Prediction of Discharge Destination After Stroke Using the Motor Assessment Scale on Admission: A Prospective, Multisite Study

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 89, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 1061-1065

  Brauer, Sandra G ^a   Bew, Paul G ^b   Kuys, Suzanne S ^c,d   Lynch, Mary R ^a   Morrison, Greg ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b THE PRINCE CHARLES HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^c GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^d PRINCESS ALEXANDRA HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

Cerebrovascular accident; Outcome assessment (health care); Patient discharge; Physical therapy; Rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; GAIT; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PHYSIOTHERAPY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RESIDENTIAL CARE; RISK; STROKE; STROKE PATIENT;

AGE FACTORS; AGED; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; GAIT DISORDERS, NEUROLOGIC; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; PATIENT ADMISSION; PATIENT DISCHARGE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RESIDENTIAL FACILITIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STROKE;

EID: 43949121405     PISSN: 00039993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.10.042     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Hankey G.J., Jamrozik K., Broadhurst R.J., Forbes S., and Anderson C.S. Long-term disability after first-ever stroke and related prognostic factors in the Perth community stroke study, 1989-1990. Stroke 33 (2002) 1034-1040
2. Barker R.N., and Brauer S.G. Upper limb recovery after stroke: The stroke survivors' perspective. Disabil Rehabil 27 (2005) 1213-1223
3. McKenna K., Tooth L., Strong J., Ottenbacher K., Connell J., and Cleary M. Predicting discharge outcomes for stroke patients in Australia. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 81 (2002) 47-56
4. Tooth L., McKenna K., Goh K., and Varghese P. Length of stay, discharge destination, and functional improvement: utility of the Australian national subacute and nonacute patient casemix classification. Stroke 36 (2005) 1519-1525
5. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australia's welfare 2003 (2003), AIHW, Canberra AIHW Cat. No. AUS 41
6. Dewey H.M., Thrift A.G., Mihalopoulos C., et al. Informal care for stroke survivors: results from the North East Melbourne Stroke Incidence Study (NEMESIS). Stroke 33 (2002) 1028-1033
7. Tooth L., McKenna K., Barnett A., Prescott C., and Murphy S. Caregiver burden, time spent caring and health status in the first 12 months following stroke. Brain Inj 19 (2005) 963-974
8. Jonsson A.C., Lindgren I., Hallstrom B., Norrving B., and Lindgren A. Determinants of quality of life in stroke survivors and their informal caregivers. Stroke 36 (2005) 803-808
9. Meijer R., van Limbeek J., Kriek B., Ihnenfeldt D., Vermeulen M., and de Haan R. Prognostic social factors in the subacute phase after a stroke for the discharge destination from the hospital stroke-unit. A systematic review of the literature. Disabil Rehabil 26 (2004) 191-197
10. Massucci M., Perdon L., Agosti M., et al. Prognostic factors of activity limitation and discharge destination after stroke rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 85 (2006) 963-970
11. Ween J.E., Mernoff S.T., and Alexander M.P. Recovery rates after stroke and their impact on outcome prediction. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 14 (2000) 229-235
12. Wee J.Y., and Hopman W.M. Stroke impairment predictors of discharge function, length of stay, and discharge destination in stroke rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 84 (2005) 604-612
13. Lutz B.J. Determinants of discharge destination for stroke patients. Rehabil Nurs 29 (2004) 154-163
14. Friedman P.J. Stroke outcome in elderly people living alone. Disabil Rehabil 17 (1995) 90-93
15. Oczkowski W., and Barreca S. The functional independence measure: its use to identify rehabilitation needs in stroke survivors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 74 (1993) 1291-1294
16. Brosseau L., Potvin L., Phillipe P., and Boulanger Y. Post stroke inpatient rehabilitation. ii. Predicting discharge disposition. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 75 (1996) 431-436
17. Sandstrom R., Mokler P.J., and Hoppe K.M. Discharge destination and motor function outcome in severe stroke as measured by the functional independence measure/function-related group classification system. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 79 (1998) 762-765
18. Wee J., and Wong H. Validation of the Berg Balance Scale as a predictor of length of stay and discharge destination in stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 84 (2003) 731-735
19. Wee J.Y., Bagg S.D., and Palepu A. The Berg Balance Scale as a predictor of length of stay and discharge destination in an acute stroke rehabilitation setting. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 80 (1999) 448-452
20. Rabadi M.H., and Blau A. Admission ambulation velocity predicts length of stay and discharge disposition following stroke in an acute rehabilitation hospital. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 19 (2005) 20-26
21. Mokler P.J., Sandstrom R., Griffin M., Farris L., and Jones C. Predicting discharge destination for patients with severe motor stroke: important functional tasks. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 14 (2000) 181-185
22. Carr J., Shepherd J., Nordholm L., and Lynne D. Investigation of a new motor assessment scale for stroke patients. Phys Ther 65 (1985) 175-180
23. Wang R.Y., Chen H.I., Chen C.Y., and Yang Y.R. Efficacy of Bobath versus orthopaedic approach on impairment and function at different motor recovery stages after stroke: a randomized controlled study. Clin Rehabil 19 (2005) 155-164
24. Langhammer B., and Stanghelle J.K. Bobath or motor relearning programme?. A follow-up one and four years post stroke. Clin Rehabil 17 (2003) 731-734
25. Tyson S.F., and DeSouza L.H. Reliability and validity of functional balance tests post stroke. Clin Rehabil 18 (2004) 916-923
26. Loewen S.C., and Anderson B.A. Predictors of stroke outcome using objective measurement scales. Stroke 21 (1990) 78-81
27. Malouin F., Pichard L., Bonneau C., Durand A., and Corriveau D. Evaluating motor recovery early after stroke: comparison of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment and the Motor Assessment Scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 75 (1994) 1206-1212
28. Loewen S., and Anderson B. Reliability of the Modified Motor Assessment Scale and the Barthel Index. Phys Ther 68 (1988) 1077-1081
29. Poole J., and Whitney S. Motor Assessment Scale for stroke patients: concurrent validity and interrater reliability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 69 (1988) 195-197
30. R Development Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing (2005), R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.R-project.org Accessed March 4, 2008
31. Stevenson T.J. Detecting change in patients with stroke using the Berg Balance Scale. Aust J Physiother 47 (2001) 29-38
32. Kornetti D.L., Fritz S.L., Chiu Y.P., Light K.E., and Velozo C.A. Rating scale analysis of the Berg Balance Scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 85 (2004) 1128-1135
33. Chou C.Y., Chien C.W., Hsueh I.P., Sheu C.F., Wang C.H., and Hsieh C.L. Developing a short form of the Berg Balance Scale for people with stroke. Phys Ther 86 (2006) 195-204
34. English C.K., Hillier S.L., Stiller K., and Warden-Flood A. The sensitivity of three commonly used outcome measures to detect change amongst patients receiving inpatient rehabilitation following stroke. Clin Rehabil 20 (2006) 52-55
35. Kwakkel G., Wagenaar R., Kollen B., and Lankhorst G. Predicting disability in stroke: a critical review of the literature. Age Ageing 25 (1996) 479-489