A comparison of three manual destination entry methods on their impact on visual attention and driving performance: An on-road evaluation

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Volumn 3, Issue , 2009, Pages 1757-1761

  Reimer, Bryan ^a   Mehler, Bruce ^a   Lammers, Vincent ^a   Wang, Ying ^a   Coughlin, Joseph F ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMOBILE DRIVERS; ERGONOMICS; TOUCH SCREENS;

DRIVING CONDITIONS; DRIVING PERFORMANCE; DRIVING PERFORMANCE MEASURES; VISUAL ATTENTION; VISUAL BEHAVIOR;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

EID: 77951597012     PISSN: 10711813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1518/107118109x12524444081917     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Duchowski, A. (2007). Eye Tracking Methodology: Theory and Practice (Vol. 2). London: Springer.
2. Green, P. (1997). Potential safety impacts of automotive navigation systems. Paper presented at the Automotive Land Navigation Conference.
3. Green, P. (2004). Driver distraction, telematics design, and workload managers: safety issues and solutions. Paper Number 2004-21-0022: SAE International.
4. Gruenstein, A., Orszulak, J., Liu, S., Roberts, S., Reimer, B., Mehler, B., et al. (2009, April, 4-9). City Browser: Developing a conversational automotive HMI. Paper presented at the Work in progress CHI Annual Meeting, Boston, MA.
5. Lammers, V. (2007). The impact of input methods for in vehicle information systems on driving performance: an on-road study. Unpublished thesis, Cologne University of Applied Sciences, Cologne, Germany.
6. Mehler, B., Reimer, B., Coughlin, J. F., & Dusek, J. A. (2009). The impact of incremental increases in cognitive workload on physiological arousal and performance in young adult drivers. Paper presented at the Transportation Research Board of The National Academies, Washington, DC.
7. Mourant, R. R., Herman, M., & Moussa-Hamouda, E. (1980). Driver looks and control location in automobiles. Human Factors, 22(4), 417-425. (Pubitemid 11246518)
8. Paelke, G. M. (1993). A comparison of route guidance destination entry methods. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 37th Annual Meeting, 569-573.
9. Pashler, H. (1992). Attentional limitations in doing two tasks at the same time. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1(2), 44-48.
10. Reimer, B. (2009). Cognitive Task Complexity and the Impact on Drivers' Visual Tunneling. Paper presented at the Transportation Research Board of The National Academies, Washington, DC.
11. Reimer, B., & Sodhi, M. (2006). Detecting eye movements in dynamic environments. Behavior Research Methods, 38(4), 667-682.
12. SAE. (2004). SAE recommended practice navigation and route guidance function accessibility while driving (SAE 2364). Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers.
13. Sodhi, M., Reimer, B., & Llamazares, I. (2002). Glance analysis of driver eye movements to evaluate distraction. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 34(4), 529-538.
14. Tijerina, L., Johnston, S., Parmer, E., Winterbottom, M. D., & Goodman, M. J. (2000). Driver distraction with route guidance systems (DOT HS 809-069). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Transportation technical report.
15. Tsimhoni, O., Smith, D., & Green, P. (2004). Address entry while driving: speech recognition versus a touch-screen keyboard. Human Factors, 46(4), 600-610. (Pubitemid 40179358)
16. Victor, T. W., Harbluk, J. L., & Engström, J. A. (2005). Sensitivity of eye-movement measures to in-task difficulty. Transportation Research Part F, 8, 167-190.
17. Wierwille, W. W. (1993). Visual and manual demands of in-car controls and displays. In B. Peacock & W. Karwowski (Eds.), Automotive ergonomics (pp. 299-320). Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis.