Address entry while driving: Speech recognition versus a touch-screen keyboard

Human Factors

Volumn 46, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 600-610

  Tsimhoni, Omer ^a,b,c   Smith, Daniel ^a,c,d   Green, Paul ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b Human Factors Division at UMTRI ^*  (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^d TOYOTA TECHNICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TEXT MESSAGING; TOUCH-SCREEN KEYBOARDS; VEHICLE CONTROL; VISUAL FEEDBACK;

COMPUTER KEYBOARDS; ELECTRONIC MAIL; INTERNET; NAVIGATION SYSTEMS; SIMULATORS;

SPEECH RECOGNITION;

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; DEVICE; DRIVING ABILITY; E-MAIL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERNET; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; SIMULATOR; SPEECH ARTICULATION; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; TOUCH SCREEN KEYBOARD; WORKLOAD;

ACCIDENTS, TRAFFIC; ADULT; AGED; ATTENTION; AUTOMOBILE DRIVING; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMAN ENGINEERING; HUMANS; HYPERMEDIA; MALE; PERCEPTION; PROBABILITY; SAFETY; SENSATION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPEECH RECOGNITION SOFTWARE; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; WORD PROCESSING;

EID: 13144283653     PISSN: 00187208     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1518/hfes.46.4.600.56813     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Chiang, D. P., Brooks, A. M., & Weir, D. H. (2001). An experimental study of destination entry with an example automobile navigation system (SAE Paper 2001-01-0810), Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers.
2. Coleman, M. F., Loring, B. A., & Wiklund, M. E. (1991). User performance on typing tasks involving reduced-size, touch screen keyboards. In Vehicle Navigation and Information Systems Conference Proceedings (VNIS '91; pp. 534-549). New York: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
3. Farber, E., Blanco, M., Foley, J., Curry, R., Greenberg, J., & Serafin, C. (2000). Surrogate measures of visual demand while driving. In Proceedings of the XIVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and 44th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (pp. 3.274-3.277). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
4. Green, P., & Shah, R. (2003). Task time and glance measures of the use of telematics: A tabular summary of the literature (Tech. Report UMTRI-2003-33), Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute.
5. Green, P., & Wei-Haas, L. (1985). The rapid development of user interfaces: Experience with the Wizard of Oz method. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 29th Annual Meeting (pp. 470-474). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
6. Lee, J. D., Caven, B., Haake, S., & Brown, T. L. (2001). Speech-based interaction with in-vehicle computers: The effect of speech-based E-mail on drivers' attention to the roadway. Human Factors, 43, 631-640.
7. Masson, M. E. J., & Loftus, G. R. (2003). Using confidence intervals for graphically based data interpretation. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 203-220.
8. Nowakowski, C., Utsui, Y., & Green, P. (2000). Navigation system destination entry: The effects of driver workload and input devices, and implications for SAE recommended practice (Tech. Report UMTRI-2000-20). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute.
9. Richardson, B., & Green, P. (2000). Trends in North American intelligent transportation systems: A year 2000 appraisal (Tech. Report 2000-9). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute.
10. Society of Automotive Engineers. (1999). Definitions and experimental measures related to the specification of driver visual behavior using video based techniques (SAE Recommended Practice J2396). Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers.
11. Strayer, D. L., Drews, F. A., & Johnston, W. A. (2003). Cell phone induced failures of visual attention during simulated driving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 9, 23-32
12. Tijerina, L., Parmer, E., & Goodman, M. J. (1998). Driver workload assessment of route guidance system destination entry while driving: A test track study. In Proceedings of the Fifth World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems [CD-ROM]. Washington, DC: ITSA.
13. Tsimhoni, O., & Green, P. (2001). Visual demand of driving and the execution of display-intensive in-vehicle tasks. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 45th Annual Meeting (pp. 1586-1590). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
14. Tsimhoni, O., Smith, D., & Green, P. (2001). Destination entry while driving: Speech recognition versus a touch-screen keyboard (Tech. Report UMTRI-2001-24). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute.
15. University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute. (2001). Driving simulators. Retrieved September 16, 2004, from www. umich.edu/~driving/sim.html
16. Wierwille, W. W., & Casali, J. G. (1983). A validated rating scale for global mental workload measurement applications. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 27th Annual Meeting (pp. 129-133). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
17. Wierwille, W. W., & Tijerina, L. (1998). Modeling the relationship between driver in-vehicle demands and accident occurrence. In A. G. Gale, I. D. Brown, C. M. Haslegrave, & S. P. Taylor (Eds.), Vision in vehicles VI (pp. 233-243). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.