In-vivo measurements of coronary blood flow using 16-slice multidetector spiral computed tomography (MDCT) in a porcine model

RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren

Volumn 181, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 220-229

  Krug, Kathrin Barbara ^a   Bovenschulte, H ^a   Geissler H J ^a   Flesch, M ^a   Schneider, T ^a   Brackrogge, D ^a   Reiter, H ^a   Heppelmann, I ^a   Christ, H ^a   Fischer, J H ^a   Lackner, K J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Arteriosclerosis; Blood vessels; Cardiac; CT angiography; CT spiral

Indexed keywords

IMERON 350; IOMEPROL; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; DRUG DERIVATIVE; IOPAMIDOL;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; AORTA; ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; CORONARY ARTERY BLOOD FLOW; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; FLOW MEASUREMENT; FLOWMETER; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING CORONARY ARTERY; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SWINE; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; BLOOD VOLUME; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; IMAGE PROCESSING; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPIRAL COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY;

ANIMALS; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; BLOOD VOLUME; CONTRAST MEDIA; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY CIRCULATION; CORONARY STENOSIS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FLOWMETERS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IOPAMIDOL; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SWINE; TOMOGRAPHY, SPIRAL COMPUTED;

EID: 61549128959     PISSN: 14389029     EISSN: 14389010     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1109054     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Traversi E, Bertoli G, Barazzoni G et al. Non-invasive coronary angiography with multislice computed tomography. Technology, methods, preliminary experience and prospects. Ital Heart J 2004; 5: 89-98
2. De Bono D on the behalf of the Joint Audit Committee of the British Cardiac Society and Royal College of Physicians in London. Br Heart J 1993; 70: 297-300
3. Kim WY, Danias PG, Stuber M et al. Coronary magnetic resonance angiography for the detection of coronary stenoses. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 1863-1869 (Pubitemid 33716560)
4. Mohr VD, Bauer J, Döbler K et al. Qualität sichtbar machen. BQS-Qualitätsreport 2005. Im Auftrag des gemeinsamen Bundesaussschusses nach §91 SGB V. ISBN- 3-9808704-7-12 Düsseldorf: Bundesgeschä ftsstelle Qualitätssicherung GGMBH, 2006
5. Mannebach H, Hamm C, Horstkotte D. 18. Bericht über die Leistungszahlen der Herzkatheterlabore in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Z Kardiol 2000; 91: 727-729
6. van Buuren E, Horstkotte D. 21. Bericht über die Leistungszahlen der Herzkatheterlabore in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Ergebnisse der gemeinsamen Umfrage der Kommission für klinische Kardiologie und der Arbeitsgruppe Interventionelle Kardiologie (für die ESC) und Angiologie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kardiologie Herz- und Kreislaufforschung für das Jahr 2004. Clin Res Cardiol 2006; 95: 383-387
7. Dewey M, Hamm B. CT-Koronarangiographie: Untersuchungstechnik, klinische Ergebnisse und Ausblick in zukünftige Entwicklungen. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2007; 179: 246-260 (Pubitemid 46769326)
8. Dewey M, Hoffmann H, Hamm B. CT coronary angiography using 16 and 64 simultaneous detector rows: intrainividual comparison. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2007; 179: 581-586 (Pubitemid 47091680)
9. Flohr T, Bruder H, Stiersdorfer K et al. New technical developments in multislice CT, part 2: submillimeter 16-slice scanning and increased gantry rotation speed for cardiac imaging. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2002; 174: 1022-1027 (Pubitemid 34982666)
10. Flohr T, Ohnesorge B, Schaller S. Heutiger Stand und zukünftige Entwicklung in der Mehrschichtcomputertomographie. Radiologe 2004; 44: 113-120
11. Flohr T, Stiersdorf K, Raupach R et al. Performance evaluation of a 64-slice CT system with z-flying focal spot. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: 1803-1810 (Pubitemid 39626396)
12. Ohnesorge BM, Hofmann LK, Flohr TG et al. CT for imaging coronary artery disease: defining the paradigm for ist application. Int J of Cardiovasc Imaging 2005; 21: 85-104 (Pubitemid 41149233)
13. Dewey M, Hoffmann H, Hamm B. Multislice CT coronary angiography: Effects of sublingual nitroglycerine on the diameter of coronary arteries. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2006; 178: 600-604 (Pubitemid 44194930)
14. Yamamura J, van Stevendaal U, Köster R et al. Experimental 16 row CT evaluation of in-stent restenosis using new stationary and moving cardiac stent phantoms: experimental examination. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2006; 178: 1079-1085 (Pubitemid 44898650)
15. Garcia MJ, Lessick J, Hoffmann for the CATSCAN Study Investigators KH. Accuracy of 16-row multidetecor Computed Tomography for the assessment of coronary artery stenosis. JAMA 2006; 296: 403-411
16. Hamon M, Biondi-Zoccai GG, Malagutti P et al. Diagnostic performance of multislice spiral computed tomography of coronary arteries as compared with conventional invasive coronary angiography: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48: 1896-1910 (Pubitemid 44755022)
17. Hoffmann U, Moselewski BS, Cury RC et al. Predictive value of 16-slice multidetector spiral computed tomography to detect significant obstructed coronary artery disease. Patient-versus segment-based analysis. Circulation 2004; 110: 2638-2643
18. Matsuo S, Nakamura Y, Matsumoto T et al. Visual assessment of coronary artery stenosis with electrocardiographically-gated multislice computed tomography. Inter J Cardiovasc Imaging 2004; 20: 61-66 (Pubitemid 38324840)
19. Sun Z, Jiang W. Diagnostic value of multislice computed tomography angiography in coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol 2006; 60: 279-286 (Pubitemid 44635043)
20. Schuijf JD, Pundziute G, Jukema JWet al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multislice computed tomography in the noninvasive evaluation of significant coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 2006; 98: 145-148 (Pubitemid 43975510)
21. Ropers D, Rixe J, Anders K et al. Usefullness of multidetector row spiral computed tomography with 64- × 0.6mmcollimation and 330-ms rotation for the noninvasive detection of significant coronary artery stenosis. Am J Cardiol 2006; 97: 343-348 (Pubitemid 43133047)
22. Johnson TR, Nikolaou K, Busch S et al. Diagnostic accuracy of dual-source computed tomography in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Invest Radiol 2007; 42: 648-691 (Pubitemid 351325900)
23. Husmann L, Schepsis T, Scheffel H et al. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with low, intermediate, and high cardiovascular risk. Acad Radiol 2008; 15: 452-461
24. Jacobs TF, Becker CR, Ohnesorge B et al. Multislice helical CT of the heart with retrospective ECG gating: reduction of exposure by ECG-controlled tube current modulation. Eur Radiol 2002; 12: 1081-1086 (Pubitemid 36940173)
25. Scheffel H, Alkadhi H, Leschka S et al. Low dose CT coronary angiography in the step-and-shoot mode: diagnostic performance. Heart online 2008 10.1136/hrt.2008.149971
26. Husmann L, Valenta I, Gaemperli O et al. Feasibility of low-dose coronary CT angiography: first experience with prospective ECG-gating. Eur heart J 2008; 29: 191-197
27. Betsou S, Efstatathopoulos EP, Katritsis D et al. Patient radiation does during cardiac catheterization procedures. Br J Radiol 1998; 71: 634-639 (Pubitemid 28271822)
28. Karpinner J, Parviainen T, Servomaa A et al. Radiation risk and exposure of radiologists and patients during coronary angiography and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Radiat Prot Dosim 1995; 57: 481-485