The present and future of cardiac CT in research and clinical practice: Moderated discussion and scientific debate with representatives from the four main vendors;Aktueller Stand und Zukunft der CT des Herzens in Forschung und klinischer Praxis: Moderierte Diskussion und wissenschaftlicher Diskurs mit Vertretern der vier Hersteller

RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren

Volumn 182, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 313-321

  Dewey, M ^a   De Vries, H ^b   De Vries, L ^c   Haas, D ^d   Leidecker, C ^e  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^b Toshiba Medical Systems Europe   (Japan)

^c PHILIPS HEALTHCARE   (United States)

^d CT Associates Inc   (United States)

^e SIEMENS CORPORATE RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Cardiac; CT; Heart

Indexed keywords

BETA ADRENERGIC RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; CALCIUM; CONTRAST MEDIUM;

BODY MASS; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY MONITORING; HEART ATRIUM FIBRILLATION; HEART RATE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; NON INVASIVE PROCEDURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION EXPOSURE; REVIEW; RR INTERVAL;

ALGORITHMS; CARDIAC-GATED IMAGING TECHNIQUES; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FORECASTING; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPIRAL CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 77949677203     PISSN: 14389029     EISSN: 14389010     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1245195     Document Type: Review

References (62)

1. Anders K, Baum U, Gauss S et al. Initial experience with prospectively triggered, sequential CT coronary angiography on a 128-slice scanner. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2009 181 332-338
2. Artmann A, Enayati S, Ratzenbock M et al. Image Quality of CT Angiography of Coronary Arteries Dependig on the Degree of Coronary Calcification Using a Dual Source CT Scanner. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2009 181 863-869
3. Dewey M, Hamm B. Recent trends in cardiovascular imaging as reflected in Fortschr Röntgenstr. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2006 178 953-956
4. Dewey M, Hamm B. CT coronary angiography: examination technique, clinical results, and outlook on future developments. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2007 179 246-260
5. Fischbach R, Miller S, Beer M et al. Recommendations of the Heart Diagnosis Working Group of the German Roentgen Society for use of computerized tomography and magnetic resonance tomography in heart diagnosis. 1-Computerized tomography. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2009 181 700-706
6. Koster R, Stevendaal U van, Grass M et al. Multi-detector computed tomography to analyze in-stent restenoses at different heart rates. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2008 180 821-831
7. Wust W, Zunker C, May M et al. Septal delineation using a 20 % diluted contrast chaser bolus in coronary CT angiography: a comparison of 64-slice and dual source CT. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2009 181 324-331
8. Hahn D. Moderne Schnittbilddiagnostik des Herzens, MRT oder MSCT? Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004 176 1215-1218
9. Heyer C M., Peters S, Lemburg S. Structure of the meeting of the german radiological society and scientific discourse pertaining to radiation dose and dose reduction: an analysis of 1998 2008. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2009 181 1065-1072
10. Maurer M H., Hamm B, Dewey M. Survey regarding the clinical practice of cardiac CT in Germany: indications, scanning technique and reporting. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2009 181 1135-1143
11. Dewey M, Hamm B. CT Coronary Angiography: Examination Technique, Clinical Results, and Outlook on Future Developments. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2007 179 246-260
12. Bansmann P M., Senegas J, Muellerleile K et al. Assessment of left ventricular function parameters with a new three-dimensional shape model. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2009 181 161-168
13. Begemann P G., Stahmer F, Stork A et al. Evaluation of two fast software tools for the measurement of left ventricular volumes in retrospectively ECG-gated multidetector CT of the heart: biplane area-length method and shape tracking method. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2007 179 572-580
14. Luders F, Fischbach R, Seifarth H et al. Dual-Source Computed Tomography: Effect on Regional and Global Left Ventricular Function Assessment Compared to Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2009 181 962-969
15. Krug K B., Bovenschulte H, Geissler H J. et al. In-vivo measurements of coronary blood flow using 16-slice multidetector spiral computed tomography (MDCT) in a porcine model. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2009 181 220-229
16. Weininger M, Ritter C O., Beer M et al. Evaluation of coronary calcifications with 64-slice CT variability of the scores and the influence of the reconstruction interval. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2007 179 938-944
17. Weber T F., Klemm H, Koops A et al. Integration of cardiac computed tomography into pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2007 179 1264-1271
18. Hollander J E., Litt H I., Chase M et al. Computed tomography coronary angiography for rapid disposition of low-risk emergency department patients with chest pain syndromes. Acad Emerg Med 2007 14 112-116
19. Schwarz F, Ruzsics B, Schoepf U J. et al. Dual-energy CT of the heart principles and protocols. Eur J Radiol 2008 68 423-433
20. Blankstein R, Shturman L D., Rogers I S. et al. Adenosine-induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging using dual-source cardiac computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009 54 1072-1084
21. George R T., Arbab-Zadeh A, Miller J M. et al. Adenosine stress 64- and 256-row detector computed tomography angiography and perfusion imaging: a pilot study evaluating the transmural extent of perfusion abnormalities to predict atherosclerosis causing myocardial ischemia. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2009 2 174-182
22. Weigold W G., Olszewski M E., Walker M J. Low-dose prospectively gated 256-slice coronary computed tomographic angiography. Int J Card Imaging 2009 25 217-230
23. Klass O, Walker M, Siebach A et al. Prospectively gated axial CT coronary angiography: comparison of image quality and effective radiation dose between 64- and 256-slice CT. Eur Radiol 2010 epub
24. Schuetz G M., Zacharopoulou N M., Schlattmann P et al. Meta-analysis: Noninvasive Coronary Angiography Using Computed Tomography versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Ann Intern Med 2010 152 167-177
25. Kovacs A, Probst C, Sommer T et al. CT coronary angiography in patients with atrial fibrillation. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2005 177 1655-1662
26. Oncel D, Oncel G, Tastan A. Effectiveness of dual-source CT coronary angiography for the evaluation of coronary artery disease in patients with atrial fibrillation: initial experience. Radiology 2007 245 703-711
27. Wolak A, Gutstein A, Cheng V Y. et al. Dual-source coronary computed tomography angiography in patients with atrial fibrillation: initial experience. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2008 2 172-180
28. Yang L, Zhang Z, Fan Z et al. 64-MDCT coronary angiography of patients with atrial fibrillation: influence of heart rate on image quality and efficacy in evaluation of coronary artery disease. Am J Roentgenol 2009 193 795-801
29. Chow B J., Larose E, Bilodeau S et al. The what, when, where, who and how? of cardiac computed tomography in 2009: guidelines for the clinician. Can J Cardiol 2009 25 135-139
30. Bluemke D A., Achenbach S, Budoff M et al. Noninvasive coronary artery imaging: magnetic resonance angiography and multidetector computed tomography angiography: a scientific statement from the american heart association committee on cardiovascular imaging and intervention of the council on cardiovascular radiology and intervention, and the councils on clinical cardiology and cardiovascular disease in the young. Circulation 2008 118 586-606
31. Schroeder S, Achenbach S, Bengel F et al. Cardiac computed tomography: indications, applications, limitations, and training requirements: report of a Writing Group deployed by the Working Group Nuclear Cardiology and Cardiac CT of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2008 29 531-556
32. Rybicki F J., Otero H J., Steigner M L. et al. Initial evaluation of coronary images from 320-detector row computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2008 24 535-546
33. Dewey M, Zimmermann E, Deissenrieder F et al. Noninvasive Coronary Angiography by 320-Row CT with Lower Radiation Exposure and Maintained Diagnostic Accuracy: Comparison of Results with Cardiac Catheterization in a Head-To-Head Pilot Investigation. Circulation 2009 120 867-875
34. Achenbach S, Marwan M, Ropers D et al. Coronary computed tomography angiography with a consistent dose below 1 mSv using prospectively electrocardiogram-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition. Eur Heart J 2010 31 340-346
35. Steigner M L., Mitsouras D, Whimore A G. et al. Iodinated Contrast Opacification Gradients in Normal Coronary Arteries Imaged with Prospectively ECG-Gated Single Heart Beat 320-Detector Row Computed Tomography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2010 in press
36. Dewey M, Laule M, Krug L et al. Multisegment and halfscan reconstruction of 16-slice computed tomography for detection of coronary artery stenoses. Invest Radiol 2004 39 223-229
37. Dewey M, Teige F, Laule M et al. Influence of heart rate on diagnostic accuracy and image quality of 16-slice CT coronary angiography: comparison of multisegment and halfscan reconstruction approaches. Eur Radiol 2007 17 2829-2837
38. Flohr T, Stierstorfer K, Raupach R et al. Performance evaluation of a 64-slice CT system with z-flying focal spot. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004 176 1803-1810
39. Flohr T G., McCollough C H., Bruder H et al. First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system. Eur Radiol 2006 16 256-268
40. Halliburton S S., Stillman A E., Flohr T et al. Do segmented reconstruction algorithms for cardiac multi-slice computed tomography improve image quality? Herz 2003 28 20-31
41. Engelken F, Lembcke A, Hamm B et al. Determining optimal acquisition parameters for computed tomography coronary angiography: evaluation of a software-assisted, breathhold exam simulation. Acad Radiol 2008 16 239-243
42. Min J K., Swaminathan R V., Vass M et al. High-definition multidetector computed tomography for evaluation of coronary artery stents: comparison to standard-definition 64-detector row computed tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2009 3 246-251
43. Imai Y, Nukui M, Ishihara Y et al. Development and performance evaluation of an experimental fine pitch detector multislice CT scanner. Med Phys 2009 36 1120-1127
44. Flohr T G., Raupach R, Bruder H. Cardiac CT: how much can temporal resolution, spatial resolution, and volume coverage be improved? J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2009 3 143-152
45. Zimmermann E, Germershausen C, Greupner J et al. Improvement of Skills and Knowledge by a Hands-on Cardiac CT Course: Before and After Evaluation with a Validated Questionnaire and Self-Assessment. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2010 DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1109950
46. Dewey M. Technical and Personnel Requirements. Chapter 2. Dewey M Coronary CT Angiography Heidelberg Springer 2008
47. Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hermann F et al. Estimated radiation dose associated with cardiac CT angiography. JAMA 2009 301 500-507
48. Budoff M J., Dowe D, Jollis J G. et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008 52 1724-1732
49. Gopal A, Budoff M J. A new method to reduce radiation exposure during multi-row detector cardiac computed tomographic angiography. Int J Cardiol 2009 132 435-436
50. Dewey M, Hoffmann H, Hamm B. Multislice CT coronary angiography: effect of sublingual nitroglycerine on the diameter of coronary arteries. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2006 178 600-604
51. Klass O, Mutlu S, Hohl K et al. Multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography: sublingual nitroglycerine improves image quality significantly because of peripheral coronary vasodilatation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2009 33 199-203
52. Chun E J., Lee W, Choi Y H. et al. Effects of nitroglycerin on the diagnostic accuracy of electrocardiogram-gated coronary computed tomography angiography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2008 32 86-92
53. Lehmkuhl L. General Electric Light Speed VCT. Chapter 8 d. Dewey M Coronary CT Angiography Heidelberg Springer 2008
54. Dewey M. Preparation. Chapter 6. Dewey M Coronary CT Angiography Heidelberg Springer 2008
55. Cademartiri F, Nieman K, Lugt A van der et al. Intravenous contrast material administration at 16-detector row helical CT coronary angiography: test bolus versus bolus-tracking technique. Radiology 2004 233 817-823
56. Koonce J, Schoepf J U., Nguyen S A. et al. Extra-cardiac findings at cardiac CT: experience with 1,764 patients. Eur Radiol 2009 19 570-576
57. Zimmermann E. Toshiba Aquilion 64. Chapter 8a. Dewey M Coronary CT Angiography Heidelberg Springer 2008
58. Klessen C. Siemens Somatom Sensation and Definition. Chapter 8b. Dewey M Coronary CT Angiography Heidelberg Springer 2008
59. Dewey M. Examination and Reconstruction. Chapter 7. Dewey M Coronary CT Angiography Heidelberg Springer 2008
60. Klink T, Hoffmann M H., Stevendaal U van et al. Automatic phase point determination of minimal motion reconstruction intervals with motion maps in ECG-gated CT diagnostics of coronary sclerosis. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2009 181 675-682
61. Hoffmann M H., Lessick J, Manzke R et al. Automatic determination of minimal cardiac motion phases for computed tomography imaging: initial experience. Eur Radiol 2006 16 365-373
62. Ruzsics B, Gebregziabher M, Lee H et al. Coronary CT angiography: automatic cardiac-phase selection for image reconstruction. Eur Radiol 2009 19 1906-1913