Preference and acceptability of partially dealcoholized white and red wines by consumers and professionals

American Journal of Enology and Viticulture

Volumn 61, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 42-52

  Meillon, Sophie ^a,b   Dugas, Valentine ^b   Urbano, Christine ^b   Schlich, Pascal ^b  

^a Pernod Ricard   (France)

^b CEMAGREF   (France)

Author keywords

Acceptability; Alcohol reduction; Liking; Sensory perception

Indexed keywords

VITACEAE;

EID: 77949298673     PISSN: 00029254     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Burgering, M., C. De Jong, H. Goorissen, and L. Pepin. 2009. Contrôle de la qualité sensorielle des vins à faible teneur en alcool préalablement à leur désalcoolisation. Rev. Œnol. 131:39-42.
2. Chocarro, R., M. Cortiñas, and M. Elorz. 2009. The impact of product category knowledge on consumer use of extrinsic cues-A study involving agrifood products. Food Qual. Pref. 20:176-186.
3. Conibear, H. 2006. Rising alcohol levels in wine-is this a cause for concern? AIM Digest 18(4):1, 3.
4. Fischer, U., and A.C. Noble. 1994. The effect of ethanol, catechin concentration, and pH on sourness and bitterness of wine. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 45:6-10.
5. Fontoin, H., C. Saucier, P.L. Teissedre, and Y. Glories. 2008. Effect of pH, ethanol and acidity on astringency and bitterness of grape seed tannin oligomers in model wine solution. Food Qual. Pref. 19:286-291.
6. Frøst, M.B., and A.C. Noble. 2002. Preliminary study of the effect of knowledge and sensory expertise on liking for red wines. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 53:275-284.
7. Gawel, R., S. Van Sluyter, and E.J. Waters. 2007. The effect of ethanol and glycerol on the body and other sensory characteristics of Riesling wines. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 13:38-45.
8. Hoopman, T., G. Birch, S. Serghat, M.O. Portmann, and M. Mathlouthi. 1993. Solute-solvent interactions and the sweet taste of small carbohydrates. Part II. Sweetness intensity and persistence in ethanol-water mixtures. Food Chem. 46(2):147-153.
9. Jackson, R.S. 2002. Wine Tasting: A Professional Handbook. Elsevier Academic Press, London.
10. Jones, P.R., R. Gawel, I.L. Francis, and E.J. Waters. 2008. The influence of interactions between major white wine components on the aroma, flavour and texture of model white wine. Food Qual. Pref. 19:596-607.
11. Lange, C., C. Martin, C. Chabanet, P. Combris, and S. Issanchou. 2002. Impact of the information provided to consumers on their willingness to pay for Champagne: Comparison with hedonic scores. Food Qual. Pref. 13:597-608.
12. Lockshin, L., W. Jarvis, F. D'Hauteville, and J.P. Perrouty. 2006. Using simulations from discrete choice experiments to measure consumer sensitivity to brand, region, price, and awards in wine choice. Food Qual. Pref. 17:166-178.
13. Martin, S., and R.M. Pangborn. 1970. Taste interaction of ethyl alcohol with sweet, salty, sour and bitter compounds. J. Sci. Food Agric. 21:653-655.
14. Meillon, S., C. Urbano, and P. Schlich. 2009. Contribution of the temporal dominance of sensations (TDS) method to the sensory description of subtle differences in partially dealcoholized red wines. Food Qual. Pref. 20:490-499.
15. Meiselman, H.L. 1992. Methodology and theory in human eating research. Appetite 19:49-55.
16. Mietton-Peuchot, M., A. Massot, P. Noilet, and V. Milisic. 2008. Applications oenologiques de techniques membranaires-Nanofiltration et osmose inverse. Rev. Œnol. 129:51-54.
17. Mueller, S., I.L. Francis, and L. Lockshin. 2009. Comparison of best-worst and hedonic scaling for the measurement of consumer wine preferences. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 15:205-215.
18. Noble, A.C. 1994. Bitterness in wine. Physiol. Behav. 56(6):1251-1255.
19. Nurgel, C., and G. Pickering. 2005. Contribution of glycerol, ethanol and sugar to the perception of viscosity and density elicited by model white wines. J. Texture Stud. 36(3):303-323.
20. Pickering, G.J. 2000. Low and reduced-alcohol wine: A review. J. Wine Res. 11:129-144.
21. Pickering, G.J., D.A. Heatherbell, L.P. Vanhanen, and M.F. Barnes. 1998. The effect of ethanol concentration on the temporal perception of viscosity and density in white wine. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 49:306-318.
22. Pineau, N., P. Schlich, S. Cordelle, C. Mathonnière, S. Issanchou, A. Imbert, M. Rogeaux, P. Etiévant, and E. Köster. 2009. Temporal dominance of sensations: Construction of the TDS curves and comparison with time-intensity. Food Qual. Pref. 20:450-455.
23. Schiefer, J., and C. Fischer. 2008. The gap between wine expert ratings and consumer preferences-Measures, determinants and marketing implications. Int. J. Wine Bus. Res. 20:335-351.
24. Siret, F., and S. Issanchou. 2000. Traditional process: Influence on sensory properties and on consumer's expectation and liking-Application to 'pâté de campagne'. Food Qual. Pref. 11:217-228.
25. Vidal, S., P. Courcoux, L. Francis, M. Kwiatkowski, R. Gawel, P. Williams, E. Waters, and V. Cheynier. 2004. Use of an experimental approach for evaluation of key wine components on mouth-feel perception. Food Qual. Pref. 15(3):209-217.
26. Williams, E.J. 1949. Experimental designs balanced for the estimation of residual effects of treatments. Aust. J. Sci. Res. A 2:149-168.
27. Wilson, C.W.M., C. O'Brien, and J.G. MacAirt. 1973. The effect of metronidazole on the human taste threshold to alcohol. Addiction 68(2):99-110.
28. Zajonc, R.B. 1968. Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Monograph Supple. 9(2):1-27.