Issues of inquiry learning in digital learning environments: Original Articles

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 169-173

  Chang, Chun Yen ^a   Wang, Hao Chuan ^b  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; SOFTWARE AGENTS;

COGNITIVE PROCESSES; DIGITAL LEARNINGS; INDEPENDENT RESEARCHES; INQUIRY LEARNINGS; INTERNET TECHNOLOGIES; MEASURING INSTRUMENTS; RESEARCH COMMUNITIES; SCIENCE TEACHINGS; UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA;

EDUCATION;

EID: 58049163007     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: 14678535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00850.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Aleven, V.A.W. M. M. Koedinger, K. R. (2002). An effective metacognitive strategy: learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based Cognitive Tutor. Cognitive Science, 26, 2, 147 179.
2. Anderson, J. R., Reder, L. M. Simon, H. (1998). Radical constructivism and cognitive psychology. In D. Ravitch (Ed Brookings papers on education policy 1998. Washington, DC : Brookings Institute Press.
3. Anderson, J. R., Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. Pelletier, R. (1995). Cognitive tutors: lessons learned. The Journal of Learning Sciences, 4, 167 207.
4. Chang, C. Y. (2003). Teaching earth sciences: should we implement teacher-directed or student-controlled CAI in the secondary classroom? International Journal of Science Education, 25, 427 438.
5. Chang, C. Y. Tsai, C. C. (2005). The interplay between different forms of CAI and students' preferences of learning environment in the secondary science class. Science Education, 89, 5, 707 724.
6. Chang, C. Y., Barufaldi, J. P., Lin, M. C. Chen, Y. C. (2007). Assessing tenth-grade students' problem solving ability online in the area of Earth sciences. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 4, 1971 1981.
7. Clark, R. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53, 445 459.
8. HI-CE Project (n.d Center for Highly Interactive Classrooms, Curricula & Computing in Education. Retrieved December 14, 2005, from http://hi-ce.org
9. Klahr, D. Nigam, M. (2004). The equivalence of learning paths in early science instruction: effects of direct instruction and discovery learning. Psychological Science, 15, 10, 661 667.
10. Mayer, R. E. (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction. American Psychologist, 59, 1, 14 19.
11. National Science Foundation (2002). Inquiry: thoughts, views and strategies for the K-5 classroom. Foundation, Vol. 2, pp. 119. Arlington, VA : NSF.
12. Wang, H. C., Chang, C. Y. Li, T. Y. (2005). Automated scoring for creative problem-solving ability with ideation-explanation modeling. In Proceedings of 13th International Conference on Computers in Education (Singapore, November 2005), Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, Vol. 133 (pp. 522 529). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press.
13. Wang, H. C., Li, T. Y. Chang, C. Y. (2006). A web-based tutoring system with styles-matching strategy for spatial geometric transformation. Interacting with Computers, 18, 331 355.
14. White, B., Shimoda, T. Frederiksen, J. (1999). Enabling students to construct theories of collaborative inquiry and reflective learning: computer support for metacognitive development. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10, 2, 151 182.
15. White, B., Frederiksen, J., Frederiksen, T., Eslinger, E., Loper, S. Collins, A. (2002). Inquiry island: affordances of a multi-agent environment for scientific inquiry and reflective learning. In P. Bell, R. Stevens T. Satwicz (Eds Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS) (pp. 1 12). Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum.