Age and functional outcome after stroke

Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 23-32

  Black Schaffer, Randie M ^a,b   Winston, Cynthia ^a  

^a and Red Sox Foundation and Massachusetts General Hospital Home Base Program   (United States)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Age; Cerebrovascular accident; Function outcome; Stroke

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME; HOME CARE; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; LONG TERM CARE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; META ANALYSIS; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; SCORING SYSTEM; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STROKE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT DISCHARGE; PROGNOSIS; REHABILITATION CENTERS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 2542440907     PISSN: 10749357     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1310/DNJU-9VUH-BXU2-DJYU     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Examples of support groups found on an Internet search for "young stroke": Different Strokes: www.differentstrokes.co.uk; Young Stroke Survivors Support Group Cincinnati, Ohio, www.cyber-business-net.com/Young_Stroke_Survivors_Support/; Generation S: www.orgsites.com/pa/generation-s/; Young Enthusiastic Stroke Survivors: http://hometown.aol.com/suebeme/myhomepage/.
2. American Heart Association. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics - 2003 Update. Dallas, TX: American Heart Association; 2002.
3. Alexander MP. Stroke rehabilitation outcome: a potential use of predictive variables to establish levels of care. Stroke. 1994;25:128-134.
4. Ergeletzis D, Kevorkian CG, Rintala D. Rehabilitation of the older stroke patient. AJPMR. 2002;81(12):881-889.
5. Falconer JA, Naughton BJ, Strasser DC, Sinacore JM. Stroke inpatient rehabilitation: a comparison across age groups. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1994;42:39-44.
6. Giaquinto S, Buzzelli S, Di Francesco L, et al. On the prognosis of outcome after stroke. Acta Neurol Scand. 1999;100:202-208.
7. Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Fiedler RC. Discharge outcome after stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. 1992; 23:978-982.
8. Kotila M, Waltimo O, Niemi ML, et al. The profile of recovery from stroke and factors influencing outcome. Stroke. 1984;15:1039-1044.
9. Lehmann JF, DeLateur BJ, Fowler RS Jr, et al. Stroke rehabilitation: outcome and prediction. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1975;56:383-389.
10. Macciocchi SN, Diamond PT, Alves WM, et al. Ischemic stroke: relation of age, lesion location, and initial neurologic deficit to functional outcome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79:497-504.
11. Nakayama H, Jorgenson HS, Rassachou HO, Olsen TS. The influence of age on stroke outcome: the Copenhagen stroke study. Stroke. 1994;25:808-813.
12. Paolucci S, et al. Aging and stroke rehabilitation: a case-comparison study. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2003;15: 98-105.
13. Sze KH, Wong E, Or KH, et al. Factors predicting stroke disability at discharge: a study of 793 Chinese. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81:876-880.
14. Weimar C, Ziegler A, Konig I, Diener H-C. Predicting functional outcome and survival after acute ischemic stroke. J Neurol. 2002;249:888-895.
15. Andrews K, Brocklehurst JC, Richards, B, Laycock PJ. The influence of age on the clinical presentation and outcome of stroke. Int Rehabil Med. 1984;6:49-53.
16. Bagg S, Pombo AP, Hopman W. Effect of age on functional outcomes after stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. 2002;33:179-185.
17. Bourestom NC. Predictors of long term recovery in cerebrovascular disease. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1967;48:415-419.
18. Colantonio A, Kasl SV, Ostfeld AM, Berkman LF. Prestroke physical function predicts stroke outcomes in the elderly. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77(6):562-566.
19. Feigenson JS, McCarthy ML, Greenberg SD, Feigenson WD. Factors influencing outcome and length of stay in a stroke rehabilitation unit, II: comparison of 318 screened and 248 unscreened patients. Stroke. 1977;8(6):657-662.
20. Wade DT, Hewer R, Wood VA. Stroke: the influence of age upon outcome. Age Ageing. 1984;13:357-362.
21. Lehmann JF, DeLateur BJ, Fowler RS Jr, et al. Stroke: Does rehabilitation affect outcome? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1975;56:375-382.
22. Jongbloed L. Prediction of function after stroke: a critical review. Stroke. 1986;17:765-776.
23. Ween JK, Alexander MP, D'Esposito M, Roberts M. Factors predictive of stroke outcome in a rehabilitation setting. Neurology. 1996;47:388-392.
24. FIM™ is a trademark of the Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation, a division of UB Foundation Activities, Inc.
25. Keith RA, Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Sherwin FS. The functional independence measure: a new tool for rehabilitation. Adv Clin Rehabil. 1987;1:6-18.
26. Hamilton BB, Laughlin JA, Granger CV, et al. Interrater agreement of the seven level functional independence measure (FIM) [abstract]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1991;72:790.
27. Heinemann AW, Roth EJ, Cichowski K, Betts, H. Multivariate analysis of improvement and outcome following stroke rehabilitation. Arch Neurol. 1987;44:1167-1172.