Influence of correction objectives on the optimal scoliosis instrumentation strategy: A preliminary study

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 140, Issue , 2008, Pages 116-120

  Majdouline, Y ^a,b   Aubin, C E ^a,b   Labelle, H ^b  

^a ÉCOLE POLYTECHNIQUE DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MONTREAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

3 D correction; Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; Biomechanics; Experimental design; Optimization; Scoliosis surgery; Surgery simulator

Indexed keywords

BIOMECHANICS; COST FUNCTIONS; DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS; ITERATIVE METHODS; OPTIMIZATION; STATISTICS;

ADOLESCENT IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS; BIO-MECHANICAL MODELS; INSTRUMENTATION DESIGNS; NON-PARAMETRIC TEST; OPTIMIZATION METHOD; PATIENT SPECIFIC; SPINAL DEFORMITY; SURGERY SIMULATOR;

SURGERY;

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; KYPHOSIS; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; MALE; PATHOLOGY; SCOLIOSIS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TIME; VERTEBRA;

ADOLESCENT; BIOMECHANICS; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; KYPHOSIS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; SCOLIOSIS; THORACIC VERTEBRAE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 54049156156     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-58603-888-5-116     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Bridwell KH. Surgical treatment of idiopathic adolescent scoliosis. Spine. 1999;24:2607-16
2. Aubin CE, Labelle H, Ciolofan OC. Variability of spinal instrumentation configurations in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, Eur Spine J, 16(1):57-64, 2007.
3. Robitaille M, Aubin CE, Labelle H. Intra and interobserver variability of preoperative planning for surgical instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2007. Oct;16(10):1604-14.
4. Majdouline Y, Aubin CE, Robitaille M, et al. Scoliosis correction objectives in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 2007, 27(7):775-81.
5. Majdouline Y, Aubin CE, Archana S, et al. Optimization of instrumentation strategies in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Orthopedic Research (will submit, Mai 2008)
6. O'Brien MF, Kuklo TR, Blanke KM et al. The Spinal Deformity Study Group Radiographic Measurement Manual, Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Memphis, TN, 2004.
7. Lenke LG, Betz RR, Harms J, et al. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001; 83:1169-81.
8. De Jonge T, Dubousset JF, Illes T. Sagittal plane correction in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2002;27:754-60.
9. Fang, K. T., Lin, D. K. J., Winker, P., and Zhang, Y., 2000, 'Unifom Design: Theory and Application", Technometries, 42(3), pp. 237-248.
10. Fang, K. T., Ma, C. X., and Winker, P., 2002, "Centered L-2-discrepancy of random sampling and Latin hypercube design, and construction of uniform designs", Math. Gomput., 71(237), pp. 275-296.
11. Aubin CE, Labelle H, Chevrefils C et al. Pre-Operative Planning Simulator for Spinal Deformity Surgeries. Spine (in press).
12. Optimization Toolbox User's Guide," 2001, Version 2, The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, MA, http://www.mathworks.com.