Colonography: Current status, research directions and challenges. Update 2002

European Radiology

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 502-524

  Luboldt, W ^a   Fletcher, Joel G ^b   Vogl, Thomas J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL FRANKFURT   (Germany)

^b MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Colon; Colonography; Colorectal cancer; CT MRI; Polyp; Screening; Virtual colonoscopy

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; FERRISELTZ; FERUMOXSIL; GADOLINIUM; SCOPOLAMINE BUTYL BROMIDE; SUPERPARAMAGNETIC IRON OXIDE;

ALGORITHM; CANCER RISK; CANCER SCREENING; COLON POLYP; COLON RADIOGRAPHY; COLORECTAL CANCER; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTESTINE RADIOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATIENT POSITIONING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION DOSE; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; COLORECTAL TUMOR; IMAGE PROCESSING; LAVAGE; MASS SCREENING; METHODOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY;

ALGORITHMS; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IRRIGATION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MASS SCREENING;

EID: 0036511123     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s003300101116     Document Type: Review

References (76)

1. Hara AK, Johnson CD, Reed JE et al. (1996) Detection of colorectal polyps by computed tomographic colography: feasibility of a novel technique. Gastroenterology 110:284-290
2. Luboldt W, Bauerfeind P, Steiner P, Fried M, Krestin GP, Debatin JF (1997) Preliminary assessment of three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging for various colonic disorders. Lancet 349:1288-1291
3. Fenlon HM, Ferrucci JT (1999) First International Symposium on Virtual Colonoscopy. Am J Roentgenol 173:565-569
4. Johnson CD, Dachman AH (2000) CT colonography: the next colon screening examination? Radiology 216:331-341
5. Ries LAG, Eisner MP, Kosary CL (2000) SEER cancer statistics review, 1973-1997. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland http://seer.cancer.gov/Publications/CSR1973_1997/colorect.pdf
6. Greenlee RT, Murray T, Bolden S, Wingo PA (2000) Cancer statistics, 2000. CA Cancer J Clin 50:7-33
7. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN et al (1993) Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 329:1977-1981
8. Ahlquist D, Wieand H, Moertel C et al. (1993) Accuracy of fecal occult blood screening for colorectal neoplasia. J Am Med Assoc 269:1262-1267
9. Simon JB (1998) Should all people over the age of 50 have regular fecal occult-blood tests? Postpone population screening until problems are solved. N Engl J Med 338:1151-1152
10. Winawer SJ, Fletcher RH, Miller L et al. (1997) Colorectal cancer screening: clinical guidelines and rationale. Gastroenterology 112:594-642
11. Morrin MM, Kruskal JB, Farrell RJ, Goldberg SN, McGee JB, Raptopoulos V (1999) Endoluminal CT colonography after an incomplete endoscopic colonoscopy. Am J Roentgenol 172:913-918
12. Fenlon HM, McAneny DB, Nunes DP, Clarke PD, Ferrucci JT (1999) Occlusive colon carcinoma: virtual colonoscopy in the preoperative evaluation of the proximal colon. Radiology 210:423-428
13. Macari M, Berman P, Dicker M, Milano A, Megibow AJ (1999) Usefulness of CT colonography in patients with incomplete colonoscopy. Am J Roentgenol 173:561-564
14. Arenas RB, Fichera A, Mhoon D, Michelassi F (1997) Incidence and therapeutic implications of synchronous colonic pathology in colorectal adenocarcinoma. Surgery 122:706-709
15. Harvey C, Amin Z, Hare C et al. (1998) Helical CT pneumocolon to assess colonic tumors: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Am J Roentgenol 170:1439-1443
16. Macari M, Lavelle M, Pedrosa I et al. (2001) Effect of different bowel preparations on residual fluid at CT colonography. Radiology 218:274-277
17. Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, Welch TJ et al. (2000) Optimization of CT colonography technique: prospective trial in 180 patients. Radiology 216:704-711
18. Callstrom M, Johnson C, Fletcher J et al. (2001) CT colonography without cathartic preparation: feasibility study. Radiology 219:693-698
19. Lefere P, Gryspeerdt B, Van Holsbeeck B, Baekelandt M (2000) Virtual CT colonoscopy after colonic cleansing with tagging of fecal residues: a study of the patient feasibility. Second International Symposium on Virtual Colonoscopy, 16-17 October 2000, Boston
20. Zalis ME, Hahn PF (2001) Digital subtraction bowel cleansing in CT colonography. Am J Roentgenol 176:646-648
21. Weishaupt D, Patak MA, Froehlich J, Ruehm SG, Debatin JF (1999) Fecal tagging to avoid colonic cleansing before MRI colonography. Lancet 354:835-836
22. Yee J, Hung RK, Akerkar GA, Wall SD (1999) The usefulness of glucagon hydrochloride for colonic distention in CT colonography. Am J Roentgenol 173:169-172
23. Lappas J, Maglinte D, Chernich S, Hage J, Kelvin F (1995) Discomfort during double-contrast barium enema examination: a placebo-controlled double-blind evaluation of the effect of glucagon and diazepam. Radiology 197:95-99
24. Luboldt W, Frohlich JM, Schneider N, Weishaupt D, Landolt F, Debatin JF (1999) MR colonography: optimized enema composition. Radiology 212:265-269
25. Luboldt W, Bauerfeind P, Wildermuth S, Debatin JF (1999) Contrast optimization for assessment of the colonic wall and lumen in MR colonography. J Magn Reson Imaging 9:745-750
26. Luboldt W, Kienzler D, Seemann M et al. (2000) Synergistic effect between iron and gadolinium in MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 12:358-362
27. Morrin MM, Hochman MG, Farrell RJ, Marquesuzaa H, Rosenberg S, Edelman RR (2001) MR colonography using colonic distention with air as the contrast material: work in progress. Am J Roentgenol 176:144-146
28. Fletcher JG, Luboldt (2000) CT colonography and MR colonography: current status, research directions and comparison. Eur Radiol 10:786-801
29. Morrin MM, Farrell RJ, Kruskal JB, Reynolds K, McGee JB, Raptopoulos V (2000) Utility of intravenously administered contrast material at CT colonography. Radiology 217:765-771
30. Luboldt W, Straub J, Seemann M, Helmberger T, Reiser M (1999) Effective contrast use in CT angiography and dual-phase hepatic CT performed with a subsecond scanner. Invest Radiol 34:751-760
31. Luboldt W, Mann C, Tryon C, et al. (2002) Computer-aided diagnosis in contrast enhanced CT colonography: an approach based on contrast. Eur Radiol (in press)
32. 2 enema: pilot study. Radiology 219:558-562
33. Luboldt W, Weber R, Seemann M, Desantis M, Reiser M (1999) Influence of helical CT parameters on spatial resolution in CT angiography performed with a subsecond scanner. Invest Radiol 34:421-426
34. Springer P, Stohr B, Giacomuzzi SM et al. (2000) Virtual computed tomography colonoscopy: artifacts, image quality and radiation dose load in a cadaver study. Eur Radiol 10:183-187
35. Hara AK, Johnson CD, Reed JE et al. (1997) Reducing data size and radiation dose for CT colonography. Am J Roentgenol 168:1181-1184
36. Jung H (1995) Health risks due to radiation exposure. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 162:91-98
37. Habr-Gama A, Waye JD (1989) Complications and hazards of gastrointestinal endoscopy. World J Surg 13:193-201
38. Luboldt W, Steiner P, Bauerfeind P, Pelkonen P, Debatin JF (1998) Detection of mass lesions with MR colonography: preliminary report. Radiology 207:59-65
39. Hopper KD, Iyriboz AT, Wise SW, Neuman JD, Mauger DT, Kasales CJ (2000) Mucosal detail at CT virtual reality: surface versus volume rendering. Radiology 214:517-522
40. Rogalla P, Bender A, Bick U, Huitema A, Terwisscha van Scheltinga J, Hamm B (2000) Tissue transition projection (TTP) of the intestines. Eur Radiol 10:806-810
41. Luboldt W, Luz O, Vonthein R et al. (2001) Three-dimensional double-contrast MR colonography: a display method simulating double-contrast barium enema. Am J Roentgenol 176:930-932
42. Paik DS, Beaulieu CF, Jeffrey RB, Karadi CA, Napel S (2000) Visualization modes for CT colonography using cylindrical and planar map projections. J Comput Assist Tomogr 24:179-188
43. Fletcher J, Johnson C, Reed J, Garry J (2001) Feasibility of planar virtual pathology: a new paradigm in volume-rendered CT colonography. J Comput Assist Tomogr (in press)
44. Dachman AH, Kuniyoshi JK, Boyle CM et al. (1998) CT colonography with three-dimensional problem solving for detection of colonic polyps. Am J Roentgenol 171:989-995
45. Macari M, Milano A, Lavelle M, Berman P, Megibow AJ (2000) Comparison of time-efficient CT colonography with two- and three-dimensional colonic evaluation for detecting colorectal polyps. Am J Roentgenol 174:1543-1549
46. Hara AK, Johnson CD, Reed JE et al. (1997) Detection of colorectal polyps with CT colonography: initial assessment of sensitivity and specificity. Radiology 205:59-65
47. Fenlon HM, Nunes DP, Schroy PC, Barish MA, Clarke PD, Ferrucci JT (1999) A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps. N Engl J Med 341:1496-1503
48. Rex DK, Vining D, Kopecky KK (1999) An initial experience with screening for colon polyps using spiral CT with and without CT colography (virtual colonoscopy). Gastrointest Endosc 50:309-313
49. Miao YM, Amin Z, Healy J et al. (2000) A prospective single centre study comparing computed tomography pneumocolon against colonoscopy in the detection of colorectal neoplasms. Gut 47:832-837
50. Mendelson RM, Foster NM, Edwards JT, Wood CJ, Rosenberg MS, Forbes GM (2000) Virtual colonoscopy compared with conventional colonoscopy: a developing technology. Med J Aust 173:472-475
51. Kay CL, Kulling D, Hawes RH, Young JW, Cotton PB (2000) Virtual endoscopy: comparison with colonoscopy in the detection of space-occupying lesions of the colon. Endoscopy 32:226-232
52. Pescatore P, Glucker T, Delarive J et al. (2000) Diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement of CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy). Gut 47:126-130
53. Spinzi G, Belloni G, Martegani A, Sangiovanni A, Del Favero C, Minoli G (2001) Computed tomographic colonography and conventional colonoscopy for colon diseases: a prospective, blinded study. Am J Gastroenterol 96:394-400
54. Yee J, Akerkar GA, Hung RK, Steinauer-Gebauer AM, Wall SD, McQuaid KR (2001) Colorectal neoplasia: performance characteristics of CT colonography for detection in 300 patients. Radiology 219:685-692
55. Hara AK, Johnson CD, MacCarty RL, Welch TJ, McCollough CH, Harmsen WS (2001) CT colonography: single-versus multi-detector row imaging. Radiology 219:461-465
56. Luboldt W, Bauerfeind P, Wildermuth S, Marincek B, Fried M, Debatin JF (2000) Colonic masses: detection with MR colonography. Radiology 216:383-388
57. Pappalardo G, Polettini E, Frattaroli FM et al. (2000) Magnetic resonance colonography versus conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colonic endoluminal lesions. Gastroenterology 119:300-304
58. Gluecker T, Johnson C, Fletcher J et al. (2001) Understanding errors at CT colonography: a blinded comparison of missed and identified colon lesions. Abdominal Radiology Postgraduate Course 2001, Scottsdale
59. Summers RM, Beaulieu CF, Pusanik LM et al. (2000) Automated polyp detector for CT colonography: feasibility study. Radiology 216:284-290
60. Summers RM, Johnson CD, Pusanik LM, Malley JD, Youssef AM, Reed JE (2001) Automated polyp detector for CT colonography: feasibility assessment in a human population. Radiology 219:51-59
61. Vogelstein B, Fearon ER, Hamilton SR et al. (1988) Genetic alterations during colorectal-tumor development. N Engl J Med 319:525-532
62. Toribara NW, Sleisenger MH (1995) Screening for colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 332:861-867
63. Eide TJ (1991) Natural history of adenomas. World J Surg 15:3-6
64. Nusko G, Mansmann U, Partzsch U et al. (1997) Invasive carcinoma in colorectal adenomas: multivariate analysis of patient and adenoma characteristics. Endoscopy 29:626-631
65. Hofstad B, Vatn MH, Andersen SN et al. (1996) Growth of colorectal polyps: redetection and evaluation of unresected polyps for a period of 3 years. Gut 39:449-456
66. Spencer RJ, Melton LJ III, Ready RL, Ilstrup DM (1984) Treatment of small colorectal polyps: a population-based study of the risk of subsequent carcinoma. Mayo Clin Proc 59:305-310
67. Hara AK, Johnson CD, MacCarty RL, Welch TJ (2000) Incidental extracolonic findings at CT colonography. Radiology 215:353-357
68. Selby JV, Friedman GD, Quesenberry CP Jr, Weiss NS (1992) A case-control study of screening sigmoidoscopy and mortality from colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 326:653-657
69. Newcomb PA, Norfleet RG, Storer BE, Surawicz TS, Marcus PM (1992) Screening sigmoidoscopy and colorectal cancer mortality. J Natl Cancer Inst 84:1572-1575
70. Mandel JS, Bond JH, Church TR et al. (1993) Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study. N Engl J Med 328:1365-1371
71. Hardcastle JD, Chamberlain JO, Robinson MH et al. (1996) Randomised controlled trial of fecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer. Lancet 348:1472-1477
72. Kronborg O, Fenger C, Olsen J, Jorgensen OD, Sondergaard O (1996) Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with fecal-occult-blood test. Lancet 348:1467-1471
73. Pineau B, Sevic M, Mikulaninec C, Vining D (1999) Evaluation of patient preference: virtual colonoscopy versus endoscopy. Gastroenterology 116:G2132
74. Luboldt W, Morrin MM (in press) MR colonography: status and perspective. Abdom Imaging
75. Blakeborough A, Sheridan MB, Chapman AH (1997) Complications of barium enema examinations: a survey of UK consultant radiologists 1992 to 1994. Clin Radiol 52:142-148
76. Ahlquist DA, Skoletsky JE, Boynton KA, et al. (2000) Colorectal cancer screening by detection of altered human DNA in stool: feasibility of a multitarget assay panel. Gastroenterology 119:1219-1227