Multi-detector computed tomography to analyze in-stent restenoses at different heart rates

RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren

Volumn 180, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 821-831

  Köster, Ralf ^a   Van Stevendaal, U ^b   Grass, M ^b   Yamamura, J ^c   Kaehler, J ^a   Adam, G ^c   Meinertz, T ^a   Begemann, P G ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY HEART CENTER HAMBURG   (Germany)

^b PHILIPS RESEARCH LABORATORIES   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

Author keywords

Coronary artery disease; Coronary stents; Heart; MDCT; Multi detector row computed tomography

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY STENT; HEART CYCLE; HEART RATE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESTENOSIS; RR INTERVAL; VISIBILITY;

EID: 52249113559     PISSN: 14389029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1027669     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Stein PD, Beemath A, Kayali F et al. Multidetector computed tomography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a systematic review. Am J Med 2006; 119: 203-216
2. Dewey M, Hamm B. CT coronary angiography: examination technique, clinical results, and outlook on future developments. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2007; 179: 246-260
3. Soon KH, Kelly AM, Cox N et al. Non-invasive multislice computed tomography coronary angiography for imaging coronary arteries, stents and bypass grafts. Intern Med J 2006; 36: 43-50
4. Budoff MJ, Achenbach S, Blumenthal RS et al. Assessment of coronary artery disease by cardiac computed tomography: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and Committee on Cardiac Imaging, Council on Clinical Cardiology. Circulation 2006; 114: 1761-1791
5. Achenbach S, Ulzheimer S, Baum U et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography by retrospectively ECG-gated multislice spiral CT. Circulation 2000; 102: 2823-2828
6. Achenbach S, Ropers D, Kuettner A et al. Contrast-enhanced coronary artery visualization by dual-source computed tomography - initial experience. Eur J Radiol 2006; 57: 331-335
7. Manzke R, Kohler T, Nielsen T et al. Automatic phase determination for retrospectively gated cardiac CT. Med Phys 2004; 31: 3345-3362
8. Funabashi N, Komiyama N, Komuro I. Patency of coronary artery lumen surrounded by metallic stent evaluated by three dimensional volume rendering images using ECG gated multislice computed tomography. Heart 2003; 89: 388
9. Maintz D, Juergens KU, Wichter T et al. Imaging of coronary artery stents using multislice computed tomography: in vitro evaluation. Eur Radiol 2003; 13: 830-835
10. Mahnken AH, Buecker A, Wildberger JE et al. Coronary artery stents in multislice computed tomography: in vitro artifact evaluation. Invest Radiol 2004; 39: 27-33
11. Maintz D, Grude M, Fallenberg EM et al. Assessment of coronary artery stents by multislice CT angiography. Acta Radiol 2003; 44: 597-603
12. Mahnken AH, Seyfarth T, Flohr T et al. Flat-panel detector comuted tomography for the assessment of coronary artery stents. Invest Radiol 2005; 40: 8-13
13. Gilard M, Cornily JC, Pennec PY et al. Assessment of coronary artery stents by 16 slice comuted tomography. Heart 2006; 92: 58-61
14. Schuijf JD, Bax JJ, Jukema W et al. Feasibility of assessment of coronary stent patency using 16 slice computed tomography. Am J Cardiol 2004; 94: 427-30
15. Maintz D, Seifarth H, Flohr T et al. Improved coronary artery stents visualization and in-stent restenosis detection using 16-slice computed tomography and dedicated image reconstruction technique. Invest Radiol 2003; 38: 790-795
16. Mahnken AH, Buecker A, Wildberger JE et al. Coronary artery stents in multislice computed tomography: in vitro artifact evaluation. Invest Radiol 2004; 39: 27-33
17. Achenbach S, Giesler T, Ropers D et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses by contrast-enhanced, retrospectively electrocardiographically- gated, multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 2001; 103: 2535-2538
18. Sediono W, Dossel O. Elastomechanics of the ventricles: development of a phantom and results of simulation. Biomed Tech 2002; 47: 243-245
19. Begemann PG, van Stevendaal U, Manzke R et al. Evaluation of spatial and temporal resolution for ECG-gated 16-row multidetector CT using a dynamic cardiac phantom. Eur Radiol 2005; 15: 1015-1026
20. Timinger H. Motion compensated navigation on virtual static road-maps for coronary intervention. Berlin: Logos, 2005: 1-153
21. Van Stevendaal U, Koken P, Begemann PGC et al. ECG gated continuous circular cone-beam multi-cycle reconstruction for in-stent coronary artery imaging: a phantom study. Proceedings of SPIE 2006 61420L-1-61420-10
22. Yamamura J, van Stevendaal U, Köster R et al. Experimental 16 row CT evaluation of in-stent restenosis using new static and moving cardiac stent phantoms. Experimental examination. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2006; 178: 1079-1085
23. Grass M, Manzke R, Nielsen T et al. Helical cardiac cone beam reconstruction using retrospective ECG gating. Phys Med Biol 2003; 48: 3069-3084
24. Manzke R, Grass M, Nielsen T et al. Adaptive temporal resolution optimization in helical cardiac cone beam CT reconstruction. Med Phys 2003; 30: 3072-3080
25. Serruys PW, Kutryk MJ, Ong AT. Coronary artery stents. N Engl J Med 2006; 354: 483-495
26. Maintz D, Seifarth H, Raupach R et al. 64-slice multidetector coronary CT angiography: in vitro evaluation of 68 different stents. Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 818-826
27. Flohr T, Stierstorfer K, Raupach R et al. Performance of a 64-slice CT system with z-flying focal spot. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: 1803-1810
28. Krüger S, Mahnken AH, Sinha AM et al. Multislice spiral computed tomography for the detection of coronary stent restenosis and patency. Int J Cardiol 2003; 89: 167-172
29. Gaspar T, Halon DA, Lewis BS et al. Diagnosis of coronary in-stent restenosis with multidetector row spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46: 1573-1579
30. Mahnken AH, Mühlenbruch G, Seyfarth T et al. 64-slice computed tomography assessment of coronary artery stents. A phantom study. Acta Radiologica 2006; 47: 36-42
31. Rixe J, Achenbach S, Ropers D et al. Assessment of coronary artery stent restenosis by 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography. Eur Heart J 2006; 27: 2567-2572
32. Niemann K, Rensing BJ, van Geuns RJ et al. Non-invasive coronary angiography with multisclice spiral computed tomography: impact of heart rate. Heart 2002; 88: 470-474
33. Cademartiri F, Runza G, Mollet NR et al. Impact of intravascular enhancement, heart rate, and calcium score on diagnostic accuracy in multislice computed tomography coronary angiography. Radiol Med 2005; 110: 42-51
34. Hoffmann M, Lessick J, Manzke R et al. Automatic determination of minimal cardiac motion phases for computed tomography imaging: initial experience. Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 365-373
35. Seifarth H, Ozgun M, Raupach R et al. 64- versus 16-slice CT angiography for coronary artery stents assessment: in vitro experience. Invest Radiol 2006; 41: 22-27
36. Schiele TM. Current understanding of coronary in-stent restenosis. Pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic work-up, and management. Z Kardiol 2005; 94: 772-790