Cellular Behavior on Basement Membrane Inspired Topographically Patterned Synthetic Matrices

Biomedical Nanostructures

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 297-319

  Gasiorowski, Joshua Z ^a   Foley, John D ^a   Russell, Paul ^a   Liliensiek, Sara J ^a   Nealey, Paul F ^b   Murphy, Christopher J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b University of Wisconsin Madison   (United States)

Author keywords

Basement membranes biology and disease; Biomimetic synthetic matrices; Nanogroove surfaces

Indexed keywords

EID: 77649271381     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9780470185834.ch11     Document Type: Chapter

References (93)

1. Abrams GA,Teixeira AI,Nealey PF, Murphy CJ. The effects of substratum topography on cell behavior. In: Dillow A,Lo wman A,ed itors,Bio mimeticMaterials and Design. New York Marcel Dekker; 2002;91-138.
2. Jefferson KK,Goldmann DA,Pier GB. Use of confocal microscopy to analyze the rate of vancomycin penetration through Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2005;49:2467-2473.
3. Suci PA,Mittelman MW, Yu FP, Geesey GG. Investigation of ciprofloxacin penetration into Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1994;38:2125-2133.
4. Schembri MA,Kjaergaard K,Klemm P. Global gene expression in Escherichia coli biofilms. Mol Microbiol 2003;48:253-267.
5. Saxena S,Davies DJ,Kirsner RL. Thin basement membranes in minimally abnormal glomeruli. J Clin Pathol 1990;43:32-38.
6. Tonna S,et al. The risks of thin basement membrane nephropathy. Semin Nephrol 2005;25:171-175.
7. Taylor HR and Kimsey RA. Corneal epithelial basement membrane changes in diabetes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1981;20:548-553.
8. Makino H,Yamasaki Y,Hironaka K,Ota Z. Glomerular extracellular matrices in rat diabetic glomerulopathy by scanning electron microscopy. Virchows Arch B Cell Pathol Incl Mol Pathol 1992;62:19-24.
9. Liu Z and Diaz LA. Bullous pemphigoid: end of the century overview. J Dermatol 2001;28:647-650.
10. Arikawa-Hirasawa E,Watanabe H,Takami H,Hassell JR,Yamada Y. Perlecan is essential for cartilage and cephalic development. Nat Genet 1999;23:354-358.
11. Boutboul S,et al. A subset of patients with epithelial basement membrane corneal dystrophy have mutations in TGFBI/BIGH3. Hum Mutat 2006;27:553-557.
12. Gould DB,et al. Role of COL4A1 in small-vessel disease and hemorrhagic stroke. N Engl J Med 2006;354:1489-1496.
13. Yurchenco PD and O'Rear JJ. Basal lamina assembly. Curr Opin Cell Biol 1994;6: 674-681.
14. Laurie GW,Leblond CP,Martin GR. Localization of type IV collagen,laminin, heparan sulfate proteoglycan,and fibronectin to the basal lamina of basement membranes. J Cell Biol 95:1982;340-344.
15. Laurie GW,Leblond CP,Inoue S,Martin GR,Chung A. Fine structure of the glomerular basement membrane and immunolocalization of five basement membrane components to the lamina densa (basal lamina) and its extensions in both glomeruli and tubules of the rat kidney. Am J Anat 1984;169:463-481.
16. Sanes JR and Hall ZW. Antibodies that bind specifically to synaptic sites on muscle fiber basal lamina. J Cell Biol 1979;83:357-370.
17. Sanes JR,Laminin.fibronectin,and collagen in synaptic and extrasynaptic portions of muscle fiber basement membrane. J Cell Biol 1982;93:442-451.
18. Noonan DM,et al. Identification of CDNA clones encoding different domains of the basement membrane heparan sulfate proteoglycan. J Biol Chem 1988;263:16379-16387.
19. Hironaka K,Makino H,Yamasaki Y,Ota Z. Pores in the glomerular basement membrane revealed by ultrahigh-resolution scanning electron microscopy. Nephron 1993;64:647-649.
20. Yamasaki Y,Makino H,Ota Z. Meshwork structures in bovine glomerular and tubular basement membrane as revealed by ultra-high-resolution scanning electron microscopy. Nephron 66:1994;189-199.
21. Abrams GA,Schaus SS,Goodman SL,Nealey PF,Murphy CJ. Nanoscale topography of the corneal epithelial basement membrane and Descemet's membrane of the human. Cornea 2000;19:57-64.
22. Abrams GA,Goodman SL,Nealey PF, Franco M,Murphy CJ. Nanoscale topography of the basement membrane underlying the corneal epithelium of the rhesus macaque. Cell Tissue Res 2000;299:39-46.
23. Pufe T,et al. Endostatin/collagen XVIII-an inhibitor of angiogenesis-is expressed in cartilage and fibrocartilage. Matrix Biol 2004;23:267-276.
24. Brammer RD,Bramhall SR,Eggo MC. Endostatin expression in a pancreatic cell line is modulated by a TNFalpha-dependent elastase. Br J Cancer 2005;93: 1024-1028.
25. Brammer RD,Bramhall SR,Eggo MC. Endostatin expression in pancreatic tissue is modulated by elastase. Br J Cancer 2005;92:89-93.
26. Carlson MA and Longaker MT. The fibroblast-populated collagen matrix as a model of wound healing: a review of the evidence. Wound Repair Regen 2004;12:134-147.
27. Lackie JM,Chaabane N,Crocket KV. A critique of the methods used to assess leucocyte behaviour. Biomed Pharmacother 1987;41:265-278.
28. Presta M,Rusnati M, Urbinati C, Sommer A,Ragnotti G. Biologically active synthetic fragments of human basic fibroblast growth factor (BFGF): Identification of two Asp-Gly-Arg-containing domains involved in the mitogenic activity of BFGF in endothelial cells. J Cell Physiol 1991;149:512-524.
29. Nagayoshi T,et al. Human nidogen: complete amino acid sequence and structural domains deduced from cDNAs,and evidence for polymorphism of the gene. DNA 1989;8:581-594.
30. Thompson MT,et al. Biochemical functionalization of polymeric cell substrata can alter mechanical compliance. Biomacromolecules 2006;7:1990-1995.
31. Engler A,et al. Substrate compliance versus ligand density in cell on gel responses. Biophys J 2004;86:617-628.
32. Pelham RJ Jr and Wang Y. Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997;94:13661-13665.
33. Wozniak MA,Desai R,Solski PA,Der CJ,Keely PJ. Rock-generated contractility regulates breast epithelial cell differentiation in response to the physical properties of a three-dimensional collagen matrix. J Cell Biol 2003;163:583-595.
34. Deroanne CF,Lapiere CM, Nusgens BV. In vitro tubulogenesis of endothelial cells by relaxation of the coupling extracellular matrix-cytoskeleton. Cardiovasc Res 2001;49:647-658.
35. Engler AJ,et al. Myotubes differentiate optimally on substrates with tissue-like stiffness: pathological implications for soft or stiff microenvironments. J Cell Biol 2004;166:877-887.
36. Polte TR,Eichler GS,Wang N,Ingber DE. Extracellular matrix controls myosin light chain phosphorylation and cell contractility through modulation of cell shape and cytoskeletal prestress. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2004;286: C518-528.
37. Wong GA,Tang V,El-Sabeawy F, Weiss RH. BMP-2 inhibits proliferation of human aortic smooth muscle cells via p21Cip1/Waf1. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2003;284:E972-979.
38. Damljanovic V,Lagerholm BC,Jacobson K. Fibroblast traction assays on modified polyacrylamide substrates. Mol Biol Cell 2004;15:160A.
39. Doyle AD and Lee J. Cyclic changes in keratocyte speed and traction stress arise from Ca2+-dependent regulation of cell adhesiveness. J Cell Sci 2005;118:369-379.
40. Georges PC,Miller WJ,Meaney DF,Sawyer ES,Janmey PA. Matrices with compliance comparable to that of brain tissue select neuronal over glial growth in mixed cortical cultures. Biophys J 2006;90:3012-3018.
41. Woerly S,Doan VD,Sosa N,de Vellis J,Espinosa-Jeffrey A. Prevention of gliotic scar formation by neurogel allows partial endogenous repair of transected cat spinal cord. J Neurosci Res 2004;75:262-272.
42. Engler AJ,Sen S,Sweeney HL,Discher DE. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 2006;126:677-689.
43. Abrams GA,Murphy CJ,Wang ZY,Nealey PF,Bjorling DE. Ultrastructural basement membrane topography of the bladder epithelium. Urol Res 2003;31: 341-346.
44. Abrams GA,Bentley E,Nealey PF,Murphy CJ. Electron microscopy of the canine corneal basement membranes. Cells Tissues Organs 2002;170:251-257.
45. Harrison R. On the stereotropism of embryonic cells. Science 1911;34:279.
46. Harrison R. The reaction of the embryonic cells to solid structures. J Exp Zool 1921;17:521.
47. Curtis A and Wilkinson C. Topographical control of cells. Biomaterials 1997;18: 1573-1583.
48. Washburn NR,Yamada KM,Simon CG Jr,Kennedy SB,Amis EJ. Highthroughput investigation of osteoblast response to polymer crystallinity: influence of nanometer-scale roughness on proliferation. Biomaterials 2004;25:1215-1224.
49. Teixeira AI,Abrams GA,Bertics PJ,Murphy CJ,Nealey PF. Epithelial contact guidance on well-defined micro- and nanostructured substrates. J Cell Sci 2003;116:1881-1892.
50. Fan YW,et al. Culture of neural cells on silicon wafers with nano-scale surface topograph. J Neurosci Methods 2002;120:17-23.
51. Clark P,Connolly P, Curtis AS,Dow JA,Wilkinson CD. Cell guidance by ultrafine topography in vitro. J Cell Sci 1991;99: (Pt 1):73-77.
52. Dalby MJ,Riehle MO,Johnstone HJ,Affrossman S,Curtis AS. Polymer-demixed nanotopography: control of fibroblast spreading and proliferation. Tissue Eng 2002;8:1099-1108.
53. Dalby MJ,Yarwood SJ,Johnstone HJ,Affrossman S,Riehle MO. Fibroblast signaling events in response to nanotopography: a gene array study. IEEE Trans Nanobioscience 2002;1:12-17.
54. Bystrom B,Virtanen I,Rousselle P,Gullberg D,Pedrosa-Domellof F. Distribution of laminins in the developing human eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47: 777-785.
55. Ziebarth NM,Manns F,Uhlhorn SR,Venkatraman AS,Parel JM. Noncontact optical measurement of lens capsule thickness in human,monkey, and rabbit postmortem eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005;46:1690-1697.
56. Futaki S,et al. Molecular basis of constitutive production of basement membrane components. Gene expression profiles of Engelbreth-Holm-Swarm tumor and f9 embryonal carcinoma cells. J Biol Chem 2003;278:50691-50701.
57. Orkin RW,et al. A murine tumor producing a matrix of basement membrane. J Exp Med 1977;145:204-220.
58. Kleinman HK,et al. Basement membrane complexes with biological activity. Biochemistry 1986;25:312-318.
59. Kubota Y,Kleinman HK,Martin GR, Lawley TJ. Role of laminin and basement membrane in the morphological differentiation of human endothelial cells into capillary-like structures. J Cell Biol 1988;107:1589-1598.
60. Dalby MJ,Riehle MO,Sutherland DS,Agheli H,Curtis AS. Changes in fibroblast morphology in response to nano-columns produced by colloidal lithography. Biomaterials 25:2004;5415-5422.
61. Price RL,Ellison K,Haberstroh KM,Webster TJ. Nanometer surface roughness increases select osteoblast adhesion on carbon nanofiber compacts. J Biomed Mater Res A 2004;70:129-138.
62. Stevens MM and George JH. Exploring and engineering the cell surface interface. Science 2005;310:1135-1138.
63. Ahmed I,et al. Three-dimensional nanofibrillar surfaces covalently modified with tenascin-c-derived peptides enhance neuronal growth in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006;76:851-860.
64. Nur EKA,Ahmed I,Kamal J,Schindler M,Meiners S. Three dimensional nanofibrillar surfaces induce activation of Rac. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2005;331:428-434.
65. Brunette DM. Spreading and orientation of epithelial cells on grooved substrata. Exp Cell Res 1986;167:203-217.
66. Chehroudi B,Go uld TR, Brunette DM. Titanium-coated micromachined grooves of different dimensions affect epithelial and connective-tissue cells differently in vivo. J Biomed Mater Res 1990;24:1203-1219.
67. Chehroudi B,McDonnell D,Brunette DM. The effects of micromachined surfaces on formation of bonelike tissue on subcutaneous implants as assessed by radiography and computer image processing. J Biomed Mater Res 1997;34: 279-290.
68. Dalby MJ,Riehle MO,Yarwood SJ,Wilkinson CD, Curtis AS. Nucleus alignment and cell signaling in fibroblasts: response to a micro-grooved topography. Exp Cell Res 2003;284:274-282.
69. den Braber ET,et al. Effect of parallel surface microgrooves and surface energy on cell growth. J Biomed Mater Res 1995;29:511-518.
70. Kim SO,et al. Epitaxial self-assembly of block copolymers on lithographically defined nanopatterned substrates. Nature 2003;424:411-414.
71. Pins GD,Bush KA,Cunningham LP, Campagnola PJ. Multiphoton excited fabricated nano and micropatterned extracellular matrix proteins direct cellular morphology. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006;78:194-204.
72. Wojciak-Stothard B,Curtis A,Monaghan W, MacDonald K,Wilkinson C. Guidance and activation of murine macrophages by nanometric scale topography. Exp Cell Res 1996;223:426-435.
73. Whitesides GM,Ostuni E,Takayama S, Jiang X,Ingber DE. Soft lithography in biology and biochemistry. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2001;3:335-373.
74. Kane RS,Takayama S,Ostuni E,Ingber DE,Whitesides GM. Patterning proteins and cells using soft lithography. Biomaterials 1999;20:2363-2376.
75. Liliensiek SJ,Campbell S,Nealey PF,Murphy CJ. The scale of substratum topographic features modulates proliferation of corneal epithelial cells and corneal fibroblasts. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006;79:185-192.
76. Araki-Sasaki K,et al. An SV40-immortalized human corneal epithelial cell line and its characterization. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1995;36:614-621.
77. DeCaprio JA,et al. Sv40 large tumor antigen forms a specific complex with the product of the retinoblastoma susceptibility gene. Cell 1988;54:275-283.
78. Fatt I. Architecture of the lid-cornea juncture. CLAO J 1992;18:187-192.
79. King-Smith PE,et al. The thickness of the human precorneal tear film: evidence from reflection spectra. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000;41:3348-3359.
80. Karuri NW,et al. Biological length scale topography enhances cell-substratum adhesion of human corneal epithelial cells. J Cell Sci 2004;117:3153-3164.
81. Chung TW,Liu DZ,Wang SY,Wang SS. Enhancement of the growth of human endothelial cells by surface roughness at nanometer scale. Biomaterials 2003;24:4655-4661.
82. Diehl KA,Foley JD,Nealey PF, Murphy CJ. Nanoscale topography modulates corneal epithelial cell migration. J Biomed Mater Res A 2005;75:603-611.
83. Sastry SK and Burridge K. Focal adhesions: a nexus for intracellular signaling and cytoskeletal dynamics. Exp Cell Res 2000;261:25-36.
84. Meyle J,Gultig K,Wolburg H,von Recum AF. Fibroblast anchorage to microtextured surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res 1993;27:1553-1557.
85. Uttayarat P,Toworfe GK,Dietrich F,Lelkes PI,Composto RJ. Topographic guidance of endothelial cells on silicone surfaces with micro- to nanogrooves: orientation of actin filaments and focal adhesions. J Biomed Mater Res A 2005;75: 668-680.
86. Curtis AS,et al. Cells react to nanoscale order and symmetry in their surroundings. IEEE Trans Nanobioscience 2004;3:61-65.
87. Dalby MJ,et al. Nanotopographical stimulation of mechanotransduction and changes in interphase centromere positioning. J Cell Biochem 2006;100:326-338.
88. Tan KS,Qian L, Rosado R,Flood PM,Cooper LF. The role of titanium surface topography on J774A. 1 macrophage inflammatory cytokines and nitric oxide production. Biomaterials 2006;27:5170-5177.
89. Zhu B,Lu Q,Yin J,Hu J,Wang Z. Alignment of osteoblast-like cells and cellproduced collagen matrix induced by nanogrooves. Tissue Eng 2005;11:825-834.
90. Zinger O,et al. Differential regulation of osteoblasts by substrate microstructural features. Biomaterials 2005;26:1837-1847.
91. Teixeira AI,et al. The effect of environmental factors on the response of human corneal epithelial cells to nanoscale substrate topography. Biomaterials 2006;27: 3945-3954.
92. Foley JD,Grunwald EW,Nealey PF,Murphy CJ. Cooperative modulation of neuritogenesis by PC12 cells by topography and nerve growth factor. Biomaterials 2005;26:3639-3644.
93. King MR. Anisotropic Brownian diffusion near a nanostructured surface. J Colloid Interface Sci 2006;296:374-376.