Dark lumen magnetic resonance colonography: Comparison with conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal pathology

Gut

Volumn 52, Issue 12, 2003, Pages 1738-1743

  Ajaj, W ^a   Pelster, G ^a   Treichel, U ^a   Vogt, F M ^a   Debatin, J F ^a   Ruehm, S G ^a   Lauenstein, T C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ESSEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GADOBENATE DIMEGLUMINE; GADOBENIC ACID;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL DISEASE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAGNETIC RESONANCE COLONOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COHORT STUDIES; COLONIC DISEASES; COLONOSCOPY; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RECTAL DISEASES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0344005436     PISSN: 00175749     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/gut.52.12.1738     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Andrew J, Aldridge, Jay NL, et al. Histological assessment of colorectal adenomas by size, are polyps less than 10 mm in size clinically important? Eur J Surg 2001;167:777-81.
2. Angtuaco TL, Banaad-Omiotek GD, Howden CW. Differing attitudes toward virtual and conventional colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening: surveys among primary care physicians and potential patients. Am J Gastroenterol 2001;96:887-93.
3. Thomeer M, Bielen D, Vanbeckevoort D, et al. Patient acceptance for CT colonography: what is the real issue? Eur Radiol 2002;12:1410-15.
4. Dachman AH, Kuniyoshi JK, Boyle CM, et al. CT colonography with three-dimensional problem solving for detection of colonic polyps. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;171:989-95.
5. Luboldt W, Steiner P, Bauerfeind P, et al. Detection of mass lesions with MR colonography: preliminary report. Radiology 1998;207:59-65.
6. Brant-Zawadzki MN. Screening CT: rationale. Radiographics 2002;22:1532-6.
7. Yee J. CT screening for colorectal cancer. Radiographics 2002;22:1525-31.
8. Luboldt W, Bauerfeind P, Steiner P, et al. Preliminary assessment of three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging for various colonic disorders. Lancet 1997;349:1288-91.
9. Luboldt W, Frohlich JM, Schneider N, et al. MR colonography: optimized enema composition. Radiology 1999;212:265-9.
10. Saar B, Heverhagen JT, Obst T, et al. Magnetic resonance colonography and virtual magnetic resonance colonoscopy with the 1.0-T system: a feasibility study. Invest Radiol 2000;35:521-6.
11. Pappalardo G, Polettini E, Frattaroli FM, et al. Magnetic resonance colonography versus conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colonic endoluminal lesions. Gastroenterology 2000;119:300-4.
12. Lauenstein TC, Herborn CU, Vogt FM, et al. Dark lumen MR-colonography: initial experience. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 2001;173:785-9.
13. Wildermuth S, Debatin JF. Virtual endoscopy in abdominal MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 1999;7:349-64.
14. 2 enema. Radiology 2001;219:558-62.
15. Luboldt W, Bauerfeind P, Wildermuth S, et al. Colonic masses: detection with MR colonography. Radiology 2000;216:383-8.
16. Luboldt W, Bauerfeind P, Wildermuth S, et al. Contrast optimization for assessment of the colonic wall and lumen in MR colonography. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;9:745-50.
17. Hansmann HJ, Kosa R, Dux M, et al. The hydro-MRT of chronic inflammatory bowel diseases. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 1997;167:132-8.
18. Gourtsoyiannis N, Papanikoloou N, Grammatikakis J, et al. MR enteroclysis protocol optimization: comparison between 3D FLASH with fat saturation after intravenous gadolinium injection and true FISP sequences. Eur Radiol 2001;11:908-13.
19. Gourtsoyiannis N, Papanikolaou N, Grammatikakis J, et al. MR imaging of the small bowel with a true-FISP sequence after enteroclysis with water solution. Invest Radiol 2000;35:707-11.
20. Morrin MM, Hochmann MG, Farrell RJ, et al. MR colonography using colonic distension with air as the contrast material: work in progress. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;176:144-6.
21. Aschoff AJ, Zeitler H, Merkle EM, et al. MR enteroclysis for nuclear spin tomographic diagnosis of inflammatory bowel diseases with contrast enhancement. Rofo Fortshr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 1997;167:387-91.
22. Rieber A, Wruk D, Nussle K, et al. MRI of the abdomen combined with enteroclysis in Crohn disease using oral and intravenous Gd-DTPA. Radiologie 1998;38:23-8.
23. Walsh JM, Terdiman JP. Colorectal cancer screening: clinical applications. JAMA 2003;289:1297-302.
24. Walsh JM, Terdiman JP. Colorectal cancer screening: scientific review. JAMA 2003;289:1288-96.
25. Villavicencio RT, Rex DK. Colonic adenomas: prevalence and incidence rates, growth rates, and miss rates at colonoscopy. Semin Gastrointest Dis 2000;11:185-93.
26. Beaulieu CF, Napel S, Daniel BL, et al. Detection of colonic polyps in a phantom model: implications for virtual colonoscopy data acquisition. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1998;22:656-63.