Automatic and intentional memory processes in visual search

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 11, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 854-861

  Boot, Walter R ^a   McCarley, Jason S ^b   Kramer, Arthur F ^a   Peterson, Matthew S ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTOMATISM; BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; MEMORY; VISION;

AUTOMATISM; HUMANS; INTENTION; MEMORY; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 6444231923     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196712     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. CHUN, M. M., & JIANG, Y. (1998). Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 28-71.
2. CHUN, M. M., & NAKAYAMA, K. (2000). On the functional role of implicit visual memory for the adaptive deployment of attention across scenes. Visual Cognition, 7, 65-81.
3. GILCHRIST, I. D., & HARVEY, M. (2000). Refixation frequency and memory mechanisms in visual search. Current Biology, 19, 1209-1212.
4. IRWIN, D. E. (1992). Memory for position and identity across eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 18, 307-317.
5. IRWIN, D. E. (1996). Integrating information across saccadic eye movements. Current Directions in Psychological Sciences, 5, 94-100.
6. JACOBY, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory & Language, 30, 513-541.
7. KLEIN, R. M. (1988). Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search. Nature, 334, 430-431.
8. KLEIN, R. M. (2000). Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 138-147.
9. KLEIN, R. M., & MACINNES, W. J. (1999). Inhibition of return is a foraging facilitator in visual search. Psychological Science, 10, 346-352.
10. LUCK, S. J., & VOGEL, E. K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 390, 279-281.
11. MACINNES, W. J., & KLEIN, R. M. (2003). Inhibition of return biases orienting during the search of complex scenes. Scientific World Journal, 3, 75-86.
12. MALJKOVIC, V., & NAKAYAMA, K. (1994). Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features. Memory & Cognition, 22, 657-672.
13. McCARLEY, J. S., WANG, R. F., KRAMER, A. F., IRWIN, D. E., & PETERSON, M. S. (2003). How much memory does oculomotor search have? Psychological Science, 14, 422-426.
14. PEARSON, D. [G.], & SAHRAIE, A. (2003). Oculomotor control and the maintenance of spatially and temporally distributed events in visuospatial working memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56A, 1089-1111.
15. PETERSON, M. S., KRAMER, A. F., WANG, R. F., IRWIN, D. E., & MCCARLEY, J. S. (2001). Visual search has memory. Psychological Science, 12, 287-292.
16. TAKEDA, Y., & YAGI, A. (2000). Inhibitory tagging in visual search can be found if search stimuli remain visible. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 927-934.
17. TIPPER, S. P., JORDAN, H., & WEAVER, B. (1999). Scene-based and object-centered inhibition of return: Evidence for dual orienting mechanisms. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 50-60.
18. WOLFE, J. M., ALVAREZ, G. A., & HOROWITZ, T. S. (2000). Attention is fast but volition is slow. Nature, 406, 691.
19. WOODMAN, G. F., VOGEL, E. K., & LUCK, S. J. (2001). Visual search remains efficient when visual working memory is full. Psychological Science, 12, 219-224.
20. YANTIS, S., & JONIDES, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 10, 601-621.