High-definition multidetector computed tomography for evaluation of coronary artery stents: Comparison to standard-definition 64-detector row computed tomography

Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 246-251

  Min, James K ^a   Swaminathan, Rajesh V ^a   Vass, Melissa ^b   Gallagher, Scott ^b   Weinsaft, Jonathan W ^a  

^a WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^b GE HEALTHCARE   (United States)

Author keywords

Computed tomography; Iterative reconstruction; Spatial resolution

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORONARY STENT; EX VIVO STUDY; HIGH DEFINITION COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NOISE REDUCTION; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL PARAMETERS;

BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; HUMANS; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STENTS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 67649391776     PISSN: 19345925     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2009.06.006     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Budoff M.J., Dowe D., Jollis J.G., Gitter M., Sutherland J., Halamert E., Scherer M., Bellinger R., Martin A., Benton R., Delago A., and Min J.K. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 52 (2008) 1724-1732
2. Hamon M., Biondi-Zoccai G.G., Malagutti P., Agostoni P., Morello R., Valgimigli M., and Hamon M. Diagnostic performance of multislice spiral computed tomography of coronary arteries as compared with conventional invasive coronary angiography: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 48 (2006) 1896-1910
3. Raff G.L., Gallagher M.J., O'Neill W.W., and Goldstein J. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 46 (2005) 552-557
4. Manghat N., Van Lingen R., Hewson P., Syed F., Kakani N., Cox I., Roobottom C., and Morgan-Hughes G. Usefulness of 64-detector row computed tomography for evaluation of intracoronary stents in symptomatic patients with suspected in-stent restenosis. Am J Cardiol 101 (2008) 1567-1573
5. Hecht H.S., Zaric M., Jelnin V., Lubarsky L., Prakash M., and Roubin G. Usefulness of 64-detector computed tomographic angiography for diagnosing in-stent restenosis in native coronary arteries. Am J Cardiol 101 (2008) 820-824
6. Cademartiri F., Schuijf J.D., Pugliese F., Mollet N.R., Jukema J.W., Maffei E., Kroft L.J., Palumbo A., Ardissino D., Serruys P.W., Krestin G.P., Van der Wall E.E., de Feyter P.J., and Bax J.J. Usefulness of 64-slice multislice computed tomography coronary angiography to assess in-stent restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 49 (2007) 2204-2210
7. Hamon M., Champ-Rigot L., Morello R., Riddell J.W., and Hamon M. Diagnostic accuracy of in-stent coronary restenosis detection with multislice spiral computed tomography: a meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 18 (2008) 217-225
8. Seifarth H., Ozgun M., Raupach R., Flohr T., Heindel W., Fischbach R., and Maintz D. 64- Versus 16-slice CT angiography for coronary artery stent assessment: in vitro experience. Invest Radiol 41 (2006) 22-27
9. Maintz D., Seifarth H., Raupach R., Flohr T., Rink M., Sommer T., Ozgun M., Heindel W., and Fischbach R. 64-slice multidetector coronary CT angiography: in vitro evaluation of 68 different stents. Eur Radiol 16 (2006) 818-826
10. Hendel R.C., Patel M.R., Kramer C.M., Poon M., Hendel R.C., Carr J.C., Gerstad N.A., Gillam L.D., Hodgson J.M., Kim R.J., Kramer C.M., Lesser J.R., Martin E.T., Messer J.V., Redberg R.F., Rubin G.D., Rumsfeld J.S., Taylor A.J., Weigold W.G., Woodard P.K., Brindis R.G., Hendel R.C., Douglas P.S., Peterson E.D., Wolk M.J., Allen J.M., and Patel M.R. ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American College of Radiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Interventional Radiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 48 (2006) 1475-1497
11. Thibault J.B., Sauer K.D., Bouman C.A., and Hsieh J. A three-dimensional statistical approach to improved image quality for multislice helical CT. Med Phys 34 (2007) 4526-4544