Skeletal Analysis and Characterization of Gene Expression Related to Pattern Formation in Developing Limbs of Japanese Silkie Fowl

Journal of Poultry Science

Volumn 43, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 126-134

  Arisawa, Kenjiro ^a,b   Kagami, Hiroshi ^a   Ono, Tamao ^a   Yazawa, Shigenobu ^c   Atsumi, Yusuke ^a  

^a SHINSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b GIFU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Japanese Silkie; limb bud; polydactyly; skeletal development

Indexed keywords

EID: 76349090394     PISSN: 13467395     EISSN: 13490486     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2141/jpsa.43.126     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Arisawa K, Yazawa S, Eguchi J, Kagami H and Ono T. Spatiotemporal pattern of EphA4 gene expression in developing quail limb buds. Animal Science Journal, 76, 65–71. 2005.
2. Barfurth D. Experimentelle Untersuchung uber die Verer-bung üer Hyperdactylie bei Hühnern. IV. Mitteilung. Der Flügelhöcker des Hühnchens, eine rudimentäre Hyperdactylie. Archiv für Entwicklungsmechanik der Organismen, 33, 255–273. 1911.
3. Burke AC and Feduccia A. Developmental patterns and the identification of homologies in the avian hand. Science, 278, 666–668. 1997.
4. Chen Y, Knezevic V, Ervin V, Hutson R, Ward Y and Mackem S. Direct interaction with Hoxd proteins reverses Gli3-repressor function to promote digit formation downstream of Shh. Development, 131, 2339–2347. 2004.
5. Chiang C, Litingtung Y, Harris MP, Simandl BK, Li Y, Beachy PA and Fallon JF. Manifestation of the limb prepattern: limb development in the absence of sonic hedgehog function. Developmental Biology, 236, 421–435. 2001.
6. Chomczynski P and Sacchi N. Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Analytical Biochemistry, 162, 156–159. 1987.
7. Crossley PH, Minowada G, MacArthur CA and Martin GR. Roles for FGF8 in the induction, initiation, and maintenance of chick limb development. Cell, 84, 127–136. 1996.
8. Dolé P, Izpisúa-Belmonte JC, Falkenstein H, Renucci A and Duboule D. Coordinate expression of the murine Hox-5 complex homoeobox-containing genes during limb pattern formation. Nature, 342, 767–772. 1989.
9. Drossopoulou G, Lewis KE, Sanz-Ezquerro JJ, Nikbakht N, McMahon AP, Hofmann C and Tickle C. A model for anteroposterior patterning of the vertebrate limb based on sequential long- and short-range Shh signalling and Bmp signalling. Development, 127, 1337–1348. 2000.
10. Dvorak L and Fallon JF. Talpid2 mutant chick limb has anteroposterior polarity and altered patterns of programmed cell death. The Anatomical Record, 231, 251–260. 1991.
11. Ede DA and Kelly WA. Developmental abnormalities in the trunk and limbs of the talpid3 mutant of the fowl. Journal of Embryology and Experimental Morphology, 12, 339–356. 1964.
12. Francis PH, Richardson MK, Brickell PM and Tickle C. Bone morphogenetic proteins and a signalling pathway that controls patterning in the developing chick limb. Development, 120, 209–218. 1994.
13. Fromental-Ramain C, Warot X, Messadecq N, LeMeur M, Dolie P and Chambon P. Hoxa-13 and Hoxd-13 play a crucial role in the patterning of the limb autopod. Development, 122, 2997–3011. 1996.
14. Galis F, Kundrát M and Metz JA. Hox genes, digit identities and the theropod/bird transition. Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution, 304, 198–205. 2005.
15. Hamburger V and Hamilton HL. A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. Journal of Morphology, 88, 49–92. 1951.
16. Hinchliffe JR and Ede DA. Abnormalities in bone and cartilage development in the talpid mutant of the fowl. Journal of Embryology and Experimental Morphology, 19, 327–339. 1968.
17. Izpisúa-Belmonte JC, Tickle C, Dollé P, Wolpert L and Duboule D. Expression of the homeobox Hox-4 genes and the specification of position in chick wing development. Nature, 350, 585–589. 1991.
18. Kaufmann-Wolf M. Embryologische und anatomische Beiträge zur Hyperdactylie (Houdanhuhn). Gegenbaurs Morphologische Jahrbuch, 38, 471–531. 1908.
19. Kengaku M, Capdevila J, Rodriguez-Esteban C, De La Peña J, Johnson RL, Izpisiúa-Belmonte JC and Tabin C.J. Distinct WNT pathways regulating AER formation and dorsoventral polarity in the chick limb bud. Science, 280, 1274–1277. 1998.
20. Knezevic V, De Santo R, Schughart K, Huffstadt U, Chiang C, Mahon KA and Mackem S. Hoxd-12 differentially affects preaxial and postaxial chondrogenic branches in the limb and regulates Sonic hedgehog in a positive feedback loop. Development, 124, 4523–4536. 1997.
21. Landauer W. Rudimentation and duplication of the radius in the duplicate mutant form of fowl. Journal of Genetics, 54, 199–218. 1956.
22. Larsson HC and Wagner GP. Pentadactyl ground state of the avian wing. Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution, 294, 146–151. 2002
23. Lewandoski M, Sun X and Martin GR. Fgf8 signalling from the AER is essential for normal limb development. Nature Genetics, 26, 460–463. 2000.
24. Litingtung Y, Dahn RD, Li Y, Fallon JF and Chiang C. Shh and Gli3 are dispensable for limb skeleton formation but regulate digit number and identity. Nature, 418, 979–983. 2002.
25. Loomis CA, Kimmel RA, Tong CX, Michaud J and Joyner AL. Analysis of the genetic pathway leading to formation of ectopic apical ectodermal ridges in mouse Engrailed-1 mutant limbs. Development, 125, 1137–1148. 1998.
26. Min H, Danilenko DM, Scully SA, Bolon B, Ring BD, Tarpley JE, DeRose M and Simonet WS. Fgf-10 is required for both limb and lung development and exhibits striking functional similarity to Drosophila branchless. Genes & Development, 12, 3156–3161. 1998.
27. Moon AM and Capecchi MR. Fgf8 is required for outgrowth and patterning of the limbs. Nature Genetics, 26, 455–459. 2000.
28. Nakane Y and Tsudzuki M. Development of the skeleton in Japanese quail embryos. Development, Growth & Differentiation, 41, 523–534. 1999.
29. Niswander L, Tickle C, Vogel A, Booth I and Martin GR. FGF-4 replaces the apical ectodermal ridge and directs outgrowth and patterning of the limb. Cell, 75, 579–587. 1993.
30. Nohno T, Noji S, Koyama E, Ohyama K, Myokai F, Kuroiwa A, Saito T and Taniguchi S. Involvement of the Chox-4 chicken homeobox genes in determination of anteroposterior axial polarity during limb development. Cell, 64, 1197–1205. 1991.
31. Ohuchi H and Noji S. Whole-mount in situ hybridization for mRNA detection in chick embryos. In: Molecular Histochemical Techniques (Koji T ed.). pp. 222–234. Springer-Verlag. Tokyo. 2000.
32. Riddle RD, Johnson RL, Laufer E and Tabin C. Sonic hedgehog mediates the polarizing activity of the ZPA. Cell, 75, 1401–1416. 1993.
33. Roberts V. British Poultry Standards. 5th ed. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Malden. MA. USA. 1997.
34. Ros MA, Lyons G, Kosher RA, Upholt WB, Coelho CN and Fallon JF. Apical ridge dependent and independent mesodermal domains of GHox-7 and GHox-8 expression in chick limb buds. Development, 116, 811–818. 1992.
35. Saunders JW Jr. and Gasseling MT. Ectodermal-mesodermal interactions in the origin of limb symmetry. In: Epithelial-Mesenchymal Interactions (Fleischmajer R and Billingham R eds.). pp. 78–97. Williams and Wilkins. Baltimore. 1968.
36. Somes RG Jr. Mutations and major variants of muscles and skeleton in chickens. In: Poultry Breeding and Genetics (Crawford RD ed.). pp. 209–237. Elsevier. Amsterdam. 1990.
37. Tickle C, Summerbell D and Wolpert L. Positional signalling and specification of digits in chick limb morphogenesis. Nature, 254, 199–202. 1975
38. Tickle C. The number of polarizing region cells required to specify additional digits in the developing chick wing. Nature, 289, 295–298. 1981.
39. Tsudzuki M. Japanese native chickens. In: The Relationship between Indigenous Animals and Humans in APEC Region (Chang HL and Huang YC eds.). pp. 91–116. The Chinese Society of Animal Science. Tainan. 2003.
40. Tsudzuki M, Nakane Y and Wada A. Hereditary multiple malformation in Japanese quail: a possible powerful animal model for morphogenetic studies. The Journal of Heredity, 89, 24–31. 1998.
41. Vargas AO and Fallon JF. Birds have dinosaur wings: The molecular evidence. Journal of Experimental Zoology. Part B, Molecular and Developmental Evolution, 304, 86–90. 2005a.
42. Vargas AO and Fallon JF. The digits of the wing of birds are 1, 2, and 3. A review. Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution, 304, 206–219. 2005b.
43. Wada Y, Yamada Y, Nishibori M and Yasue H. Complete nucleotide sequence of mitochondrial genome in Silkie fowl (Gallus gallus var. domesticus). Journal of Poultry Science, 41, 76–82. 2004.
44. Yang Y, Drossopoulou G, Chuang PT, Duprez D, Marti E, Bumcrot D, Vargesson N, Clarke J, Niswander L, McMahon A and Tickle C. Relationship between dose, distance and time in Sonic Hedgehog-mediated regulation of anteroposterior polarity in the chick limb. Development, 124, 4393–4404. 1997.