When linguistic and cultural differences are not disclosed in court interpreting

Multilingua

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 379-401

  Lee, Jieun ^a  

^a MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Court interpreter; Cross cultural communication; Crosslinguistic communication; Roles

Indexed keywords

EID: 77950119648     PISSN: 01678507     EISSN: 16133684     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/mult.2009.017     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Astiz, Carlos A. (1986). They don't speak the language: Achieving quality control of translation in criminal courts. The Judges' Journal 25(20). 32-35
2. Australian Institute of Interpreters and Translators (2000). Code of ethics for interpreters & translators. Sydney: AUSIT
3. Barsky, Robert (1996). The interpreter as intercultural agent in convention refugee hearings. The Translator 2(10), 45-63
4. Berk-Seligson, Susan (1988). The impact of politeness in witness testimony: The influence of the court interpreter. Multilingua 7(4) 411-439
5. nd edition
6. Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
7. Brunette, Louise, Georges Bastin, Isabelle Hemlin & Heather Clarke (eds.) (2003). Critical link 3: Interpreters in the community. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins
8. Carter, Ronald & Michael McCarthy (2006). Cambridge grammar of English: A comprehensive guide to spoken and written English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
9. Chang, Kyung-Hee (1980). Chisie 'i, ku, ce'uy uymipwunsek ['Semantic analysis of Korean deictic terms "I, gu, ce"']. Language Research 16(2). 167-184
10. Commonwealth Attorney General's Department (1991). Access to interpreters in the Australian legal system. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service
11. Comrie, Bernard (ed.) (1985). The world's major languages. London/Sydney: Croom Helm
12. Dimitrova, Birgitta E. (2000). Expertise and explicitation in the translation process. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins
13. Edwards, Alicia Betsy (1995). Introduction to court interpreting. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins
14. Elwork, Amiram, Bruce D. Sales & David Suggs (1981). The trial: A research review. In Bruce D. Sales (ed.), The trial process, 1-68. New York: Plenum Press
15. Gentile, Adolfo, Uldis Ozolins & Mary Vasilakakos (1996). Liaison interpreting: A handbook. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press
16. Gonzalez, Roseann D., Victoria F. Vasquez & Holly Mikkelson (1991). Fundamentals of court interpretations: Theory, policy and practice, Durham: Carolina Academic Press
17. Hale, Sandra (1997a). Clash of world perspectives: the discursive practices of the law, the witness and the interpreter. Forensic Linguistics 4(2). 197-209
18. Hale, Sandra (1997b). The treatment of register in court interpreting. The Translator 3(1) 39-54
19. Hale, Sandra (2002). How faithfully do court interpreters render the style of non-English speaking witnesses' testimonies?: A data-based study of Spanish-English bilingual proceedings. Discourse Studies 4(1). 25-47
20. Hale, Sandra (2004). The discourse of court interpreting. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins
21. Hale, Sandra (2007). Community interpreting. Basingstoke: Palgrave
22. Hale, Sandra (2008a). Controversies over the role of the court interpreter. In Carmen Valero-Garcés & Anne Martin (eds.), Crossing borders in community interpreting, 99-121. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins
23. Hatim, Basil & Ian Mason (1997). The translator as communicator. London/New York: Routledge
24. Hijirida, Kyoko & Ho-Min Sohn (1986). Cross-cultural patterns of honorifics and sociolinguistics sensitivity to honorific variables: Evidence for English, Japanese, and Korean. Papers in Linguistics 19. 365-401
25. Hoji, Hajime (ed.) (1990). Japanese/Korean linguistics. Stanford: The Centre for the Study of Language and Information
26. Hutchby, Ian & Robin Wooffitt (1998). Conversation analysis. Cambridge: Polity
27. Jansen, Peter (1995). The role of the interpreter in Dutch courtroom interaction: The impact of the situation on translational norms. In Jorma Tommola (ed.), Topics in interpreting research, 11-36. Turku: University of Turku, Centre for Translation and Interpreting
28. Jacobsen, Bente (2003). Pragmatics in court interpreting. In Louise Brunette, Georges Bastin, Isabelle Hemlin & Heather Clarke (eds.), Critical link 3: Interpreters in the community, 223-238. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins
29. Kelly, Arlene M. (2000). Cultural parameters for interpreters in the courtroom. In Roda P. Roberts, Silvana E. Carr, Diana Abraham & Aideen Dufour (eds.), Critical link 2: Interpreters in the community, 131-152. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins
30. Kim, Nam-Ki (1985). Korean. In Bernard Comrie (ed.), The world's major languages, 881-898. London/Sydney: Croom Helm
31. Laster, Kathy & Veronica Taylor (1994). Interpreters and the legal system. Melbourne: Federation Press
32. Lee, Ik-Seop & Hong-Bin Yim (1983). Kwuke mwunpeplon ['A study of Korean grammar']. Seoul: Hakyeonsa
33. Lee, Ik-Seop & Wan Chae (1999). Kwukemwunpeplon kanguy ['Korean Grammar']. Seoul: Hakyeonsa
34. th ISFC Congress Conference Proceedings, Sydney, Australia, 253-256
35. Lee, Jieun (2009a). Conflicting views on court interpreting examined through surveys of legal professionals and court interpreters. Interpreting 11(1). 35-56
36. Lee, Jieun (2009b). Interpreting inexplicit language during courtroom examination. Applied Linguistics 30(1). 93-114
37. Lee, Kwan-Kyu (2005). Kwuke kyoyukul wihan kwuke mwunpeplon ['Theory on Korean grammar for Korean education']. Seoul: Jipmoondang
38. Lugris, A. A. & A. F. Ocampo (eds.) (1999). Anovar/Anosar: Estudios de Traducción e Interpretación. Ocampo, Vigo: Universidade de Vigo
39. Marzocchi, Carlo (n.d.). On norms and ethics in the discourse on interpreting. http://www.openstarts. units.it/dspace/bitstream/10077/2474/1/07. pdf (accessed on 11 February 2008)
40. Ian Mason (ed.) (2001). Triadic exchanges: Studies in dialogue interpreting. Manchester: St. Jerome
41. Mason, Ian & Miranda Stewart (2001). Interactional pragmatics, face and the dialogue interpreter. In Ian Mason (ed.), Triadic exchanges: Studies in dialogue interpreting, 51-70. Manchester: St. Jerome
42. Matoesian, Gregory M. (1993). Reproducing rape: Domination through talk in courtroom. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press
43. Mikkelson, Holly (1998). Towards a redefinition of the role of the court interpreter. Interpreting 3(1). 21-45
44. Mikkelson, Holly (2000). Introduction to court interpreting. Manchester: St Jerome
45. Mikkelson, Holly (2008). Evolving views of the court interpreter's role: Between Scylla and Charybdis. In Carmen Valero-Garcés & Anne Martin (eds.), Crossing borders in community interpreting, 81-97. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins
46. Mikkelson, Holly (n.d.). Verbatim interpretation: an oxymoron. http://www.acebo. com/papers/VERBATIM. HTM (accessed on 17 November 2007)
47. Moeketsi, Rosemary (1999). Discourse in a multilingual and multicultural courtroom: A court interpreter's guide. Pretoria: J. L. van Schaik
48. Morris, Marshall (ed.) (1995). Translation and the law. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins
49. Morris, Ruth (1993). The interlingual interpreter - cypher or intelligent participant? International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 6(18). 271-291
50. Morris, Ruth (1995). Moral dilemmas of court interpreting. The Translator 1(2). 25-46
51. Niska, Helge (1995). Just interpreting: Role conflicts and discourse types in court interpreting. In Marshall Morris (ed.), Translation and the law, 293-316. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins
52. Park, Mae-Ran (1990). Conflict avoidance in social interaction: A sociolinguistic comparison of the Korean and Japanese honorific systems. In Hajime Hoji (ed.), Japanese/Korean linguistics, 111-127. Stanford: The Center for the Study of Language and Information
53. Park, Sun-Hee (2007). Incorrect oral usage of ku by English (L1) learners of Korean (L2): Evidence of overprojection of semantic functions from the L1 form 'the'. Hwapep Yeonkwu (Korea Speech Research) II. 237-260
54. Roberts, Roda P., Silvana E. Carr, Diana Abraham & Aideen Dufour (eds.) (2000). Critical link 2: Interpreters in the community. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins
55. Sales, Bruce D. (ed.) (1981). The trial process. New York: Plenum Press
56. Shlesinger, M. (1999). Norms, strategies and constraints: how do we tell them apart? In A. A. Lugris & A. F. Ocampo (eds.), Anovar/Anosar: Estudios de Traducción e Interpretación, 65-77. Ocampo, Vigo: Universidade de Vigo
57. Sohn, Ho-Min (1993). Korean. London/New York: Longman
58. Tommola, Jorma (ed.) (1995). Topics in interpreting research. Turku: University of Turku, Centre for Translation and Interpreting
59. Valero-Garcés, Carmen & Anne Martin (eds.) (2008). Crossing borders in community interpreting. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins