Visual search is guided by prospective and retrospective memory

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 69, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 123-135

  Peterson, Matthew S ^a   Beck, Melissa R ^a   Vomela, Miroslava ^a  

^a GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; LONG TERM MEMORY; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; RECALL; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; SHORT TERM MEMORY;

ADULT; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; MENTAL RECALL; MOTION PERCEPTION; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PROBABILITY LEARNING; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; RETENTION (PSYCHOLOGY); SACCADES;

EID: 34248555474     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03194459     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. BOOT, W. R., KRAMER, A. F., MCCARLEY, J. S., PETERSON, M. S., & SCIALFA, C. T. (2004, April). Older adults display a larger memory span than younger adults in visual search. Paper presented at the Cognitive Aging Conference-2004, Atlanta.
2. BOOT, W. R., MCCARLEY, J. S., KRAMER, A. F., & PETERSON, M. S. (2004). Automatic and intentional memory processes in visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 854-861.
3. CASTEL, A. D., PRATT, J., & CRAIK, F. I. M. (2003). The role of spatial working memory in inhibition of return: Evidence from divided attention tasks. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 970-981.
4. CHUN, M. M., & JIANG, Y. (1998). Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 28-71.
5. DEUBEL, H., & SCHNEIDER,W. X. (1996). Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism. Vision Research, 36, 1827-1837.
6. FINDLAY, J. M. (1997). Saccade target selection during visual search. Vision Research, 37, 617-631.
7. GIBSON, B. S., LI, L., SKOW, E., BROWN, K., & COOKE, L. (2000). Searching for one versus two identical targets: When visual search has a memory. Psychological Science, 11, 324-327.
8. GILCHRIST, I. D., & HARVEY, M. (2000). Refixation frequency and memory mechanisms in visual search. Current Biology, 10, 1209-1212.
9. GILCHRIST, I. D., & HARVEY, M. (2006). Evidence for a systematic component within scanpaths in visual search. Visual Cognition, 14, 704-715.
10. GREENWOOD, P. M., & PARASURAMAN, R. (2004). The scaling of spatial attention in visual search and its modification in healthy aging. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 3-22.
11. HAN, S. H., & KIM, M. S. (2004). Visual search does not remain efficient when executive working memory is working. Psychological Science, 15, 623-628.
12. HENDERSON, J. M., & HOLLTNGWORTH, A. (1999). The role of fixation position in detecting scene changes across saccades. Psychological Science, 10, 438-443.
13. HOFFMAN, J. E., & REISS, J. (2001, November). When is visual search "amnesic"? Paper presented at the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Orlando, FL.
14. HOFFMAN, J. E., & SUBRAMANIAM, B. (1995). The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements. Perception A Psychophysics, 57, 787-795.
15. HOROWITZ, T. S., HOLCOMBE, A. O., WOLFE, J. M., ARSENIO, H. C., & DIMASE, J. S. (2004). Attentional pursuit is faster than attentional saccade. Journal of Vision, 4, 585-603.
16. HOROWITZ, T. S., & WOLFE, J. M. (1998). Visual search has no memory. Nature, 394, 575-577.
17. HOROWITZ, T. S., & WOLFE, J. M. (2001). Search for multiple targets: Remember the targets, forget the search. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 272-285.
18. IRWIN, D. E., & BROCKMOLE, J. R. (2004). Suppressing where but not what: The effect of saccades on dorsal- and ventral-stream visual processing. Psychological Science, 15, 467-473.
19. IRWIN, D. E., & GORDON, R. D. (1998). Eye movements, attention, and trans-saccadic memory. Visual Cognition, 5, 127-155.
20. JIANG, Y., OLSON, I. R., & CHUN, M. M. (2000). Organization of visual short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, & Cognition, 26, 683-702.
21. JIANG, Y., & WAGNER, L. C. (2004). What is learned in spatial contextual cuing-configuration or individual locations? Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 454-463.
22. KLEIN, R. M., & MACINNES, W. J. (1999). Inhibition of return is a foraging facilitator in visual search. Psychological Science, 10, 346-352.
23. KLEIN, R. M., SHORE, D. I., MACINNES, W. J., MATHESON, W. R., & CHRISTIE, J. (1998). Remember that memoryless search theory? Well forget itl Unpublished manuscript
24. KOWLER, E., ANDERSON, E., DOSHER, B., & BLASER, E. (1995). The role of attention in the programming of saccades. Vision Research, 35, 1897-1916.
25. KRISTJANSSON, A. (2000). In search of remembrance: Evidence for memory in visual search. Psychological Science, 11, 328-332.
26. MCCARLEY, J. S., WANG, R. F., KRAMER, A. F., IRWIN, D. E., & PETERSON, M. S. (2003). How much memory does oculomotor search have? Psychological Science, 14, 422-426.
27. MOTTER, B. C., & BELKY, E. J. (1998). The guidance of eye movements during active visual search. Vision Research, 38, 1805-1815.
28. OH, S.H., & KIM, M.-S. (2004). The role of spatial working memory in visual search efficiency. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 275-281.
29. PETERSON, M. S., BOOT, W. R., KRAMER, A. F., & MCCARLEY, J. S. (2004). Landmarks help guide attention during visual search. Spatial Vision, 17, 497-510.
30. PETERSON, M. S., & KRAMER, A. F. (2001). Contextual cueing reduces interference from task-irrelevant onset distractors. Visual Cognition, 8, 843-859.
31. PETERSON, M. S., KRAMER, A. F., & IRWIN, D. E. (2004). Covert shifts of attention precede involuntary eye movements. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 398-405.
32. PETERSON, M. S., KRAMER, A. F., WANG, R. F., IRWIN, D. E., & MCCARLEY, J. S. (2001).Visual search has memory. Psychological Science, 12, 287-292.
33. ROSS, J., MORRONE, M. C., GOLDBERG, M. E,. & BURR, D. C. (2001). Changes in visual perception at the time of saccades. Trends in Neurosciences, 24, 113-121.
34. SAPIR, A., HAYES, A., HENK, A., DANZIGER, S., & RAFAL, R. (2004). Parietal lobe lesions disrupt saccadic remapping of inhibitory location tagging. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 503-509.
35. THEEUWES, J., GODIJN, R., & PRATT, J. (2004). A new estimation of the duration of attentional dwell time. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 60-64.
36. THORNTON, I. M., & HOROWITZ, T. S. (2004). The multi-item localization (MILO) task: Measuring the spatiotemporal context of vision for action. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 38-50.
37. TREISMAN, A., & GORMICAN, S. (1988). Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries. Psychological Review, 95, 15-48.
38. VON MÜHLENEN, A., MÜLLER, H. J., & MÜLLER, D. (2003). Sit-and-wait strategies in dynamic visual search. Psychological Science, 14, 309-314.
39. WOLFE, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 202-238.
40. WOLFE, J. M., & HOROWITZ, T. S. (2004). What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 495-501.
41. WOODMAN, G. F., & LUCK, S. J. (2004). Visual search is slowed when visuospatial working memory is occupied. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 269-274.
42. ZELINSKY, G. J., & SHEINBERG, D. L. (1997). Eye movements during parallel-serial visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 244-262.
43. ZINGALE, C. M., & KOWLER, E. (1987). Planning sequences of saccades. Vision Research, 27, 1327-1341.