Social perception deficits after traumatic brain injury: Interaction between emotion recognition, mentalizing ability, and social communication

Neuropsychology

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 572-579

  McDonald, Skye ^a   Flanagan, Sharon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN INJURY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVERSATION; DATA ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; EMOTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOCIAL INTERACTION; SOCIALIZATION; THINKING; VIDEOTAPE;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; AMBULATORY CARE; BRAIN INJURIES; COMPREHENSION; CULTURE; EMOTIONS; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PERSONAL CONSTRUCT THEORY; PROBLEM SOLVING; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL PERCEPTION; VERBAL BEHAVIOR; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 3242736444     PISSN: 08944105     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0894-4105.18.3.572     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Adams, J. H., Doyle, D., Ford, I., Gennarelli, T. A., Graham, D. I., & McLellan, D. R. (1989). Diffuse axonal injury in head injury: Definition, diagnosis and grading. Histopathology, 15, 49-59.
2. Adams, J. H., Doyle, D., Graham, D. I., Lawrence, A. E., McLellan, D. R., Gennarelli, T. A., et al. (1985). The contusion index: A reappraisal in human and experimental nonmissile head injury. Neuropathology & Applied Neurobiology, 11, 299-308.
3. Adolphs, R. (2002). Neural systems for recognizing emotion. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 12, 169-177.
4. Adolphs, R., Baron-Cohen, S., & Tranel, D. (2002). Impaired recognition of social emotions following amygdala damage. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 1264-1274.
5. Bara, B. G., Tirassa, M., & Zettin, M. (1997). Neuropsychological constraints on formal theories of dialogue. Brain and Language, 59, 7-49.
6. Bechara, A. (2002). The neurology of social cognition. Brain, 125, 1673-1675.
7. Bond, M. R. (1975). Assessment of the psychosocial outcome after severe head injury. Paper presented at the Outcome of Severe Damage to the Central Nervous System: CIBA Foundation Symposium 34, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
8. Bond, M. R. (1976). Assessment of the psychosocial outcome of severe head injury. Acta Neurochirurgica, 34, 57-70.
9. Broks, P., Young, A. W., Maratos, E., Coffey, P. J., Calder, A. J., Isaac, C. L., et al. (1998). Face processing impairments after encephalitis: Amygdala damage and recognition of fear. Neuropsychologia, 36, 59-70.
10. Brooks, N., Campsie, L., Symington, C., Beattie, A., & McKinlay, W. (1987). The effects of severe head injury on patient and relative within seven years of injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 2, 1-13.
11. Channon, S., & Crawford, S. (2000). The effects of anterior lesions on performance on a story comprehension test: Left anterior impairment on a theory of mind-type task. Neuropsychologia, 38, 1006-1017.
12. Cicerone, K. D., & Tanenbaum, L. N. (1997). Disturbance of social cognition after traumatic orbitofrontal brain injury. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 12, 173-188.
13. Corrigan, P. W., & Toomey, R. (1995). Interpersonal problem solving and information processing in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 21, 395-403.
14. Cowland, A. J., Young, A. W., Rowland, D., Perrett, D. I., Hodges, J. R., & Etcoff, N. L. (1996). Facial emotion after bilateral amygdala damage: Differentially severe impairment of fear. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 13, 699-745.
15. Dennis, M., & Barnes, M. A. (1990). Knowing the meaning, getting the point, bridging the gap, and carrying the message: Aspects of discourse following closed head injury in childhood and adolescence. Brain and Language, 39, 428-446.
16. Fine, C., Lumsden, J., & Blair, R. J. R. (2001). Dissociation between "theory of mind" and executive functions in a patient with early left amygdala damage. Brain, 124, 287-298.
17. Happe, F., Malhi, G. S., & Checkley, S. (2001). Acquired mind-blindness following frontal lobe surgery? A single case study of impaired "theory of mind" in a patient treated with stereotactic anterior capsulotomy. Neuropsychologia, 39, 83-90.
18. Heaton, R. K., Chelune, G. J., Talley, J. L., Kay, G. G., & Curtiss, G. (1993). Wisconsin Card Sorting Test manual: Revised and expanded. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
19. Hopkins, M. J., Dywan, J., & Segalowitz, S. J. (2002). Altered electrodermal response to facial expression after closed head injury. Brain Injury, 16, 245-257.
20. Hornack, J., Rolls, E. T., & Wade, D. (1996). Face and voice expression identification in patients with emotional and behavioural changes following ventral frontal lobe damage. Neuropsychologia, 34, 247-261.
21. Jackson, H. F., & Moffat, N. J. (1987). Impaired emotional recognition following severe head injury. Cortex, 23, 293-300.
22. Kendall, E., Shum, D., Halson, D., Bunning, S., & Teh, M. (1997). The assessment of social problem solving ability following traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 12, 68-78.
23. Levin, H. S., Amparo, E., Eisenberg, H. M., Williams, D. H., High, W. M., Jr., McArdle, C. B., & Weiner, R. L. (1987). Magnetic resonance imaging and computerized tomography in relation to the neurobehavioral sequelae of mild and moderate head injuries. Journal of Neurosurgery, 66, 706-713.
24. McDonald, S. (1992). Differential pragmatic language loss following closed head injury: Ability to comprehend conversational implicature. Applied Psycholinguistics, 13, 295-312.
25. McDonald, S., Flanagan, S., Martin, I., & Saunders, C. (in press). The ecological validity of TASIT: A test of social perception. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation.
26. McDonald, S., Flanagan, S., & Rollins, J. (2002). The Awareness of Social Inference Test. Bury St Edmonds, United Kingdom: Thames Valley Test Company.
27. McDonald, S., Flanagan, S., Rollins, J., & Kinch, J. (2003). TASIT: A new clinical tool for assessing social perception after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 18, 219-238.
28. McDonald, S., & Pearce, S. (1996). Clinical insights into pragmatic language theory: The case of sarcasm. Brain and Language, 53, 81-104.
29. McMordie, W. R., Barker, S. L., & Paolo, T. M. (1990). Return to work (RTW) after head injury. Brain Injury, 4, 57-90.
30. Milders, M., Fuchs, S., & Crawford, J. R. (2003). Neuropsychological impairments and changes in emotional and social behaviour following severe traumatic brain injury. Journal of Clinical & Experimental Neuropsychology, 25, 157-172.
31. Pearce, S., McDonald, S., & Coltheart, M. (1998). Ability to process ambiguous advertisements after frontal lobe damage. Brain and Cognition, 38, 150-164.
32. Ponsford, J. L., Olver, J. H., & Curran, C. (1995). A profile of outcome: 2 years after traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 9, 1-10.
33. Prigatano, G. P., & Pribram, K. H. (1982). Perception and memory of facial affect following brain injury. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 54, 859-869.
34. Santoro, J., & Spiers, M. (1994). Social cognitive factors in brain injury associated with personality change. Brain Injury, 8, 265-276.
35. Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1987). Precis of Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 10, 697-754.
36. Stone, V. E., Baron-Cohen, S., Calder, A., Keane, J., & Young, A. (2003). Acquired theory of mind impairments in individuals with bilateral amygdala lesions. Neuropsychologia, 41, 209-220.
37. Stone, V. E., Baron-Cohen, S., & Knight, R. T. (1998). Frontal lobe contributions to theory of mind. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 640-656.
38. Stuss, D. T., Gallup, G. G., Jr., & Alexander, M. P. (2001). The frontal lobes are necessary for "theory of mind." Brain, 124, 279-286.
39. Sullivan, K., Winner, E., & Hopfield, N. (1995). How children tell a lie from a joke: The role of second order mental attributions. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 13, 191-204.
40. Tate, R. L., & Broe, G. A. (1999). Psychosocial adjustment after traumatic brain injury: What are the important variables? Psychological Medicine, 29, 713-725.
41. Tate, R. L., Fenelon, B., Manning, M. L., & Hunter, M. (1991). Patterns of neuropsychological impairment after severe blunt head injury, Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 179, 117-126.
42. Tate, R. L., Lulham, J., Broe, T., Strettles, B., & Pfaff, A. (1989). Psychosocial outcome for the survivors of severe blunt head injury: The results from a consecutive series of 100 patients. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 52, 1128-1134.
43. Turkstra, L., McDonald, S., & DePompei, R. (2001). Social information processing in adolescents: Data from normally-developing adolescents and preliminary data from their peers with traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 16, 469-483.
44. Van Horn, K. R., Levine, M. J., & Curtis, C. L. (1992). Developmental levels of social cognition in head injury patients. Brain Injury, 6, 15-28.
45. Vilkki, J., Ahola, K., Holst, P., Ohman, J., Servo, A., & Heiskanen, O. (1994). Prediction of psychosocial recovery after head injury with cognitive tests and neurobehavioural ratings. Journal of Clinical & Experimental Neuropsychology, 16, 325-338.
46. Weddell, R., Oddy, M., & Jenkins, D. (1980). Social adjustment after rehabilitation: A two-year follow-up of patients with severe head injury. Psychological Medicine, 10, 257-263.
47. Young, A. W., Hellawell, D. J., Van de Wal, C., & Johnson, M. (1996). Facial expression processing after amygdalotomy. Neuropsychologia, 34, 31-39.