Prediction of discharge destination after neurological rehabilitation in stroke patients

European Neurology

Volumn 63, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 227-233

  Frank, Matthias ^a   Conzelmann, Martin ^a   Engelter, Stefan ^a,b  

^a Geriatric Competence Center   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL BASEL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Aging; Cerebrovascular disease; Prognosis; Stroke; Stroke outcome

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; APHASIA; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; ATHEROSCLEROSIS; CAROTID ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COGNITION; DIABETES MELLITUS; DISEASE SEVERITY; DYSPHONIA; EMBOLISM; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL DISEASE; HEART ATRIUM FIBRILLATION; HELP SEEKING BEHAVIOR; HEMIANOPIA; HOME CARE; HOMEBOUND PATIENT; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MULTIVARIATE LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; PATIENT MOBILITY; PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY; PREDICTOR VARIABLE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REHABILITATION CARE; SELF CARE; SITTING; SMOKING; SOCIAL INTERACTION; STANDING; STROKE; STROKE PATIENT; URINARY CATHETER; WALKING;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DATABASES, FACTUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT ADMISSION; PATIENT DISCHARGE; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STROKE;

EID: 77649289414     PISSN: 00143022     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000279491     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. World Health Organization: International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2001.
2. Warlow C, van Gijn J, Dennis M, et al. (eds): Stroke Practical Management, ed 3. Oxford, Blackwell, 2008, p 505 ff.
3. Meijer R, van Limbeek J, Kriek B, Ihnenfeldt D, Vermeulen M, de Haan R: Prognostic social factors in the subacute phase after a stroke for the discharge destination from the hospital stroke unit: a systematic review of the literature. Disabil Rehabil 2004; 26: 191-197.
4. Kalra L: Does age affect benefits of stroke unit rehabilitation? Stroke 1994; 25: 346-351.
5. Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Kollen BJ, Lankhorst GJ: Predicting disability in stroke - a critical review of the literature. Age Ageing 1996; 25: 479-489.
6. Bagg S, Pombo AP, Hopman W: Effect of age on functional outcomes after stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 2002; 33: 179-185.
7. Meijer R, Ihnenfeldt DS, van Limbeek J, Vermeulen M, de Haan RJ: Prognostic factors in the subacute phase after stroke for the future residence after six months to one year: a systematic review of the literature. Clin Rehabil 2003; 17: 512-520.
8. Niewada M, Kobayashi A, Sandercock PA, Kaminski B, Czlonkowska A: Influence of gender on baseline features and clinical outcomes among 17370 patients with confirmed ischaemic stroke in the international stroke trial. Neuroepidemiology 2005; 24: 123-128.
9. Nguyen TA, Page A, Aggarwal A, Henke P: Social determinants of discharge destination for patients after stroke with low admission FIM instrument scores. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007; 88: 740-744.
10. Jongbloed L: Prediction of function after stroke: a critical review. Stroke 1986; 17: 765-776.
11. Blanco M, Castellanos M, Rodriguez-Yanez M, Sobrino T, Leira R, Vivancos J, et al: High blood pressure and inflammation are associated with poor prognosis in lacunar infarctions. Cerebrovasc Dis 2006; 22: 123-129.
12. Jorgensen H, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS: Stroke in patients with diabetes: The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Stroke 1994; 25: 1977-1984. (Pubitemid 24291283)
13. Pinto A, Tuttolomondo A, Di Raimondo D, Fernandez P, Licata G: Risk factors profile and clinical outcome of ischemic stroke patients admitted in a department of internal medicine and classified by TOAST classification. Int Angiol 2006; 25: 261-267.
14. Liu X, Xu G, Wu W, Zhang R, Yin Q, Zhu W: Subtypes and one-year survival of first-ever stroke in Chinese patients: The Nanjing Stroke Registry. Cerebrovasc Dis 2006; 22: 130-136.
15. Mead GE, Shingler H, Farrell A, O'Neill PA, McCollum CN: Carotid disease in acute stroke. Age Ageing 1998; 27: 677-682.
16. Dennis MS, Lewis SC, Warlow C: Effect of timing and method of enteral tube feeding for dysphagic stroke patients (FOOD): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005; 365: 764-772.
17. Iizuka M, Reding M: Use of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding tubes and functional recovery in stroke rehabilitation: a case-matched controlled study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005; 86: 1049-1052.
18. Paolucci S, Antonucci G, Pratesi L, Traballesi M, Lubich S, Grasso MG: Functional outcome in stroke inpatient rehabilitation: predicting no, low and high response patients. Cerebrovasc Dis 1998; 8: 228-234.
19. Carod-Artal FJ, Medeiros MS, Horan TA, Braga LW: Predictive factors of functional gain in long-term stroke survivors admitted to a rehabilitation programme. Brain Inj 2005; 19: 667-673.
20. Tilling K, Sterne JA, Rudd AG, Glass TA, Wityk RJ, Wolfe CD: A new method for predicting recovery after stroke. Stroke 2001; 32: 2867-2873.
21. Appelros P, Karlsson GM, Seiger A, Nydevik I: Prognosis for patients with neglect and anosognosia with special reference to cognitive impairment. J Rehabil Med 2003; 35: 254-258.
22. Appelros P, Nydevik I, Karlsson GM, Thorwalls A, Seiger A: Recovery from unilateral neglect after right-hemisphere stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2004; 26: 471-477.
23. Patel AT, Duncan PW, Lai SM, Studenski S: The relation between impairments and functional outcomes poststroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 81: 1357-1363.
24. Bamford J, Sandercock P, Dennis M, Burn J, Warlow C: Classification and natural history of clinically identifiable subtypes of cerebral infarction. Lancet 1991; 337: 1521-1526.
25. Adams HP Jr, Bendixen BH, Kappelle LJ, Biller J, Love BB, Gordon DL, et al: Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke: definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. TOAST. Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment. Stroke 1993; 24: 35-41.
26. Linacre JM, Heinemann AW, Wright BD, Granger CV, Hamilton BB: The structure and stability of the Functional Independence Measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75: 127-132.
27. Gostynski M, Engelter S, Papa S, Ajdacic- Gross V, Gutzwiller F, Lyrer P: Incidence of first-ever ischemic stroke in the Canton Basle-City, Switzerland: a population-based study 2002/2003. J Neurol 2006; 253: 86-91.
28. Brauer SG, Bew PG, Kuys SS, Lynch MR, Morrison G: Prediction of discharge destination after stroke using the motor assessment scale on admission: a prospective, multisite study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008; 89: 1061-1065.
29. Massucci M, Perdon L, Agosti M, Celani MG, Righetti E, Recupero E, et al: Prognostic factors of activity limitation and discharge destination after stroke rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2006; 85: 963-970.
30. Nguyen T-A, Page A, Aggarwal A, Henke P: Social determinants of discharge destination for patients after stroke with low admission FIM instrument scores. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007; 88: 740-744.
31. Paolucci S, Antonucci G, Troisi E, Bragoni M, Coiro P, De Angelis D, et al: Aging and stroke rehabilitation: a case-comparison study. Cerebrovasc Dis 2003; 15: 98-105.
32. Black-Schaffer RM, Winston C: Age and functional outcome after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil 2004; 11: 23-32.