Towards a redefinition of the role of the court interpreter

Interpreting

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 21-45

  Mikkelson, Holly ^a  

^a MONTEREY INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84989402094     PISSN: 13846647     EISSN: 1569982X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/intp.3.1.02mik     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Administrative Office of the United States Courts. (1990, September). Federal court interpreters manual: Policies and procedures. Washington, D.C.: Author.
2. Arizona v. Natividad, 111 Ariz. 191, 526 P.2d 730 (1974).
3. Australian Institute for Interpreters and Translators (AUSIT) (1996). Code of ethics for interpreters & translators. Sydney: Author.
4. Bayley, C. J. (1973). Manual del traductor público, castellano-inglés. Buenos Aires: Author.
5. Berk-Seligson, S. (1990). The bilingual courtroom: Court interpreters in the judicial process. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
6. California Constitution, Article I, Section 14. (1974).
7. California Evidence Code, Chapter 4, Section 751. (1984).
8. California Rules of Court, Standards of Judicial Administration, Section 18.1, Interpreted Proceedings: Instructing Participants on Procedure; Section 18.3, Standards of Professional Conduct for Court Interpreters. (1979).
9. Colín Sánchez, G. (1992). Derecho mexicano de procedimientos penales. Mexico City: Editorial Porrúa, S.A.
10. Cooke, M. (1995). Understood by all concerned? Anglo/Aboriginal legal translation. In Morris, M. (Ed.), Translation and the law. American Translators Association Scholarly Monograph Series, Volume VIII (pp. 37-63). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
11. Corsellis, A. (1995). Non-English speakers and the English legal system: A handbook to good practice for those working in the legal system across language and culture. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Institute of Criminology.
12. Dunnigan, T. & Downing, B.T. (1995). Legal interpreting on trial: A case study. In Morris, M. (Ed.), Translation and the law. American Translators Association Scholarly Monograph Series, Volume VIII (pp. 93-113). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
13. Dusky v. United States, 271 F.2d 385 (8th Cir.), reversed (per curiam), 362 U.S. 402 (1960).
14. Edwards, A.B. (1995). The practice of court interpreting. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
15. Falck, S. (1987). Rett tolk? En unders0kelse av tolker, sprâk, rettssikkerhetsproblemer og rollekonflikter inninen politi og domstroler. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
16. Friendly, H.J. (1975). Some kind of hearing. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 123. 1267-1317.
17. González, R.D., Vásquez, V.F., & Mikkelson, H. (1991). Fundamentals of court interpretation: Theory, policy and practice. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
18. Hewitt, W. E. (1995). Court interpretation: Model guides for policy and practice in the state courts. Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts.
19. In re Norberg, 4 Mass. 81 (1808).
20. Judicial Council of California, Administrative Office of the Courts, (no year). Professional ethics and the role of the court interpreter. San Francisco, CA: Author.
21. Kasanji, L. (1995). Let's talk: Guidelines for government agencies hiring interpreters. Wellington, NZ: Ethnic Affairs Service.
22. Merryman, J.H. & Clark, D.S. (1978). Comparative law: Western European and Latin American legal systems. Indianapolis, New York: Bobbs-Merrill.
23. Morris, R. (1995a). “The moral dilemmas of court interpreting.” The Translator, 7(1), 2546.
24. Morris, R. (1995b). Pragmatism, precept and passions: The attitudes of English-language legal systems to non-English speakers. In Morris, M. (Ed.), Translation and the law. American Translators Association Scholarly Monograph Series, Volume VIII (pp. 263-279). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
25. Niska, H. (1995). Just interpreting: Role conflicts and discourse types in court interpreting. In Morris, M. (Ed.), Translation and the law. American Translators Association Scholarly Monograph Series, Volume VIII (pp. 293-316). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
26. Northwest Territories Justice (1993). Manuel des interprètes judiciaires des territoires du nord-ouest. Yellowknife, Northwest Territories: Author.
27. Obenaus, G. (1994). “The legal translator as information broker.” In Morris, M. (Ed.)
28. Translation and the law. American Translators Association Scholarly Monograph Series, Volume VIII (pp. 247-259). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
29. People v. Aguilar, 35 Cal. 3d 785, 200 Cal. Rptr. 908 (1984).
30. People v. DeLarco, 142 Cal. App. 3d 294, 190 Cal. Rptr. 757 (1983).
31. People v. Menchaca, 146 Cal. App. 3d 1029, 1025, 194 Cal. Rptr. 691 (1983).
32. People v. Rioz, 161 Cal. App. 3d 905, 207 Cal. Rptr. 903 (Cal. App. 3d Dist. 5, 1984). People v. Shaw, 35 Cal. 3d 535, 542, 198 Cal. Rptr. 788 (1984).
33. Pointer v. Texas, 380 U.S. 400 (1965).
34. Robinson, D. (1991). The translator’s turn. Baltimore and London: John Hopkins University Press.
35. State v. New Chue Her, Minnesota Court of Appeals Decision, 12/27/93.
36. Supreme Court of the State of Oregon. (1995). Order No. 95-042, Establishing Code of Professional Responsibility for Interpreters in Oregon Courts. Salem.
37. Terry v. State, 105 So. 386 (Ala. 1925).
38. Torres v. U.S., 505 F. 2d 957 (1974).
39. United States ex rel. Negron v. New York, 434 F.2d 386 (2d Cir. 1970).
40. United States v. Carrion, 488 F.2d 12 (1st Cir. 1973), cert, denied, 416 U.S. 907 (1974).