Gender differences and the online classroom: Male and female college students evaluate their experiences

Community College Journal of Research and Practice

Volumn 25, Issue 10, 2001, Pages 805-818

  Sullivan, Patrick ^a  

^a Manchester Community College   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 9644256257     PISSN: 10668926     EISSN: 15210413     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/106689201753235930     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Allen, M. (1994). Adventures with ‘Robin Hood’: Gender Conflict on a first-year bulletin board. Journal of Teaching Writing, 13, 169-196.
2. American Association of University Women. (1991). Shortchanging girls, shortchanging America. Washington, DC: Author.
3. Barber, M., Sullivan, L., & Walker, J. (1997). Body, identity, and access: Diversity and networked environments [Letter from the guest editors]. Computers and Composition, 14 (Special issue), 163-167.
4. Behnke, R., & Sawyer, C. (2000). Anticipatory anxiety patterns for male and female public speakers. Communication Education, 49(2), 187-195.
5. Belenky, M., Clinchy, B., Goldberger, N., & Tarule, J. (1997). Women’s ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind (10th anniversary ed.). New York: Basic.
6. Bimber, B. (2000). Measuring the gender gap on the Internet. Social Science Quarterly, 81(3), 868-876.
7. Brown, L., & Gilligan, C. (1990). Meeting at the crossroads: Women’s psychology and girls’ development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8. Creed, T. (1997). Extending the classroom walls electronically. In W. Campbell & K. Smith (Eds.), New paradigms for college teaching. Edine, MN: Interaction (pp. 149-184).
9. Fox, T. (1999). Defending access: A critique of standards in higher education. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
10. Gabriel, S., & Smithson, I. (Eds.). (1990) Gender in the classroom: Power and pedagogy. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
11. Hall, R., & Sandler, B. (1982). The classroom climate: A chilly one for women? Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges, Project on the Status and Education of Women, Association of American Colleges.
12. Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39, 1123-1134.
13. Merisotis, J., & Phipps, R. (1999). What’s the difference? A review of contemporary research on the effectiveness of distance learning in higher education. The Institute for Higher Education Policy.
14. Nilan, P. (2000). “You’re hopeless I swear to God”: Shifting masculinities in classroom talk. Gender and Education, 12(1), 53-62.
15. Pagnucci, G., & Mauriello, N. (1999). The masquerade: Gender, identity, and writing for the web. Computers and Composition, 16(1), 141-151.
16. Palloff, R., & Pratt, K. (1999). Building learning communities in cyberspace: Effective strategies for the online classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
17. Powell, R., Conway, C., & Ross, L. (1990). Effects of student predisposing characteristics on student success. Journal of Distance Education, 5(1), 20-37.
18. Rickly, R. (1999). The gender gap in computers and composition research: Must boys be boys? Computers and Composition, 16(1), 121-140.
19. Roueche, J., & Baker, G. (1987). Access and excellence: The open-door college. Washington, DC: The Community College Press.
20. Russell, T. (1999). The no significant difference phenomenon. Office of Instructional Telecommunications. Chapel Hill, NC: North Carolina State University Press.
21. Sadker, D. (1999). Gender equity: Still knocking at the classroom door. Educational Leadership, 56(7), 22-26.
22. Savicki, V., Lingenfelter, D., & Kelley, M. (1996). Gender language style and group composition in Internet discussion groups. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2(3), 102-138.
23. Selfe, C. (1990). Technology in the English classroom: Computers through the lens of feminist theory. In C. Handa (Ed.), Computers and community: Teaching composition in the twentieth century. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook (pp. 118-139).
24. Selfe, C. (1999). Technology and literacy: A story about the perils of not paying attention. College Composition and Communication, 50, 411-436.
25. Selfe, C., & Selfe, R. (1994). The politics of the interface: Power and its exercise in electronic contact zones. College Composition and Communication, 45, 480-504.
26. Sullivan, P. (1999). Gender and the online classroom. Teaching English in the Two-Year College, 26, 361-371.
27. Turner, J. H. (1988). A theory of social interaction. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
28. Warrington, M., & Younger, M. (2000). The other side of the gender gap. Gender and Education, 12(4), 493-508.
29. White, K., & Weight, B. (Eds.). (1999). The online teaching guide: A handbook of attitudes, strategies, and techniques for the virtual classroom. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
30. Wojahn, P. (1994) Computer mediated communication: The great equalizer between men and women? Technical Communication: Journal of the Society for Technical Communication, 41(4), 747-752.
31. Wolfe, J. (1999). Why do women feel ignored?: Gender differences in computer-mediated classroom interactions. Computer and Composition, 16(1), 153-166.
32. Wolfe, J. (2000). Gender, ethnicity, and classroom discourse. Written Communication, 17(4), 491-520.
33. Wood, J. (1994). Gendered lives: Communication, gender, and culture. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
34. Younger, M., Warrington, M., & Williams, J. (1999). The gender gap and classroom interactions: Reality and rhetoric. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20(3), 325-341.