Eye movement trajectories in active visual search: Contributions of attention, memory, and scene boundaries to pattern formation

Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

Volumn 72, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 114-141

  Keech, T D ^a   Resca, L ^a  

^a CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; EYE MOVEMENT; HUMAN; MEMORY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; THEORETICAL MODEL; VISION;

ATTENTION; EYE MOVEMENTS; HUMANS; MEMORY; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 77949331161     PISSN: 19433921     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/APP.72.1.114     Document Type: Article

References (148)

1. AKS, D. J. (2005). 1/f dynamic in complex visual search: Evidence for self-organized criticality in human perception. In M. A. Riley & G. C. Van Orden (Eds.), Tutorials in contemporary nonlinear methods for the behavioral sciences (pp. 326-359). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. Available at wwwjisf.gov/sbe/bcs/pac/nmbs/nmbs.jsp.
2. AKS, D. J., ZELINSKY, G., & SPROTT, J. C. (2002). Memory across eyemovements: 1/f dynamic in visual search. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, & Life Sciences, 6, 1-25.
3. BALL, K. K., BEARD, B. L., ROENKER, D. L., MILLER, R. L., & GRIGGS, D. S. (1988). Age and visual search: Expanding the useful field of view. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 5, 2210-2219.
4. BAYUS, G. C., & DRIVER, J. (1993). Visual attention and objects: Evidence for hierarchical coding of location. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 451-470.
5. BECK, M. R., PETERSON, M. S., BOOT, W. R., VOMELA, M., & KRAMER, A. F. (2006). Explicit memory for rejected distractors during visual search. Visual Cognition, 14, 150-174.
6. BECK, M. R., PETERSON, M. S., & VOMELA, M. (2006). Memory for where, but not what, is used during visual search. Journal of Expertmental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 32, 235-250.
7. BOCCIGNONE, G., & FERRARO, M. (2004). Modelling gaze shifts as a constrained random walk. Physlca A, 331, 207-218.
8. BOOT, W. R., MCCARLEY, J. S., KRAMER, A. F., & PETERSON, M. S. (2004). Automatic and intentional memory processes in visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 854-861.
9. BROCKMANN, D., & GEISEL, T. (2000). The ecology of gaze shifts. Neurocomputing, 32, 643-650.
10. CAMERON, E. L., TAI, J. C., ECKSTEIN, M. P., & CARRASCO, M. (2004). Signal detection theory applied to three visual search tasksIdentification, yes/no detection and localization. Spatial Vision, 17, 295-325.
11. CASTIELLO, U., & UMILTA, C. (1990). Size of the attentional focus and efficiency of processing. Acta Psychologtca, 73, 195-209.
12. CAVE, K. R., & BICHOT, N. P. (1999). Visuospatial attention: Beyond a spotlight model. Psychonomic Bulletin A Review, 6, 204-223.
13. CAVE, K. R., & WOLFE, J. M. (1990). Modeling the role of parallel processing in visual search. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 225-271.
14. CHASTAIN, G. (1992). Analog versus discrete shifts of attention across the visual field. Psychological Research, 54, 175-181.
15. COHEN, E., & RUPPIN, E. (1999). From parallel to serial processing: A computational study of visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 1449-1461.
16. DANZIGER, S., KINGSTONE, A., & SNYDER, J. J. (1998). Inhibition of return to successively stimulated locations in a sequential visual search paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 1467-1475.
17. DEUBEL, H., & SCHNEIDER, W. X. (1996). Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism. Vision Research, 36, 1827-1837.
18. DICKINSON, C. A., & ZEUNSKY, G. J. (2005). Marking rejected distractors: A gaze-contingent technique for measuring memory during search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 1120-1126.
19. DICKINSON, C. A., & ZEUNSKY, G. J. (2007). Memory for the search path: Evidence for a high-capacity representation of search history. Vision Research, 47, 1745-1755.
20. DODD, M. D., CASTEL, A. D., & PRATT, J. (2003). Inhibition of return with rapid serial shifts of attention: Implications for memory and visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 1126-1135.
21. DOWNING, C. J. (1988). Expectancy and visual-spatial attention: Effects on perceptual quality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 14, 188-202.
22. DUNCAN, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 501-517.
23. DUNCAN, J., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433-458.
24. DUNCAN, J., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (1992). Beyond the search surface: Visual search and attentional engagement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 578-588.
25. ECKSTEIN, M. P., THOMAS, J. P., PALMER, J., & SHIMOZAKI, S. S. (2000). A signal detection model predicts the effects of set size on visual search accuracy for feature, conjunction, triple conjunction, and disjunction displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 425-451.
26. EGETH, H. E. (1977). Attention and preattentioa In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 11, pp. 277-320). New York: Academic Press.
27. EGETH, H. E., VTRZI, R. A., & GARBART, H. (1984). Searching for conjunctively defined targets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 10, 32-39.
28. ENGEL, F. L. (1971). Visual conspicuity, directed attention and retinal locus. Vision Research, 11, 563-576.
29. ENGEL, F. L. (1974). Visual conspicuity and selective background interference in eccentric vision. Vision Research, 14, 459-471.
30. ENGEL, F. L. (1977). Visual conspicuity, visual search and fixation tendencies of the eye. Vision Research, 17, 95-108.
31. ERKSEN, C. W., & MURPHY, T. D. (1987). Movement of the attentional focus across the visual field: A critical look at the evidence. Perception A Psychophysics, 42, 299-305.
32. ERIKSEN, C. W., & ST. JAMES, J. D. (1986). Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 225-240.
33. FINDLAY, J. M. (1997). Saccade target selection during visual search. Vision Research, 37, 617-631.
34. FINDLAY, J. M., & BROWN, V. (2006a). Eye scanning of multi-element displays: I. Scanpath planning Vision Research, 46, 179-195.
35. FINDLAY, J. M., & BROWN, V. (2006b). Eye scanning of multi-element displays: II. Saccade planning. Vision Research, 46, 216-227.
36. FINDLAY, J. M., BROWN, V., & GILCHRIST, I. D. (2001). Saccade target selection in visual search: The effect of information from the previous fixation. Vision Research, 41, 87-95.
37. FINDLAY, J. M., & WALKER, R. (1999). A model of saccadic eye movement generation based on parallel processing and competitive inhibition. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 22, 661-721.
38. GIBSON, B. S. (1994). Visual attention and objects: One versus two or convex versus concave? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 203-207.
39. GIBSON, B. S., & EGETH, H. (1994a). Inhibition and disinhibition of return: Evidence for temporal order judgments. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 669-680.
40. GIBSON, B. S., & EGETH, H. (1994b). Inhibition of return to object-based and environment-based locations. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 323-339.
41. GIBSON, B. S., Li, L., SKOW, E., BROWN, K., & COOKE, L. (2000). Searching for one versus two identical targets: When visual search has memory. Psychological Science, 11, 324-327.
42. GILCHRIST, I. D., & HARVEY, M. (2000). Refixation frequency and memory mechanisms in visual search. Current Biology, 10, 1209-1212.
43. GILCHRIST, I. D., & HARVEY, M. (2006). Evidence for a systematic component within scan paths in visual search. Visual Cognition, 14, 704-715.
44. GILCHRIST, I. D., NORTH, A., & HOOD, B. (2001). Is visual search really like foraging? Perception, 30, 1459-1464.
45. GREEN, D. M., & SWETS, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Krieger.
46. GREENWOOD, P. M., & PARASURAMAN, R. (1999). Scale of attentional focus in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 837-859.
47. GREENWOOD, P. M., & PARASURAMAN, R. (2004). The scaling of spatial attention in visual search and its modification in healthy aging. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 3-22.
48. HENDERSON, J. M. (1992). Visual attention and eye-movement control during reading and picture viewing. In K. Rayner (Ed.), Eye movements and visual cognition: Scene perception and reading (pp. 260-283). New York: Springer.
49. HENDERSON, J. M. (1993). Visual attention and saccadic eye movements. In G. d'Ydewalle & J. van Rensbergen (Eds.), Perception and cognition: Advances in eye movement research (pp. 37-50). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
50. HOOGE, I. T. C., & ERKELENS, C. J. (1996). Control of fixation duration in a simple search task. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 969-976.
51. HOOGE, I. T. C., & ERKELENS, C. J. (1998). Adjustment of fixation duration in visual search. Vision Research, 38, 1295-1302.
52. HOOGE, I. T. C., & ERKELENS, C. J. (1999). Peripheral vision and oculomotor control during visual search. Vision Research, 39, 1567-1575.
53. HOROWITZ, T. S., & WOLFE, J. M. (1998). Visual search has no memory. Nature, 394, 575-577.
54. HOROWITZ, T. S., & WOLFE, J. M. (2001). Search for multiple targets: Remember the targets, forget the search. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 272-285.
55. HOROWITZ, T. S., & WOLFE, J. M. (2003). Memory for rejected distractors in visual search? Visitai Cognition, 10, 257-298.
56. IKEDA, M., & TAKEUCHI, T. (1975). Influence of foveal load on the functional visual field. Perception & Psychophysics, 18, 255-260.
57. IRWIN, D. E., & ZEUNSKY, G. J. (2002). Eye movements and scene perception: Memory for things observed. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 882-895.
58. ITTI, L., & KOCH, C. (2000). A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention. Vision Research, 40, 1489-1506.
59. ITTI, L., & KOCH, C. (2001). Computational modeling of visual attention. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 1-11.
60. JULESZ, B. (1981 ). A theory of preattentive texture discrimination based on first order statistics of textons. Biological Cybernetics, 41, 131-138.
61. JULESZ, B. (1984). A brief outline of the texton theory of human vision. Trends in Neurosciences, 7, 41-45.
62. JULESZ, B., & BERGEN, J. R. (1983). Textons, the fundamental elements in preattentive vision and perception of textures. Bell Systems Technology, 62, 1619-1646.
63. KEECH, T. D. (2006). Dynamics of spontaneous saccades in a conjunctive visual search task. Doctoral thesis, Catholic University of America, Department of Physics. Full-text PDF available from http://libraries.cua.edu/welcome.html under the Dissertations from CUA database selection.
64. KEECH, T. D., GREENWOOD, P. M., RESCA, L., & PARASURAMAN, R. (2009). Active visual search in young and older humans: The interplay of attention and memory. Unpublished manuscript.
65. KEECH, T. D., & RESCA, L. (in press). Eye movements in active visual search: A computable phenomenological model. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.
66. KLEIN, R. [M.] (1988). Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search. Nature, 334, 430-431.
67. KLEIN, R. M. (2000). Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 138-147.
68. KLEIN, R. M., & MACINNES, W. J. (1999). Inhibition of return is a foraging facilitator in visual search. Psychological Science, 10, 346-352.
69. KLEIN, R. M., & TAYLOR, T. L. (1994). Categories of cognitive inhibition with reference to attention. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 113-150). San Diego: Academic Press.
70. KOCH, C., & ULLMAN, S. (1985). Shifts in selective visual attention: Toward the underlying neural circuitry. Human Neurobiology, 4, 219-227.
71. KOWLER, E., ANDERSON, E., DOSHER, B., & BLASER, E. (1995). The role of attention in the programming of saccades. Vision Research, 35, 1897-1916.
72. KRAISS, K. F., & KNXEUPER, A. (1982). Using visual lobe area measurements to predict visual search performance. Human Factors, 24, 673-682.
73. KRISTJXNSSON, A. (2000). In search of remembrance: Evidence for memory in visual search. Psychological Science, 11, 328-332.
74. LABERGE, D., & BROWN, V. (1989). Theory of attentional operations in shape identification. Psychological Review, 96, 101-124.
75. LÉVY-SCHOEN, A. (1981). Flexible and/or rigid control of oculomotor scanning behavior. In D. Fisher, R. A. Monty, & J. Sender (Eds.), Eye movements: Cognition and visual perception (pp. 299-314). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
76. LOFTUS, G. R., & MASSON, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 476-490.
77. LUPIÁÑEZ, J., KLEIN, R. M., & BARTOLOMEO, P. (2006). Inhibition of return: Twenty years after. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23, 1003-1014.
78. MASSON, M. E. J., & LOFTUS, G. R. (2003). Using confidence intervals for graphically based data interpretation. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 203-220.
79. MCCARLEY, J. S., WANG, R. F., KRAMER, A. R, IRWIN, D. E, & PETERSON, M. S. (2003). How much memory does oculomotor search have? Psychological Science, 14, 422-426.
80. MCPEEK, R. M., SKAVENSKI, A. A., & NAKAYAMA, K. (2000). Concurrent processing of saccades in visual search. Vision Research, 40, 2499-2516.
81. MOTTER, B. C., & BELKY, E. J. (1998a). The guidance of eye movements during active visual search. Vision Research, 38, 1805-1815.
82. MOTTER, B. C., & BELKY, E. J. (1998b). The zone of focal attention during active visual search. Vision Research, 38, 1007-1022.
83. MOTTER, B. C., & HOLSAPPLE, J. W. (2000). Cortical image density determines the probability of target discovery during active search. Vision Research, 40, 1311-1322.
84. MOTTER, B. C., & HOLSAPPLE, J. W. (2001). Separating attention from chance in active visual search. In J. Braun, C. Koch, & J. Davis (Eds.), Visual attention and neural circuits (pp. 159-175). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
85. MOTTER, B. C., & HOLSAPPLE, J. W. (2007). Saccades and covert shifts of attention during active visual search: Spatial distributions, memory, and items per fixation. Vision Research, 47, 1261-1281.
86. MOTTER, B. C., & SIMONI, D. A. (2007). The roles of cortical image separation and size in active visual search performance. Journal of Vision, 7(2, Art 6), 1-15. Available at http://journalofvision.org/7/2/6/. doi:10.1167/7.2.6
87. MOTTER, B. C., & SIMONI, D. A. (2008). Changes in the functional visual field during search with and without eye movements. Vision Research, 48, 2382-2393.
88. MÜLLER, H. J., & VON MN̈HLENEN, A. (2000). Probing distractor inhibition in visual search: Inhibition of return. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 32, 1591-1605.
89. MÜLLER, N. G., BARTELT, O. A., DONNER, T. H., VILLRINGER, A., & BRANDT, S. A. (2003). A physiological correlate of the "zoom lens" of visual attention. Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 3561-3565.
90. MURPHY, T. D., & ERIKSEN, C. W. (1987). Temporal changes in the distribution of attention in the visual field in response to precues. Perception & Psychophysics, 42, 576-586.
91. NAJEMNIK, J., & GEISLER, W. S. (2005). Optimal eye movement strategies in visual search. Nature, 434, 387-391.
92. NOTON, D., & STARK, L. W. (1971 ). Scanpaths in eye movements during pattern perception. Science, 171, 308-311.
93. OPPENHEIM, A. V., SCHÄFER, R. W., & BUCK, J. R. (1999). Discrete-time signal processing (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
94. PALMER, J., VERGHESE, P., & PAVEL, M. (2000). The psychophysics of visual search. Vision Research, 40, 1227-1268.
95. PASHLER, H. (1987). Detecting conjunctions of color and form: Reassessing the serial search hypothesis. Perception & Psychophysics, 41, 191-201.
96. PATHRIA, R. K. (1996). Statistical mechanics (2nd ed.). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
97. PETERSON, M. S., BECK, M. R., & VOMELA, M. (2007). Visual search is guided by prospective and retrospective memory. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 123-135.
98. PETERSON, M. S., KRAMER, A. F., & IRWIN, D. E. (2004). Covert shifts of attention precede involuntary eye movements. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 398-405.
99. PETERSON, M. S., KRAMER, A. F., IRWIN, D. E., & HAHN, S. (2002). Modulation of oculomotor capture by abrupt onsets during attentionairy demanding visual search. Visual Cognition, 9, 755-791.
100. PETERSON, M. S., KRAMER, A. F., WANG, R. F., IRWIN, D. E., & McCARLEY, J. S. (2001). Visual search has memory. Psychological Science, 12, 287-292.
101. POMPLUN, M., REINGOLD, E. M., & SHEN, J. (2003). Area activation: A computational model of saccadic selectivity in visual search. Cognitive Science, 27, 299-312.
102. POSNER, M. L, & COHEN, V. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In R Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 531-556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
103. POSNER, M. L, RAFAL, R. D., CHOATE, L. S., & VAUGHAN, J. (1985). Inhibition of return: Neural basis and function. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2, 211-228.
104. SAARINEN, J., & JULESZ, B. (1991). The speed of attentional shifts in the visual field. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 88, 1812-1814.
105. SAGI, D., & JULESZ, B. (1985). Fast noninertial shifts of attention. Spatial Vision, 1, 141-149.
106. SANDERS, A. F. (1970). Some aspects of the selective process in the functional visual field. Ergonomics, 13, 101-117.
107. SANDERS, A. F. & HOUTMANS, M. J. M. (1985). Perceptual processing modes in the functional visual field. Acta Psychologica, 58, 251-261.
108. SCIALFA, C. T., KLINE, D. W., & LYMAN, B. J. (1987). Age differences in target identification as a function of retinal location and noise level: An examination of the useful field of view. Psychological Aging, 2, 14-19.
109. SCALFA, C. T., THOMAS, D. M., & JOFFE, K. M. (1994). Age differences in the useful field of view: An eye movement analysis. Optometry & Vision Science, 71, 736-742.
110. SCINTO, L. F. M., PiLLALAMARRi, R., & KARSH, R. (1986). Cognitive strategies for visual search. Acta Psychologica, 62, 263-292.
111. SHORE, D. L, & KLEIN, R. M. (2000). On the manifestations of memory in visual search. Spatial Vision, 14, 59-75.
112. SNYDER, J. J., & KINGSTONE, A. (2000). Inhibition of return and visual search: How many separate loci are inhibited? Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 452-458.
113. SPALEK, T. M., & HAMMAD, S. (2004). Supporting the attentional momentum view of IOR: Is attention biased to go right? Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 219-233.
114. SPERLING, G., & WEICHSELGARTNER, E. (1995). Episodic theory of the dynamics of spatial attention. Psychological Review, 102, 503-532.
115. STARK, L. W., & CHOI, Y. S. (1996). Experimental metaphysics: The scanpath as an epistemological mechanism. In W. H. Zangemeister, H. S. Stiehl, & C. Freksa (Eds.), Visual attention and cognition (pp. 3-69). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
116. SWETS, J. A. (ED.) (1964). Signal detection and recognition by human observers: Contemporary readings. New York: Wiley.
117. TAKEDA, Y. (2004). Search for multiple targets: Evidence for memorybased control of attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 71-76.
118. TAKEDA, Y., & YAGI, A. (2000). Inhibitory tagging in visual search can be found if search stimuli remain visible. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 921-934.
119. TANNER, W. P., JR., & SWETS, J. A. (1954). A decision-making theory of visual detection. Psychological Review, 61, 401-409.
120. TAYLOR, T. L., & KLEIN, R. M. (1998). On the causes and effects of inhibition of return. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 625-643.
121. THORNTON, I. M., & HOROWITZ, T. S. (2004). The multi-item localization (MILO) task: Measuring the spatiotemporal context of vision for action. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 38-50.
122. TIPPER, S. P., WEAVER, B., JERREAT, L. M., & BURAK, A. L. (1994). Object-based and environment-based inhibition of return of visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 478-499.
123. TbRRALBA, A., OLIVA, A., CASTELHANO, M. S., & HENDERSON, J. M. (2006). Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in realworld scenes: The role of global features on object search. Psychological Review, 113, 766-786.
124. TREISMAN, A. [M.] (1988). Features and objects: The 14th Bartlett Memorial Lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A, 201-237.
125. TREISMAN, A. M., & GELADB, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
126. TREISMAN, A. [M.], & GORMICAN, S. (1988). Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries. Psychological Review, 95, 15-48.
127. TREISMAN, A. [M.], & SATO, S. (1990). Conjunction search revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 459-478.
128. UNEMA, P. J. A., PANNASCH, S., JOOS, M., & VELICHKOVSKY, B. M. (2005). Time course of information processing during scene perception: The relationship between saccade amplitude and fixation duration. Visual Cognition, 12, 473-494.
129. VERGHESE, P. (2001). Visual search and attention: A signal detection theory approach. Neuron, 31, 523-535.
130. VON MÜHLENEN, A., MÜLLER, H. J., & MÜLLER, D. (2003). Sit-andwait strategies in dynamic visual search. Psychological Science, 14, 309-314.
131. WIDDEL, H. (1983). A method of measuring the visual lobe area. In R. Groner, C. Menz, D. F. Fisher, & R. A. Monty (Eds.), Eye movements and psychological functions: International views (pp. 73-83). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
132. WIDDEL, H., & KASTER, J. (1981). Eye movement measurements in the assessment and training of visual performance. In J. Moraal & K. F. Kraiss (Eds.), Manned systems design, methods, equipment and applications (pp. 251-270). New York: Plenum.
133. WILUAMS, D. E., & REINGOLD, E. M. (2001). Preattentive guidance of eye movements during triple conjunction search tasks: The effects of feature discriminability and saccadic amplitude. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 476-488.
134. WILLIAMS, L. G. (1966). Target conspicuity and visual search. Human Factors, 8, 80-92.
135. WOLFE, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 202-238.
136. WOLFE, J. M. (1998). Visual search. In H. Pashler (Ed.), Attention (pp. 13-73). Hove, UK.: Psychology Press.
137. WOLFE, J. M. (2003). Moving toward solutions to some enduring controversies in visual search. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1, 70-76.
138. WOLFE, J. M., CAVE, K. R., & FRANZEL, S. L. (1989). Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15, 419-433.
139. WOLFE, J. M., FRIEDMAN-HILL, S. R., STEWART, M. I., Sc O'CONNELL, K. M. (1992). The role of categorization in visual search for orientation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 34-49.
140. WOLFE, J. M., & POKORNÝ, C. W. (1990). Inhibitory tagging in visual search: A failure to replicate. Perception & Psychophysics, 48, 357-362.
141. WOODMAN, G. F., & LUCK, S. J. (2004). Visual search is slowed when visuospatial working memory is occupied. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 269-214.
142. WOODMAN, G. F., VOGEL, E. K., & LUCK, S. J. (2001). Visual search remains efficient when visual working memory is full. Psychological Science, 12, 219-224.
143. YARBUS, A. L. (1967). Eye movements and vision (L. A. Riggs, Trans.). New York: Plenum.
144. ZELINSKY, G. J. (1996). Using eye saccades to assess the selectivity of search movements. Vision Research, 36, 2177-2187.
145. ZELINSKY, G. J., & LOSCHKY, L. C. (2005). Eye movements serialize memory for objects in scenes. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 676-690.
146. ZELINSKY, G. J., RAO, R. P. N., HAYHOE, M. M., & BALLARD, D. H. (1997). Eye movements reveal the spatiotemporal dynamics of visual search. Psychological Science, 8, 448-453.
147. ZELINSKY, G. J., & SHEINBERG, D. L. (1997). Eye movements during parallel-serial visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 244-262.
148. ZIHL, J., & HEBEL, N. (1997). Patterns of oculomotor scanning in patients with unilateral posterior parietal or frontal lobe damage. Neuropsychologta, 35, 893-906.