Theory of mind deficits in patients with acquired brain injury: A quantitative review

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 48, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 1181-1191

  Martín Rodríguez, Juan Francisco ^a,b   León Carrión, José ^b,c  

^a Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla   (Spain)

^b Center for Brain Injury Rehabilitation (CRECER)   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SEVILLE   (Spain)

Author keywords

Belief tasks; Faux pas; Frontal lobe; Indirect speech; Right hemisphere; Social cognition

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATABASE; BRAIN INJURY; COGNITIVE DEFECT; DISEASE SEVERITY; EFFECT SIZE; FRONTAL LOBE; HUMAN; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; MEDLINE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; PSYCINFO; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; SOCIAL ASPECT; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; THEORY;

EID: 77949775155     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.02.009     Document Type: Review

References (107)

1. Abu-Akel A. A neurobiological mapping of theory of mind. Brain Research Reviews 2003, 43:29-40.
2. Apperly I.A., Samson D., Carroll N., Hussain S., Humphreys G. Intact first- and second-order false belief reasoning in a patient with severely impaired grammar. Social Neuroscience 2006, 1:334-348.
3. Apperly I.A., Samson D., Chiavarino C., Bickerton W.-L., Humphreys G.W. Testing the domain-specificity of a theory of mind deficit in brain-injured patients: Evidence for consistent performance on non-verbal, " reality-unknown" false belief and false photograph tasks. Cognition 2007, 103:300-321.
4. Apperly I.A., Samson D., Chiavarino C., Humphreys G.W. Frontal and temporo-parietal lobe contributions to theory of mind: Neuropsychological evidence from a false-belief task with reduced language and executive demands. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2004, 16:1773-1784.
5. Apperly I.A., Samson D., Humphreys G.W. Domain-specificity and theory of mind: Evaluating neuropsychological evidence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2005, 9:572-577.
6. Avis J., Harris P. Belief-desire reasoning among Baka children: Evidence for a universal conception of mind. Child Development 1991, 62:460-467.
7. Bara B.G., Tirassa M., Zettin M. Neuropragmatics: Neuropsychological constraints on formal theories of dialogue. Brain and Language 1997, 59:7-49.
8. Baron-Cohen, S. (2000). Theory of mind and autism: A fifteen year review. In S. Baron-Cohen, H. Tager-Flusber, & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Understanding other minds: Perspectives from developmental cognitive neuroscience (2nd ed.) (pp. 3-22). New York: Oxford University Press.
9. Baron-Cohen S., Lesley A.M., Frith U. Does the autistic child have a 'theory of mind'? Cognition 1985, 21:37-46.
10. Baron-Cohen S., O'Riordan M., Stone V., Jones R., Plaisted K. Recognition of faux pas by normally developing children and children with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 1999, 29:407-418.
11. Baron-Cohen S., Ring H., Moriarty J., Shmitz P., Costa D., Ell P. Recognition of mental state terms: a clinical study of autism, and a functional neuroimaging study of normal adults. British Journal of Psychiatry 1994, 165:640-649.
12. Bibby H., McDonald S. Theory of mind after traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychologia 2005, 43:99-114.
13. Bird C.M., Castelli F., Malik O., Frith U., Husain M. The impact of extensive medial frontal lobe damage on 'Theory of Mind' and cognition. Brain 2004, 127:914-928.
14. Blair R.J.R., Cipolitti L. Impaired social response reversal: A case of 'acquired sociopathy'. Brain 2000, 123:1122-1141.
15. Bloom P., German T.P. Two reasons to abandon the false belief task as a test of theory of mind. Cognition 2000, 77:B25-31.
16. Borenstein M., Hedges L., Higgins J., Rothstein H. Comprehensive meta-analysis version 2 2005, Biostat, Englewood, NJ.
17. Borod J.C. Interhemispheric and intrahemispheric control of emotion: A focus on unilateral brain damage. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1992, 60:339-348.
18. Brüne M. Theory of mind and the role of IQ in chronic disorganized schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research 2003, 60:57-64.
19. Channon S., Crawford S. The effects of anterior lesions on performance on a story comprehension test: Left anterior impairment on a theory of mind-type task. Neuropsychologia 2000, 38:1006-1017.
20. Channon S., Pellijeff A., Rule A. Social cognition after head injury: Sarcasm and theory of mind. Brain and Language 2005, 93:123-134.
21. Channon S., Rule A., Maudgil D., Martinos M., Pellijeff A., Frankl J., et al. Interpretation of mentalistic actions and sarcastic remarks: Effects of frontal and posterior lesions on mentalising. Neuropsychologia 2007, 45:1725-1734.
22. Channon S., Watts M. Pragmatic language interpretation after closed head injury: Relation to executive functioning. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry 2003, 8:243-260.
23. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences 1988, New York, Academic Press. 2nd ed.
24. Costa A., Torriero S., Oliveri M., Caltagirone C. Prefrontal and temporo-parietal involvement in taking others' perspective: TMS evidence. Behavioral Neurology 2008, 19:71-74.
25. Decety J., Jackson P.L. The functional architecture of human empathy. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews 2004, 3:71-100.
26. Dennett D. Belief about beliefs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1978, 4:568-570.
27. Dews S., Winner E., Kaplan J., Rosenblatt E., Hunt M., Lim K., et al. Children's understanding of the meaning and functions of verbal irony. Child Development 1996, 67:3071-3085.
28. Fine C., Lumsden J., Blair R.J. Dissociation between 'theory of mind' and executive functions in a patient with early left amygdala damage. Brain 2001, 124:287-298.
29. Fletcher P.C., Happé F., Frith U., Baker S.C., Dolan R.J., Frackowiak R.S., et al. Other minds in the brain: A functional imaging study of 'theory of mind' in story comprehension. Cognition 1995, 57:109-128.
30. Frith U., Frith C.D. Development and neurophysiology of mentalizing. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological Sciences 2003, 358:459-473.
31. Grattan L.M., Ghahramanlou M. The rehabilitation of neurologically based social disturbances. Neuropsychological interventions: Clinical research and practice 2002, 266-293. The Guilford Press, New York. P.J. Eslinger (Ed.).
32. Gregory C., Lough S., Stone V.E., Erzincliouglu S., Martin L., Baron-Cohen S., et al. Theory of mind in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease: Theoretical and practical implications. Brain 2002, 125:752-764.
33. Griffin R., Fiedman O., Ween J., Winner E., Happé F., Brownell H. Theory of mind and the right cerebral hemisphere: Refining the scope of impairment. Laterality 2006, 11:195-225.
34. Happé, F.G. (1994). An advanced test of theory of mind: Understanding of story characters' thoughts and feelings by able autistic, mentally handicapped, and normal children and adults. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24, 129-154.
35. Happé F.G., Brownell H., Winner E. Adquired 'theory of mind' impairments following stroke. Cognition 1999, 70:211-240.
36. Happé F., Mahli G.S., Checkley S. Acquired mind-blindness following frontal lobe surgery. A single case study of impaired " theory of mind" in a patient trated with stereotactic anterior capsulotomy. Neuropsychologia 2001, 39:744-750.
37. Havet-Thomassin V., Allain P., Etcharry-Bouyx F., Le Gall D. What about theory of mind after severe brain injury?. Brain Injury 2006, 20:83-91.
38. Hedges L.V. Distribution theory for Glass's estimator of effect size and related estimators. Journal of Educational Statistics 1981, 6:107-128.
39. Hedges L.V., Olkin I.M. Statistical methods for meta-analysis 1985, Academic Press, New York.
40. Higgins, J. P. T., & Green, S. (2008). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.0. Retrieved February 24, 2008, from The Cochrane Collaboration Web site: http://www.cochrane-handbook.org/.
41. Igliori G.C., Damasceno B.P. Theory of mind and the frontal lobes. Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria 2006, 64:202-206.
42. Kaplan J.A., Brownell H.H., Jacobs J.R., Gardner H. The effects of right hemisphere damage on the pragmatic interpretation of conversational remarks. Brain and Language 1990, 38:315-333.
43. Karmiloff-Smith, A., Klima, E., Bellugi, U., Grant, J., & Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Is there a social module? Language, face processing, and theory of mind in individuals with Williams syndrome. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 196-208.
44. Kobayashi C., Glover G.H., Temple E. Children's and adults' neural bases of verbal and nonverbal 'theory of mind'. Neuropsychologica 2007, 45:1522-1532.
45. Koskinen S. Quality of life 10 years after a very severe traumatic brain injury (TBI): The perspective of the injured and the closest relative. Brain Injury 1998, 12:631-648.
46. Langdon R., Coltheart M. Recognition of metaphor and irony in young adults: The impact of schizotypal personality traits. Psychiatry Research 2004, 125:9-20.
47. Leon-Carrion J. Dementia due to head trauma: An obscure name for a clear neurocognitive syndrome. NeuroRehabilitation 2002, 17:115-122.
48. Leon-Carrion J., Martin-Rodriguez J.F., Damas-Lopez J., Barroso y Martin J.M., Dominguez-Morales M.R. Delta-alpha ratio correlates with level of recovery after neurorehabilitation in patients with acquired brain injury. Clinical Neurophysiology 2009, 120:1039-1045.
49. Leon-Carrion J., Taaffe P.J., Barroso y Martin J.M. Neuropsychological assessment of persons with acquired brain injury. Brain injury treatment: Theories and practices 2006, 275-312. Taylor & Francis, London & New York. J. Leon-Carrion, K.R.H. von Wild, G.A. Zitney (Eds.).
50. Leslie A.M. Pretense and representation: The origins of " theory of mind." Psychological Review 1987, 94:412-426.
51. Levin H.S., Amparo E., Eisenberg H.M., Williams D.H., High W.M., McArdle C.B., et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and computerized tomography in relation to the neurobehavioral sequelae of mild and moderate head injuries. Journal of Neurosurgery 1987, 66:706-713.
52. Lezak M.D. Neuropsychological assessment 1995, Oxford University Press, New York, (Chapter 8). 3rd ed.
53. Lipsey M.W., Wilson D.B. Practical meta-analysis 2001, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, (Chapter 7).
54. Marascuillo L.A., Busk P.L., Serlin R.C. Large sample multivariate procedures for comparing and combining effect sizes within a single study. Journal of Experimental Education 1988, 58:69-85.
55. McDonald S., Flanagan S. Social perception deficits after traumatic brain injury: Interaction between emotion recognition, mentalizing ability, and social communication. Neuropsychology 2004, 18:572-579.
56. Martin I., McDonald S. Evaluating the causes of impaired irony comprehension following traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology 2005, 19:712-730.
57. Martin I., McDonald S. That can't be right-What causes pragmatic language impairment following right hemisphere damage?. Brain impairment 2006, 7:202-211.
58. McDonald S., Pearce S. Clinical insights into pragmatic theory: Frontal lobe deficits and sarcasm. Brain & Language 1996, 53:81-104.
59. Milders M., Fuchs S., Crawford J.R. Neuropsychological impairments and changes in emotional and social behaviour following severe traumatic brain injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 2003, 25:157-172.
60. Milders M., Ietswaart M., Crawford J.R., Currie D. Impairments in theory of mind shortly after traumatic brain injury and at 1-year follow-up. Neuropsychology 2006, 20:400-408.
61. Milders M., Ietswaart M., Crawford J.R., Currie D. Social behavior following traumatic brain injury and its association with emotion recognition, understanding of intentions, and cognitive flexibility. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2008, 14:318-326.
62. Ozonoff S., Miller J.N. An exploration of right-hemisphere contributions to the pragmatic impairments of autism. Brain and Language 1996, 52:411-434.
63. Passingham R.E. The frontal cortex: Does size matters?. Nature Neuroscience 2002, 5:190-192.
64. Perner J., Lang B. Development of theory of mind and executive control. Trends in cognitive sciences 1999, 3:337-344.
65. Perner J., Wimmer H. "John thinks that Mary thinks that...": Attribution of second order false beliefs by 5- to 10-year-old children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 1985, 39:437-471.
66. Rosenthal R. The " file drawer problem" and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin 1979, 86:638-641.
67. Rosenthal R. Parametric measures of effect size. The handbook of research synthesis 1994, 231-244. Russell Sage Foundation, New York. H. Cooper, L.V. Hedges (Eds.).
68. Rosenthal R., DiMatteo M.R. Meta-analysis: Recent developments in quantitative methods for literature reviews. Annual Review of Psychology 2001, 52:59-82.
69. Rowe A.D., Bullock P., Polkey C.E., Morris R.G. Theory of mind-impairment and their relationship to executive functioning following frontal lobe excisions. Brain 2001, 124:600-616.
70. Ruby P., Decety J. Effect of subjective perspective taking during simulation in action: A PET investigation of agency. Nature Neuroscience 2001, 4:546-550.
71. Safarti Y., Hardy-Baylé M.C., Besche C., Wildlöcher D. Attribution of intentions to others in people with schizophrenia: A non-verbal exploration with comic strips. Schizophrenia Research 1997, 25:199-209.
72. Samson, D., Apperly, I. A., Chiavarino, C., & Humphreys, G. W. (2004). Left temporoparietal junction is necessary for representing someone else's belief. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 499-500.
73. Santoro J., Spiers M. Social cognitive factors in brain injury-associated personality change. Brain Injury 1994, 8:265-276.
74. Saver J.L., Damasio A.R. Preserved access and processing of social knowledge in a patient with acquired sociopathy due to ventromedial frontal damage. Neuropsychologia 1991, 29:1241-1249.
75. Saxe R. Four brain regions for one theory of mind. Social neuroscience: people thinking about thinking people 2006, 83-102. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. J.T. Cacioppo, P.S. Visser, C.L. Pickett (Eds.).
76. Saxe R., Kanwisher N. People thinking about thinking people: fMRI investigations of theory of mind. Neuroimage 2003, 9:1835-2842.
77. Shamay-Tsoory S.G., Aharon-Peretz J. Dissociable prefrontal networks for cognitive and affective theory of mind: A lesion study. Neuropsychologia 2007, 45:3054-3067.
78. Shamay-Tsoory S.G., Tibi-Elhanany Y. The ventromedial prefrontal cortex is involved in understanding affective but not cognitive theory of mind stories. Social Neuroscience 2006, 3-4:149-166.
79. Shamay-Tsoory S.G., Tibi-Elhanany Y., Aharon-Peretz J. The green-eyed monster and malicious joy: The neuroanatomical bases of envy and gloating (schadenfreude). Brain 2007, 130:1663-1678.
80. Shamay-Tsoory S.G., Tomer R., Aharon-Peretz J. The neuroanatomical basis of understanding sarcasm and its relationship to social cognition. Neuropsychology 2005, 19:288-300.
81. Shamay-Tsoory S.G., Tomer R., Berger B.D., Aharon-Peretz J. Characterization of empathy deficits following prefrontal brain damage: The role of the right ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2003, 15:324-337.
82. Shamay-Tsoory S.G., Tomer R., Berger B.D., Goldsher D., Aharon-Peretz J. Impaired " affective theory of mind" is associated with right ventromedial prefrontal damage. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology 2005, 18:55-67.
83. Shamay-Tsoory S.G., Tomer R., Goldsher D., Berger B.D., Aharon-Peretz J. Impairment in cognitive and affective empathy in patients with brain lesions: Anatomical and cognitive correlates. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 2004, 26:1113-1127.
84. Shaw P., Lawrence E., Bramham J., Brierley B., Radbourne C., David A.S. A prospective study of the effect of anterior temporal lobectomy on emotion recognition and ToM. Neuropsychologia 2007, 45:2783-2790.
85. Shaw P., Lawrence E.J., Radbourne C., Bramham J., Polkey C.E., David A.S. The impact of early and late damage to the human amygdala on-theory of mind-reasoning. Brain 2004, 127:1535-1548.
86. Siegal M., Carrington J., Radel M. Theory of mind and pragmatic understanding following right hemisphere damage. Brain and Language 1996, 53:40-50.
87. Snowden J.S., Gibbons Z.C., Blackshaw A., Doubleday E., Thompson J., Craufurd D., et al. Social cognition in frontotemporal dementia and Huntington's disease. Neuropsychologia 2003, 41:688-701.
88. Sommer M., Döhnel K., Sodian B., Meinhardt J., Thoermer C., Hajak G. Neural correlates of true and false belief reasoning. Neuroimage 2007, 35:1378-1384.
89. Spatt J., Zebenholzer K., Oder W. Psychosocial long-term outcome of severe head injury as perceived by patients, relatives, and professionals. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica 1997, 95:173-179.
90. Sprong M., Schothorst P., Vos E., Hox J., Van Engeland H. Theory of mind in schizophrenia. Meta-analysis. British Journal of Psychiatry 2007, 191:5-13.
91. Stone V.E. Theory of mind and the evolution of social intelligence. Social neuroscience: People thinking about thinking people 2006, 103-129. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. J.T. Cacioppo, P.S. Visser, C.L. Pickett (Eds.).
92. Stone V.E., Baron-Cohen S., Calder A., Keane J., Young A. Acquired theory of mind impairments in individuals with bilateral amygdale lesions. Neuropsychologia 2003, 41:209-220.
93. Stone V.E., Baron-Cohen S., Knight R.T. Frontal lobe contributions to theory of mind. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1998, 10:640-656.
94. Stuss D.T., Gallup G.G., Alexander M.P. The frontal lobes are necessary for 'theory of mind'. Brain 2001, 124:279-286.
95. Surian L., Siegal M. Sources of performance on theory of mind tasks in right hemisphere-damaged patients. Brain & Language 2001, 78:224-232.
96. Tatemichi T.K., Desmond D.W., Stern Y., Paik M., Sano M., Bagiella E. Cognitive impairment after stroke: Frequency, patterns, and relationship to functional abilities. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 1994, 57:202-207.
97. Tennant A, McDermott N., Neary D. The long-term outcome of head injury: Implications for service planning. Brain Injury 1995, 9:595-605.
98. Tesink C.M., Buitelaar J.K., Petersson K.M., van der Gaag R.J., Kan C.C., Tendolkar I. Neural correlates of pragmatic language comprehension in autism spectrum disorders. Brain 2009, 132:1941-1952.
99. Torralva T., Kipps C.M., Hodges J.R., Clark L., Bekinschtein T., Roca M., et al. The relationship between affective decision-making and theory of mind in the frontal variant of fronto-temporal dementia. Neuropsychologia 2007, 45:342-349.
100. Turkstra L.S., Dixon T.M., Baker K.K. Theory of mind and social beliefs in adolescents with traumatic brain injury. NeuroRehabilitation 2004, 19:245-256.
101. Varley R., Siegal M. Evidence for cognition without grammar from causal reasoning and 'theory of mind' in an agrammatic aphasic patient. Current Biology 2000, 10:723-726.
102. Waiter G.D., Williams J.H., Murray A.D., Gilchrist A., Perrett D.I., Whiten A. Structural white matter deficits in high-functioning individuals with autistic spectrum disorder: A voxel-based investigation. Neuroimage 2005, 24:455-461.
103. Wilson, D. B. (2005). SPSS macros for meta-analysis (Version 2005.05.23) online at: [Computer software]. George Mason University (Available). http://mason.gmu.edu/~dwilsonb/ma.html.
104. Wimmer H., Perner J. Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception. Cognition 1983, 13:103-128.
105. Winner E., Brownell H., Happé F., Blum A., Pincus D. Distinguishing lies from jokes: Theory of mind deficits and discourse interpretation in right hemisphere brain-damaged patients. Brain & Language 1998, 62:89-106.
106. Winner E., Leekman S. Distinguishing irony from deception: Understanding the speaker's second-order intention. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 1991, 9:257-270.
107. Yates P.J. Psychological adjustment, social enablement and community integration following acquired brain injury. Neuropschological Rehabilitation 2003, 3:367-387.