Teaching phonological skills to a deaf first grader: A promising strategy

American Annals of the Deaf

Volumn 154, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 382-388

  Syverud, Susan M ^a   Guardino, Caroline ^a   Selznick, Dana N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDITORY REHABILITATION; CASE REPORT; CHILD; COMPREHENSION; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; MALE; MIXED HEARING LOSS; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT; PHONETICS; READING; SCHOOL; STUDENT; TIME;

CHILD; COMPREHENSION; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION, SPECIAL; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; HEARING IMPAIRED PERSONS; HEARING LOSS, MIXED CONDUCTIVE-SENSORINEURAL; HUMANS; MAINSTREAMING (EDUCATION); MALE; PHONETICS; PUBLIC SECTOR; READING; REHABILITATION OF HEARING IMPAIRED; SCHOOLS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STUDENTS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 75649122591     PISSN: 0002726X     EISSN: 15430375     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/aad.0.0113     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. American Federation of Teachers (1999). Five promising remedial reading intervention programs. Retrieved January 23, 2009, from http://www.aft.org/pubs- reports/downloads/teachers/remedial.pdf
2. American Institutes for Research (1999). An ed - ucators' guide to schoolwide reform. Retrieved April 6, 2009, from http://www.aasa.org /edissues /content.cfm?ItemNumber=6170
3. Bailes, C. (2001). Integrative ASL-English language arts: Bridging paths to literacy. Sign Language Studies, 1(2), 147-175.
4. Deford, D. (2001). Dominie reading and writing assessment portfolio (3rd ed.). Carlsbad, CA: Dominie Press.
5. Englemann, S., & Bruner, E. C. (1995). Reading mastery I. Columbus, OH: Science Research Associates/McGraw-Hill.
6. Engelmann, S., Carnine, L., & Johnson, G. (1999). Corrective reading decoding A. Columbus, OH: Science Research Associates/ McGraw-Hill.
7. Engelmann, S., Haddox, P., & Bruner, E. (1983). Teach your child to read in 100 easy lessons. New York: Simon & Schuster.
8. Evans, C. (2004). Literacy development in deaf students: Case studies in bilingual teaching and learning. American Annals of the Deaf, 149(1), 17-27.
9. Fredrick, N. M., & John, G. C. (2002). Introduction to audiology (8th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
10. Friedman-Narr, R. A. (2006).Teaching phonological awareness with deaf and hard-ofhearing students. Teaching Exceptional Children, 38(4), 53-58.
11. Goldin-Meadow, S., & Mayberry, R. I. (2001). How do profoundly deaf children learn to read? Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 16(4), 222-230.
12. Good, R. H., Kaminski, R. A., Shinn, M., Bratten, J., Shinn, M., Laimon, L., Smith, S., & Flindt, N. (2004). Technical adequacy and decision- making utility of DIBELS (Technical Report No. 7). Eugene: University of Oregon.
13. Grossen, B. (Ed.). (1995-1996). Focus: What was that project follow-through? [Special issue]. Effective School Practices, 15(1). Retrieved March 11, 2009, from University of Oregon website: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/ ~adiep/ft/grossen.htm
14. International Communication Learning Institute. (n.d.). See-the-sound visual phonics. Retrieved April 22, 2009, from http://seethesound.org/
15. Izzo, A. (2002). Phonemic awareness and reading ability: An investigation with young readers who are deaf. American Annals of the Deaf, 147(4), 18-28.
16. Lloyd, S. (n.d.). Nonsense words. Retrieved January 9, 2009, from Scholar's Choice web - site: http://www.scholarschoice.ca/ScholarsPromos/2007/ Workshops/JollyResources/18-%20Special%20Needs%20-%20Nonsense%20Words.pdf
17. Narr, R. F. (2008). Phonological awareness and decoding in Deaf/Hard of hearing students who use visual phonics. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 13(3), 405-416.
18. National Cued Speech Association. (2009). What is Cued Speech? Retrieved April 21, 2009, from http://www.cuedspeech.org/
19. National Reading Panel (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Jessup, MD: National Institute for Literacy.
20. Padden, C., & Ramsey, C. (1998). Reading ability in signing deaf children. Topics in Language Disorders, 18(4), 30-46.
21. Psychological Corporation. (2002). Wechsler individual achievement test-II (WAIT-II). San Antonio, TX: Author.
22. Sterne, A., & Goswami, U. (2000). Phono - logical awareness of syllables, rhymes, and phonemes in deaf children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41(5), 609-625.
23. Trezek, B. J. (2002). Does direct instruction in phonics benefit deaf students? If so, how? Direct Instruction News, 1(1-2), 18-23.
24. Trezek, B. J., & Malmgren, K. W. (2005). The efficacy of utilizing a phonics treatment package with middle school deaf and hard of hearing students. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 10(3), 256-271.
25. Trezek, B. J, & Wang Y. (2006). Implications of utilizing a phonics-based reading curriculum with children who are deaf or hard of hearing. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 11(2), 202-213.
26. Trezek, B., Wang, Y., Woods, D., Gampp, T. L., & Paul, P. V. (2007). Using Visual Phonics to supplement beginning reading instruction for students who are deaf and hard of hearing. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 12(3), 373-384.
27. Wang, Y., Trezek, B. J., Luckner, J. L., & Paul, P. V. (2008). The role of phonology and phonologically related skills in reading instruction for students who are deaf or hard of hearing. American Annals of the Deaf, 153(4), 396-407.