Nanometer surface roughness increases select osteoblast adhesion on carbon nanofiber compacts

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

Volumn 70, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 129-138

  Price, Rachel L ^a   Ellison, Karen ^a   Haberstroh, Karen M ^a   Webster, Thomas J ^a,b  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Adhesion; Carbon fiber; Nanometer; Orthopedic; Osteoblast; PLGA

Indexed keywords

ADHESION; BONE; CARBON FIBERS; CELLS; DENTAL PROSTHESES; INTERFACIAL ENERGY; MUSCLE; NANOSTRUCTURED MATERIALS; ORTHOPEDICS; PROSTHETICS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

CARBON NANOFIBERS; FIBROBLASTS; OPTIMAL MATERIALS; OSTEOBLASTS;

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING;

CARBON; HYDROXYAPATITE; POLYGLACTIN; POLYMER;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BIOMECHANICS; BONE PROSTHESIS; CALLUS; CARTILAGE CELL; CELL ADHESION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENERGY; FIBROBLAST; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IMPLANT; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; OSTEOBLAST; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; SMOOTH MUSCLE FIBER; SURFACE PROPERTY;

EID: 3042802518     PISSN: 00219304     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.30073     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. James K, Levene H, Parsons JR, Kohn J. Small changes in polymer chemistry have a large effect on the bone-implant interface: Evaluation of a series of degradable tyrosine-derived polycarbonates in bone defects. Biomaterials 1999;20:2203-2212.
2. Anderson JM, Gristina AG, Hanson SR, Harker LA, Johnson RJ, Merritt K, Naylor PT, Schoen FJ. Host reactions to biomaterials and their evaluation. In: Ratner BD, Hoffman AS, Schoen AS, Lemons JE, editors. Biomaterials science: An introduction to materials in medicine. San Diego: Academic Press, Inc.; 1996. p 165-214.
3. Schmalzried T, Campbell P, Chan F. Biological issues in metal-metal total hip arthroplasty. Biomater Forum 2001;23:6-20.
4. Frayssinet P, Gineste L, Gineste M, Ellefterion A, Guilhem A, Rouquet N. Degredation of hydroxlapatite, fluorapatite and fluorhydroxyapatite-coating of dental implants in dogs. Bioceramics 1998;11:353-356.
5. DeFife KM, Shive MS, Hagen KM, Clapper DL, Anderson JM. Effects of photochemically immobilized polymer coatings on protein adsorption, cell adhesion, and the foreign body reaction to silicone rubber. J Biomed Mater Res 1999;44:298-307.
6. 60-related tubules and spherules. In: Dresselhaus MS, Dresselhaus G, Eklund PC, editors. Science of fullerenes and carbon nanotubes. San Diego: Academic Press; 1996. p. 756-869.
7. Kaplan FS, Hayes WC, Keaveny TM, Boskey A, Einhorn TA, Iannotti JP. Form and function of bone. In: Simon SR, editor. Orthopaedic basic science. Rosemont, IL: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 1994. p. 127-185.
8. Jacques SL, Prahl SA. Mie scattering from collagen fibers [online]. Available: http://omlc.ogi.edu/classroom/ece532/ class3/mie_collagen. html. Accessed 4 May 2004.
9. Qin L, Iijima S. Twisting of single-walled carbon nanotube bundles. Mater Res Soc Symp Proc 2000: Amorphous and nanostructured carbon; p 33-38.
10. Kennel EB, Glasgow DG. Carbon nanofiber composites for aerospace. Conference proceedings: NASA nanospace 2001-Exploring interdisciplinary frontiers, Galveston, TX; 2001. p 220.
11. Pyrograf Products. Available: http://www.apsci.com/asiresearch.html. Accessed 4 May 2004.
12. Burton DJ, Glasgow DG, Lake ML, Kwag C, Finegan JC. Influence of carbon nanofiber surface characteristics on composite properties. Proceedings of the 46th International SAMPE Symposium and Exhibition, Long Beach, CA, 2001. p 647.
13. Webster TJ, Siegel RW, Bizios R. An in vitro evaluation of nanophase alumina for orthopaedic/dental applications. In: LeGeros RZ, LeGeros JP, editors. Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Ceramics in Medicine. New York: World Scientific; 1998. p 273.
14. Thapa A, Miller DC, Webster TJ, Haberstroh KM. Nano-structured polymers enhance bladder smooth muscle cell function. Biomaterials 2003;24:2915-2926.
15. Goldstein JI, Newberry DE, Echlin P, Joy DC, Romig AD Jr, Lyman CA, Fiori C, Lifshin E. Scanning electron microscopy. In: Scanning electron microscopy and X-ray analysis, 2nd ed. New York: Plenum Press; 1992. p 260-267.
16. Haberstroh KM, Kaefer M, Retik AB, Freeman MR, Bizios R. The effects of sustained hystrostatic pressure on select bladder smooth muscle cell functions. J Urol 1999;162:2114-2118.
17. Elias KE, Price RL, Webster TJ. Enhanced functions of osteoblasts on nanometer diameter carbon fibers. Biomaterials 2002;23:3279-3287.
18. Webster TJ, Siegel RW, Bizios R. Osteoblast adhesion on nanophase ceramics. Biomaterials 1999;20:1221-1227.
19. Montgomery DC. Inferences about differences in means, randomized designs. In: Montgomery DC, editor. Design and analysis of experiments. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1991. p 28-30.
20. Deligianni DD, Katsala ND, Koutsoukos PG, Missirlis YF. Effect of surface roughness of hydroxyapatite on human bone marrow cell adhesion, proliferation, differentiation and detachment strength. Biomaterials 2001;22:87-96.
21. Webster TJ, Siegel RW, Bizios R. Enhanced functions of osteoblasts on nanophase ceramics. Biomaterials 2000;21:1803-1810.
22. Webster TJ, Ergun C, Doremus RH, Siegel RW, Bizios R. Enhanced functions of osteoclast-like cells on nanophase ceramics. Biomaterials 2001;22:1327-1333.
23. Webster TJ. Nanophase ceramics: The future orthopedic and dental implant material. In: Ying JY, editor. Advances in chemical engineering, vol. 27. New York: Academic Press; 2001. p 125-166.
24. Webster TJ, Schadler LS, Siegel RW, Bizios R. Mechanisms of enhanced osteoblast adhesion on nanophase alumina involve vitronectin. Tissue Eng 2001;7:291-301.
25. Webster TJ, Ergun C, Doremus RH, Siegel RW, Bizios R. Specific proteins mediate enhanced osteoblast adhesion on nanophase ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;51:475-483.