Prognostic factors of activity limitation and discharge destination after stroke rehabilitation

American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 85, Issue 12, 2006, Pages 963-970

  Massucci, Maurizio ^a   Perdon, Luigi ^b   Agosti, Maurizio ^d   Celani, Maria Grazia ^c   Righetti, Enrico ^c,e   Recupero, Egidio ^c,e   Todeschini, Elisabetta ^f   Franceschini, Marco ^d,g  

^a Hospital of Passignano   (Italy)

^b GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^c Stroke Unit   (Italy)

^d Parma Hospital   (Italy)

^e Sicilian Cooperative of Rehabilitation   (Italy)

^f Hospital of Trevi   (Italy)

^g Parma Hospital   (Italy)

Author keywords

Activity Limitation; Discharge Destination; Rehabilitation; Stroke Outcome

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLADDER CATHETERIZATION; BLADDER DYSFUNCTION; COGNITIVE DEFECT; DEMOGRAPHY; DYSPHAGIA; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; EARLY INTERVENTION; FAMILY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HOME; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HUMAN; INDEPENDENCE; INDWELLING CATHETER; ITALY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PHYSICAL DISABILITY; PREDICTION; PROGNOSIS; REHABILITATION CENTER; SEX DIFFERENCE; STROKE;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AFTERCARE; AGED; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; ITALY; MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT DISCHARGE; PROGNOSIS; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REHABILITATION CENTERS;

EID: 33751217128     PISSN: 08949115     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.phm.0000242620.44924.1b     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Stewart DG: Stroke rehabilitation 1. Epidemiologic aspects and acute management. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80:S4-7
2. Heruti RJ, Lusky A, Dankner R, et al: Rehabilitation outcome of elderly patients after a first stroke: effect of cognitive status at admission on the functional outcome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:742-9
3. Ozdemir F, Birtane M, Tabatabaei R, et al: Comparing stroke rehabilitation outcomes between acute inpatient and nonintense home setting. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:1375-9
4. Inouye M, Hashimoto H, Mio T, et al: Influence of admission functional status on functional change after stroke rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2001;80:121-5
5. Wee JYM, Hopman WM: Stroke impairment predictors of discharge function, length of stay, and discharge destination in stroke rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2005;84:604-12
6. Epstein RS, Sherwood LM: From outcomes research to disease management. A guide for the perplexed. Ann Intern Med 1996;124:832-7
7. Langhorne P, Wagenaar R, Partridge C: Physiotherapy after stroke: more is better? Physiother Res Int 1996;1:75-88
8. Paolucci S, Antonucci G, Pratesi L, et al: Functional outcome in stroke inpatient rehabilitation: predicting no, low and high responce patients. Cerebrovasc Dis 1998;8:228-34
9. Domholdt E: Physical Therapy Research: Principles and Applications, 2nd ed. WB Saunders Company, 2000
10. Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Kollen BJ, et al: Predicting disability in stroke. A critical review of literature. Age Ageing 1996;25:479-89
11. Wee JY, Wong H, Palepu A: Validation of Berg Balance Scale as a predictor of length of stay and discharge destination in stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84:731-5
12. Patel AT, Duncan PW, Lai SM, et al: The relation between impairments and functional outcomes poststroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81:1357-63
13. Mann G, Hankey GJ, Cameron D: Swallowing function after stroke: prognosis and prognostic factors at 6 months. Stroke 1999;30:744-8
14. Yavuzer G, Küçükdeveci A, Arasil T, et al: Rehabilitation of stroke patients: clinical profile and functional outcome. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2001;80:250-55
15. Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Twisk JRW, et al: Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: a randomised trial. Lancet 1999;354:191-6
16. Di Carlo A, Lamassa M, Pracucci G, et al: Stroke in the very old: clinical presentation and determinants of 3-month functional outcome: a European perspective. Stroke 1999;30:2313-19
17. Musicco M, Emberti L, Nappi G, et al: Early and long term outcome of rehabilitation in stroke patients: the role of patient characteristics, time of initiation, and duration of interventions. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84:551-8
18. Stroke and rehabilitation: Italian Cooperative Research (ICR2). Eur Med Phys 2003;39:7-17
19. WHO (World Health Organisation) Special Report: Stroke 1989: recommendations on stroke prevention, diagnosis and therapy. Stroke 1989;20:1407-31
20. Bagg S, Paris Pombo A, Hopman W: Effect of age on functional outcomes after stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 2002;33:179-85
21. Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke. Stroke Unit Trialists' Collaboration. The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2004
22. Demeurisse G, Demol O, Robaye E: Motor evaluation in vascular hemiplegia. Eur Neurol 1980;19:382-9
23. Wade DT: Measurement in neurological rehabilitation. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1995
24. Collin C, Wade D: Assessing motor impairment after stroke: a pilot reliability study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1990;53:576-9
25. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR: Mini-mental state: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975;12:189-98
26. Warlow CP, Dennis MS, van Gijn J et al: Stroke. A Practical Guide to Management, 2nd ed. Oxford, Blackwell Science Ltd, 2001
27. Bamford J, Sandercook P, Dennis M, et al: Classification and natural history of clinically identifiable subtype of cerebral infarction. Lancet 1991;337:1521-6
28. Rankin J: Cerebral vascular accidents in patients over the age of 60 II: prognosis. Scott Med J 1957;2:200-15
29. Collin C, Wade DT, Davies S, et al: The Barthel ADL Index. A reliability study. Int Disabil Stud 1988;10:61-63
30. Dennis M, Wellwood I, Warlow C: Are simple question a valid measure of outcome after stroke? Cerebrovasc Dis 1997;7:22-7
31. Duncan PW, Jorgensen HS, Wade DT: Outcome measures in acute stroke trials. Review. Stroke 2000;31:1429-38
32. International Stroke Trial Collaborative Group. The International Stroke trial (IST): a randomised trial of aspirin, subcutaneous heparin, both or neither among 19435 patients with acute ischaemic stroke. Lancet 1997;349:1569-81
33. Ozdemir F, Birmane M, Tabatabaei R, et al: Cognitive evaluation and functional outcome after stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2001;80:410-5
34. Langhorne P: Pollock A in conjunction with The Stroke Unit Trialists' Collaboration: what are the components of effective stroke unit care? Age Ageing 2002;31:365-71
35. Feigenson JS, McDowell FH, Meese P, et al: Factors influencing outcome and length of stay in a stroke rehabilitation unit. Part 1. Analysis of 248 unscreened patients-medical and functional prognostic indicators. Stroke 1977;8:651-6
36. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, van der Grond J, et al: Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper Limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. Stroke 2003;34:2181-6
37. Kollen BJ, van de Port I, Lindeman E, et al: Predicting improvement in gait after stroke: a longitudinal prospective study. Stroke 2005;36:2676-80
38. Ween JE, Alexander MP, D'Esposito M, et al: Factors predictive of stroke outcome in a rehabilitation setting. Neurology 1996;47:388-92
39. Agarval V, McRae MP, Bhardwaj A, et al: A model to aid in the prediction of discharge location for stroke rehabilitation patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84:1703-9
40. Ricci S, Celani MG, La Rosa F et al: SEPIVAC: a community-based study of stroke incidence in Umbria, Italy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 1991;54:695-8