The problem with paradigms: Bateman's worldview as a case study

Integrative and Comparative Biology

Volumn 45, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 821-830

  Tang Martinez, Zuleyma ^a   Ryder, T Brandt ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI ST LOUIS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 30744445420     PISSN: 15407063     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/icb/45.5.821     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (119)

1. Alcock, J. 1989. Animal behavior: An evolutionary approach. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
2. Adams, C. E. and M. M. Singh. 1981. Semen characteristic and fertility of rabbits subjected to exhaustive use. Lab. Anim. 15:157-161.
3. Arnaud, L. and E. Haubruge. 1999. Mating behaviour and male mate choice in Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera, Tenbrionidae). Behaviour 136:67-77.
4. Arnold, S. J. 1994. Bateman's principles and the measurement of sexual selection in plants and animals. Am. Nat. 144:S126-S149.
5. Arnold, S. J. and D. Duvall. 1994. Animal mating systems: A synthesis based on selection theory. Am. Nat. 143:317-348.
6. Bateman, A. J. 1948. Intrasexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2:349-368.
7. Bennet, P. M. and I. P. F. Owens. 2002. Evolutionary ecology of birds: Life histories, mating systems and extinction. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
8. Birkhead, T. R. 2000. Promiscuity: An evolutionary history of sperm competition. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
9. Birkhead, T. R. and F. Fletcher. 1995. Depletion determines sperm number in male zebra finches. Anim. Behav. 49:451-456.
10. Birkhead, T. R. and A. P. Moller. 1993. Female control of paternity. Trends Ecol. Evol. 8:100-104.
11. Birkhead, T. R. and A. P. Moller. 1998. Sperm competition and sexual selection. Academic Press, San Diego.
12. Bray, O. E., J. J. Kenelly, and L. L. Guarino. 1975. Fertility of eggs produced on territories of vasectomized Red-winged Blackbirds. Wilson Bull. 87:187-195.
13. Daly, M. and M. Wilson. 1983. Sex, evolution, and behavior. Willard Grant Press, Boston.
14. Darwin, C. 1871. The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. John Murray, London.
15. Dawkins, R. 1976. The selfish gene. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
16. Dewsbury, D. A. 1982. Ejaculate cost and male choice. Am. Nat. 119:601-610.
17. Dewsbury, D. A. 1998. Robert Yerkes, sex research, and the problem of data simplification. Hist. Psychol. 1:116-129.
18. Dewsbury, D. A. 2005. The Darwin-Bateman paradigm in historical context. Integr. Comp. Biol. 45:831-837.
19. Dewsbury, D. A. and D. K. Sawrey. 1984. Male capacity as related to sperm production, pregnancy initiation, and sperm competition in deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 16:37-47.
20. Dixon, A. D., D. Ross, S. L. C. O'Malley, and T. Burke. 1994. Paternal investment inversely related to degree of paternity in the reed bunting. Nature 371:698-700.
21. Drea, C. M. and K. Wallen. 2003. Female sexuality and the myth of male control. In C. B. Travis (ed.), Evolution, gender, and rape. pp. 29-60. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
22. Drickamer, L. C., S. H. Vessey, and E. M. Jakob. 2002. Animal behavior: Mechanisms, ecology, evolution. Mc Graw Hill, New York.
23. Drickamer, L. C., P. A. Gowaty, and D. M. Wagner. 2003. Free mutual mate preferences in house mice affect reproductive success and offspring performance. Anim. Behav. 65:105-114.
24. Eaton, R. L. 1978. Why some felids copulate so much: A model for the evolution of copulation frequency. Carnivore 1:42-51.
25. Eberhard, W. G. 1996. Female control: Sexual selection by cryptic-female choice. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
26. Emlen, S. T. and L. W. Oring. 1977. Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197:215-223.
27. Freund, M. 1963. Effect of frequency of emission on semen output and an estimate of daily sperm production in man. J. Reprod. Fert. 6:269-286.
28. Gomendio, M. and E. R. S. Roldan. 1993. Mechanisms of sperm competition: Linking physiology and behavioral ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 8:95-100.
29. Gomez, A. and M. Serra. 1996. Mate choice in male Brachionus plicatilis rotifers. Funct. Ecol. 10:681-687.
30. Goodall, J. 1971. In the shadow of man. Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
31. Gowaty, P. A. 1985. Multiple parentage and apparent monogamy in birds. In P. A. Gowaty and D. W. Mock (eds.), Avian monogamy, pp. 11-17. Allen Press, Lawrence, KS.
32. Gowaty, P. A. 1994. Architects of sperm competition. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9:160-162.
33. Gowaty, P. A. 1997a. Sexual dialectics, sexual selection, and variation in reproductive behavior. In P. A. Gowaty (ed.), Feminism and evolutionary biology: Boundaries, intersections and frontiers, pp. 351-384. Chapman Hall, New York.
34. Gowaty, P. A. 1997b. Females' perspectives in avian behavioral ecology. J. Avian Biol: 28:1-8.
35. Gowaty, P. A. 2003. Sexual natures: How feminism changed evolutionary biology. Signs 28:902-921.
36. Gowaty, P. A. 2004. Sex roles, contests for the control of reproduction, and sexual selection. In P. Kappeler and C. van Schaik (eds.), Sexual selection in primates: New and comparative perspectives, pp. 37-54. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK.
37. Gowaty, P. A. and W. C. Bridges. 1991. Behavioral, demographic, and environmental correlates of uncertain parentage in eastern bluebirds. Behav. Ecol. 2:339-350.
38. Gowaty, P. A. and N. Buschhaus. 1998. Ultimate causation of aggressive and forced copulation in birds: Female resistance, the CODE hypothesis, and social monogamy. Amer. Zool. 38:207-225.
39. Gowaty, P. A., L. C. Drickamer, and S. Schmid-Holmes. 2003b. Male house mice produce fewer offspring with lower viability and poorer performance when mated with females they do not prefer. Anim. Behav. 65:95-103.
40. Gowaty, P. A. and A. A. Karlin. 1984. Multiple maternity and paternity in single broods of apparently monogamous Eastern Bluebirds (Sialia sialis). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 15:91-95.
41. Gowaty, P. A., B. Steinichen, and W. W. Anderson. 2002. Mutual interest by male and female Drosophila pseudoobscura and reproductive success. Evolution 56:2537-254.
42. Gowaty, P. A., B. Steinichen, and W. W. Anderson. 2003a. Indiscriminate females and choosy males: Within and between species variation in Drosophila. Evolution 57:2037-2035.
43. Gowaty, P. A. and S. P. Hubbell. 2005. Chance, time allocation, and the evolution of adaptively flexible sex role behavior. Integr. Comp. Biol. 45:931-944.
44. Gray, E. M. 1997. Intraspecific variation in extra-pair behavior of Red-winged Blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus). In P. G. Parker and N. T. Burley (eds.), Avian reproductive tactics: Female and male perspectives, pp. 61-80. The American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C.
45. Griffith, S. C., I. P. F. Owens, and K. A. Thuman. 2002. Extra-pair paternity in birds: A review of the interspecific variation and adaptive function. Molec. Ecol. 11:2195-2212.
46. Halliday, T. and A. Houston. 1978. The newt as an honest salesman. Anim. Behav. 26:1273-1281.
47. Hrdy, S. B. 1977. The Langurs of Abu. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
48. Hrdy, S. B. 1986. Empathy, polyandry and the myth of the "coy" female. In R. Bleier (ed.), Feminist approaches to science, pp. 119-146. Pergamon Press, New York.
49. Hrdy, S. B. 1997. Raising Darwin's consciousness: Female sexuality and the prehominid origins of patriarchy. Hum. Nat. 8:1-49.
50. Hubbell, S. P. and S. K. Johnson. 1987. Environmental variance in lifetime mating success, mate choice, and sexual selection. Am. Nat. 130:91-112.
51. Hunter, F. M., R. Harcourt, M. Wright, and L. S. Davis. 2000. Strategic allocation of ejaculates by male Adelie penguins. Proc. R. Soc. London B. 267:1541-1545.
52. Huyvaert, K. 2004. Social and genetic dynamics of extra-pair mating in waved albatrosses (Phoebatria irrorata). Ph.D. Diss. University of Missouri-St. Louis.
53. Jaffe, K. 2004. Sex promotes gamete selection: A quantitative comparative study of features favoring the evolution of sex. Complexity 9:43-51.
54. Johnson, L. K. and S. P. Hubbell. 1984. Male choice: Experimental demonstration in a brentid weevil. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 15:183-188.
55. Jones, A. G., J. R. Arguello, and S. J. Arnold. 2002. Validation of Bateman's principles: A genetic study of sexual selection and mating patterns in the rough-skinned newt. Proc. R. Soc. London B 269:2533-2539.
56. Jones, A. G., G. Rosenqvist, A. Berglund, and J. C. Avise. 2005. The measurement of sexual selection using Bateman's principles: An experimental test in the sex-role-reversed pipefish Syngnathus typhle. Integr. Comp. Biol. 45:874-884.
57. Jones, T. M. 2001. A potential cost of monandry in the lekking sandfly Lutzomya longipalpis. J. Insect Behav. 14:385-399.
58. Kanagawa, H., E. S. E. Hefez, M. Nawar, and S. Jaszczak. 1972. Patterns of sexual behavior and anatomy of copulatory organs in macaques. Z. Tierpsychol. 31:449-460.
59. Kaufmann, B. P. and M. Demerec. 1942. Utilization of sperm by the female Drosophila melanogaster. Am. Nat. 76:445-469.
60. Keil, A. and N. Sachser. 1998. Reproductive benefits from female promiscuous mating in a small mammal. Ethology 104:897-903.
61. Ketterson, E. D., P. G. Parker, S. A. Raouf, V. Nolan, C. Ziegenfus, and C. R. Chandler. 1998. P. G. Parker and N. T. Burley (eds.), Avian reproductive tactics: Female and male perspectives, pp. 81-101.
62. Krebs, J. R. and N. B. Davies. 1993. An introduction to behavioural ecology. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, U.K..
63. Kuhn, T. 1970. The structure of scientific revolutions. Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago.
64. Lanctot, R. B., K. T. Schribner, B. Kempenaers, and P. J. Weatherhead. 1997. Lekking without a paradox in the buff-breasted sandpiper. Am. Nat. 149:1051-1070.
65. Lank, D. B., C. M. Smith, O. Hanotte, A. Ohtonen, S. Bailey, and T. Burke. 2002. High frequency of polyandry in a lek mating system. Behav. Ecol. 13:209-215.
66. Lawton, M. F., W. R. Garstka, and J. C. Hanks. 1997. The mask of theory and the face of nature. In P. A. Gowaty (ed.), Feminism and evolutionary biology: Boundaries, intersections and frontiers, pp. 63-85. Chapman Hall, New York.
67. Levitan, D. R. 2005. The distribution of male and female reproductive success in a broadcast spawning marine invertebrate. Integr. Comp. Biol. 45:848-855.
68. Lefevre, G. and U. B. Jonsson. 1962. Sperm transfer, storage, displacement and utilization in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 47:1719-1736.
69. Lewis, S. M., C. K. Cratsley, and J. A. Rooney. 2004. Nuptial gifts and sexual selection in Photinus fireflies. Integr. Comp. Biol. 44:234-237.
70. Ligon, J. D. 1999. The evolution of avian breeding systems. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.
71. Madsen, T., R. Shine, J. Loman, and T. Hakansson. 1992. Why do female adders copulate so frequently? Nature 355:440-441.
72. Marler, P. 1956. Behaviour of the Chaffinch Fringilla coelebs. Behaviour 5(suppl.):1-84.
73. Moller, A. P. and T. R. Birkhead. 1989. Copulation behaviour in mammals: Evidence that sperm competition is widespread. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 38:119-131.
74. Mulder, R. A., P. O. Dunn, A. Cockburn, K. A. Lazenby-Cohen, and M. J. Howell. 1994. Helpers liberate female fairy wrens from constraints on extra-pair mate choice. Proc. R. Soc. London B 255:223-229.
75. Nakatsuru, K. and D. L. Kramer. 1982. Is sperm cheap? Limited male fertility and female choice in lemon tetra. Science 216:753-755.
76. Neudorf, D. L., B. J. M. Stutchbury, and W. H. Piper. 1997. Covert extra-territorial behavior of female hooded warblers. Behav. Ecol. 8:595-600.
77. Newcomer, S. D. J. A. Zeh, and D. W. Zeh. 1999. Genetic benefits enhance the reproductive success of polyandrous females. Proc. Natl. Sci. U. S. A. 96:10236-10241.
78. Olsson, M. A. Gullberg, H. Tegelstrom, T. Madsen, and R. Shine. 1994. Promiscuous lizards: Females have more variable young. Nature 369:528.
79. Olsson, M., R. Shine, T. Madsen, A. Gullberg, and H. Tegelstrom. 1996. Female lizards control paternity of their offspring by selective use of sperm. Nature 383:585.
80. Olsson, M., T. Madsen, and R. Shine. 1997. Is sperm really so cheap? Costs of reproduction in male adders, Vipera berus. Proc. R. Soc. London B 264:455-459.
81. Orians, G. H. 1969. On the evolution of mating systems in birds and mammals. Am. Nat. 103:589-603.
82. Parker, G. A. 1979. Sexual selection and sexual conflict. In M. S. Blum and N. A. Blum (eds.), Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects, pp. 123-166. Academic Press, New York.
83. Parker, G. A., R. R. Baker, and V. G. F. Smith. 1972. The origin and evolution of gamete dimorphism and the male-female phenomenon. J. Theor. Biol. 36:529-553.
84. Parker, P. G. and N. T. Burley. 1998. Avian reproductive tactics: Female and male perspectives. Allen Press, Lawrence; Kansas.
85. Parker, P. G. and Z. Tang-Martinez. 2005. Bateman gradients in field and laboratory studies: A cautionary tale. Integr. Comp. Biol 45:895-902.
86. Parish, A. R. and F. B. M. De Waal. 2000. The other "closest living relative": How bonobos (Pan paniscus) challenge traditional assumptions about females, dominance, intra- and intersexual interactions, and hominid evolution. In D. LeCroy, and P. Moller (eds.), Evolutionary perspectives on human reproductive behavior, pp. 97-113. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, New York.
87. Petrie, M., M. Hall, T. Halliday, H. Budgey, and C. Pierpoint. 1992. Multiple mating in a lekking bird: Why do peahens mate with more than one male and with the same male more than once? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 31:349-358.
88. Pinxten, R. and M. Eens. 1997. Copulations and mate guarding patterns in polygynous male starlings. Anim. Behav. 54:45-58.
89. Pitnick, S. and T. L. Karr. 1996. Sperm caucus. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11:148-151.
90. Renfree, M. B. 1992. Diapausing dilemmas, sexual stress and mating madness in marsupials. In K. E. Sheppard, J. H. Boublik, and J. W. Funder (eds.), Stress and reproduction, pp. 347-360. Raven Press, New York.
91. Royer, L. and J. N. McNeil. 1993. Male investment in the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis (Lepidoptera Pyralidae) - impact on female longevity and reproductive performance. Funct. Ecol. 7:209-215.
92. Rutowski, R. L. 1979. The butterfly as an honest salesman. Anim. Behav. 27:1269-1270.
93. Saether, S. A., P. Fiske, and J. A. Kalas. 2001. Male mate choice, sexual conflict and strategic allocation of copulations in a lekking bird. Proc. R. Soc. London B. 268:2097-2102.
94. Schaus, J. M. and S. K. Sakaluk. 2001. Ejaculate expenditures of male crickets in response to varying risk and intensity of sperm competition: Not all species play games. Behav. Ecol. 12:740-745.
95. Semple, K., R. K. Wayne, and R. M. Gibson. 2001. Microsatellite analysis of female mating behaviour in lek-breeding sage grouse. Mol. Ecol. 10:2043-2048.
96. Sheldon, B. C. 1994. Sperm competition in the Chaffinch: The role of the female. Anim. Behav. 47:163-173.
97. Shuster, S. M. and M. J. Wade. 2003. Mating systems and strategies. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
98. Simmons, L. W. 1987. Sperm competition as a mechanism of female choice in the field cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 21:197-202.
99. Simmons, L. W. 2001. Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in insects. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
100. Smith, S. M. 1988. Extra-pair copulations in Black-capped Chickadees: The role of the female. Behaviour 107:15-23.
101. Smuts, B. B. and R. W. Smuts. 1993. Male aggression and sexual coercion of females in non-human primates and other mammals: Evidence and theoretical implications. Adv. Study Behav. 22:1-63.
102. Snowdon, C. S. 1997. The "nature" of sex differences: Myths of male and female. In P. A. Gowaty (ed.), Feminism and evolutionary biology: Boundaries, intersections and frontiers, pp. 276-293. Chapman Hall, New York.
103. Stamps, J. 1997. The role of females in extrapair copulations in socially monogamous territorial animals. In P. A. Gowaty (ed.), Feminism and evolutionary biology: Boundaries, intersections and frontiers, pp. 294-319. Chapman Hall, New York.
104. Stockley, P. 1997. Sexual conflict resulting from adaptations to sperm competition. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12:154-159.
105. Sutherland, W. J. 1985. Chance can produce sex differences in mating success and explain Bateman's data. Anim. Behav. 33:1349-1352.
106. Taber, S. and J. Wendel. 1958. Concerning the number of times queen bees mate. J. Econ. Entomol. 51:786-789.
107. Taggart, D. A. and P. D. Temple-Smith. 1990. Effects of breeding season and mating on total number and distribution of spermatozoa in the epididymis of the brown marsupial mouse, Antechinus stuartii. J. Reprod. Fertil. 88:81-91.
108. Tang-Martinez, Z. 2000. Paradigms and primates: Bateman's principle, passive females, and perspectives from other taxa. In C. S. Strum and L. M. Fedigan (eds.), Primate encounters: Models of science, gender, and society, pp. 261-274. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
109. Tregenza, T. and N. Wedell. 1998. Benefits of multiple mates in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. Evolution 52:1726-1730.
110. Trivers, R. L. 1972. Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man, pp. 136-179. Aldine Publishing, Chicago.
111. Van Voorhies, W. A. 1992. Production of sperm reduces nematode lifespan. Science 360:456-458.
112. Wade, M. J. 1979. Sexual selection and variance in reproductive success. Am. Nat. 114:742-764.
113. Warner, R. R., D. Y. Shapiro, and C. W. Peterson. 1995. Sexual conflict: Males with the highest mating success convey the lowest fertilization benefits to females. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. B 262:135-139.
114. Wedell, N., M. J. G. Gage, and G. A. Parker. 2002. Sperm competition, male prudence and sperm-limited females. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17:313-320.
115. Wiley, H. R. and J. Poston. 1996. Indirect mate choice, competition for mates, and coevolution of the sexes. Evolution 50:1371-1381.
116. Williams, G. C. 1966. Adaptation and natural selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
117. Wilson, E. O. 1975. Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
118. Wink, M. and A. Dyrez. 1999. Mating systems in birds: A review of molecular studies. Acta Ornithol. 34:91-109.
119. Worden, B. D. and P. G. Parker. 2001. Polyandry in grain beetles leads to greater reproductive success: Material and genetic benefits? Behav. Ecol. 12:761-767.