The Darwin-Bateman paradigm in historical context

Integrative and Comparative Biology

Volumn 45, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 831-837

  Dewsbury, Donald A ^a  

^a University of Florida ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 30744478656     PISSN: 15407063     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/icb/45.5.831     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (54)

1. Arnold, S. J. and D. Duvall. 1994. Animal mating systems: A synthesis based on selection theory. Am. Nat. 143:317-348.
2. Arnqvist, G. 2000. The evolution of polyandry: Multiple mating and female fitness in insects. Anim. Behav. 60:145-164.
3. Bateman, A. J. 1948. Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. J. Hered. 2:349-368.
4. Beach, F. A. 1976. Sexual attractivity, proceptivity, and receptivity in female mammals. Horm. Behav. 7:105-138.
5. Begley, S. 2000. Sex and the single fly. Newsweek August 14:44-45.
6. Bercovitch, F. B. 2002. Sex-biased parental investment in primates. Int. J. Primat. 23:905-921.
7. Bermant, G. and J. M. Davidson. 1974. Biological bases of sexual behavior. Harper & Row, New York.
8. Bernstein, I. 2003. The study of things I have never seen. Am. J. Primat. 60:77-84.
9. Birkhead, T. 2000. Promiscuity: An evolutionary history of sperm competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
10. Cameron, E. Z. and W. L. Linklater. 2002. Sex bias in studies of sex bias: The value of daughters to mothers in poor condition. Animal. Behav. 63:F5-F8.
11. Carranza, J. 2002. What did Trivers and Willard really predict? Animal. Behav. 63:F1-F3.
12. Clutton-Brock, T. H. 1988. Reproductive success. In T. H. Clutton-Brock (ed.), Reproductive success: Studies of individual variation in contrasting breeding systems, pp. 472-485. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
13. Cunningham, E. J. A. and T. R. Birkhead. 1998. Sex roles and sexual selection. Anim. Behav. 56:1311-1321.
14. Dawkins, R. 1976. The selfish gene. Oxford University Press, New York.
15. Darwin, C. 1871. The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. London: John Murray [1st issue; reprinted by Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1981; J. T. Bonner and R. M. May (eds.)].
16. Davidoff, L. 1973. The best circles: Women and society in Victorian England. Rowman and Littlefield, Totawa, New Jersey.
17. Debus, A. G. (ed.) 1968. World who's who in science. Marquis, Chicago.
18. Dewsbury, D. A. 1982. Ejaculate cost and male choice. Am. Nat. 119:601-610.
19. Ellis, H. 1894. Man and woman: A study of human secondary sexual characteristics. Walter Scott, London.
20. Fausto-Sterling, A. 2000. Sexing the body: Gender politics and the construction of sexuality. Basic Books, New York.
21. Feingold, A. 1992. Sex differences in variability in intellectual abilities: A new look at an old controversy. Rev. Educ. Res. 62:61-84.
22. Fitch, R. H., P. E. Cowell, and V. H. Denenberg. 1998. The female phenotype: Nature's default? Devel. Neuropsychol. 14:213-231.
23. Geddes, P. and J. A. Thomson. 1889. The evolution of sex. Humboldt, New York.
24. Gowaty, P. A. 2003. Sexual natures: How feminism changed evolutionary biology. Signs: J. Women Cult. Soc. 28:901-921.
25. Hafernik, J. E., Jr. and R. W. Garrison. 1986. Mating success and survival rate in a population of damselflies: Results at variance with theory? Am. Nat. 128:353-365.
26. Harris, W. E. and J. R. Lucas. 2002. A state-based model of sperm allocation in a group-breeding salamander. Behav. Ecol. 13:705-712.
27. Hedges, L. V. and A. Nowell. 1995. Sex differences in mental test scores, variability, and numbers of high-scoring individuals. Science 269:41-45.
28. Hollingworth, L. S. 1914. Variability as related to sex differences in achievement: A critique. Am. J. Sociol. 19:510-530.
29. Houghton, W. E. 1957. The Victorian frame of mind 1930-1870. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut.
30. Hrdy, S. B. 1986. Empathy, polyandry, and the myth of the coy female. In R. Bleier (ed.), Feminist approaches to science, pp. 119-146. Pergamon, New York.
31. Hrdy, S. B. 1997. Raising Darwin's consciousness: Female sexuality and the prehominid origins of patriarchy. Hum. Nat. 8:1-49.
32. Hubbell, S. P. and L. K. Johnson. 1987. Environmental variance in lifetime mating success, mate choice, and sexual selection. Am. Nat. 130:91-112.
33. Jennions, M. D. and M. Petrie. 2000. Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biol. Rev. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 75:21-64.
34. Jones, A. G., J. R. Arguello, and S. J. Arnold. 2002. Validation of Bateman's principles: A genetic study of sexual selection and mating patterns in the rough-skinned newt. Proc. R. Soc. London B. 269:2533-2539.
35. Jones, A. G., G. Rosenqvist, A. Berglund, and S. J. Arnold. 2001. The Bateman gradient and the cause of sexual selection in a sex-role-reversed pipefish. Proc. R. Soc. London B. 267:677-680.
36. Nakatsuru, K. and D. L. Kramer. 1982. Is sperm cheap? Limited male fertility and female choice in the lemon tetra Pisces, Characidae. Science 216:753-755.
37. Nicholson, I. A. M. 2003. Inventing personality: Gordon Allport and the science of selfhood. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
38. Noddings, N. 1992. Variability: A pernicious hypothesis. Rev. Educ. Res. 62:85-88.
39. Pearson, K. 1897. The chances of death and other studies in evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
40. Pizzari, T., C. K. Cornwallis, H. Løvlie, S. Jakobsson, and T. R. Birkhead. 2003. Sophisticated sperm allocation in male fowl. Nature 426:70-74.
41. Sheridan, M. and R. H. Tamarin. 1988. Space use, longevity, and reproductive success in meadow voles. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 22:85-90.
42. Shields, S. A. 1975. Functionalism, Darwinism, and the psychology of women: A study in social myth. Am Psychol. 30:739-754.
43. Shields, S. A. 1982. The variability hypothesis: The history of a biological model of sex differences in intelligence. Signs: J. Women Cult. Soc. 7:769-797.
44. Spencer, H. 1896. The study of sociology. Appleton, New York.
45. Sutherland, W. J. 1985. Chance can produce a sex difference in variance in mating success and explain Bateman's data. Anim. Behav. 33:1349-1352.
46. Tang-Martinez, Z. 2000. Paradigms and primates: Bateman's principle, passive females, and perspectives from other taxa. In S. Strum and L. Fedigan (eds.), Primate encounters: Models of science, gender, and society. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
47. Thorndike, E. L. 1906. Sex in education. The Bookman 23:211-214.
48. Thornhill, R. and J. Alcock. 1983. The evolution of insect mating systems. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
49. Trivers, R. L. 1972. Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man 1971-1971, pp. 136-179. Aldine, Chicago.
50. Trivers, R. L. and D. E. Willard. 1973. Natural selection of parental ability to vary the sex ratio of offspring. Science 179:90-92.
51. Wedell, N., M. J. G. Gage, and G. A. Parker. 2002. Sperm competition, male prudence and sperm-limited females. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17:313-320.
52. Williams, G. C. 1966. Adaptation and natural selection: A critique of some current evolutionary thought. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
53. Wilson, E. O. 1975. Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
54. Zuk, M. 2002. Sexual selections: What we can and can't learn about sex from animals. University of California Press, Berkeley, California.