A collaborative network for first responders: Lessons from the CapWIN case

Government Information Quarterly

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 785-807

  Fedorowicz, Jane ^a   Gogan, Janis L ^a   Williams, Christine B ^a  

^a BENTLEY COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

CapWIN; Collaborative network; Cross boundary collaboration; eGovernment; First responder; Information sharing; Interagency integration; Interorganizational systems; IOS

Indexed keywords

EID: 35649000820     PISSN: 0740624X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2007.06.001     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Agranoff R., and McGuire M. A jurisdiction-based model of intergovernmental management in U.S. cities. Publius 28 4 (1998) 1-20
2. Agranoff R., and McGuire M. American federalism and the search for models of management. Public Administration Review 61 6 (2001) 671-682
3. Bardach E. Developmental dynamics: Interagency collaboration as an emergent phenomenon. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 11 2 (2001) 149-164
4. Bensao M. Interorganizational cooperation: The role of information technology-An empirical comparison of U.S. and Japanese supplier relations. Information Systems Research 8 2 (1997) 107-124
5. Bozeman B., and Bretschneider S. Public management information systems: Theory and prescription. Public Administration Review Special Issue (1986) 475-487
6. Cash Jr. J.I., and Konsynski B.R. IS redraws competitive boundaries. Harvard Business Review (1985, March-April) 134-142
7. Chwelos P., Benbasat I., and Dexter A.S. Research report: Empirical test of an EDI adoption model. Information Systems Research 12 3 (2001, September) 304-321
8. Clark T., and Stoddard D.B. Interorganizational business process redesign: Merging technological and process innovation. Journal of Management Information Systems 13 2 (1996) 9-28
9. Crook C.W., and Kumar R.L. Electronic data interchange: A multi-industry investigation using grounded theory. Information and Management 34 (1998) 75-89
10. Dawes S.S. Interagency information sharing: Expected benefits, manageable risks. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 15 (1995) 377-394
11. Dawes, S. S., & Eglene, O. (2004). New models of collaboration for delivering government services: A dynamic model drawn from multi-national research. The National Digital Government Research Conference (DGo), Seattle, 2004, http://dgrc.org/dgo2004/disc/presentations/collaboration/dawes.pdf
12. Dawes S.S., Pardo T.A., and Cresswell A.M. Designing electronic government information access programs: A holistic approach. Government Information Quarterly 21 (2004) 3-23
13. Drake D.D., Steckler N.A., and Koch M.J. Information sharing in and across government agencies: the role and influence of scientist, politician, and bureaucrat subcultures. Social Science Computer Review 22 1 (2004) 67-84 (Spring)
14. Elgarah W., Falaleeva N., Saunders C.S., Ilie V., Shim J.T., and Courtney J.F. Data exchange in interorganizational relationships: Review through multiple conceptual lenses. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems 36 1 (2005) 9-21
15. Fedorowicz J., Gogan J.L., and Williams C.B. The challenge of interagency integration: Lessons learned in five eGovernment cases (2006), IBM Center for the Business of Government Monograph, Washington, DC
16. Fountain J.E. Building the virtual state: Information technology and institutional change (2001), Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC
17. Gil-Garcia J.R., and Pardo T.A. E-government success factors: Mapping practical tools to theoretical foundations. Government Information Quarterly 22 (2005) 187-216
18. Gluckman, S., & Mechling, J. (2003). Capital Wireless Integrated Network (CapWIN): An integrated transportation and public safety information network. John F. Kennedy School of Government Case Collection, Harvard University.
19. Gosain S., Malhotra A., and El Sawy O.A. Coordinating for flexibility in e-business supply chains. Journal of Management Information Systems 21 3 (2004-5) 7-45
20. Grover V. An empirically derived model for the adoption of customer-based interorganizational systems. Decision Sciences 24 3 (1993) 603-640
21. Guijarro L. Interoperability frameworks and enterprise architectures in e-government initiatives in Europe and the United States. Government Information Quarterly 24 1 (2007) 89-101
22. Hart P.M. Emerging electronic partnerships: Antecedents and dimensions of EDI use from the suppliers' perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems 14 4 (1998) 87-111
23. Hart P.M., and Saunders C. Power and trust: Critical factors in the adoption and use of electronic data interchange. Organization Science 8 1 (1997) 23-42
24. Iacovou C.L., Benbasat I., and Dexter A.S. Electronic data interchange and small organizations: Adoption and impact of technology. MIS Quarterly 19 4 (1995) 465-485
25. Kingdon J.W. Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. second edition (1995), HarperCollins, New York
26. Kumar R.L., and Crook C.W. A multi-disciplinary framework for the management of interorganizational systems. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems 30 1 (1999) 22-37
27. Markus M.L. Technology shaping effects of e-collaboration technologies: Bugs and features. International Journal of E-Collaboration 1 1 (2005) 1-23
28. Milward, H. B., & Provan, K. G. (2006). A manager's guide to choosing and using collaborative networks. Report published by the IBM Center for the Business of Government, Washington, DC.
29. Moynihan. (2005). Leveraging collaborative networks in infrequent emergency situations. Report published by the IBM Center for the Business of Government. Washington, DC.
30. Murphy D.A. Presenting community level data in "outcomes and indicators" framework: Lessons from Vermont's experience. Public Administration Review 59 1 (1999) 76-82
31. Pardo T.A., Cresswell A.M., Dawes S.S., and Burke G.B. Modeling the social and technical processes of interorganizational information integration. Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2004)
32. Provan K.G., and Milward H.B. Do networks really work? A framework for evaluating public-sector organizational networks. Public Administration Review 61 4 (2001) 414-424
33. Provan K.G., Milward H.B., and Brinton H. A preliminary theory of interorganizational network effectiveness: A comparative study of four community mental health systems. Administrative Science Quarterly 40 1 (1995) 1-33
34. Saeed K.A., Malhotra M.K., and Grover V. Examining the impact of interorganizational systems on process efficiency and sourcing leverage in buyer-suppler dyads. Decision Sciences 36 3 (2005) 365
35. Saunders C.S., and Clark S. EDI adoption and implementation: A focus on interorganizational linkages. Information Resource Management Journal 5 1 (1992) 9-19
36. Truman G.E. Integration in electronic exchange environments. Journal of Management Information Systems 17 1 (2000) 209-244
37. Weiss J.A. Pathways to cooperation among public agencies. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 7 1 (1987) 94-117
38. West D.M. Digital government (2005), Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
39. Ya Ni A., and Tat-Kei Ho A. Challenges in e-government development: Lessons from two information kiosk projects. Government Information Quarterly 22 (2005) 58-74