solution for vertical jumping in three dimensions. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 2 3 (1999) 201-231
18. Bell A.L., Pedersen D.R., and Brand R.A. A comparison of the accuracy of several hip center location prediction methods. J Biomech 23 6 (1990) 617-621
19. Churchill D.L., Incavo S.J., Johnson C.C., and Beynnon B.D. The transepicondylar axis approximates the optimal flexion axis of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 356 1 (1998) 111-118
20. Inman V.T. The joints of the ankle (1976), Williams and Wilkins Company, Baltimore, Maryland
21. de Leva P. Adjustments to Zatsiorsky-Seluyanov's segment inertia parameters. J Biomech 29 9 (1996) 1223-1230
22. Griewank A., Juedes D., Mitev H., Utke J., Vogel O., and Walther A. ADOL-C: a package for the automatic differentiation of algorithms written in C/C++. Assoc Comput Mach Trans Math Software 22 2 (1996) 131-167
23. Chéze L., Fregly B.J., and Dimnet J. Determination of joint functional axes from noisy marker data using the finite helical axis. Hum Mov Sci 17 1 (1998) 1-15
24. Hammersley J. Monte Carlo methods for solving multivariable problems. In: Proceedings of the New York Academy of Science 1960; 86:844-874.
25. Wada M., Imura S., Nagatani K., Baba H., Shimada S., and Sasaki S. Relationship between gait and clinical results after high tibial osteotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 354 1 (1998) 180-188
26. Reinbolt JA, Haftka RT, Chmielewski TL, Fregly BJ. Are patient-specific joint and inertial parameters necessary for accurate inverse dynamics analyses of gait? IEEE Trans Biomed Eng;54:782-793.
27. Fregly BJ, Reinbolt JA, Rooney KL, Mitchell KH, Chmielewski TL. Design of patient-specific gait modifications for knee osteoarthritis rehabilitation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, in press.
28. Nagurka M.L., and Yen V. Fourier-based optimal control of nonlinear dynamic systems. J Dyn Syst Meas Control 112 1 (1990) 17-26