Art and integrated curriculum

Handbook of Research and Policy in Art Education

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 775-794

  Parsons, Michael ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77950320638     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410609939-42     Document Type: Chapter

References (86)

1. Arnheim, R. (1969). Visual thinking. Berkeley, CA: The University of California press.
2. Barrett, T. (1994). Criticizing art: Understanding the contemporary (2nd ed.). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
3. Barrett, T. (1996). Criticizing photographs: An introduction to understanding images (2nd ed.). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
4. Beane, J. (1997). Curriculum integration: Designing the core of democratic education. New York: Teachers College Press.
5. Beane, J. (1993). The middle school curriculum: From rhetoric to reality (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: The National Middle School Association.
6. Birt, D., Krug, D., & Sheridan, M. (1997). Earthly matters: Learning occurs when you hear the grass singing. Art Education, 50(6), 6-13.
7. Boston, B. (1996). Connections: The arts and the integration of the high school curriculum. New York: The College Entrance Examination Board and the Getty Center for Education in the Arts.
8. Brazee, E., & Capelluti, J. (1995). Dissolving boundaries: Toward an integrative curriculum. Columbus, OH: The National Middle School Association.
9. Bredekamp, S., & Copple, C., (Eds.). (1997). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs: Revised. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
10. Broudy, H., Smith, B., & Burnett, J. (1964). Democracy ami excellence in American secondary education: A study in curriculum theory. Chicago: Rand, Mcnally.
11. Bruner, J. (1960). The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12. Burnaford, G., Aprill, A., & Weiss, C. (2001). Renaissance inthe classroom:Artsintegrationandmeaningfullearning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13. Burns, R. (1995). Dissolving the boundaries: Planning for curriculum integration in middle and secondary schools. Charleston, WV: Appalachia Educational Laboratory.
14. Burton, J. (2000). The configuration of meaning: Learner centered art education revisited. Studies in Art Education, 41(4), 330-345.
15. Chanda, J., & Daniel, V. (2000). Recognizing works of art: The essences of contextual understanding. Art Education, 53(2), 6-11.
16. Charbonneau, M., & Reider, B. (1995). The integrated elementary classroom: A developmental model of education for the 21st century. London: Allyn & Bacon.
17. Charlesworth, R. (1997). Mathematics and the developmentally appropriate integrated curriculum. C. Hart, D. Burts, & R. Charlesworth (Eds.), Integrated curriculum and developmentally appropriate practice (pp. 51-74). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
18. Clincy, E. (1997). Transforming public education: A new course for America's future. New York: Teachers College Press.
19. Colbert, C. (1997). Visual arts in the developmentally appropriate integrated curriculum. In C. Hart, D. Burts, & R. Charlesworth (Eds.), Integrated curriculum and developmentally appropriate practice. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
20. Colbert, C., & Taunton, M. (1992). Developmentally appropriate practices for the visual arts education of young children. Reston, VA: The National Art Education Association.
21. The Consortium of National Arts Education Associations. (2002). Authentic connections: Interdisciplinary work in the arts. Reston, VA: The National Art Education Association.
22. Cremin, L. (1961). The transformation of the school: Progressivism in American education, 1876-1957. New York: Knopf.
23. Daniel, V. (2001). Art education as a community act: Teaching and learning through the community. In Proceedings of the International Symposium in Art Education (pp. 49-71). National Taipei University, Taiwan.
24. Danto, A. (1981). The transfiguration of the commonplace. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25. Davis, J., & Gardner, H. (1992). The cognitive revolution: Consequences for the understanding and education of the child as artist. In B. Reimer & R. Smith (Eds.), The arts, education, and aesthetic knowing (pp. 92-123). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26. Dewey, J. (1990). The school and society; and the child and curriculum. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. (originally published in 1902)
27. Dickie, G. (1984). The art circle: A theory of art. New York: Haven Press.
28. Dublin Arts Council. (2002). Dublin's museum without walls. Dublin, OH: Dublin Arts Council.
29. Duncum, P. (2001). Visual culture: Development, definitions, and directions for art education. Studies in Art Education, 42(2), 101-112.
30. Efland, A. (2000). The city as metaphor for integrated learning through the arts. Studies in Art Education, 41(3), 276-295.
31. Efland, A. (2002a). Art and cognition: Integrating the visual arts in the curriculum. New York: Teachers College Press.
32. Efland, A. (2002b). Emerging visions of art education. NAEA conference, Miami Florida.
33. Eisner, E. (2001). Should we create new aims for art education? Art Education, 54(5), 6-10.
34. Eisner, E. (1986). The role of discipline-based art education in America's schools. Los Angeles, CA: Getty Center for Education in the Arts.
35. Freedman, K. (1994). Interpreting gender and visual culture in art classrooms. Studies in Art Education, 35(3), 156-168.
36. Freedman, K. (2000). Social perspectives on art education in the US: Teaching visual culture in a democracy. Studies in Art Education, 41(4), 314-327.
37. Freedman, K., & Stuhr, P. (2001). Visual culture: Broadening the domain of art education. Council for Policy Studies in Art Education meeting, unpublished.
38. Gablik, S. (1991). The reenchantment of art. New York: Thames and Hudson.
39. Gardner, H. (1990). Art education and human development. Los Angeles: J. Paul Getty Trust.
40. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
41. Goodman, N. (1978). The languages of art (2nd ed.). Indianapolis: Hackett.
42. Guilfoil, J. (2000). From the ground up: Art in American built environment education. Art Education, 53(4), 6-12.
43. Habermas, J. (1981). The theory of communicative action. Thomas McCarthy (Trans.). Boston: Beacon Press.
44. Harris, J. (2001). The new art history: A critical introduction. London: Routledge
45. Hart, C., Burts, D., & Charlesworth, R. (Eds.). (1997). Integrated curriculum and developmentally appropriate practice. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
46. Huang, H. (1999). Educational reform in Taiwan. International Journal of Educational Reform, 8(2), 145-153.
47. Jacobs, H. (1989). Interdisciplinary curriculum: Design and implementation. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
48. Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
49. Katz, L. (1998). What can we learn from Reggio Emilia? In C. Edwards, L. Gandini & G. Forman (Eds.), The hundred languages of children: The Reggio Emilia approach (pp. 27-45). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
50. Kilpatrick, W. (1936). Remaking the curriculum. Chicago, Newson.
51. Kliebard, H. (1995). The struggle for the American curriculum, 1893-1958 (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
52. Krug, D. (1997). Art and ecology: Interdisciplinary approaches to the curriculum. Santa Monica, CA: Getty Center for the Arts in Education. http:/www.getty.edu/artsednet/resources/ecology/curriculum/inter.html
53. Krug, D., & Cohen-Evron, N. (2000). Curriculum integration: Positions and practices in art education. Studies in Art Education, 41(3), 258-275.
54. Lacy, S. (Ed.). (1995). Mapping the terrain: New genre public art. Seattle: Bay Press.
55. Lowenfeld, V., & Brittain, W. (1982). Creative and mental growth (8th ed.). New York: Macmillan. (1st ed. by Lowenfeld, V. in 1947)
56. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
57. Marche, T. (1998). Looking outward, looking in: Community in art education. Art Education, 51(3), 6-13.
58. Middle Level Curriculum Project. (1993). Middle level curriculum: In search of self and social meaning. In T. Dickinson (Ed.), Readings in middle school curriculum: A continuing conversation. Columbus, OH: The National Middle School Association.
59. Mitchell, W. (1994). Picture theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
60. NAEA (2002). Art education and visual culture. NAEA advisory. Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
61. The National Arts Education Consortium. (2002). Final project report. Transforming education through the arts challenge. Columbus, OH: The Department of Art Education, The Ohio Sate University.
62. The Ohio State University TETAC Mentors. (2002). Integrated curriculum: Possibilities for the arts. Art Education, 55(3), 12-22.
63. Parsons, M. (1998). Integrated curriculum and our paradigm of cognition in the arts. Studies in Art Education, 39(2).
64. Parsons, M. (2002). Aesthetic experience and the construction of meanings. The Journal of Aesthetic Education, 36(2), 24-37.
65. Pitri, E. (2002). Project learning: Exploration, discussion, and discovery. Art Education, 55(5), 18-24.
66. Rabitti, G. (1994). An integrated art approach in a preschool. In L. Katz & B. Cesarone (Eds.), Reflections on the Reggio Emilia approach (pp. 51-68). Urbana, Ill: ERIC Clearing House on Elementary Education.
67. Ranklin, B. (1998). Curriculum development in Reggio Emilia: A long-term curriculum about dinosaurs. In C. Edwards, L. Gandini & G. Forman (Eds.), The hundred languages of children: The Reggio Emilia approach (pp. 215-237). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
68. Raven, A. (Ed.). (1993). Art in the public interest. New York: Da Capo Press.
69. Russell, F., & Russell, R (2001). Art in the market: A program integrating service learning with asset-based community development in Cincinnati. Paper presented at the 27th annual meeting of Social Theory, Politics and the Arts. St. Louis, MO.
70. Shandler, S. (1999). Ophelia speaks: Adolescent girls write about their search for self. New York: Harper
71. Smith, R. (1995). Excellence II: The continuing quest in art education. Reston, VA: The National Art Education Association.
72. Smith, R. (1995). The continuing quest in art education. Reston, VA: The National Art Education Association.
73. Spaid, S. (2002). Ecovention: Current art to transform ecologies. Cincinnati: The Contemporary Art Center.
74. Spaggiari, S. (1987). The hundred languages of children. Reggio Emilia, Italy: Department of Education.
75. Spiro, R., Coulson, R., Feltovich, P., & Anderson, D. (1988). Cognitive flexibility theory: Advanced knowledge acquisition is ill-structured domains. (Tech. Rep. No. 441) University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Center for the Study of Reading.
76. Stuhr, P. (1994). Social reconstructionist multicultural art curriculum design: Using the Powwow as an example. In R. Neperud (Ed.), Context, content, and community in art education (pp. 193-221). New York: Teachers College Press.
77. Taylor, P. (2002). Service learning as postmodern art and pedagogy. Studies in Art Education, 43(2), 124-140.
78. Taylor, P. (2000). Madonna and hypertext: Liberatory learning in art education. Studies in Art Education, 41(4), 376-389.
79. Thurber, F. (1997). A site to behold: Creating curricula about local urban environmental art. Art Education, 50(6).
80. Ulbricht, J. (1998). Interdisciplinary art education reconsidered. Art Education, 51(4), 13-17.
81. U.S. Bureau of Education. (1918). Cardinal principles of secondary education: A report of the commission on the reorganization of secondary education (U.S. Bureau of Education, Bulletin, 1918, no. 35). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
82. Varela, F., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
83. Wagner-Ott, A. (2002). Analysis of gender identity through doll and action figure politics in art education. Studies in Art Education, 43(3), 246-263.
84. Walker, S. (2001). Teaching meaning in artmaking. Worcester, MA: Davis.
85. Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (1998). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
86. Wiseman, V. (1999). Unpublished paper, Cleveland City Schools.