Bayesian phylogenetics and its influence on insect systematics

Annual Review of Entomology

Volumn 55, Issue , 2010, Pages 189-206

  Ronquist, Fredrik ^a   Deans, Andrew R ^b  

^a SWEDISH MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY   (Sweden)

^b NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bayes factor; Markov chain Monte Carlo; Model averaging; Model choice; Molecular evolution

Indexed keywords

HEXAPODA;

ANIMAL; BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLASSIFICATION; INSECT; PHYLOGENY; REVIEW;

ANIMALS; BAYES THEOREM; INSECTS; MODELS, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY;

EID: 77449143195     PISSN: 00664170     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ento.54.110807.090529     Document Type: Review

References (98)

1. Abdo Z, Golding GB. 2007. A step toward barcoding life: a model-based, decision-theoretic method to assign genes to preexisting species groups. Syst. Biol. 56:44-56
2. Akerborg O, Sennblad B, Arvestad L, Lagergren J. 2009. Simultaneous Bayesian gene tree reconstruction and reconciliation analysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106:5714-5719
3. Alfaro ME, Holder MT. 2006. The posterior and the prior in Bayesian phylogenetics. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 37:19-42
4. Altekar G, Dwarkadas S, Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F. 2004. Parallel Metropolis-coupled Markov chain Monte Carlo for Bayesian phylogenetic inference. Bioinformatics 20:407-415
5. Ané C, Larget B, Baum DA, Smith SD, Rokas A. 2007. Bayesian estimation of concordance among gene trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24:412-426
6. Aris-Brosou S, Yang Z. 2002. Effects of models of rate evolution on estimation of divergence dates with special reference to the metazoan 18S ribosomal RNA phylogeny. Syst. Biol. 51:703-714
7. Arvestad L, Berglund AC, Lagergren J, Sennblad B. 2004. Gene tree reconstruction and orthology analysis based on an integrated model for duplications and sequence evolution. RECOMB '04: Proc. 8th Annu. Int. Conf. Res. Comput. Mol. Biol., San Diego, March 27-31. ACM
8. Baele G, Van de Peer Y, Vansteelandt S. 2008. A model-based approach to study nearest-neighbor influences reveals complex substitution patterns in noncoding sequences. Syst. Biol. 57:675-692
9. Blanquart S, Lartillot N. 2006. A Bayesian compound stochastic process for modeling nonstation-ary and nonhomogeneous sequence evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23:2058-2071
10. Blanquart S, Lartillot N. 2008. A site-and time-heterogeneous model of amino acid replacement. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25:842-858
11. Bollback J. 2002. Bayesian model adequacy and choice in phylogenetics. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19:1171-1180
12. Brooks SP, Gelman A. 1998. General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations. J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 7:434-455
13. Buckley TR, Cordeiro M, Marshall DC, Simon C. 2006. Differentiating between hypotheses of lineage sorting and introgression in New Zealand alpine cicadas (Maoricicada Dugdale). Syst. Biol. 55:411-425
14. Dornburg A, Santini F, Alfaro ME. 2008. The influence of model averaging on clade posteriors: an example using the triggerfishes (family Balistidae). Syst. Biol. 57:905-919
15. Drummond AJ, Ho SYW, Phillips MJ, Rambaut A. 2006. Relaxed phylogenetics and dating with confidence. PLoS Biol. 4(5):e88
16. Drummond AJ, Nicholls GK, Rodrigo AG, Solomon W. 2002. Estimating mutation parameters, population history and genealogy simultaneously from temporally spaced sequence data. Genetics 161:1307-1320
17. Drummond AJ, Rambaut A. 2007. BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evol. Biol. 7:214
18. Edwards SV, Liu L, Pearl DK. 2007. High-resolution species trees without concatenation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104:5936-5941
19. Felsenstein J, Churchill GA. 1996. A hidden Markov model approach to variation among sites in rate of evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:93-104
20. Fenn JD, Song H, Cameron SL, Whiting MF. 2008. A preliminary mitochondrial genome phylogeny of Orthoptera (Insecta) and approaches to maximizing phylogenetic signal found within mitochondrial genome data. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 49:59-68
21. Foster PG. 2004. Modeling compositional heterogeneity. Syst. Biol. 53:485-495
22. Galtier N, Gouy M. 1998. Inferring pattern and process: maximum-likelihood implementation of a non-homogeneous model of DNA sequence evolution for phylogenetic analysis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15:871-879
23. Gelman A. 1998. Simulating normalizing constants: from importance sampling to bridge sampling to path sampling. Stat. Sci. 13:163-185
24. Geyer CJ. 1991. Markov chain Monte Carlo maximum likelihood. In Computing Science and Statistics: Proceedings of the 23rd Symposium on the Interface, ed. EM Keramides, pp. 156-163 Fairfax Station, VA: Interface Found.
25. Gibson A, Gowri-Shankar V, Higgs PG, Rattray M. 2005. A comprehensive analysis of mammalian mitochondrial genome base composition and improved phylogenetic methods. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22:251-264
26. Goldman N, Thorne JL, Jones DT. 1998. Assessing the impact of secondary structure and solvent accessibility on protein evolution. Genetics 149:445-458
27. Gowri-Shankar V, Rattray M. 2007. A reversible jump method for Bayesian phylogenetic inference with a nonhomogeneous substitution model. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24:1286-1299
28. Green PJ. 1995. Reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo computation and Bayesian model determination. Biometrika 82:711-732
29. Gu Y, Fu YX, Lu WH. 1995. Maximum likelihood estimation of the heterogeneity of substitution rates among nucleotide sites. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12:546-557
30. Hall BG. 2005. Comparison of the accuracies of several phylogenetic methods using protein and DNA sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22:792-802
31. Hebert PDN, Gregory TR. 2005. The promise of DNA barcoding for taxonomy. Syst. Biol. 54:852-859
32. Hickerson MJ, Meyer CP, Moritz C. 2006. DNA barcoding will often fail to discover new animal species over broad parameter space. Syst. Biol. 55:729-739
33. Holder MT, Zwickl DJ, Dessimoz C. 2008. Evaluating the robustness of phylogenetic methods to among-site variability in substitution processes. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 363:4013-4021
34. Hudelot C, Gowri-Shankar V, Jow H, Rattray M, Higgs PG. 2003. RNA-based phylogenetic methods: application to mammalian mitochondrial RNA sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 28:241-252
35. Huelsenbeck JP, Jain S, Frost SWD, Kosakovsky Pond SL. 2006. A Dirichlet process model for detecting positive selection in protein-coding DNA sequences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103:6263-6268
36. Huelsenbeck JP, Joyce P, Lakner C, Ronquist F. 2008. Bayesian analysis of amino acid substitution models. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 363:3941-3953
37. Huelsenbeck JP, Larget B, Alfaro ME. 2004. Bayesian phylogenetic model selection using reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21:1123-1133
38. Huelsenbeck JP, Larget B, Miller RE, Ronquist F. 2002. Potential applications and pitfalls of Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Syst. Biol. 51:673-688
39. Huelsenbeck JP, Larget B, Swofford D. 2000. A compound Poisson process for relaxing the molecular clock. Genetics 154:1879-1892
40. Huelsenbeck JP, Rannala B. 2004. Frequentist properties of Bayesian posterior probabilities of phylogenetic trees under simple and complex substitution models. Syst. Biol. 53:904-913
41. Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F. 2001. MRBAYES. Bayesian inferenceof phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17:754-755
42. Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F, Nielsen R, Bollback JP. 2001. Bayesian inference of phylogeny and its impact on evolutionary biology. Science 294:2310-2314
43. Huelsenbeck JP, Suchard MA. 2007. A nonparametric method for accommodating and testing across-site rate variation. Syst. Biol. 56:975-987
44. Hunt T, Bergsten J, Levkanicova Z, Papadopoulou A, St John O, et al. 2007. A comprehensive phylogeny of beetles reveals the evolutionary origins of a superradiation. Science 318:1913-1916
45. Hwang DG, Green P. 2004. Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo sequence analysis reveals varying neutral substitution patterns in mammalian evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:13994-14001
46. Jow H, Hudelot C, Rattray M, Higgs PG. 2002. Bayesian phylogenetics using an RNA substitution model applied to early mammalian evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 19:1591-1601
47. Kass RE, Raftery AE. 1995. Bayes factors. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 90:773-795
48. Kolaczkowski B, Thornton JW. 2007. Effects of branch length uncertainty on Bayesian posterior probabilities for phylogenetic hypotheses. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24:2108-2118
49. Lakner C, Van Der Mark P, Huelsenbeck JP, Larget B, Ronquist F. 2008. Efficiency of MCMC tree proposals in Bayesian phylogenetics. Syst. Biol. 57:86-103
50. Larget B, Simon DL. 1999. Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms for the Bayesian analysis of phyloge-netic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:750-759 (Pubitemid 29260829)
51. Lartillot N, Philippe H. 2004. A Bayesian mixture model for across-site heterogeneities in the amino acid replacement process. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21:1095-1109
52. Lartillot N, Philippe H. 2006. Computing Bayes factors using thermodynamic integration. Syst. Biol. 55:195-207
53. Lepage T, Bryant D, Philippe H, Lartillot N. 2007. A general comparison of relaxed molecular clock models. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24:2669-2680
54. Linnen CR, Farrell BD. 2007. Mitonuclear discordance is caused by rampant mitochondrial introgression in Neodiprion (Hymenoptera: Diprionidae) sawflies. Evolution 61:1417-1438
55. Linnen CR, Farrell BD. 2008. Comparison of methods for species-tree inference in the sawfly genus Neodiprion (Hymenoptera: Diprionidae). Syst. Biol. 57:876-890
56. Lunter G, Miklós I, Drummond A, Jensen JL, Hein J. 2005. Bayesian coestimation of phylogeny and sequence alignment. BMC Bioinform. 6:83
57. Meier R, Shiyang K, Vaidya G, Ng PKL. 2006. DNA barcoding and taxonomy in Diptera: a tale of high intraspecific variability and low identification success. Syst. Biol. 55:715-728
58. Mossel E, Vigoda E. 2005. Phylogenetic MCMC algorithms are misleading on mixtures of trees. Science 309:2207-2209
59. Mossel E, Vigoda E. 2006. Response to comment on "Phylogenetic MCMC algorithms are misleading on mixtures of trees. " Science 312:367
60. Munch K, Boomsma W, Huelsenbeck JP, Willerslev E, Nielsen R. 2008. Statistical assignment of DNA sequences using Bayesian phylogenetics. Syst. Biol. 57:750-757
61. Newton MA, Raftery AE. 1994. Approximating Bayesian inference with the weighted likelihood bootstrap. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 56:3-48
62. Nielsen R, Matz M. 2006. Statistical approaches for DNA barcoding. Syst. Biol. 55:162-169
63. Nielsen R, Yang Z. 1998. Likelihood models for detecting positively selected amino acid sites and applications to the HIV-1 envelope gene. Genetics 148:929-936
64. Nylander J, Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP, Nieves-Aldrey JL. 2004. Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of combined data. Syst. Biol. 53:47-67
65. Nylander J, Wilgenbusch J, Warren D. 2008. AWTY(are we there yet?): a system for graphical exploration of MCMC convergence in Bayesian phylogenetics. Bioinformatics 24:581-583
66. Ogata Y. 1989. A Monte Carlo method for high dimensional integration. Num. Math. 55:137-157
67. Pagel M, Meade A. 2004. A phylogenetic mixture model for detecting pattern-heterogeneity in gene sequence or character-state data. Syst. Biol. 53:571-581
68. Pons J, Barraclough TG, Gomez-Zurita J, Cardoso A, Duran DP, et al. 2006. Sequence-based species delimitation for the DNA taxonomy of undescribed insects. Syst. Biol. 55:595-609
69. Posada D, Crandall KA. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model ofDNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817-818
70. Posada D, Crandall KA. 2001. Selecting the best-fit modelof nucleotide substitution. Syst. Biol. 50:580-601
71. Rambaut A, Drummond AJ. 2007. Tracer v1. 4. http://beast. bio. ed. ac. uk/Tracer
72. Rannala B, Yang Z. 1996. Probability distribution of molecular evolutionary trees: a new method of phylogenetic inference. J. Mol. Evol. 43:304-311
73. Rannala B, Yang Z. 2008. Phylogenetic inference using whole genomes. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 9:217-231
74. Redelings BD, Suchard MA. 2005. Joint Bayesian estimation of alignment and phylogeny. Syst. Biol. 54:401-418
75. Regier J, Shultz J, Ganley A, Hussey A, Shi D, et al. 2008. Resolving arthropod phylogeny: exploring phylogenetic signal within 41 kb of protein-coding nuclear gene sequence. Syst. Biol. 57:920-998
76. Robinson DM, Jones DT, Kishino H, Goldman N, Thorne JL. 2003. Protein evolution with dependence among codons due to tertiary structure. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18:1692-1704
77. Rodrigue N, Philippe H, Lartillot N. 2006. Assessing site-interdependent phylogenetic models of sequence evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23:1762-1775
78. Ronquist F. 2002. Parsimony analysis of coevolving species associations. In Tangled Trees: Phylogeny, Cospe-ciation and Coevolution, ed. RDM Page, pp. 22-64. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
79. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. 2003. MrBayes3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572-1574
80. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP, Britton T. 2004. Bayesian supertrees. In Phylogenetic Supertrees: Combining Information to Reveal the Tree of Life, ed. ORP Bininda-Emonds, pp. 193-224. Amsterdam: Kluwer
81. Ronquist F, Larget B, Huelsenbeck JP, Kadane JB, Simon D, Van Der Mark P. 2006. Comment on "Phylogenetic MCMC algorithms are misleading on mixtures of trees. " Science 312:367
82. Shapiro B, Rambaut A, Drummond AJ. 2006. Choosing appropriate substitution models for the phylo-genetic analysis of protein-coding sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23:7-9
83. Stamatakis A, Ludwig T, Meier H. 2005. RAxML-III: a fast program for maximum likelihood-based inference of large phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 21:456-463 (Pubitemid 40310232)
84. Suchard MA, Kitchen CMR, Sinsheimer JS, Weiss RE. 2003. Hierarchical phylogenetic models for analyzing multipartite sequence data. Syst. Biol. 52:649-664
85. Suchard MA, Redelings BD. 2006. BAli-Phy: simultaneous Bayesian inference of alignment and phy-logeny. Bioinformatics 22:2047-2048
86. Suchard MA, Weiss RE, Sinsheimer JS. 2001. Bayesian selection of continuous-time Markov chain evolutionary models. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18:1001-1013
87. Sullivan J, Joyce P. 2005. Model selection in phylogenetics. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 36:445-466
88. Suzuki Y, Glazko GV, Nei M. 2002. Overcredibility of molecular phylogenies obtained by Bayesian phylogenetics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:16138-16143
89. Svennblad B. 2008. On estimating topology and divergence times in phylogenetics. PhD thesis. Uppsala Univ., Sweden. 52 pp.
90. Thorne JL, Kishino H. 2002. Divergence time and evolutionary rate estimation with multilocus data. Syst. Biol. 51:689-702
91. Thorne JL, Kishino H, Felsenstein J. 1991. An evolutionary model for maximum likelihood alignment of DNA sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 33:114-124
92. Thorne JL, KishinoH, Painter IS. 1998. Estimating the rateofevolutionofthe rate ofmolecular evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 15:1647-1657
93. Yang Z. 1994. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic estimation from DNA sequences with variable rates over sites: approximate methods. J. Mol. Evol. 39:306-314
94. Yang Z. 1995. A space-time process model for the evolution of DNA sequences. Genetics 139:993-1005
95. Yang Z. 1996. Maximum-likelihood models for combined analyses of multiple sequence data. J. Mol. Evol. 42:587-596
96. Yang Z, Rannala B. 1997. Bayesian phylogenetic inference using DNA sequences: a Markov Chain Monte Carlo Method. Mol. Biol. Evol. 14:717-724
97. Yang Z, Roberts D. 1995. On the use of nucleic acid sequences to infer branchings in the tree of life. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12:451-458
98. Zwickl D, Holder M. 2004. Model parameterization, prior distributions, and the general time-reversible model in Bayesian phylogenetics. Syst. Biol. 53:877-888