Social Determinants of Discharge Destination for Patients After Stroke With Low Admission FIM Instrument Scores

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 88, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 740-744

  Nguyen, Tuan Anh ^a   Page, Andrew ^b   Aggarwal, Arun ^a   Henke, Peter ^a  

^a ROYAL PRINCE ALFRED HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Emigration and immigration; Marriage; Patient discharge; Rehabilitation; Stroke

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENCE MEASURE; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; IMMIGRANT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MARRIAGE; NURSING HOME; SCORING SYSTEM; SOCIAL ASPECT; SOCIAL STATUS; STROKE; STROKE PATIENT;

AGE FACTORS; AGED; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; EMIGRATION AND IMMIGRATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MARITAL STATUS; MIDDLE AGED; NURSING HOMES; PATIENT DISCHARGE; REHABILITATION CENTERS; SEX FACTORS; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; TRAUMA SEVERITY INDICES;

EID: 34249062905     PISSN: 00039993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.03.011     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Secondary prevention and rehabilitation after coronary events or stroke: a review of monitoring issues (2003), AIHW, Canberra AIHW Cat. No. CVD 25.
2. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Heart, stroke and vascular diseases-Australian facts 2004 (2004), AIHW and National Heart Foundation of Australia, Canberra AIHW Cat. No. CVD 27.
3. Ween J.E., Alexander M.P., D'Esposito M., and Roberts M. Factors predictive of stroke outcome in a rehabilitation setting. Neurology 47 (1996) 388-392
4. Nakayama H., Jorgensen H.S., Raaschou H.O., and Olsen T.S. The influence of age on stroke outcome. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Stroke 25 (1994) 808-813
5. Brosseau L., Potvin L., Philippe P., and Boulanger Y.L. Post-stroke inpatient rehabilitation. II. Predicting discharge disposition. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 75 (1996) 431-436
6. Jorgensen H.S., Reith J., Nakayama H., Kammersgaard L.P., Raaschou H.O., and Olsen T.S. What determines good recovery in patients with the most severe strokes?. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Stroke 30 (1999) 2008-2012
7. DeJong G., and Branch L.G. Predicting the stroke patient's ability to live independently. Stroke 13 (1982) 648-655
8. Meijer R., van Limbeek J., Kriek B., Ihnenfeldt D., Vermeulen M., and de Haan R. Prognostic social factors in the subacute phase after a stroke for the discharge destination from the hospital stroke-unit. A systematic review of the literature. Disabil Rehabil 26 (2004) 191-197
9. Wilson D.B., Houle D.M., and Keith R.A. Stroke rehabilitation: a model predicting return home. West J Med 154 (1991) 587-590
10. Wade D.T., and Hewer R.L. Outlook after an acute stroke: urinary incontinence and loss of consciousness compared in 532 patients. Q J Med 56 (1985) 601-608
11. Shen Q., Cordato D.J., Chan D.K., and Kokkinos J. Comparison of stroke risk factors and outcomes in patients with English-speaking background versus non-English-speaking background. Neuroepidemiology 24 (2005) 79-86
12. Young C.M. Migration and mortality: the experience of birthplace groups in Australia. Int Migration Rev 21 (1987) 531-554
13. Christie D. Stroke in Melbourne, Australia: an epidemiological study. Stroke 12 (1981) 467-469
14. Dewey H.M., Thrift A.G., Mihalopoulos C., et al. Cost of stroke in Australia from a societal perspective: results from the North East Melbourne Stroke Incidence Study (NEMESIS). Stroke 32 (2001) 2409-2416
15. Oczkowski W.J., and Barreca S. The functional independence measure: its use to identify rehabilitation needs in stroke survivors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 74 (1993) 1291-1294
16. Patel A.T., Duncan P.W., Lai S.M., and Studenski S. The relation between impairments and functional outcomes poststroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 81 (2000) 1357-1363
17. Sandstrom R., Mokler P.J., and Hoppe K.M. Discharge destination and motor function outcome in severe stroke as measured by the functional independence measure/function-related group classification system. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 79 (1998) 762-765
18. Mokler P.J., Sandstrom R., Griffin M., Farris L., and Jones C. Predicting discharge destination for patients with severe motor stroke: important functional tasks. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 14 (2000) 181-185
19. Mauthe R.W., Haaf D.C., Hayn P., and Krall J.M. Predicting discharge destination of stroke patients using a mathematical model based on six items from the Functional Independence Measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 77 (1996) 10-13
20. World Health Organization. International statistical classification of diseases and health related problems. 2nd ed. (2004), WHO, Geneva 10th revision.
21. van den Bos G.A., Smits J.P., Westert G.P., and van Straten A. Socioeconomic variations in the course of stroke: unequal health outcomes, equal care?. J Epidemiol Community Health 56 (2002) 943-948
22. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Socioeconomic indexes for areas, Australia 2001 (2003), ABS, Canberra ABS Catalogue no. 2039.0.
23. Armitage P., Berry G., and Matthews J. Statistical methods in medical research (2002), Blackwell Science, Oxford
24. Rothman K.J., and Greenland S. Modern epidemiology (1998), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia
25. Rasch G. Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests (1980), Univ Chicago Pr, Chicago
26. Heinemann A.W., Linacre J.M., Wright B.D., Hamilton B.B., and Granger C. Prediction of rehabilitation outcomes with disability measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 75 (1994) 133-143
27. Black T.M., Soltis T., and Bartlett C. Using the Functional Independence Measure instrument to predict stroke rehabilitation outcomes. Rehabil Nurs 24 (1999) 109-114
28. Glass T.A., Matchar D.B., Belyea M., and Feussner J.R. Impact of social support on outcome in first stroke. Stroke 24 (1993) 64-70