The effect of ethanol concentration on the temporal perception of viscosity and density in white wine

American Journal of Enology and Viticulture

Volumn 49, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 306-318

  Pickering, G J ^a   Heatherbell, D A ^b   Vanhanen, L P ^b   Barnes, M F ^b  

^a CHARLES STURT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b LINCOLN UNIVERSITY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Body; Density; Ethanol; Fullness; Mouthfeel; Sensory evaluation; Temporal; Time intensity; Viscosity; Wine

Indexed keywords

DENSITY; ETHANOL CONCENTRATION; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; VISCOSITY; WINE;

EID: 0031742750     PISSN: 00029254     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Amerine, M. A., and E. B. Roessler. Wines: Their Sensory Evaluation. W. H. Freeman and Company, New York (1983).
2. nd ed.). pp 309-310. University of California Press (1977).
3. Anonymous. Brauwelt 115(14):1 (1975).
4. Christensen, C. M. Oral perception of solution viscosity. J. Texture Studies 10:153 (1979).
5. Christensen, C. M., J. G. Brand, and D. Malamud. Salivary changes in solution pH: a source of individual differences in sour taste perception. Physiol. Behav. 40:221-227 (1987).
6. th Congress, Nice 1975. In: S. A. Langstaff and M. J. Lewis. The mouthfeel of beer - a review. J. Inst. Brew. 99:31:37 (1993).
7. Clapperton, J. F. Letter to Mr. Morten Meilgaard. 6 December 1976. In: Langstaff, S.A., and M.J. Lewis. The mouthfeel of beer - a review. J. Inst. Brew. 99:31-37 (1993).
8. Cliff, M. Temporal perception of sweetness and fruitiness and their interaction in model system. Thesis, University of California, Davis (1987).
9. Cliff, M., and H. Heymann. Development and use of time-intensity methodology for sensory evaluation: A review. Food Res. Int. 26:375-385 (1993).
10. Cutler, A. N., E. R. Morris, and L. J. Taylor. Oral perception of viscosity in fluid foods and model systems. J. Texture Studies 14:377-395 (1983).
11. De Clerk, J. A. A Textbook of Brewing (Vol. 1). Chapman and Hall, London (1957).
12. Fischer, U. The influence of ethanol, pH, and phenolic composition on the temporal perception of bitterness and astringency, and parotid salivation. MS Thesis, University of California, Davis (1990).
13. Fischer, U., R. B. Boulton, and A. C. Noble. Physiological factors contributing to the variability of sensory assessments: relationship between salivary flow rate and temporal perception of gustatory stimuli. Food Qual. Pref. 5:55-64 (1994).
14. Fischer, U., and A. C. Noble. The effect of ethanol, catechin concentration, and pH on sourness and bitterness of wine. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 45:6-10 (1994).
15. Green, B.G. Effects of Thermal, Mechanical, and Chemical Stimulation on the Perception of Oral Irritation. In: Chemical Senses (vol. 2). Irritation. B. G. Green, J. R. Mason, and M. R. Kare (Eds.). pp 171:192. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York (1990).
16. Guggenbuhl, B. Effect of glucose and CMC concentrations on temporal perception of sweetness and viscosity and on parotid saliva flow. MS Thesis, University of California, Davis (1994).
17. Guinard, J-X., R. M. Pangborn, and M. J. Lewis. The time-course of astringency in wine upon repeated ingestion. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 3:184-189 (1986).
18. Guinard, J-X., R. M. Pangborn, and M. J. Lewis. Effects of repeated ingestion on temporal perception of bitterness in beer. Am. Soc. Brew. Chem. J. 44:28 (1986).
19. Haeseler, G. Viskositat von Spirituosen. Die Brannyweinwirtschaft, 2. Juniheft, Table 1, p 219 (1952).
20. Harrison, S. K., and R. A. Bernhard. Time-intensity sensory characteristics of saccharin, xylitol and galactose and their effect on the sweetness of lactose. J. Food Sci. 49:780 (1984).
21. Hinreiner, E., F. Filipello, et al. Evaluation of thresholds andminimum difference concentrations for various constituents of wines. III. Ethyl alcohol, glycerol and acidity in aqueous solution. Food Technol. July:351-353 (1955).
22. Ishikawa, T., and A. C. Noble. Temporal perception of astringency and sweetness in red wine. Food Qual. Pref. 6(1):27 (1995).
23. Jackson, R. S. Wine Science: Principles and Applications, p 439. Academic Press Inc., California (1994).
24. Johnson, H. Modern Encyclopedia of Wine, p 495. Simon and Schuster, New York (1983).
25. nd ed.). M. A. Joslyn (Ed.). pp 379-380. Academic Press, New York (1970).
26. Jowitt, R. The terminology of food texture. J. Texture Studies 5:351 (1974).
27. Kemp, S. E., and G. G. Birch. An intensity/time study of the taste of amino acids. Chem. Senses 17:151-168 (1992).
28. Kokini, J. L., J. B. Kadane, and E. G. Cussler. Liquid texture perceived in the mouth. J. Texture Studies 8:195 (1977).
29. Langstaff, S. A., and M. J. Lewis. The mouthfeel of beer - a review. J. Inst. Brew. 99:31-37 (1993).
30. Langstaff, S. A., J.-X. Guinard, and M. J. Lewis. Sensory evaluation of the mouthfeel of beer. ASBC J. 49:54-59 (1991).
31. Langstaff, S. A., J.-X. Guinard, and M. J. Lewis. Instrumental evaluation of the mouthfeel of beer and correlation with sensory evaluation. J. Inst. Brew. 97:427-433 (1991).
32. Larson-Powers, N. L., and R.-M. Pangborn. Paired comparison and time-intensity measurements of the sensory properties of beverages and gelatins containing sucrose or synthetic sweeteners. J. Food Sci. 43:41-46 (1978).
33. Lee, C. B., and H. T. Lawless. Time-course of astringent sensations. Chem. Senses 16:225-238 (1991).
34. Lynch, L. Low-alcohol: A must for the future? Decanter, December:85-86, (1988).
35. Martin, S., and R. M. Pangborn. Taste interaction of ethyl alcohol with sweet, salty, sour and bitter compounds. J. Sci. Food Agric. 21:653-655 (1970).
36. Meilgaard, M. C., and T. L. Peppard. The flavour of beer. In" Food Flavours. Part B. The Flavours of Beverages. I. D. Morton and A. J. Macleod (Eds.). Elsevier, New York (1986).
37. Meilgaard, M. C. D. Tech. Dissertations, Technical University of Denmark, Copenhagen, (1981). In: Langstaff, S. A., and M. J. Lewis. The mouthfeel of beer - a review. J. Inst. Brew. 99:31-37 (1993).
38. Moore, L. J., and C. R. Shoemaker. Sensory textural properties of stabilized ice cream. J. Food Sci. 46:399, 402-409 (1981).
39. Moulton, D. G. Sensory perception, J. Dairy Sci., 52:811-815 (1969).
40. Munoz, A. M., R.-M. Pangborn, and A. C. Noble. Sensory and mechanical attributes of gel texture. II. Gelatin, sodium alginate and kappa-carrageenan gels. J. Texture Studies 17:17-36 (1986).
41. Narziss, L. Abriss der Bierbrauerei. Ferdinand Enke Verlage, Stuttgart (1972).
42. Noble, A. C. Bitterness in wine. Physiol. Behav. 56(6):1251-1255 (1994).
43. Noble, A. C. Application of time-intensity procedures for the evaluation of taste and mouthfeel (1994 Honorary Research Lecture). Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 46:128-133 (1995).
44. Noble, A. C., N. L. Matysiak, and S. Bonnans. Factors affecting the time-intensity parameters of sweetness. Food Technol. 45:121 (1991).
45. Noble, A. C., and M. Shannon. Profiling Zinfandel wine by sensory and chemical analyses. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 38:1-5 (1987).
46. Oakley, B. Taste responses of human chorda tympani nerve. Chemical Senses 10:469-481 (1985).
47. Ott, D. B., and S. J. Palmer. Ingestion and expectoration sampling methods of four tastes in a model system using time-intensity evaluations. J. Sensory Studies 13:53-70 (1990).
48. Ott, D. B., C. L. Edwards, and S. J. Palmer. Perceived taste intensity and duration of nutritive and non-nutritive sweeteners in water using time-intensity (T-I) evaluations. J. Food Sci. 56:535 (1991).
49. Pangborn, R. M., and A. Koyasako. Time-course of viscosity, sweetness and flavor in chocolate desserts. J. Texture Studies 12:141-150 (1981).
50. Parkinson, C., and P. Sherman. The influence of turbulent flow on the sensory assessment of viscosity in the mouth. J. Texture Studies 2:451 (1971).
51. Pecore, S. Issues in measurement of sweetness. Advances in Sensory Food Science Rose-Marie Pangborn Memorial Symposium, Abstract A.III.3 (1992).
52. Pickering, G. J. The production of reduced-alcohol wine using glucose oxidase. Thesis, Lincoln University, New Zealand, (1997).
53. Rainbird, G. An Illustrated Guide to Wine. p 214. Harmony Books, New York (1983).
54. Rankine, B. Making Good Wine. Sun Books, Melbourne, Australia (1989).
55. Rine, S. Computerized analysis of the sensory properties of peanut butter. Thesis, University of California, Davis, (1987) In: Cliff, M. and H. Heymann. Development and use of time-intensity methodology for sensory evaluation: A review. Food Res Intl. 26:375-385 (1993).
56. Robichaud, J. L., and A. C. Noble. Astringency and bitterness of selected phenolics in wine. J. Sci. Food Agric. 53:343:53 (1990).
57. Rowe, D. How low can you go? Decanter. March:75-78 (1989).
58. Schmitt, D. J., L. J. Thompson, et al. An improved method for evaluation of time-intensity data. J. Food Sci. 49:539 (1984).
59. Shama, F., and P. Sherman. Identification of stimuli controlling the sensory evaluation of viscosity. II: Oral methods. J. Texture Studies 4:111-118 (1973).
60. Shama, F., and P. Sherman. Variation in stimuli associated with oral evaluation of the viscosities of glucose solutions. J. Texture Studies 4:254-262 (1973b).
61. Silver, W. L. Physiological factors in nasal trigeminal chemoreception In: Chemical Senses Vol. 2 Irritation. B. G. Green, J. R. Mason, and M. R. Kare (Eds.). pp 171-192. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York (1990).
62. Stevens, D. A., and H. T. Lawless. Putting out the fire: effects of tastants on oral chemical irritation. Percept. Psychophys. 39(5):346 (1986).
63. Szczesniak, A. S. Classification of mouthfeel characteristics of beverages. In: Food Texture and Rheology. P. Sherman (Ed.). pp 1-20. Academic Press, London (1979).
64. Thorngate, J. H., and A. C. Noble. Sensory evaluation of bitterness and astringency of 3R(-)-epicatechin and 3S(+)-catechin. J. Sci. Food Agric. 67(4):531 (1995).
65. van Buuren, S. Analyzing time-intensity responses in sensory evaluation. Food Technol. 46(2):101 (1992).