Information systems in the public sector: The e-Government enactment framework

Journal of Strategic Information Systems

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 52-66

  Cordella, Antonio ^a   Iannacci, Federico ^b  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

^b CANTERBURY CHRIST CHURCH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Case study research; e Government; e Government enactment framework; Public sector ICT; Technology enactment framework

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL APPROACH; CASE STUDY RESEARCH; E-GOVERNMENT; IN-DEPTH INVESTIGATION; NEW TECHNOLOGIES; POLITICAL INTEREST; PUBLIC SECTOR; PUBLIC SECTOR ICT; PUBLIC SECTOR INFORMATION;

COMPUTER CRIME; DESIGN; GOVERNMENT DATA PROCESSING; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; RESEARCH; SAILING VESSELS; TECHNOLOGY;

PUBLIC POLICY;

EID: 77949486563     PISSN: 09638687     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsis.2010.01.001     Document Type: Article

References (91)

1. Aberbach J., and Christensen T. Citizens and consumers: a NPM dilemma. Public Management Review 7 (2005) 225-246
2. Andersen K.V. Reengineering public sector organizations using information technology. In: Heeks R. (Ed). Reinventing Government in the Information Age: International Practice in IT-enabled Public Sector Reform (1999), Routledge, London
3. APSA U, 2002. Benchmarking E-Government: A Global Perspective. United Nations, New York.
4. Asgarkhani M. Digital government and its effectiveness in public management reform. Public Management Review 7 (2005) 465-487
5. Auld, L.J., 2001. A Review of the Criminal Courts of England and Wales. Mo Justice.
6. Avgerou C., and Walsham G. Information Technology in Context: Studies from the Perspective of Developing Countries (2000), Ashgate Ashgate Publishing
7. Barley S.R. Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of ct scanners and the social order of radiology departments. Administrative Science Quarterly 31 (1986) 78-108
8. Barley S.R. Images of imaging: notes on doing longitudinal field work. Organization Science (1990) 220-247
9. Barzelay M. The New Public Management: Improving Research and Policy Dialogue (2001), University of California Press, Berkeley
10. Bateson G. Steps to an Ecology of Mind (1972), Ballantine, New York
11. Bekkers V., and Homburg V. The myths of e-government: looking beyond the assumptions of a new and better government. The Information Society 23 (2007) 373-382
12. Bekkers V.J., and Zouridis S. Electronic service delivery in public administration: some trends and issues. International Review of Administrative Sciences 65 (1999) 183-196
13. Bellamy C., and Taylor J. New information and communications technologies and institutional change. International Journal of Public Sector Management 9 (1996) 51-69
14. Benbasat I., Goldstein D.K., and Mead M. The case research strategy in studies of information systems. MIS Quarterly 11 (1987) 368-386
15. Bhen R.D. The new public management paradigm and the search for government accountability. International Public Management Journal 2 (1998) 131-164
16. In: Bijker W., and Law J. (Eds). Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change (1994), The MIT Press, Cambridge Ma
17. Bozeman B., and Bretschneider S. Public management information systems: theory and prescription. Public Administration Review 46 (1986) 475-487
18. Bretschneider S. Information technology, e-government and institutional change. Public Administration Review 63 (2003) 738-741
19. Brewer G.A., Neubauer B.J., and Geiselhart K. Designing and implementing e-government systems: critical implications for public administration and democracy. Administration & Society 38 (2006) 472-499
20. Brown J.S., and Duguid P. Borderline issues: social and material aspects of design. Human-Computer Interaction 9 (1994) 3-36
21. Brownlee I.D. The statutory charging scheme in England and Wales: towards a unified prosecution system. Criminal Law Review November (2004) 896-907
22. Chadwick A., and May C. Interaction between states and citizens in the age of the internet: /e-government/ in the United States, Britain and the European Union. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions 16 (2003) 271-300
23. Chapman R.A. Concepts and issues in public sector reform: the experience of the United Kingdom in the 1980s. Public Policy and Administration 6 (1991) 1-19
24. In: Ciborra C.U. (Ed). From Control to Drift (2000), Oxford University Press, Oxford
25. CJS, 2006. The Exchange: A Beginners' Guide. OfCJ Reform.
26. CJS, 2007. Office for Criminal Justice Reform: Business Plan 2007/08. OfCJ Reform.
27. Clarke J., Gewirtz S., and McLaughlin E. New Managerialism, New Welfare? (2000), SAGE Publications Ltd.
28. Contini F., and Lanzara G.F. ICT and Innovation in the Public Sector (2008), Pelgrave, London
29. Cordella A. E-government: towards the e-bureaucratic form?. Journal of Information technology 22 (2007) 265-274
30. Cordella A., and Willcocks L. Outsourcing, bureaucracy and public value: reappraising the notion of the "contract state". Government information Quarterly 27 (2010) 82-88
31. CPS, 2003. Technology to Transform. Technology to Trust. CPS e-Strategy 2003-2008. CP Service.
32. CPS, 2006. Information System Strategy 2006-2009. Crown Prosecution Service.
33. Danziger J., Dutton W.H., Kling R., and Kraemer K. Computers and Politics: High Technology in American Local Governments (1982), Columbia University Press, New York
34. Danziger J.N., and Andersen K.V. The impacts of information technology on public administration: an analysis of empirical research from the 'golden age' of transformation. International Journal of Public Administration 25 (2002) 591-627
35. Dawes S.S. Governance in the digital age: a research and action framework for an uncertain future. Government Information Quarterly 26 (2009) 257-264
36. Denziger J.N., and Andersen K.V. The impacts of information technology on public administration: an analysis of empirical research from the 'golden age' of transformation. International Journal of Public Administration 25 (2002) 591-627
37. du Gay P. Making up managers: bureaucracy, enterprise and the liberal art of separation. The British Journal of Sociology 45 (1994) 655-674
38. Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., Tinkler, J., 2005. New public management is dead - long live digital-era governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory.
39. Dunleavy P., Margetts H., Bastow S., and Tinkler J. Digital Era Governance (2006), Oxford University Press, Oxford
40. Eisenhardt K.M. Building theories from case study research. Academy of management. The Academy of Management Review 14 (1989) 532-550
41. Fedorowicz J., Gogan L., and Williams C.B. A collaborative network for first responders: lessons from the CapWIN case. Government Information Quarterly 24 (2007) 785-807
42. Fountain J.E. Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change (2001), Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC
43. Fountain, J.E., 2007. Bureaucratic Reform and E-government in the United States: An Institutional Perspective NCDG Working Paper No. 07-006.
44. Fowles T. COUNTERBLAST: the criminal justice act 2003 - the end of an era?. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice 45 (2006) 71-73
45. Frederickson H.G. Can bureaucracy be beautiful?. Public Administration Review 60 (2000) 47-53
46. Galliers R.D. Towards the integration of e-business, knowledge management and policy considerations within an information systems strategy framework. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 8 (1999) 29-34
47. Galliers R.D. Commentary on Wanda Orlikowski's material knowing: the scaffolding of human knowledgeability. European Journal of Information Systems 15 (2006) 470-472
48. Gil-Garcia J.R., and Pardo T.A. E-government success factors: mapping practical tools to theoretical foundations. Government Information Quarterly 22 (2005) 187-216
49. Guba E.G., and Lincoln Y.S. Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In: Denzin N.K., and Lincoln Y.S. (Eds). Handbook of Qualitative Research (1994), Sage, London
50. Gupta B., Dasgupta S., and Gupta A. Adoption of ICT in a government organization in a developing country: an empirical study. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 17 (2008) 140-154
51. Gupta M.P., and Jana D. E-government evaluation: a framework and case study. Government Information Quarterly 20 (2003) 365-387
52. Hammer M. Reengineering work - don't automate, obliterate. Harvard Business Review 68 (1990) 104-112
53. Hanseth O. Information Technology as Infrastructure (1996), Göteborg University, Göteborg
54. Hanseth O., and Monteiro E. Inscribing behaviour in information infrastructure standards. Accounting, Management and Information System (1996)
55. Heeks R. Reinventing Government in the Information Age (2002), Routledge, London pp. 9-21
56. Heeks R., and Bailur S. Analyzing e-government research: perspectives, philosophies, theories, methods, and practice. Government Information Quarterly 24 (2007) 243-265
57. Homburg V. E-government and NPM: a perfect marriage?. The 6th International Conference on Electronic Commerce Delft (2004), ACM Press, The Netherland
58. Hood C. A public management for all the seasons?. Public Administration 69 (1991) 3-19
59. Hughes T. The evolution of large technological systems. In: Bijker W.E., and Law J. (Eds). The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology (1997), Cambridge University Press, Ma
60. Iannacci F. Steps towards joined-up management: ICT for crown prosecutors' offices. In: Fabri M. (Ed). ICT for the Public Prosecutor's Office (2008), Clueb, Bologna
61. Irani Z., Loveb P.E.D., and Jones S. Learning lessons from evaluating e-government: reflective case experiences that support transformational government. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 17 (2008) 155-164
62. Kallinikos J. Computer-based technology and the constitution of work: a study on the cognitive foundations of work. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies 9 (1999) 261-291
63. Layne K., and Lee J. Developing fully functional e-government: a four stage model. Government Information Quarterly 18 (2001) 122-136
64. Luna-Reyes L.F., Zhang J., Ramon Gil-Garcia J., and Cresswell A.M. Information systems development as emergent socio-technical change: a practice approach. European Journal of Information Systems (2005)
65. Madon S., Sahay S., and Sudan S. E-government policy and health information systems implementation in Andhra Pradesh, India: need for articulation of linkages between the macro and the micro. The Information society 23 (2007) 327-345
66. McLaughlin E., Muncie J., and Hughes G. The permanent revolution: new labour, new public management and the modernisation of criminal justice. Criminology and Criminal Justice 1 (2001) 301-318
67. Melitski J. Capacity and e-government performance: an analysis based on early adopters of internet technologies in New Jersey. Public Performance & Management Review 26 (2003) 376-390
68. Mitchelhill D. Justice on-line?. The Magistrate 62 (2006) 12-13
69. Moon M.J. The evolution of e-government among municipalities: rhetoric or reality?. Public Administration Review 62 (2002) 424-433
70. Moore M. Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government (1995), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
71. Norris D.F. Building the virtual state or not: a critical appraisal. Social Science Computer Review 21 (2003) 417-424
72. Orlikowski W.J. The duality of technology: rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science 3 (1992) 398-427
73. Orlikowski W.J., and Baroudi J.J. Studying information technology in organizations: research approaches and assumptions. Information Systems Research 2 (1991) 1-28
74. Osborne D., and Gaebler T. Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector (1992), Addison-Wesley, Massachusetts
75. Panel P.S.P. Public Services Productivity: Meeting the Challenge (2000), HM Treasury, London
76. Pettigrew A.M. Longitudinal field research on change: theory and practice. Organization Science 1 (1990) 267-292
77. Pollit C., and Bouchaert G. Public Management Reform (2004), Oxford University Press, Oxford
78. Sanders A., and Young R. Prosecutions Ch. 6. In: Sanders A., and Young R. (Eds). Criminal Justice (2002), Reed Elsevier Ltd., London
79. Sawyer S., and Rosenbaum H. Social informatics in the information sciences: current activities and emerging directions. Informing Science 3 (2000) 89-95
80. Self, P., 2000. Rolling Back the State. Economic Dogma and Political Choice. St. Martin's Press, New York.
81. Thong J.Y.L., Yap C.-S., and Seah K.-L. Business process reengineering in the public sector: the case of the housing development board in Singapore. Journal of Management Information Systems 17 (2000) 245-270
82. Tom C., and Per L. The whole-of-government approach to public sector reform. Public Administration Review 67 (2007) 1059-1066
83. UN, 2001. Benchmarking E-government: A global Perspective - Assessing the Progress of the UN Member States. United Nations, Division for Public Economics and Public Administration and American Society for Public Administration.
84. UN, ASPA, 2002. Benchmarking E-government: A Global Perspective. United Nations Division of Public Economics and Public Administration and the American Society for Public Administration, New York.
85. Venkatraman N. IT-enabled business transformation: from automation to business scope redefinition. Sloan Management Review 35 (1994) 73-87
86. Wagner E., and Newell S. Best' for whom? The tension between 'best practice' ERP packages and diverse epistemic cultures in a university context. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 13 (2004) 305-328
87. Wagner E., and Newell S. Does best-practice make perfect. Cutter Benchmark Review 6 (2006) 5-12
88. Wagner E., Newell S., and Galliers R.D. The creation of 'best practice' software: myth, reality and ethics. Information and Organization 16 (2006) 251-275
89. West D.M. E-government and the transformation of service delivery and citizen attitudes. Public Administration Review 64 (2004) 15-27
90. Yildiz M. E-government research: reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward. Government Information Quarterly 24 (2007) 646-665
91. Yin R.K. Case Study Research: Design and Methods (2003), Sage Publications, Thousands Oaks