A major e-learning project to renovate science leaning environment in Taiwan

Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 7-12

  Chang, Chun Yen ^a   Lee, Greg ^b  

^a Graduate Institute of Science Education   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL TAIWAN NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 76449096732     PISSN: None     EISSN: 13036521     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Chang, C. Y. (2001) A problem-solving based computer-assisted tutorial for the earth sciences. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17, 263-274.
2. Chang, C. Y. (2002). The impact of different forms of multimedia CAI on students' science achievement. Innovations in Education & Teaching International, 39(4), 280-288.
3. Chang, C. Y. (2003). Teaching earth sciences: Should we implement teacher-directed or student-controlled CAI in the secondary classroom? International Journal of Science Education, 25(4), 427-438.
4. Chang, C. Y., Hsiao, C. H., & Barufaldi, J. P. (2006). Preferred-actual learning environment 'spaces' and earth science outcomes in Taiwan. Science Education, 90(3), 420-433.
5. Chang, C. Y., & Mao, S. L. (1999) Comparison of Taiwan science students' outcomes with inquiry-group versus traditional instruction. The Journal of Educational Research, 92, 340-346.
6. Chang, C. Y., & Tsai, C.-C. (2005). The interplay between different forms of CAI and students' preferences of learning environment in the secondary science class. Science Education, 89, 707-724.
7. Chang, C. Y., & Wang, H.-C. (2009). Issues of inquiry learning in digital learning environments. British Journal of Educational Technology. 40, 169-173.
8. Clark, R. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53, 445-459.
9. Clark, R. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 42, 21-29.
10. De Corte, E. (2000). Marrying theory building and the improvement of school practice: A permanent challenge for instructional psychology. Learning and Instruction, 10, 249-266.
11. Hokanson, B., & Hooper, S. (2000). Computes as cognitive media: Examining the potential of computers in education. Computers in Human Behavior, 16, 537-552.
12. Kinchin, I. M. (2004). Investigating students' beliefs about their preferred role as learners. Educational Research, 46 (3), 301-312.
13. Linn, M. C. (2003). Technology and science education: Starting points, research programs, and trends. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 727-758.
14. Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., Gonzalez, E. J., & Chrostowski, S. J. (2004). TIMSS 2003 international science report. Boston, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College.
15. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
16. Orion, N., Hofstein, A., Tamir, P., & Giddings, G. J. (1997). Development and validation of an instrument for assessing the learning environment of outdoor science activities. Science Education, 81(2), 161-171.
17. van Driel, J. H., Bulte, A. M. W., & Verloop, N. (2005). The conceptions of chemistry teachers about teaching and learning in the context of a curriculum innovation. International Journal of Science Education, 27(3), 303-322.
18. Wang, H.-C., Chang, C.-Y., & Li, T.-Y. (2008). Assessing creative problem-solving with automated text grading. Computers & Education, 51, 1450-1466.
19. Wierstra, R. F. A., KANSELAAR, G., VAN DER LINDEN, J. L., LODEWIJKS, H. G. L. C., & VERMUNT, J. A. D. (2003). The impact of the university context on European students' learning approaches and learning environment preferences. Higher Education, 45, 503-523.