Do we need a Sexual Selection 2.0?

Animal Behaviour

Volumn 79, Issue 3, 2010, Pages

  Roughgarden, Joan ^a   Akçay, Erol ^b  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b University of Tennessee and National Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis   (United States)

Author keywords

competition; cooperation; cooperative game theory; evolutionarily stable strategy; Nash bargaining solution; Nash competitive equilibrium; noncompetitive game theory; sexual conflict; sexual selection; social selection; two tiered evolutionary theory

Indexed keywords

BARGAINING; COMPETITION (ECOLOGY); EVOLUTIONARILY STABLE STRATEGY; EVOLUTIONARY THEORY; GAME THEORY; SEXUAL CONFLICT; SEXUAL SELECTION;

EID: 76449112179     PISSN: 00033472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.06.006     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Akçay E., and Roughgarden J. Extra-pair parentage: a new theory based on transactions in a cooperative game. Evolutionary Ecology Research 9 (2007) 1223-1243
2. Akçay E., and Roughgarden J. Extra-pair paternity in birds: review of the genetic benefits. Evolutionary Ecology Research 9 (2007) 855-868
3. Akçay E., and Roughgarden J. The perfect family: biparental care in animals. PloS One 4 (2009) E7345
4. Akçay E., Van Cleve J., Feldman M.W., and Roughgarden J. A theory for the evolution of other-regard integrating ultimate and proximate perspectives. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 106 (2009) 19061-19066
5. Arnqvist G., and Kirkpatrick M. The evolution of infidelity in socially monogamous passerines: the strength of direct and indirect selection on extrapair copulation behaviour in females. American Naturalist 165 (2005) S26-S37
6. Bateman A.J. Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2 (1948) 349-368
7. Belden D. DarWin-Win. Tikkun Sept/Oct (2009) 62-63
8. Bro-Jørgensen J., Johnstone R.A., and Evans M.R. Uninformative exaggeration of male sexual ornaments in barn swallows. Current Biology 17 (2007) 850-855
9. Carranza J. Defining sexual selection as sex-dependent selection. Animal Behaviour 77 (2009) 749-751
10. Chaine A.S., and Lyon B.E. Adaptive plasticity in female mate choice dampens sexual selection on male ornaments in the lark bunting. Science 319 (2008) 459-462
11. Clutton-Brock T. Sexual selection in males and females. Science 318 (2007) 1882-1885
12. Clutton-Brock T. Sexual selection in females. Animal Behaviour 77 (2009) 3-11
13. Crook J.H. Sexual selection, dimorphism and social organization in the primates. In: Campbell B. (Ed). Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man 1871-1971 (1972), Aldine, Chicago 231-281
14. Dewsbury D. The Darwin-Bateman paradigm in historical context. Integrative and Comparative Biology 45 (2005) 831-837
15. Gangestad S.W., and Thornhill R. Human oestrus. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 275 (2008) 991-1000
16. Griffith S.C., and Immler S. Female infidelity and genetic compatibility in birds: the role of the genetically loaded raffle in understanding the function of extrapair paternity. Journal of Avian Biology 40 (2009) 97-101
17. Hadfield J.D., Burgess M.D., Lord A., Phillimore A.B., Clegg S.M., and Owens I.P.F. Direct versus indirect sexual selection: genetic basis of colour, size and recruitment in a wild bird. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 273 (2006) 1347-1353
18. Harris W.E., McKane A.J., and Wolf J.B. The maintenance of heritable variation through social competition. Evolution 62 (2008) 337-347
19. Hinde C.A. Negotiation over offspring care? A positive response to partner-provisioning rate in great tits. Behavioral Ecology 17 (2006) 6-12
20. Houston A.I., and McNamara J.M. A self-consistent approach to paternity and parental effort. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B 357 (2002) 351-362
21. Iyer P., and Roughgarden J. Dioecy as a specialization promoting sperm delivery. Evolutionary Ecology Research 10 (2008) 867-892
22. Iyer P., and Roughgarden J. Gametic conflict versus contact in the evolution of anisogamy. Theoretical Population Biology 73 (2008) 461-472
23. Iyer P., and Roughgarden J. Alternation of haploid and diploid generations: evolution by gamete amplification. Evolutionary Ecology Research 11 (2009) 57-77
24. Kavanagh E.E. Debating sexual selection and mating strategies. Science 312 (2006) 689-697
25. Kokko H., and Jennions M.D. Parental investment, sexual selection and sex ratios. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 21 (2008) 919-948
26. Kotiaho J.S., LeBas N.R., Puurtinen M., and Tomkins J.L. On the resolution of the lek paradox. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 23 (2008) 1-3
27. Kunte K. Mimetic butterflies support Wallace's model of sexual dimorphism. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 275 (2008) 1617-1624
28. Maynard Smith J. Evolution and the Theory of Games (1982), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
29. Miller C.W., and Moore A.J. A potential resolution to the lek paradox through indirect genetic effects. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 274 (2007) 1279-1286
30. Nash J. The bargaining problem. Econometrica 18 (1950) 155-162
31. Odling-Smee J. Genes, games and the sexes. Nature 458 (2009) 1111-1112
32. Ord T.J., and Stuart-Fox D. Ornament evolution in dragon lizards: multiple gains and widespread losses reveal a complex history of evolutionary change. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 19 (2006) 797-808
33. Parker G.A. Sexual conflict over mating and fertilization: an overview. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B 361 (2006) 235-259
34. Parker G.A., Baker R.R., and Smith V.G.F. The origin and evolution of gamete dimorphism and the male-female phenomenon. Journal of Theoretical Biology 36 (1972) 529-553
35. Pruett-Jones, S. Did you compete or cooperate to find your mate? BioScience, In press.
36. Queller D.C. Why do females care more than males?. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 264 (1997) 1555-1557
37. Qvarnström A., Brommer J.E., and Gustafsson L. Testing the genetics underlying the co-evolution of mate choice and ornament in the wild. Nature 441 (2006) 84-86
38. Roughgarden J. Evolution's Rainbow (2004), University of California Press, Berkeley
39. Roughgarden J. The Genial Gene: Deconstructing Darwinian Selfishness (2009), University of California Press, Berkeley
40. Roughgarden J., Oishi M., and Akçay E. Reproductive social behaviour: cooperative games to replace sexual selection. Science 311 (2006) 965-970
41. Snyder B., and Gowaty P.A. A reappraisal of Bateman's classic study of intrasexual selection. Evolution 61 (2007) 2457-2468
42. Takahashi M., Arita H., Hiraiwa-Hasegawa M., and Hasegawa T. Peahens do not prefer peacocks with more elaborate trains. Animal Behaviour 75 (2008) 1209-1219
43. Tang-Martinez Z., and Ryder T.B. The problem with paradigms: Bateman's worldview as a case study. Integrative and Comparative Biology 45 (2005) 821-830
44. West-Eberhard M.J. Sexual selection, social competition, and evolution. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 123 (1979) 222-234