Morphological evolution in the variable resin-producing Detarieae (Fabaceae): Do morphological characters retain a phylogenetic signal?

Annals of Botany

Volumn 105, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 311-325

  Fougère Danezan, Marie ^a,b   Herendeen, Patrick S ^c   Maumont, Stéphan ^d,e   Bruneau, Anne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b CHENGDU INSTITUTE OF BIOLOGY   (China)

^c CHICAGO BOTANIC GARDEN   (United States)

^d CNRS   (France)

^e UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE   (France)

Author keywords

Caesalpinioideae; Detarieae; Floral evolution; Leguminosae; Morphology; Phylogeny; Resins; Taxonomy

Indexed keywords

DNA; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; FLORAL TRAIT; LEGUME; MORPHOLOGY; PHYLOGENETICS; PHYLOGENY; RESIN; TAXONOMY;

ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; EVOLUTION; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HISTOLOGY; LEGUME; PHYLOGENY;

EVOLUTION; FABACEAE; PHYLOGENY;

CAESALPINIOIDEAE; DETARIEAE; FABACEAE;

EID: 76649094891     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: 10958290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcp280     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Almeida J, Rocheta M, Galego L. 1997. Genetic control of flower shape in Antirrhinum majus. Development 124: 1387-1392.
2. Banks H. 2003. Structure of pollen apertures in the Detarieae sensu stricto (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae), with particular reference to underlying structures (Zwischenkörper). Annals of Botany 92: 425-435.
3. Banks H, Gasson PE. 2000. Pollen morphology and wood anatomy of the Crudia group (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae, Detarieae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 134: 19-59.
4. Banks H, Klitgaard BB. 2000. Palynological contribution to the systematics of detarioid legumes (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae). In: Herendeen P, Bruneau A. eds. Advances in legume systematics, Part 9. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens, 79-106.
5. Banks H, Klitgaard BB, Lewis GP, Crane PR, Bruneau A. 2003. Pollen and the systematic of tribes Caesalpinieae and Cassieae (Caesalpinioideae: Leguminosae). In: Klitgaard BB, Bruneau A. eds. Advances in legume systematics, Part 10. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens, 95-122.
6. Bremer K. 1988. The limits of amino acid sequence data in angiosperm phylogenetic reconstruction. Evolution 42: 795-803.
7. Bremer K. 1994. Branch support and tree stability. Cladistics 10: 295-304.
8. Breteler FJ. 1995. The boundary between Amherstieae and Detarieae (Caesalpinioideae). In: Crisp MD, Doyle JJ. eds. Advances in legume systematics, Part 7. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens, 53-61.
9. Breteler FJ. 1999. A revision of Prioria, including Gossweilerodendron, Kingiodendron, Oxystigma, and Pterygopodium (Leguminoseae-Caesalpinioideae- Detarieae) with emphasis on Africa. Wageningen Agricultural Papers 99: 1-61.
10. Breteler FJ, Ferguson IK, Gasson PE, Welle BJHt. 1997. Colophospermum reduced to Hardwickia (Leguminoseae-Caesalpinioideae). Adansonia série 3 19.:279-291.
11. Bruneau A, Breteler FJ, Wieringa JJ, Gervais GYF, Forest F. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships in tribes Macrolobieae and Detarieae as inferred from chloroplast trnL intron sequences. In: Herendeen P, Bruneau A. eds. Advances in legume systematics, Part 9. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens, 121-149.
12. Bruneau A, Forest F, Herendeen P, Klitgaard BB, Lewis GP. 2001. Phylogenetic relationships in the Caesalpinioideae (Leguminosae) as inferred from the chloroplast trnL intron sequences. Systematic Botany 26: 487-514.
13. Bruneau A, Mercure M, Lewis GP, Herendeen PS. 2008. Phylogenetic patterns and diversification in the caesalpinioid legumes. Botany 86: 697-718.
14. Citerne HL, Pennington RT, Cronk QCB. 2006. An apparent reversal in floral symmetry in the legume Cadia is a homeotic transformation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 103: 12017-12020.
15. Cowan RS, Polhill RM. 1981a. Amherstieae Benth. emend. J. Léon. (1957). In: Polhill RM, Raven PH. eds. Advances in legume systematics, Part 1. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens, 135-142.
16. Cowan RS, Polhill RM. 1981b. Detarieae DC. (1957). In: Polhill RM, Raven PH. eds. Advances in legume systematics, Part 1. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens, 117-134.
17. Cubas P. 2004. Floral zygomorphy, the recurring evolution of a successful trait. Bioessays 26: 1175-1184.
18. Cunningham CW. 1997. Can three incongruence tests predict when data should be combined? Molecular Biology and Evolution 14: 733-740.
19. Eriksson T. 2001. AutoDecay, version 5.0. Stockholm: Bergius Foundation, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences.
20. Farris JS, Källersjö M, Kluge AG, Bult C. 1995. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10: 315-319.
21. Fougère-Danezan M, Maumont S, Bruneau A. 2003. Phylogenetic relationships in resin-producing Detarieae inferred from molecular data and preliminary results for a biogeographic hypothesis. In: Klitgaard BB, Bruneau A. eds. Advances in legume systematics, Part 10. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens, 161-180.
22. Fougère-Danezan M, Maumont S, Bruneau A. 2007. Relationships among resin-producing Detarieae s.l. (Leguminosae) as inferred by molecular data. Systematic Botany 32: 748-761.
23. Galego L, Almeida J. 2002. Role of DIVARICATA in the control of dorsoventral asymmetry in Antirrhinum flowers. Genes and Development 16: 880-891.
24. Gasson P, Trafford C, Matthews B. 2003. Wood anatomy of Caesalpinioideae. In: Klitgaard BB, Bruneau A. eds. Advances in legume systematics, Part 10. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens, 63-93.
25. Goldblatt P. 1981. Cytology and the phylogeny of Leguminosae. In: Polhill RM, Raven PM. eds. Advances in legume sytematics, Part 2. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens, 427-463.
26. Gunn CR. 1991. Fruits and seeds of genera in the subfamily Caesalpinioideae (Fabaceae). USDA Technical Bulletin No. 1755.
27. Herendeen PS. 2000. Structural evolution in the Caesalpinioideae (Leguminosae). In: Herendeen PS, Bruneau A. eds. Advances in legume systematics, Part 9. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens, 45-64.
28. Herendeen P, Lewis GP, Bruneau A. 2003. Floral morphology in caesalpinioid legumes: testing the monophyly of the 'Umtiza clade'. International Journal of Plant Sciences 164: 393-407.
29. Irish VF. 2008. The Arabidopsis petal: a model for plant organogenesis. Trends in Plant Science 13: 430-436.
30. Jenner RA. 2004. Accepting partnership by submission? Morphological phylogenetics in a molecular millennium. Systematic Biology 53: 333-342.
31. Kooiman P. 1960. On the occurrence of amyloids in plant seeds. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 9: 208-219.
32. Krüger H, Tiedt LR, Wessels DCJ. 1999. Floral development in the legume tree Colophospermum mopane, Caesalpinioideae: Detarieae. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 131: 223-233.
33. Langenheim JH. 1981. Terpenoids in the Leguminosae. In: Polhill RM, Raven PH. eds. Advances in legume systematics, Part 2. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens, 627-656.
34. Langenheim JH. 2003. Plant resins: chemistry, evolution, ecology, and ethnobotany. Portland, OR: Timber Press.
35. Lee Y-T, Langenheim JH. 1975. Systematics of the genus Hymenaea L. (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae, Detarieae). University of California Publications in Botany, Vol.69. University of California Press.
36. Leaf Architecture Working Group. 1999. Manual of leaf architecture: morphological description and categorization of dicotyledonous and netveined monocotyledonous angiosperms. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.
37. Léonard J. 1957. Genera des Cynometreae et des Amherstieae africaines (Leguminosae-Caesalpinoideae). Essai de blastogénie appliquée à la syste ́matique. Mémoires de l'Académie Royale de Belgique. Classe des Sciences 30: 1-314.
38. Léonard J. 1994. Nouveaux apports de la blastogénie à la délimitation générique des Caesalpiniaceae africaines (Detarieae et Amherstieae). Bulletin du Jardin Botanique National de Belgique 63: 357-395.
39. Léonard J. 1999. Colophospermum n'est pas synonyme d'Hardwickia (Caesalpiniaceae). Conclusion d'une méthode objective de travail. Bulletin du Jardin Botanique National de Belgique 67: 21-43.
40. Levin DA. 1983. Polyploidy and novelty in flowering plants. American Naturalist 122: 1-25.
41. Lewis GP, Schrire BD, Mackinder B, Lock M. 2005. Legumes of the world. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.
42. Lewis GP, Simpson BB, Neff JL. 2000. Progress in understanding the reproductive biology of the Caesalpinioideae (Leguminosae). In: Herendeen PS, Bruneau A. eds. Advances in legume sytematics, Part 9. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens, 65-78.
43. Luckow M, Bruneau A. 1997. Circularity and independence in phylogenetic tests of ecological hypotheses. Cladistics 13: 145-151.
44. Luo D, Carpenter R, Vincent C, Copsey L, Coen E. 1996. Origin of floral asymmetry in Antirrhinum. Nature 383: 794-799.
45. Luo D, Carpenter R, Copsey L, Vincent C, Clark J, Coen E. 1999. Control of organ asymmetry in flowers of Antirrhinum. Cell 99: 367-376.
46. Lynch VJ, Wagner GP. 2008. Resurrecting the role of transcription factor change in developmental evolution. Evolution 62: 2131-2154.
47. MacKinder B. 2005. Detarieae. In: Lewis GP, Schrire BD, Mackinder B, Lock M. eds. Legumes of the world. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens, 68-109.
48. Maddison WP, Maddison DR. 2009. Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version 2.6. http://mesquiteproject.org.
49. Redden KM, Herendeen PS. 2006. Morphology and phylogenetic analysis of Paloue and related genera in the Brownea clade (Detarieae, Caesalpinioideae). International Journal of Plant Science 167: 1229-1246.
50. Swofford DL. 2002. PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and other methods), version 4.0beta10. Sunderland, PA: Sinauer Associates.
51. Symington CF. 1944. Pseudosindora palustris. Proceedings of the Linnean Society 155: 285-288.
52. Theißen G. 2001. Development of floral organ identity: stories from the MADS house. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 4: 75-85.
53. Theißen G, Saedler H. 2001. Floral quartets. Nature 409: 469-471.
54. Tucker SC. 2000a. Evolutionary loss of sepals and/or petals in detarioid legume taxa Aphanocalyx, Brachystegia, and Monopetalanthus (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae). American Journal of Botany 87: 608-624.
55. Tucker SC. 2000b. Floral development and homeosis in Saraca (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae: Detarieae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 161: 537-549.
56. Tucker SC. 2000c. Floral development in tribe Detarieae (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae): Amherstia, Brownea, and Tamarindus. American Journal of Botany 87: 1385-1407.
57. Tucker SC. 2000d. Organ loss in detarioid and other leguminous flowers, and the possibility of saltatory evolution. In: Herendeen P, Bruneau A. eds. Advances in legume sytematics, Part 9. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens, 107-120.
58. Tucker SC. 2001a. Floral development in Schotia and Cynometra (Leguminosae: Casalpinioideae: Detarieae). American Journal of Botany 88: 1164-1180.
59. Tucker SC. 2001b. The ontogenetic basis for missing petals in Crudia (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae: Detarieae). International Journal of Plant Sciences 162: 83-89.
60. Tucker SC. 2002a. Comparative floral ontogeny in Detarieae (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae). 2. Zygomorphic taxa with petal and stamen suppression. American Journal of Botany 89: 888-907.
61. Tucker SC. 2002b. Comparative floral ontogeny in Detarieae (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae). I. Radially symmetrical taxa lacking organ suppression. American Journal of Botany 89: 875-887.
62. Tucker SC. 2003. Comparative floral ontogeny in Detarieae (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae). III. Adaxially initiated whorls in Julbernardia and Sindora. International Journal of Plant Sciences 164: 275-286.
63. Verdcourt B. 1979. A manual of New Guinea legumes. Botany Bulletin 11: 93-98.
64. Watson L, Dallwitz MJ. 1993 onwards. The genera of Leguminosae - Caesalpinioideae and Swartzieae: description, identification, and information retrieval. In English and French; French translation by E. Chenin. http://delta-intkey.com, accessed 22 March 2009.
65. Wendel JF. 2000. Genome evolution in polyploids. Plant Molecular Biology 42: 225-249.
66. Wiens JJ. 2004. The role of morphological data in phylogeny reconstruction. Systematic Biology 53: 653-661.
67. Yoder AD, Irwin JA, Payseur BA. 2001. Failure of the ILD to determine data combinability for slow loris phylogeny. Systematic Biology 50: 408-424.