CT coronary angiography: Examination technique, clinical results, and outlook on future developments;CT-koronarangiografie: Untersuchungstechnik, klinische ergebnisse und ausblick in zukünftige entwicklungen

RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren

Volumn 179, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 246-260

  Dewey, Marc ^a   Hamm, B ^a  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Computed tomography; Coronary angiography; Coronary artery stenosis; Review; Sensitivity; Specificity

Indexed keywords

BETA ADRENERGIC RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; GLYCERYL TRINITRATE;

ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; HEART FUNCTION; HEART RATE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; IMAGE PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY;

CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY DISEASE; CORONARY STENOSIS; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 34247565631     PISSN: 14389029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-962830     Document Type: Review

References (77)

1. Kim WY, Danias PG, Stuber M et al. Coronary magnetic resonance angiography for the detection of coronary stenoses. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 1863-1869
2. Schuijf JD, Bax JJ, Shaw LJ et al. Meta-analysis of comparative diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging and multislice computed tomography for noninvasive coronary angiography. Am Heart J 2006; 151: 404-411
3. Dewey M, Teige F, Schnapauff D et al. Noninvasive Detection of Coronary Artery Stenoses with Multislice Computed Tomography or Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Ann Intern Med 2006; 145: 407-415
4. Sommer T, Hofer U, Hackenbroch M et al. Hochauflösende 3D-MR-Koronarangiographie in Echt-Zeit-Navigatortechnik: Ergebnisse aus 107 Patientenuntersuchungen. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2002; 174: 459-466
5. Blobel J, Baartman H, Rogalla P et al. Räumliche und zeitliche Auflosung für die Herzdiagnostik mit 16-Schicht- Computertomographie. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2003; 175: 1264-1271
6. Moshage WE, Achenbach S, Seese B et al. Coronary artery stenoses: three-dimensional imaging with electrocardiographically triggered, contrast agent-enhanced, electron-beam CT. Radiology 1995; 196: 707-714
7. Enzweiler CN, Becker CR, Burning R et al. Wertigkeit der Elektronenstrahl-Computertomographie (EBT) - II. Nichtkardiale Anwendungen und Strahlenexposition. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: 1566-1575
8. Enzweiler CN, Becker CR, Felix R et al. Diagnostische Wertigkeit der Elektronenstrahl-Computertomographie (EBT). I. Kardiale Anwendungen. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: 27-36
9. Lembcke A, Wiese TH, Schnorr J et al. Image quality of noninvasive coronary angiography using multislice spiral computed tomography and electron-beam computed tomography: intraindividual comparison in an animal model. Invest Radiol 2004; 39: 357-364
10. Becker CR, Knez A, Leber A et al. Erste Erfahrungen mit der Mehrzeilendetektorspiral-CT in der Diagnostik der Arteriosklerose der Koronargefäße. Radiologe 2000; 40: 118-122
11. Nieman K, Cademartiri F, Lemos PA et al. Reliable noninvasive coronary angiography with fast submillimeter multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 2002; 106: 2051-2054
12. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, Nieman K et al. Multislice spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 43: 2265-2270
13. Hoffmann MH, Shi H, Schmitz BL et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography with multislice computed tomography. JAMA 2005; 293: 2471-2478
14. Flohr T, Stierstorfer K, Raupach R et al. Leistungsbeurteilung eines 64-Schichten-CT-Geräts mit einem z-Springfokus. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: 1803-1810
15. Flohr TG, McCollough CH, Bruder H et al. First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system. Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 256-268
16. Johnson TR, Nikolaou K, Wintersperger BJ et al. Dual-source CT cardiac imaging: initial experience. Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 1409-1415
17. Dewey M, Müller M, Teige F et al. Multisegment and halfscan reconstruction of 16-slice computed tomography for assessment of regional and global left ventricular myocardial function. Invest Radiol 2006; 41: 400-409
18. Dewey M, Laule M, Krug L et al. Multisegment and halfscan reconstruction of 16-slice computed tomography for detection of coronary artery stenoses. Invest Radiol 2004; 39: 223-229
19. Hoffmann MH, Shi H, Manzke R et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography with 16-detector row CT: effect of heart rate. Radiology 2005; 234: 86-97
20. Wintersperger BJ, Nikolaou K, von Ziegler F et al. Image quality, motion artifacts, and reconstruction timing of 64-slice coronary computed tomography angiography with 0.33-second rotation speed. Invest Radiol 2006; 41: 436-442
21. Lembcke A, Rogalla P, Mews J et al. Darstellung der Koronararterien mittels Mehrschicht-Spiral-CT: Optimierung der Bildqualität mittels Multisegment-Rekonstruktion und variabler Gantry-Rotationszeit. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2003; 175: 780-785
22. Trabold T, Buchgeister M, Küttner A et al. Abschätzung der Strahlenexposition der 16-Zeilen-Multidetektor-Computertomographie des Herzens mit retrospektivem EKG-Gating. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2003; 175: 1051-1055
23. Achenbach S, Ropers D, Kuettner A et al. Contrast-enhanced coronary artery visualization by dual-source computed tomography - initial experience. Eur J Radiol 2006; 57: 331-335
24. Kondo C, Mori S, Endo M et al. Real-time volumetric imaging of human heart without electrocardiographic gating by 256-detector row computed tomography: initial experience. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2005; 29: 694-698
25. Schlosser T, Konorza T, Hunold P et al. Noninvasive visualization of coronary artery bypass grafts using 16-detector row computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44: 1224-1229
26. Martuscelli E, Romagnoli A, D'Eliseo A et al. Evaluation of venous and arterial conduit patency by 16-slice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 2004; 110: 3234-3238
27. Yamamoto M, Kimura F, Niinami H et al. Noninvasive assessment of off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery by 16-channel multidetector-row computed tomography. Ann Thorac Surg 2006; 81: 820-827
28. Pache G, Saueressig U, Frydrychowicz A et al. Initial experience with 64-slice cardiac CT: non-invasive visualization of coronary artery bypass grafts. Eur Heart J 2006; 27: 976-980
29. Malagutti P, Nieman K, Meijboom WB et al. Use of 64-slice CT in symptomatic patients after coronary bypass surgery: evaluation of grafts and coronary arteries. Eur Heart J 2006; Epub
30. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD Initiative. Ann Intern Med 2003; 138: 40-44
31. Kreitner KF, Ehrhard K, Kunz RP et al. Koronare Bypassdiagnostik mit CT und MRT - eine Bestandsaufnahme. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: 1079-1088
32. Mahnken AH, Gunther RW, Krombach GA. Grundlagen der linksventrikulären Funktionsanalyse mittels MRT und MSCT. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: 1365-1379
33. Dewey M, Müller M, Eddicks S et al. Evaluation of Global and Regional Left Ventricular Function with 16-Slice Computed Tomography, Biplane Cineventriculography, and Two-Dimensional Transthoracic Echocardiography: Comparison with Magnetic Resonance Imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48: 2034-2044
34. Cademartiri F, Runza G, Luccichenti G et al. Coronary artery anomalies: incidence, pathophysiology, clinical relevance and role of diagnostic imaging. Radiol Med (Torino) 2006; 111: 376-391
35. Leitlinie der Deutschen Röntgengesellschaft (AG Herzdiagnostik). Leitlinien für den Einsatz der Computertomographie in der Diagnostik des Herzens und der großen thorakalen Gefäße. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: 632-637
36. Schuijf JD, Bax JJ, Jukema JW et al. Feasibility of assessment of coronary stent patency using 16-slice computed tomography. Am J Cardiol 2004; 94: 427-430
37. Gaspar T, Halon DA, Lewis BS et al. Diagnosis of coronary in-stent restenosis with multidetector row spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46: 1573-1579
38. Wang ZJ, Reddy GP, Gotway MB et al. CT and MR imaging of pericardial disease. Radiographics 2003; 23: S167-180
39. Dorgelo J, Willems TP, Geluk CA et al. Multidetector computed tomography-guided treatment strategy in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes: a pilot study. Eur Radiol 2005; 15: 708-713
40. Mahnken AH, Gunther RW, Krombach G. Kontrastangehobene MRT und MSCT zur kardialen Vitalitätsdiagnostik. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2006; 178: 771-780
41. Kovacs A, Probst C, Sommer T et al. CT-Koronarangiographie bei Patienten mit Vorhofflimmern. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2005; 177: 1655-1662
42. Dewey M, Hoffmann H, Hamm B. Mehrschicht-CT-Koronarangiographie: Einfluss der sublingualen Nitroglyceringabe auf den proximalen Durchmesser der Koronararterien. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2006; 178: 600-604
43. Cademartiri F, Luccichenti G, Marano R et al. Use of saline chaser in the intravenous administration of contrast material in non-invasive coronary angiography with 16-row multislice Computed Tomography. Radiol Med (Torino) 2004; 107: 497-505
44. Cademartiri F, Mollet NR, Runza G et al. Improving diagnostic accuracy of MDCT coronary angiography in patients with mild heart rhythm irregularities using ECG editing. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 186: 634-638
45. Herzog C, Arning-Erb M, Zangos S et al. Multi-detector row CT coronary angiography: influence of reconstruction technique and heart rate on image quality. Radiology 2006; 238: 75-86
46. Leschka S, Wildermuth S, Boehm T et al. Noninvasive Coronary Angiography with 64-Section CT: Effect of Average Heart Rate and Heart Rate Variability on Image Quality. Radiology 2006; 241: 378-385
47. Dewey M, Schnapauff D, Laule M et al. Mehrschicht-CT- Koronarangiographie: Evaluation einer Software zur automatischen Gefäßerkennung. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: 478-483
48. Peitgen HO, Krass S, Lang M. Computerunterstützung in der klinischen bildbasierten Diagnostik und Therapie: Herausforderung für den Forschungsstandort Deutschland. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: 297-301
49. Cury RC, Pomerantsev EV, Ferencik M et al. Comparison of the degree of coronary stenoses by multidetector computed tomography versus by quantitative coronary angiography. Am J Cardiol 2005; 96: 784-787
50. Kefer J, Coche E, Legros G et al. Head-to-head comparison of three-dimensional navigator-gated magnetic resonance imaging and 16-slice computed tomography to detect coronary artery stenosis in patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46: 92-100
51. Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O'Neill WW et al. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46: 552-557
52. Dewey M, Rutsch W, Schnapauff D et al. Coronary Artery Stenosis Quantification with Multislice Computed Tomography. Invest Radiol 2007; 42: 78-84
53. Vogl TJ, Abolmaali ND, Diebold T et al. Techniques for the detection of coronary atherosclerosis: multi-detector row CT coronary angiography. Radiology 2002; 223: 212-220
54. Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL et al. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 1975; 51: 5-40
55. Golder W. Plädoyer fur einen Antibarbarus der radiologischen Fachsprache. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2003; 175: 1029-1031
56. Ropers D, Baum U, Pohle K et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses with thin-slice multi-detector row spiral computed tomography and multiplanar reconstruction. Circulation 2003; 107: 664-666
57. Hoffmann U, Moselewski F, Cury RC et al. Predictive value of 16-slice multidetector spiral computed tomography to detect significant obstructive coronary artery disease in patients at high risk for coronary artery disease: patient-versus segment-based analysis. Circulation 2004; 110: 2638-2643
58. Martuscelli E, Romagnoli A, D'Eliseo A et al. Accuracy of thin-slice computed tomography in the detection of coronary stenoses. Eur Heart J 2004; 25: 1043-1048
59. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, Krestin GP et al. Improved diagnostic accuracy with 16-row multi-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 45: 128-132
60. Achenbach S, Ropers D, Pohle FK et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses using multi-detector CT with 16 ' 0.75 collimation and 375 ms rotation. Eur Heart J 2005; 26: 1978-1986
61. Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A et al. Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. Eur Heart J 2005; 26: 1482-1487
62. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, van Mieghem CA et al. High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation 2005; 112: 2318-2323
63. Pugliese F, Mollet NR, Runza G et al. Diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive 64-slice CT coronary angiography in patients with stable angina pectoris. Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 575-582
64. Ropers D, Rixe J, Anders K et al. Usefulness of Multidetector Row Spiral Computed Tomography With 64- ' 0.6-mm Collimation and 330-ms Rotation for the Noninvasive Detection of Significant Coronary Artery Stenoses. Am J Cardiol 2006; 97: 343-348
65. Nikolaou K, Knez A, Rist C et al. Accuracy of 64-MDCT in the diagnosis of ischemic heart disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 187: 111-117
66. Ehara M, Surmely JF, Kawai M et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography for detecting angiographically significant coronary artery stenosis in an unselected consecutive patient population: comparison with conventional invasive angiography. Circ J 2006; 70: 564-571
67. Garria MJ, Lessick J, Hoffmann MH. Accuracy of 16-row multidetector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery stenosis. JAMA 2006; 296: 403-411
68. Leber AW, Knez A, von Ziegler F et al. Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46: 147-154
69. Kitagawa T, Fujii T, Tomohiro Y et al. Noninvasive assessment of coronary stents in patients by 16-slice computed tomography. Int J Cardiol 2006; 109: 188-194
70. Cademartiri F, Mollet N, Lemos PA et al. Usefulness of multislice computed tomographic coronary angiography to assess in-stent restenosis. Am J Cardiol 2005; 96: 799-802
71. Gilard M, Cornily JC, Rioufol G et al. Noninvasive assessment of left main coronary stent patency with 16-slice computed tomography. Am J Cardiol 2005; 95: 110-112
72. Van Mieghem CA, Cademartiri F, Mollet NR et al. Multislice spiral computed tomography for the evaluation of stent patency after left main coronary artery stenting: a comparison with conventional coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. Circulation 2006; 114: 645-653
73. Rixe J, Achenbach S, Ropers D et al. Assessment of coronary artery stent restenosis by 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography. Eur Heart J 2006; 27: 2567-2572
74. Gilard M, Cornily JC, Pennec PY et al. Assessment of coronary artery stents by 16 slice computed tomography. Heart 2006; 92: 58-61
75. Rentrop KP, Cohen M, Blanke H et al. Changes in collateral channel filling immediately after controlled coronary artery occlusion by an angioplasty balloon in human subjects. J Am Coll Cardiol 1985; 5: 587-592
76. Dewey M, Dubel HP. Coronary collaterals. Eur Heart J 2005; 26: 2595
77. Hoffmann MH, Lessick J, Manzke R et al. Automatic determination of minimal cardiac motion phases for computed tomography imaging: initial experience. Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 365-373