MR colonography in patients with incomplete conventional colonoscopy

Radiology

Volumn 234, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 452-459

  Ajaj, Waleed ^a   Lauenstein, Thomas C ^a   Pelster, Gregor ^a   Holtmann, Gerald ^a   Ruehm, Stefan G ^a   Debatin, Joerg F ^a   Goehde, Susanne C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ESSEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GADOBENATE DIMEGLUMINE;

ADULT; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; ASCENDING COLON; CECUM; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COLITIS; COLON DILATATION; COLON POLYP; COLON STENOSIS; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DESCENDING COLON; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTESTINE RADIOGRAPHY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE COLONOGRAPHY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECTUM; SIGMOID; TRANSVERSE COLON;

ADULT; COLON; COLONIC DISEASES; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOSCOPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED;

EID: 12344278976     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2342032001     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Aldridge AJ, Simson JN. Histological assessment of colorectal adenomas by size: are polyps less than 10 mm in size clinically important? Eur J Surg 2001; 167: 777-781.
2. Angtuaco TL, Banaad-Omiotek GD, Howden CW. Differing attitudes toward virtual and conventional colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening: surveys among primary care physicians and potential patients. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96:887-893.
3. Marshall JB, Barthel JS. The frequency of total colonoscopy and terminal ileal intubation in the 1990s. Gastrointest Endosc 1993; 39:518-520.
4. Cirocco WC, Rusin LC. Factors that predict incomplete colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 1995; 38:964-968.
5. Brown AL, Skehan SJ, Greaney T, Rawlinson J, Somers S, Stevenson GW. Value of double-contrast barium enema performed immediately after incomplete colonoscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 176:943-945.
6. Chong A, Shah JN, Levine MS, et al. Diagnostic yield of barium enema examination after incomplete colonoscopy. Radiology 2002; 223:620-624.
7. Macari M, Berman P, Dicker M, Milano A, Megibow AJ. Usefulness of CT colonography in patients with incomplete colonoscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 173: 561-564.
8. Morrin MM, Kruskal JB, Farrell RJ, Goldberg SN, McGee JB, Raptopoulos V. Endoluminal CT colonography after an incomplete endoscopic colonoscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 172:913-918.
9. Thoeni RF, Gould RG. Enteroclysis and small bowel series: comparison of radiation dose and examination time. Radiology 1991; 178:659-662.
10. Luboldt W, Steiner P, Bauerfeind P, Pelkonen P, Debatin JF. Detection of mass lesions with MR colonography: preliminary report. Radiology 1998; 207:59-65.
11. Luboldt W, Bauerfeind P, Steiner P, et al. Preliminary assessment of three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging for various colonic disorders. Lancet 1997; 349:1288-1291.
12. Lauenstein TC, Herborn CU, Vogt FM, Goehde SC, Debatin JF, Ruehm SG. Dark lumen MR-colonography: initial experience. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 2001; 173: 785-789.
13. Lauenstein TC, Goehde SC, Ruehm SG, Holtmann G, Debatin JF. MR colonography with barium-based fecal tagging: initial clinical experience. Radiology 2002; 223:248-254.
14. Lauenstein T, Holtmann G, Schoenfelder D, Bosk S, Ruehm SG, Debatin JF. MR colonography without colonic cleansing: a new strategy to improve patient acceptance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 177: 823-827.
15. Ajaj W, Pelster G, Treichel U, et al. Dark lumen magnetic resonance colonography: comparison with conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal pathology. Gut 2003; 52:1738-1743.
16. 2 enema. Radiology 2001; 219:558-562.
17. Morrin MM, Hochmann MG, Farrell RJ, Marqueszuaa H, Rosenberg S, Edelmann RR. MR colonography using colonic distension with air as the contrast material. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 176:144-146.
18. Hagspiel KD, Altes TA, Mugler JP, et al. MR virtual colonography using hyperpolarized (3)He as an endoluminal contrast agent: demonstration of feasibility. Magn Reson Med 2000; 44:813-816.
19. Schrock TR. Colonoscopy versus barium enema in the diagnosis of colorectal cancers and polyps. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 1993; 3:585-610.
20. Atkin WS, Hart A, Edwards R, et al. Uptake, yield of neoplasia, and adverse effects of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening. Gut 1998; 42:560-565.
21. Rex DK, Mark D, Clarke B, Lappas JC, Lehman GA. Colonoscopy evaluations: justification by cost? Am J Gastroenterol 1996; 91:614-615.
22. Dafnis G, Granath F, Pahlman L, Hannuksela H, Ekbom A, Blomqvist P. The impact of endoscopists' experience and learning curves and interendoscopist variation on colonoscopy completion rates. Endoscopy 2001; 33:511-517.
23. Miao YM, Amin Z, Healy J, et al. A prospective single centre study comparing computed tomography pneumocolon against colonoscopy in the detection of colorectal neoplasms. Gut 2000; 47:832-837.
24. Rottgen R, Schroder RJ, Lorenz M, et al. CT-colonography with the 16-slice CT for the diagnostic evaluation of colorectal neoplasms and inflammatory colon diseases. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 2003; 175:1384-1391.
25. Gluecker TM, Johnson CD, Harmsen WS, et al. Colorectal cancer screening with CT colonography, colonoscopy, and double-contrast barium enema examination: prospective assessment of patient perceptions and preferences. Radiology 2003; 227:378-384.
26. Brewster NT, Grieve DC, Saunders JH. Double-contrast barium enema and flexible sigmoidoscopy for routine colonic investigation. Br J Surg 1994; 81: 445-447.
27. Hagenthau P, Wagner HJ, Stinner B, Klose KJ. The value of double contrast colon imaging in inadequate colposcopic diagnosis. Radiologe 1995; 35:356-360.
28. Lappas JC, Maglinte DD, Chernish SM, Hage JP, Kelvin FM. Discomfort during double-contrast barium enema examination: a placebo-controlled double-blind evaluation of the effect of glucagon and diazepam. Radiology 1995; 197:95-99.
29. Eckardt VF, Kanzler G, Willems D. Same-day versus separate-day sigmoidoscopy and double contrast barium enema: a randomized controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc 1989; 35:512-515.
30. Iinuma G, Moriyama N, Miyakawa K, et al. Early invasive colorectal carcinomas with submucosal invasion: radiographic characteristics with barium double contrast images. Abdom Imaging 2003; 28: 492-504.
31. Klabunde CN, Jones E, Brown ML, Davis WW. Colorectal cancer screening with double-contrast barium enema: a national survey of diagnostic radiologists. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 179:1419-1427.
32. Culpan DG, Mitchell AJ, Hughes S, Nutman M, Chapman AH. Double contrast barium enema sensitivity: a comparison of studies by radiographers and radiologists. Clin Radiol 2002; 57:604-607.
33. Kawamoto K, Ueyama T, Iwashita I, et al. Colonic submucosal tumors: comparison of endoscopic US and target air-enema CT with barium enema study and colonoscopy. Radiology 1994; 192:697-702.
34. Taylor SA, Halligan S, Saunders BP, Bassett P, Vance M, Bartram CI. Acceptance by patients of multidetector CT colonography compared with barium enema examinations, flexible sigmoidoscopy, and colonoscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003; 181:913-921.
35. Vos FM, van Gelder RE, Serlie IW, et al. Three-dimensional display modes for CT colonography: conventional 3D virtual colonoscopy versus unfolded cube projection. Radiology 2003; 228:878-885.
36. Fenlon HM, McAneny DB, Nunes DP, Clarke PD, Ferrucci JT. Occlusive colon carcinoma: virtual colonoscopy in the preoperative evaluation of the proximal colon. Radiology 1999; 210:423-428.
37. Vogl TJ, Luboldt W, Herzog Ch, Hammerstingl R. Contrast-enhanced multislice CT in detection and evaluation of abdominal neoplasms. Radiologe 2002; 42: 646-654.
38. Neri E, Giusti P, Battolla L, et al. Colorectal cancer: role of CT colonography in preoperative evaluation after incomplete colonoscopy. Radiology 2002; 223:615-619.
39. Kettritz U, Isaacs K, Warshauer DM, Semelka RC. Crohn's disease: pilot study comparing MRI of the abdomen with clinical evaluation. J Clin Gastroenterol 1995; 21:249-253.
40. Madsen SM, Thomsen HS, Munkholm P, Dorph S, Schlichting P. Active Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis evaluated by low-field magnetic resonance imaging. Scand J Gastroenterol 1998; 33:1193-1200.
41. Schunk K, Kern A, Heussel CP, et al. Assessment of inflammatory activity in Crohn's disease with hydro-MRI. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 2000; 172:153-160.
42. Koh DM, Miao Y, Chinn RJ, et al. MR imaging evaluation of the activity of Crohn's disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 177:1325-1332.
43. Maglinte DD, Gourtsoyiannis N, Rex D, Howard TJ, Kelvin FM. Classification of small bowel Crohn's subtypes based on multimodality imaging. Radiol Clin North Am 2003; 41:285-303.
44. Pauls S, Kratzer W, Rieber A, et al. Quantifying the inflammatory activity in Crohn's disease using CE dynamic MRI. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 2003; 175:1093-1099.