Integrated Curriculum: Possibilities for the Arts

Art Education

Volumn 55, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 12-24

[No Author Info available]

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85044956957     PISSN: 00043125     EISSN: 23255161     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00043125.2002.11651490     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Burns, R.C., (1995). Dissolving the boundaries: Planning for curriculum integration in middle and secondary schools. Charleston, WV: Appalachia Educational Laboratory
2. Cahan, S., & Kocur, S., (1996). Contemporary art and visual culture and multicultural education. New York: The Museum of Contemporary Art and Visual Culture.
3. Evans, R., (1996) The human side of school change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
4. Freedman, K., & Stuhr, P.L., (2001). Visual culture: Broadening the domain of art education, (Unpublished paper for Council for Policy Studies in Art Education).
5. Jacobs, H., (1989). Interdisciplinary curriculum: Design and implementation. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
6. Krug, D., (1997). Art and ecology:Interdisciplinary approaches to the curriculum. Santa Monica, CA: J. P. Getty Foundation, The Getty Center for the Arts in Education. http://www.getty.edu/artsednet/resources/Ecology/Curric/inter.html
7. Krug, D., & Cohen-Evron, N., (2000). Curriculum integration: Positions and practices in art education. Studies in Art Education, 41(3), 258–275.
8. Rogers, B., (1997). Informing the shape of the curriculum: New views of knowledge and its representation in schooling. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 26 (6), 686.
9. The Ohio State TETAC Curriculum Guidelines (2001). The Ohio State TETAC Assessment Guidelines (2001). Unpublished Document.